Feet flat on ground
#1
Newbie
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 4
Bikes: Bianchi Cortina, Electra Cruiser 1
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Feet flat on ground
I'm new to cycling and wondering what the advantage is to bikes that don't allow you to put more than a tip toe or the ball of your foot on the ground. I've read posts that seem to dismiss bikes that allow you to put your feet down as something you couldn't use for anything more than the most casual cycling. I'm just curious what the advantages are to bikes that seat you higher off the ground. Thanks.
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: UK
Posts: 2,324
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I don't think there is any designed advantage to it, but if you could put your feet flat on the ground with the correct saddle height then your bottom bracket would be scraping along the road!
#3
Senior Member
Some time ago last year there was a discussion on this forum about this. Some say if you sit too low your knee would be always bent while paddling, which could harm your knees. Try search the forum.
#4
Senior Member
Bikes that let you put both feet on the ground are designed with the crank (and bottom bracket) much farther to the front than the usual convention. They are not bad, the bottom bracket doesn't hit the ground, and your knees make the normal extention. They are more or less intended for casual riding, at least partly because your position is much less aerodynamic that road bikes.
For the original question, the advantage is in perceived comfort. As distance increases, the perception usually changes.
For the original question, the advantage is in perceived comfort. As distance increases, the perception usually changes.
__________________
Some people are like a Slinky ... not really good for anything, but you still can't help but smile when you shove them down the stairs.
Some people are like a Slinky ... not really good for anything, but you still can't help but smile when you shove them down the stairs.
#5
Conservative Hippie
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Wakulla Co. FL
Posts: 4,271
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Bikes that let you put both feet on the ground are designed with the crank (and bottom bracket) much farther to the front than the usual convention. They are not bad, the bottom bracket doesn't hit the ground, and your knees make the normal extention. They are more or less intended for casual riding, at least partly because your position is much less aerodynamic that road bikes.
For the original question, the advantage is in perceived comfort. As distance increases, the perception usually changes.
For the original question, the advantage is in perceived comfort. As distance increases, the perception usually changes.
#6
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Leeds UK
Posts: 2,084
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 38 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times
in
3 Posts
It's about efficient pedalling. If you're on a bike suitable for your size and you can put your feet flat on the ground, then your knees are too bent at the top of the pedal stroke and the force you have to exert with your leg this bent can, potentially, harm the joint as well as tiring the rider out more quickly.
If you, or someone else, isn't confident except with the saddle that low, then the solution is to raise the saddle a 1/4" at a time and get used to the new height. Keep on doing this until it's more or less the right height - check this by moving a pedal to its lowest point and place your heel on it. If you can move your knee backwards and forwards without lifting your rear off the saddle, it's as near the right height as you will need.
By this time, you should be comfortable with balancing with just the ball of one (or both) feet on the ground when you come to a halt. At which point, any nervousness should be a thing of the past.
If you, or someone else, isn't confident except with the saddle that low, then the solution is to raise the saddle a 1/4" at a time and get used to the new height. Keep on doing this until it's more or less the right height - check this by moving a pedal to its lowest point and place your heel on it. If you can move your knee backwards and forwards without lifting your rear off the saddle, it's as near the right height as you will need.
By this time, you should be comfortable with balancing with just the ball of one (or both) feet on the ground when you come to a halt. At which point, any nervousness should be a thing of the past.
#7
Conservative Hippie
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Wakulla Co. FL
Posts: 4,271
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
It's about efficient pedalling. If you're on a bike suitable for your size and you can put your feet flat on the ground, then your knees are too bent at the top of the pedal stroke and the force you have to exert with your leg this bent can, potentially, harm the joint as well as tiring the rider out more quickly.
If you, or someone else, isn't confident except with the saddle that low, then the solution is to raise the saddle a 1/4" at a time and get used to the new height. Keep on doing this until it's more or less the right height - check this by moving a pedal to its lowest point and place your heel on it. If you can move your knee backwards and forwards without lifting your rear off the saddle, it's as near the right height as you will need.
By this time, you should be comfortable with balancing with just the ball of one (or both) feet on the ground when you come to a halt. At which point, any nervousness should be a thing of the past.
If you, or someone else, isn't confident except with the saddle that low, then the solution is to raise the saddle a 1/4" at a time and get used to the new height. Keep on doing this until it's more or less the right height - check this by moving a pedal to its lowest point and place your heel on it. If you can move your knee backwards and forwards without lifting your rear off the saddle, it's as near the right height as you will need.
By this time, you should be comfortable with balancing with just the ball of one (or both) feet on the ground when you come to a halt. At which point, any nervousness should be a thing of the past.
This type of bike is desirable for people who want to remain on the seat while putting their feet on the ground when they stop. On a conventional bike you should be off the saddle when stopped; and would have to be to put both feet on the ground if the saddle is adjusted to the proper height.
#8
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 477
Bikes: 2010 Trek FX 7.5, 2011 Trek 2.1
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Last year we got Trek Pure's, a pedal forward design because my wife wanted to learn to ride, and I thought it would be the easiest one to start with, allowing more confidence. The longest ride we did was about 20 miles, 10 to a cafe where we had lunch then back. We now have different bikes, and do 20 miles pretty much all at once without a big stop. I couldn't see that on the Pure's. There was a point where I didn't think a big cushy seat could be uncomfortable. I found out they are.
#9
Newbie
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 4
Bikes: Bianchi Cortina, Electra Cruiser 1
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Thanks. I understand now. I tried searching for my answer but didn't have much luck. Hopefully this thread will be easier for others to find.
#10
Humvee of bikes =Worksman
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 5,362
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times
in
3 Posts
Sounds like few here are know about a "layback" seat post. With a solid bar layback seat post 'feet on the ground' is easy without changing the entire bike geometry.
__________________
My preferred bicycle brand is.......WORKSMAN CYCLES
I dislike clipless pedals on any city bike since I feel they are unsafe.
Originally Posted by krazygluon
Steel: nearly a thousand years of metallurgical development
Aluminum: barely a hundred, which one would you rather have under your butt at 30mph?
My preferred bicycle brand is.......WORKSMAN CYCLES
I dislike clipless pedals on any city bike since I feel they are unsafe.
Originally Posted by krazygluon
Steel: nearly a thousand years of metallurgical development
Aluminum: barely a hundred, which one would you rather have under your butt at 30mph?
#12
Membership Not Required
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: On the road-USA
Posts: 16,855
Bikes: Giant Excursion, Raleigh Sports, Raleigh R.S.W. Compact, Motobecane? and about 20 more! OMG
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 68 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 6 Times
in
5 Posts
__________________
Webshots is bailing out, if you find any of my posts with corrupt picture files and want to see them corrected please let me know. :(
ISO: A late 1980's Giant Iguana MTB frameset (or complete bike) 23" Red with yellow graphics.
"Cycling should be a way of life, not a hobby.
RIDE, YOU FOOL, RIDE!"_Nicodemus
"Steel: nearly a thousand years of metallurgical development
Aluminum: barely a hundred
Which one would you rather have under your butt at 30mph?"_krazygluon
Webshots is bailing out, if you find any of my posts with corrupt picture files and want to see them corrected please let me know. :(
ISO: A late 1980's Giant Iguana MTB frameset (or complete bike) 23" Red with yellow graphics.
"Cycling should be a way of life, not a hobby.
RIDE, YOU FOOL, RIDE!"_Nicodemus
"Steel: nearly a thousand years of metallurgical development
Aluminum: barely a hundred
Which one would you rather have under your butt at 30mph?"_krazygluon
#13
Insane Bicycle Mechanic
Indeed. Mine is quite comfortable all day long, and I have no problems putting my feet down when stopped. Several of my recumbent-riding friends ride brevets- continuous rides of 200, 300, 400, and 600 kilometers.

__________________
Jeff Wills
Comcast nuked my web page. It will return soon..
Jeff Wills
Comcast nuked my web page. It will return soon..
#14
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Munising, Michigan, USA
Posts: 4,131
Bikes: Priority 600, Priority Continuum, Devinci Dexter
Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 685 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 55 Times
in
37 Posts
It's a geometry thing. You can put down more power to the pedals when you're leaned forward over the bars. The pedal-forward design used to allow one's feet to touch the ground works against an aggressive pedaling position. Pedal-forward bikes are ok for toodling around the neighborhood, but if you have steep hills to get up, or you want to go long distances, or you are interested in speed, then you are better off with more traditional geometries.
#15
Icantre Member
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: the Bayou City perpetually under construction
Posts: 384
Bikes: 2001 DBR Axis TT, 1998 Trek 5500 OCLV, 1993 Trek 1100, 1971 Raleigh Grand Prix, 1972 Gitane Attic Beater
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
It's all part of the illusion that the entire cycling nation is going to start racing each other on a massive scale with very high end bikes that cost more than your car and that what you've just bought that you thought was just a nice light bike to ride is actually some kind of "starter" bike and if you don't ride said bike in just the right way your legs are going to fall off at the knees..etc.,etc. It's called cycling snobbery. Sorry, folks but I'm calling it like I sees it. I've been riding "flat footed" all my life and my thighs are a little on the large side and guess what..my knees are just fine. I've known guys that got knee replacements at my age, but they don't ride bikes. So just ride and enjoy it and don't worry that you're not doing something right. Pay attention to your pain and make the adjustments required and you'll be just fine.
#16
Banned.
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Uncertain
Posts: 8,651
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
It's all part of the illusion that the entire cycling nation is going to start racing each other on a massive scale with very high end bikes that cost more than your car and that what you've just bought that you thought was just a nice light bike to ride is actually some kind of "starter" bike and if you don't ride said bike in just the right way your legs are going to fall off at the knees..etc.,etc. It's called cycling snobbery. Sorry, folks but I'm calling it like I sees it. I've been riding "flat footed" all my life and my thighs are a little on the large side and guess what..my knees are just fine. I've known guys that got knee replacements at my age, but they don't ride bikes. So just ride and enjoy it and don't worry that you're not doing something right. Pay attention to your pain and make the adjustments required and you'll be just fine.
Of course, I may have misunderstood and you may be talking about a different style of bike. But if so you need to be explicit, or there's a danger that people are going to be misled.
#17
Icantre Member
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: the Bayou City perpetually under construction
Posts: 384
Bikes: 2001 DBR Axis TT, 1998 Trek 5500 OCLV, 1993 Trek 1100, 1971 Raleigh Grand Prix, 1972 Gitane Attic Beater
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Oh, Ok, alright, danger Will Robinson. I'm talking about an inch, that's all. It was an opinion, not necessarily advice. There oughta be a law, right. Thanks for your concern.
#18
Banned
'Crank Forward' is a bike category for the folks wanting a lower than tippy toe
seat to ground distance .
and not having the cash and desire for a recumbent..
local, just go for a ride, casual.
seat to ground distance .
and not having the cash and desire for a recumbent..
local, just go for a ride, casual.