Ground speed vs Air speed
#1
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 16
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Ground speed vs Air speed
There is formula for on wiki article "Bicycle performance" known as
P = g * m * V_g * (K_1 + s) + K_2 * (V_a)^2 * V_g
P - Power in watts
g - gravity
m - mass of the rider plus bike
s - grade of surface
V_g - ground speed m/s
V_a - air speed
K_1 - a constant which represents frictional losses
K_2 - a constant representing aerodynamic drag
My question is why do we have both a V_g (ground speed) and V_a (Air speed)? Wouldn't these two always be the same?
P = g * m * V_g * (K_1 + s) + K_2 * (V_a)^2 * V_g
P - Power in watts
g - gravity
m - mass of the rider plus bike
s - grade of surface
V_g - ground speed m/s
V_a - air speed
K_1 - a constant which represents frictional losses
K_2 - a constant representing aerodynamic drag
My question is why do we have both a V_g (ground speed) and V_a (Air speed)? Wouldn't these two always be the same?
#2
cowboy, steel horse, etc
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: The hot spot.
Posts: 44,836
Bikes: everywhere
Mentioned: 71 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 12768 Post(s)
Liked 7,683 Times
in
4,078 Posts
I think the air speed might be there to take wind into account. I haven't looked at the article yet, however.
#3
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Zang's Spur, CO
Posts: 9,083
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3375 Post(s)
Liked 5,513 Times
in
2,856 Posts
The frictional losses are caused by the rotating mechanical parts on the bike and the tires, so ground speed is the only thing that matters to it.
The aero drag is entirely dependent on the relative wind.
The only time V_g and V_a are the same is when the wind speed is zero.
The aero drag is entirely dependent on the relative wind.
The only time V_g and V_a are the same is when the wind speed is zero.
#4
cowboy, steel horse, etc
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: The hot spot.
Posts: 44,836
Bikes: everywhere
Mentioned: 71 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 12768 Post(s)
Liked 7,683 Times
in
4,078 Posts
#5
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Bay Area, Calif.
Posts: 7,239
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 659 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 7 Times
in
6 Posts
Don't understand what you're trying to say here. If I'm going 20 mph due south with a 20 mph wind out of the north then the apparent wind speed (i.e. what I feel) will be zero. But in that case V_g is 20 mph and V_a is 0 mph; certainly not the same.
#6
cowboy, steel horse, etc
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: The hot spot.
Posts: 44,836
Bikes: everywhere
Mentioned: 71 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 12768 Post(s)
Liked 7,683 Times
in
4,078 Posts
Oops. Wasn't reading the variables properly there. You're correct.
#7
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 16
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Suppose V_a is the cyclists ground speed with respect to the wind. If we have a tail wind of 8 m/s (so 18 mph approx) and your going with the wind, then V_a = 0 if you are also moving 8m/s.
Thus P = g * m * 8 * (K_1 + s).
If we are going on level terrain than s = 1.
Assume the bike is 8 kg (so a pretty light one) and the rider 75 kg;
K_1 = 0.0053 approx, so K_1 + s = 1 approximately.
Thus P = g * m * 8 = g * 664.
g = 9.8 m / s^2
Thus P = 6500 watts approx.
This sounds wrong. The world record is around 2300 watts, and in the above case the 75 kg rider is going with the wind on a light 8 kg bike at only 8 m / s (18 mph).
This doesn't look right
Thus P = g * m * 8 * (K_1 + s).
If we are going on level terrain than s = 1.
Assume the bike is 8 kg (so a pretty light one) and the rider 75 kg;
K_1 = 0.0053 approx, so K_1 + s = 1 approximately.
Thus P = g * m * 8 = g * 664.
g = 9.8 m / s^2
Thus P = 6500 watts approx.
This sounds wrong. The world record is around 2300 watts, and in the above case the 75 kg rider is going with the wind on a light 8 kg bike at only 8 m / s (18 mph).
This doesn't look right
#8
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Zang's Spur, CO
Posts: 9,083
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3375 Post(s)
Liked 5,513 Times
in
2,856 Posts
On re-reading that formula, two things caught my attention:
- V_a must be *relative* wind, not wind speed. i.e. the apparent wind felt by the rider.
- That last V_g term makes no sense. I think that was an error made by the OP.
- V_a must be *relative* wind, not wind speed. i.e. the apparent wind felt by the rider.
- That last V_g term makes no sense. I think that was an error made by the OP.
#9
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 16
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
No I copied it correctly. Unless whoever wrote the wiki entry got it wrong.
#10
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 16
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Suppose V_a is the cyclists ground speed with respect to the wind. If we have a tail wind of 8 m/s (so 18 mph approx) and your going with the wind, then V_a = 0 if you are also moving 8m/s.
Thus P = g * m * 8 * (K_1 + s).
If we are going on level terrain than s = 1.
Assume the bike is 8 kg (so a pretty light one) and the rider 75 kg;
K_1 = 0.0053 approx, so K_1 + s = 1 approximately.
Thus P = g * m * 8 = g * 664.
g = 9.8 m / s^2
Thus P = 6500 watts approx.
This sounds wrong. The world record is around 2300 watts, and in the above case the 75 kg rider is going with the wind on a light 8 kg bike at only 8 m / s (18 mph).
This doesn't look right
Thus P = g * m * 8 * (K_1 + s).
If we are going on level terrain than s = 1.
Assume the bike is 8 kg (so a pretty light one) and the rider 75 kg;
K_1 = 0.0053 approx, so K_1 + s = 1 approximately.
Thus P = g * m * 8 = g * 664.
g = 9.8 m / s^2
Thus P = 6500 watts approx.
This sounds wrong. The world record is around 2300 watts, and in the above case the 75 kg rider is going with the wind on a light 8 kg bike at only 8 m / s (18 mph).
This doesn't look right
Thus we have
P = 9.8 * 83 * 8 * 0.0053 = 34.5 watts.
That sounds a little low even with a 8 m / s ( ie 18 mph) tailwind.
#11
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Zang's Spur, CO
Posts: 9,083
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3375 Post(s)
Liked 5,513 Times
in
2,856 Posts
Lots of formulas and calculators here: https://www.analyticcycling.com/
#12
Banned
Force 10+ Gale as head wind, air speed can be 60 MPH ,
while you walk the bike because your ground speed is so difficult
you fall over if you try pedaling the bike.. ground speed zero, or backwards.
No formula needed, I live on the coast, and winter storms can arrive
with a vengeance.
Winter off SW Irish Coast, they are as strong or stronger
coming off the North Atlantic.
Air speed/ ground speed is an Airplane issue..
In a Boat , if the tide is coming in and you want to go out, right then,
and the water is moving against you.
probably better to drop the hook and wait a while.
while you walk the bike because your ground speed is so difficult
you fall over if you try pedaling the bike.. ground speed zero, or backwards.
No formula needed, I live on the coast, and winter storms can arrive
with a vengeance.
Winter off SW Irish Coast, they are as strong or stronger
coming off the North Atlantic.
Air speed/ ground speed is an Airplane issue..
In a Boat , if the tide is coming in and you want to go out, right then,
and the water is moving against you.
probably better to drop the hook and wait a while.
Last edited by fietsbob; 01-10-11 at 01:08 PM.
#13
cowboy, steel horse, etc
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: The hot spot.
Posts: 44,836
Bikes: everywhere
Mentioned: 71 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 12768 Post(s)
Liked 7,683 Times
in
4,078 Posts
Are there enough variables to account for running TT discs front and rear?
#14
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Bay Area, Calif.
Posts: 7,239
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 659 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 7 Times
in
6 Posts
To Shimagnolo's comment on the last V_g:
The formula given is correct. The drag force due to air resistance is proportional to the wind speed squared - hence the (V_a)^2. But the power needed to move at a given speed is: P = V x F, so you multiply the drag force by the ground speed of the bike.