Graeme Obree HPV Record
#1
Devourer of souls
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,466
Bikes: Felt f70
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Graeme Obree HPV Record
anybody keeping up with this? The new bike looked like a pile of crap at first is now looking like something that might actually work. It seems he has had tons of problems getting things together for whatever reason. Is beyond the realm of possibility that he could actually make this happen?
#4
The Recumbent Quant
anybody keeping up with this? The new bike looked like a pile of crap at first is now looking like something that might actually work. It seems he has had tons of problems getting things together for whatever reason. Is beyond the realm of possibility that he could actually make this happen?
I heard him taking the bike outside and riding it, but absolutely nothing as far as what kind of speeds were reached just tootin' 'round.
Even if it were possible, it almost certainly wouldn't be Graeme who could put out enough power himself. Maybe earlier in his career, but he's not exactly young anymore.
Edit: Graeme's apparently only 5 years older than Sam Whittingham, so maybe not as too old as I thought
All that being said, I'd love to see a proper attempt. And if he tries, I'm rooting for him.
Last edited by cplager; 04-15-13 at 07:59 AM.
#5
Devourer of souls
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,466
Bikes: Felt f70
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Graeme has said he has done 40mph with no aero shell, confirmed by a pace car. I reckon he could do pretty damn good with the fairing. It looks like he really is payig a lot of attention to te aeros. A lot of the stuff Hoerner talks about in his aubject matter on interference drag describes shapes very similar to his shell.
I wouldnt be suprised if he actually does go fast. Whittingham isnt an amazing physical specimin at that. Put a real pro cyclist in varna diablo and I be it would get a lot closer to 100mph.
I wouldnt be suprised if he actually does go fast. Whittingham isnt an amazing physical specimin at that. Put a real pro cyclist in varna diablo and I be it would get a lot closer to 100mph.
#6
The Recumbent Quant
Graeme has said he has done 40mph with no aero shell, confirmed by a pace car. I reckon he could do pretty damn good with the fairing. It looks like he really is payig a lot of attention to te aeros. A lot of the stuff Hoerner talks about in his aubject matter on interference drag describes shapes very similar to his shell.
I wouldnt be suprised if he actually does go fast. Whittingham isnt an amazing physical specimin at that. Put a real pro cyclist in varna diablo and I be it would get a lot closer to 100mph.
I wouldnt be suprised if he actually does go fast. Whittingham isnt an amazing physical specimin at that. Put a real pro cyclist in varna diablo and I be it would get a lot closer to 100mph.
Hopefully Graeme was not going full bore when he hit 40. (100/40)^2 = 6.25. I doubt the shell makes his bike behave as if it had 1/6th the cross section. I'll consider Graeme's attempt hugely successful if he breaks 80 mph, and that's only a factor of four he needs to find...
#7
Banned
Theres a NL Uni engineering dept, working on a web-cam & monitor scheme to lower the profile further,
reducing the windows to ones on the sides, & no head bubble.
reducing the windows to ones on the sides, & no head bubble.
#8
don't try this at home.
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: N. KY
Posts: 5,936
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 973 Post(s)
Liked 511 Times
in
351 Posts
Remember air resistance grows (at least) speed squared. So we're looking at more than 50% more resistance at 100 mph. I doubt anybody could get the Varna to go that fast.
Hopefully Graeme was not going full bore when he hit 40. (100/40)^2 = 6.25. I doubt the shell makes his bike behave as if it had 1/6th the cross section. I'll consider Graeme's attempt hugely successful if he breaks 80 mph, and that's only a factor of four he needs to find...
Hopefully Graeme was not going full bore when he hit 40. (100/40)^2 = 6.25. I doubt the shell makes his bike behave as if it had 1/6th the cross section. I'll consider Graeme's attempt hugely successful if he breaks 80 mph, and that's only a factor of four he needs to find...
Obree's bike frontal area must be bigger than a prone rider riding between the wheels, just off the ground. That'll make it harder to go fast.
#9
Devourer of souls
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,466
Bikes: Felt f70
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
What do you need a university engineering dept working on monitors for? Jesus I could bodge that up with some radio shack security gear.
#10
Devourer of souls
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,466
Bikes: Felt f70
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Remember air resistance grows (at least) speed squared. So we're looking at more than 50% more resistance at 100 mph. I doubt anybody could get the Varna to go that fast.
Hopefully Graeme was not going full bore when he hit 40. (100/40)^2 = 6.25. I doubt the shell makes his bike behave as if it had 1/6th the cross section. I'll consider Graeme's attempt hugely successful if he breaks 80 mph, and that's only a factor of four he needs to find...
Hopefully Graeme was not going full bore when he hit 40. (100/40)^2 = 6.25. I doubt the shell makes his bike behave as if it had 1/6th the cross section. I'll consider Graeme's attempt hugely successful if he breaks 80 mph, and that's only a factor of four he needs to find...
Maybe not 1/6th the cross sectional area, but thats not what you look at when calculating drag. You look at the aerodynamic "flat plate area". Reducing cross sectional area does not automatically reduce drag. I think its VERY likely that the flat plate area with the shell will be 1/6th of that without also, do your calcs assume the power output will be the same on the record attempt as it was for him going 40mph?
#11
Banned
But they made the body out of Carbon fibers, and used Wind tunnels to test and optimize the shape
Maybe with a big enough computer, and the right data streams that can be modeled and changed
without making a physical model.
and By using the monitor to see the course center line,
they cannot see where they are going any other way But, as the benefit they don't even have to raise their head
so the highest oint on the body is clearance for the wheels inside.
Obree is in a prone position, face down.. recumbents are in a supine position, face Up..
Prone is a Position Snipers shoot from , laying on the ground.
yea and the wind tunnel testing can be done during the spring Tornado season
.. on the cheap too..
Maybe with a big enough computer, and the right data streams that can be modeled and changed
without making a physical model.
and By using the monitor to see the course center line,
they cannot see where they are going any other way But, as the benefit they don't even have to raise their head
so the highest oint on the body is clearance for the wheels inside.
Obree is in a prone position, face down.. recumbents are in a supine position, face Up..
Prone is a Position Snipers shoot from , laying on the ground.
I could bodge that up with some radio shack security gear.
.. on the cheap too..
#12
The Recumbent Quant
Maybe not 1/6th the cross sectional area, but thats not what you look at when calculating drag. You look at the aerodynamic "flat plate area". Reducing cross sectional area does not automatically reduce drag. I think its VERY likely that the flat plate area with the shell will be 1/6th of that without also, do your calcs assume the power output will be the same on the record attempt as it was for him going 40mph?
And rm -rf is right; I was talking about force. If you talk about power (which we cyclists usually do), we're talking about the cube, not the square.
Yes, we don't know if he was putting out anything near full power on his 40mph test run. If he was, he's completely sunk. Even if he wasn't, there's a big difference between riding at 40 mph (which I can do if the hill is big enough) and 80 mph, not to mention his goal of 100 mph.
If I were a betting man, I'd bet against him. I'm not, so if he tries, I'll root for him. But I won't be holding my breath.
#13
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Above ground, Walnut Creek, Ca
Posts: 6,681
Bikes: 8 ss bikes, 1 5-speed touring bike
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 86 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times
in
4 Posts
you know, if it were possible to just design the various dimensions of the bike and it's drag, etc. and measure the rider's output the max speed could be calculated without even building the bike, let alone making it ride-able and then actually riding it. yet they do. so i have to assume it is not all that clear cut...
Last edited by hueyhoolihan; 04-15-13 at 02:44 PM.
#14
Devourer of souls
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,466
Bikes: Felt f70
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
The cross sectional area itself will actually increase very slightly when he puts on the fairing. What he will do is reduce the drag coefficient. And I don't think he'll drop this coefficient by a factor of 6.
And rm -rf is right; I was talking about force. If you talk about power (which we cyclists usually do), we're talking about the cube, not the square.
Yes, we don't know if he was putting out anything near full power on his 40mph test run. If he was, he's completely sunk. Even if he wasn't, there's a big difference between riding at 40 mph (which I can do if the hill is big enough) and 80 mph, not to mention his goal of 100 mph.
If I were a betting man, I'd bet against him. I'm not, so if he tries, I'll root for him. But I won't be holding my breath.
And rm -rf is right; I was talking about force. If you talk about power (which we cyclists usually do), we're talking about the cube, not the square.
Yes, we don't know if he was putting out anything near full power on his 40mph test run. If he was, he's completely sunk. Even if he wasn't, there's a big difference between riding at 40 mph (which I can do if the hill is big enough) and 80 mph, not to mention his goal of 100 mph.
If I were a betting man, I'd bet against him. I'm not, so if he tries, I'll root for him. But I won't be holding my breath.
Just trying to clarify.
#15
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Dallas Fort Worth Metroplex
Posts: 5,058
Bikes: 2013 Haro FL Comp 29er MTB.
Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1470 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 45 Times
in
35 Posts
The cross sectional area itself will actually increase very slightly when he puts on the fairing. What he will do is reduce the drag coefficient. And I don't think he'll drop this coefficient by a factor of 6.
And rm -rf is right; I was talking about force. If you talk about power (which we cyclists usually do), we're talking about the cube, not the square.
Yes, we don't know if he was putting out anything near full power on his 40mph test run. If he was, he's completely sunk. Even if he wasn't, there's a big difference between riding at 40 mph (which I can do if the hill is big enough) and 80 mph, not to mention his goal of 100 mph.
If I were a betting man, I'd bet against him. I'm not, so if he tries, I'll root for him. But I won't be holding my breath.
And rm -rf is right; I was talking about force. If you talk about power (which we cyclists usually do), we're talking about the cube, not the square.
Yes, we don't know if he was putting out anything near full power on his 40mph test run. If he was, he's completely sunk. Even if he wasn't, there's a big difference between riding at 40 mph (which I can do if the hill is big enough) and 80 mph, not to mention his goal of 100 mph.
If I were a betting man, I'd bet against him. I'm not, so if he tries, I'll root for him. But I won't be holding my breath.
#16
Uber Goober
Just glancing over his website and all, I am reminded of the world-land-speed record attempts for automobiles. Craig Breedlove was working trying to break the speed of sound, basically by experimenting and fixing what broke and hoping he didn't die in the process. Richard Noble invested time and money in a proper attempt, with a driver that knew what he was doing, and the record was set. Graeme Obree seems to be very much on the Breedlove-approach, and does not inspire a lot of confidence.
I like the little quote on Graeme's site: "When a true genius appears, you can know him by this sign: that all the dunces are in a confederacy against him.” Unfortunately, it's not that easy. You can be like Tesla, a certified genius and still a crackpot.
I like the little quote on Graeme's site: "When a true genius appears, you can know him by this sign: that all the dunces are in a confederacy against him.” Unfortunately, it's not that easy. You can be like Tesla, a certified genius and still a crackpot.
__________________
"be careful this rando stuff is addictive and dan's the 'pusher'."
"be careful this rando stuff is addictive and dan's the 'pusher'."
#17
Devourer of souls
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,466
Bikes: Felt f70
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Just glancing over his website and all, I am reminded of the world-land-speed record attempts for automobiles. Craig Breedlove was working trying to break the speed of sound, basically by experimenting and fixing what broke and hoping he didn't die in the process. Richard Noble invested time and money in a proper attempt, with a driver that knew what he was doing, and the record was set. Graeme Obree seems to be very much on the Breedlove-approach, and does not inspire a lot of confidence.
I like the little quote on Graeme's site: "When a true genius appears, you can know him by this sign: that all the dunces are in a confederacy against him.” Unfortunately, it's not that easy. You can be like Tesla, a certified genius and still a crackpot.
I like the little quote on Graeme's site: "When a true genius appears, you can know him by this sign: that all the dunces are in a confederacy against him.” Unfortunately, it's not that easy. You can be like Tesla, a certified genius and still a crackpot.
While I understand what you are saying, you cant really apply to Obree, since he has already set world records on his kitchen built bicycles.
#18
The Recumbent Quant
What a story it would be if I'm wrong! But I'm probably not.
#19
Insane Bicycle Mechanic
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: other Vancouver
Posts: 9,835
Mentioned: 34 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 802 Post(s)
Liked 703 Times
in
376 Posts
Also, the Varna bikes have had the same basic design for almost 20 years. (I hosted George Georgiev and his previous rider, Paul Buettemer, when they came to Portland for some test track time in 1996. The current bikes are somewhat similar.) So they have many years of testing, working out the details of what makes a fast HPV fast. I'll bet Sam has more time riding an HPV above 70 mph than everyone else combined.
That being said, I hope Obree refines his machine to where it is competitive with other high-speed HPVs. He brings a spotlight on this odd corner of the bicycle world.
__________________
Jeff Wills
Comcast nuked my web page. It will return soon..
Jeff Wills
Comcast nuked my web page. It will return soon..
#21
Cathedral City, CA
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Cathedral City, CA
Posts: 1,504
Bikes: 2016 RITCHEY BreakAway (full Chorus 11), 2005 Ritchey BreakAway (full Chorus 11, STOLEN), 2001 Gary Fisher Tassajara mountain bike (sold), 2004 Giant TRC 2 road bike (sold)
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
#22
Devourer of souls
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,466
Bikes: Felt f70
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
*rolls eyes*
Im an electrician and data tech. Ive got tons of experience with cameras. I could have a panoramic camera setup rigged up in Graemes bike in a few days. Connecting a camera to an LCD just isnt a difficult task. All I am saying is everything one needs to to it is available at your local electronics supply store.
Im an electrician and data tech. Ive got tons of experience with cameras. I could have a panoramic camera setup rigged up in Graemes bike in a few days. Connecting a camera to an LCD just isnt a difficult task. All I am saying is everything one needs to to it is available at your local electronics supply store.
#23
Uber Goober
But consider that with the current HPV and record attempts, the major issue is optimizing aerodynamics, which can become a very involved problem, and one on which Mr. Obree doesn't seem to have started yet.
__________________
"be careful this rando stuff is addictive and dan's the 'pusher'."
"be careful this rando stuff is addictive and dan's the 'pusher'."
#24
Banned
it's not the camera per se ,it's what the low drag body shape can be if you dont need to see out a window,at all .
#25
Thread Killer
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 12,431
Bikes: 15 Kinesis Racelight 4S, 76 Motebecane Gran Jubilée, 17 Dedacciai Gladiatore2, 12 Breezer Venturi, 09 Dahon Mariner, 12 Mercier Nano, 95 DeKerf Team SL, 19 Tern Rally, 21 Breezer Doppler Cafe+, 19 T-Lab X3, 91 Serotta CII, 23 3T Strada
Mentioned: 30 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3133 Post(s)
Liked 1,700 Times
in
1,027 Posts