gear sizes
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Berea KY
Posts: 139
Bikes: motorized cruiser,& Mtn bike & Folder
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
gear sizes
can someone point me to where i can read about bike gear sizes ? thx Cuz
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Utah
Posts: 589
Bikes: Thorn Nomad Mk2, 1996 Trek 520, Workcycles Transport, Brompton
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Sheldon Brown is always a good place to start:
https://sheldonbrown.com/gloss_g.html#gear
or wikipedia:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bicycle_gearing
https://sheldonbrown.com/gloss_g.html#gear
or wikipedia:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bicycle_gearing
#3
Membership Not Required
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: On the road-USA
Posts: 16,855
Bikes: Giant Excursion, Raleigh Sports, Raleigh R.S.W. Compact, Motobecane? and about 20 more! OMG
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 70 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 15 Times
in
14 Posts
I will second Sheldon Brown. What specifically do you want to know? Gearing is a huge topic. I use different gearing ranges for different types of bikes. Different bikes have different numbers and ranges. I have everything from single speeds up to 21 gears, new bikes can have as many as 28 or 30.
Aaron
Aaron
__________________
Webshots is bailing out, if you find any of my posts with corrupt picture files and want to see them corrected please let me know. :(
ISO: A late 1980's Giant Iguana MTB frameset (or complete bike) 23" Red with yellow graphics.
"Cycling should be a way of life, not a hobby.
RIDE, YOU FOOL, RIDE!"_Nicodemus
"Steel: nearly a thousand years of metallurgical development
Aluminum: barely a hundred
Which one would you rather have under your butt at 30mph?"_krazygluon
Webshots is bailing out, if you find any of my posts with corrupt picture files and want to see them corrected please let me know. :(
ISO: A late 1980's Giant Iguana MTB frameset (or complete bike) 23" Red with yellow graphics.
"Cycling should be a way of life, not a hobby.
RIDE, YOU FOOL, RIDE!"_Nicodemus
"Steel: nearly a thousand years of metallurgical development
Aluminum: barely a hundred
Which one would you rather have under your butt at 30mph?"_krazygluon
#4
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Berea KY
Posts: 139
Bikes: motorized cruiser,& Mtn bike & Folder
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I will second Sheldon Brown. What specifically do you want to know? Gearing is a huge topic. I use different gearing ranges for different types of bikes. Different bikes have different numbers and ranges. I have everything from single speeds up to 21 gears, new bikes can have as many as 28 or 30.
Aaron
Aaron
#5
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Utah
Posts: 589
Bikes: Thorn Nomad Mk2, 1996 Trek 520, Workcycles Transport, Brompton
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
33 to 66 is not a very deluxe gear range but it sounds practical actually in a bare bones sort of way. 66 ought to be fine for riding on the flat and 33 is decent for going up hills. You won't have anything for downhill but that is the least important gear anyway. Mostly I like a good downhill gear so I can pick up some momentum to help carry me a ways up the next climb!
If the price is right, a 33 to 66 gearing will get you across town OK.
If the price is right, a 33 to 66 gearing will get you across town OK.
#6
Banned.
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Brighton UK
Posts: 1,662
Bikes: 20" Folder, Road Bike
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
I'm an old duffer riding a 33 to 66 folding bike and can tell you
66 isn't enough for pounding downhill or for a big tailwind.
I also have a 40 to 100 road bike for comparison.
If your young and fit 33 to 66 will be limiting. I've done 33mph on
my folder downhill with the wind behind me, but stopped pedaling
to any useful effect around 20mph, that is a high cadence for me.
For me the gearing range is about right, assuming you don't
want to hammer it downhill or with tailwinds. 18mph is about
my consistent limit mild downhills or some tailwind on the flat.
I can go quite a bit faster on my road bike, not that it matters.
Initially for me I struggled uphill and into headwinds with the
lower gears, but I'm an old duffer, and now they are fine.
rgds, sreten.
Last edited by sreten; 05-28-13 at 09:42 PM.
#7
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 126
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I used this "Gear calculator.
https://home.earthlink.net/~mike.sherman/shift.html
https://home.earthlink.net/~mike.sherman/shift.html
#8
Banned.
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Brighton UK
Posts: 1,662
Bikes: 20" Folder, Road Bike
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Hi,
FWIW I can go up hills easier on my 40" to 100" road bike
than I can on my 33" to 66" folder, gear inches don't tell
you everything about the effective gearing of a bike.
The gearing for a typical 6 speed cheap folder is low for
16" wheels and about right when used with 20" wheels.
Usually a 14, 16, 18, 21, 24 and 28 freewheel on the back.
rgds, sreten.
FWIW I can go up hills easier on my 40" to 100" road bike
than I can on my 33" to 66" folder, gear inches don't tell
you everything about the effective gearing of a bike.
The gearing for a typical 6 speed cheap folder is low for
16" wheels and about right when used with 20" wheels.
Usually a 14, 16, 18, 21, 24 and 28 freewheel on the back.
rgds, sreten.
#9
Banned
Ratio (tooth count numbers) F:R x wheel diameter, calculate circumference X wheel RPM & you got speed.
#11
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: St Peters, Missouri
Posts: 30,225
Bikes: Catrike 559 I own some others but they don't get ridden very much.
Mentioned: 16 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1572 Post(s)
Liked 643 Times
in
364 Posts
You're asking a question that only you can answer.
None of us have to ride that particular bike over your roads while using your body. The bike comes with gears the manufacturer thinks will work for most people. You aren't most people, you're you. Get the bike and ride it around for awhile. It'll tell you if you need higher or lower gears.
None of us have to ride that particular bike over your roads while using your body. The bike comes with gears the manufacturer thinks will work for most people. You aren't most people, you're you. Get the bike and ride it around for awhile. It'll tell you if you need higher or lower gears.
#12
Banned.
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Brighton UK
Posts: 1,662
Bikes: 20" Folder, Road Bike
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Hi,
Not easily or cheaply. The rear 6 speed is pretty much a standard 14 to 28
freewheel, and the 14 to 34 megarange won't work with the rear derailleur,
though I assume your after more than 66", not lower than 33".
I've looked and haven't found many other sized 6 speed freewheels.
I'm sure they are out there but just not very common / stocked.
13t is the smallest I've found and not cheap at all.
Changing the crankset to more teeth is expensive for the minor benefit.
rgds, sreten.
Not easily or cheaply. The rear 6 speed is pretty much a standard 14 to 28
freewheel, and the 14 to 34 megarange won't work with the rear derailleur,
though I assume your after more than 66", not lower than 33".
I've looked and haven't found many other sized 6 speed freewheels.
I'm sure they are out there but just not very common / stocked.
13t is the smallest I've found and not cheap at all.
Changing the crankset to more teeth is expensive for the minor benefit.
rgds, sreten.
#13
The Recumbent Quant
That suggests that either your position on your folding bike isn't as good as that on your road bike (meaning you can more easily generate power on your road bike) or some other inefficiency in your folding bike (tires, drive chain). At hill climbing speeds, aerodynamics shouldn't be playing a large effect.
The real point of this is that this doesn't have to be the case with folding bicycles - they can be (almost) as performant as full size bicycles.
Not easily or cheaply. The rear 6 speed is pretty much a standard 14 to 28
freewheel, and the 14 to 34 megarange won't work with the rear derailleur,
though I assume your after more than 66", not lower than 33".
I've looked and haven't found many other sized 6 speed freewheels.
I'm sure they are out there but just not very common / be stocked.
13t is the smallest I've found and not cheap at all.
Changing the crankset to more teeth is expensive for the minor benefit.
freewheel, and the 14 to 34 megarange won't work with the rear derailleur,
though I assume your after more than 66", not lower than 33".
I've looked and haven't found many other sized 6 speed freewheels.
I'm sure they are out there but just not very common / be stocked.
13t is the smallest I've found and not cheap at all.
Changing the crankset to more teeth is expensive for the minor benefit.
Last edited by cplager; 05-30-13 at 06:04 PM.
#14
Senior Member
IMHO - for a non racing utility and pleasure rider, a 1x9 set up bike with 12-36 cassette and 44 t chainring with a 32/622 tire provides a gear in range of 33-99 (in hilly areas substitute a 39 t chain ring). This range provides a pragmatic and reliable useful range.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Racer Ex
Track Cycling: Velodrome Racing and Training Area
5
12-09-13 09:49 PM
johnj2803
Commuting
28
05-07-11 01:50 PM