Random thoughts re: Brooks saddles
#26
Señor Member
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 5,066
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 649 Post(s)
Liked 292 Times
in
215 Posts
Brooks benefited greatly by the age-wave, older men returning to cycling and sitting more upright. Not sure I've ever seen a young cyclist with a Brooks saddle, but I've never been to Amsterdam. My 20-something kids have zero interest in Brooks, it's like metamucil. I've read the average age is of a 911 owner is 46, I suspect it might be even higher for Brooks saddles in the US.
the almost complete lack of leather saddles
and the prevalence of racing style plastic and ti saddles
on young peoples bikes
is more an indicator of choosing style over function
than people using books saddles
imho
#27
Banned
Or just leaving the saddle on that came with the bike from the shop, because it was OK with them.
Rare is the new bike sold as It came out of the shipping carton, included with a Brooks leather Saddle..
then there are the gram counters, a leather saddle weighs more than a carbon fiber one.
you asked your neighbor where they bought their saddle?
I expect it was a separate purchase.
Rare is the new bike sold as It came out of the shipping carton, included with a Brooks leather Saddle..
then there are the gram counters, a leather saddle weighs more than a carbon fiber one.
you asked your neighbor where they bought their saddle?
I expect it was a separate purchase.
Last edited by fietsbob; 12-15-13 at 11:42 AM.
#28
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Copenhagen, Denmark
Posts: 403
Bikes: Bullitt Milk Plus with Alfine 11s; Dahon Smooth Hound
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
In my experience, most people keep the saddle the bike came with until it is ripped (and a lot come with lower tier Brooks saddles - at least here in Northern Europe). But then again, most aren't as geeky as people on these boards (me included, of course).
#29
Thread Killer
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 12,428
Bikes: 15 Kinesis Racelight 4S, 76 Motebecane Gran Jubilée, 17 Dedacciai Gladiatore2, 12 Breezer Venturi, 09 Dahon Mariner, 12 Mercier Nano, 95 DeKerf Team SL, 19 Tern Rally, 21 Breezer Doppler Cafe+, 19 T-Lab X3, 91 Serotta CII, 23 3T Strada
Mentioned: 30 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3129 Post(s)
Liked 1,697 Times
in
1,026 Posts
Ha! Aren't you right! I'd not thought about those in all this...But the Brooks crowd isn't migrating, is it?
#30
Thread Killer
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 12,428
Bikes: 15 Kinesis Racelight 4S, 76 Motebecane Gran Jubilée, 17 Dedacciai Gladiatore2, 12 Breezer Venturi, 09 Dahon Mariner, 12 Mercier Nano, 95 DeKerf Team SL, 19 Tern Rally, 21 Breezer Doppler Cafe+, 19 T-Lab X3, 91 Serotta CII, 23 3T Strada
Mentioned: 30 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3129 Post(s)
Liked 1,697 Times
in
1,026 Posts
And what is the average age of a Ferrari owner?
It's not like most twenty-somethings can afford a super car, regardless of it being a Porsche or a Ferrari.
I bought into Brooks saddles when I was in my twenties. Now I'm forty. So at least 11 years ago (more like 15-16 in reality).
It's not like most twenty-somethings can afford a super car, regardless of it being a Porsche or a Ferrari.
I bought into Brooks saddles when I was in my twenties. Now I'm forty. So at least 11 years ago (more like 15-16 in reality).
#31
Senior Member
I am intending to get my first Brooks (and upright bike suitable for it) this spring, wherein I'll be about 26.
I don't understand why, if I like one end of the spectrum (leather saddles like in the old days) I am required by some kind of cultural law to dislike the other end of the spectrum (carbon shingles).
Every thing can have appeal. Use reason.
I wouldn't put a Brooks on my alu drop bar road bike because it would be at odds with the ascetics, but that's just me.
M.
I don't understand why, if I like one end of the spectrum (leather saddles like in the old days) I am required by some kind of cultural law to dislike the other end of the spectrum (carbon shingles).
Every thing can have appeal. Use reason.
I wouldn't put a Brooks on my alu drop bar road bike because it would be at odds with the ascetics, but that's just me.
M.
#32
Bourbon junkie
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: NorCal
Posts: 722
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5 Post(s)
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
#33
Membership Not Required
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: On the road-USA
Posts: 16,855
Bikes: Giant Excursion, Raleigh Sports, Raleigh R.S.W. Compact, Motobecane? and about 20 more! OMG
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 70 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 15 Times
in
14 Posts
I rode Brooks saddles in the 1970's (Wright's and Ideale too) still riding Brooks today, if it ain't broke it don't need fixing. When someone gives me a saddle that is more comfortable than my very comfortable Brooks I will consider switching, however that has yet to happen. FWIW I have 7 or 8 Brooks equipped bikes.
Aaron
Aaron
__________________
Webshots is bailing out, if you find any of my posts with corrupt picture files and want to see them corrected please let me know. :(
ISO: A late 1980's Giant Iguana MTB frameset (or complete bike) 23" Red with yellow graphics.
"Cycling should be a way of life, not a hobby.
RIDE, YOU FOOL, RIDE!"_Nicodemus
"Steel: nearly a thousand years of metallurgical development
Aluminum: barely a hundred
Which one would you rather have under your butt at 30mph?"_krazygluon
Webshots is bailing out, if you find any of my posts with corrupt picture files and want to see them corrected please let me know. :(
ISO: A late 1980's Giant Iguana MTB frameset (or complete bike) 23" Red with yellow graphics.
"Cycling should be a way of life, not a hobby.
RIDE, YOU FOOL, RIDE!"_Nicodemus
"Steel: nearly a thousand years of metallurgical development
Aluminum: barely a hundred
Which one would you rather have under your butt at 30mph?"_krazygluon
#35
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: NYC, duh Bronx.
Posts: 3,578
Bikes: Salsa Ti Warbird- 2014/ November RAIL52s
Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 67 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Probably not... Brooks' is beautiful stuff btw...but it's great to see the design modernized and moving forward. I'm really looking forward to getting some miles in on the Kurve shortly...
#36
In Real Life
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Down under down under
Posts: 52,152
Bikes: Lots
Mentioned: 141 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3203 Post(s)
Liked 596 Times
in
329 Posts
That is, of course, what he intended when he started this thread.
__________________
Rowan
My fave photo threads on BF
Century A Month Facebook Group
Machka's Website
Photo Gallery
Rowan
My fave photo threads on BF
Century A Month Facebook Group
Machka's Website
Photo Gallery
#37
In Real Life
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Down under down under
Posts: 52,152
Bikes: Lots
Mentioned: 141 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3203 Post(s)
Liked 596 Times
in
329 Posts
Not sure I've ever seen a young cyclist with a Brooks saddle, but I've never been to Amsterdam. My 20-something kids have zero interest in Brooks, it's like metamucil. I've read the average age is of a 911 owner is 46, I suspect it might be even higher for Brooks saddles in the US.
I got my first Brooks when I was 37 ... on the advice of several friends, one of whom had been riding Brooks for a while and he was 32.
__________________
Rowan
My fave photo threads on BF
Century A Month Facebook Group
Machka's Website
Photo Gallery
Rowan
My fave photo threads on BF
Century A Month Facebook Group
Machka's Website
Photo Gallery
#38
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Copenhagen, Denmark
Posts: 403
Bikes: Bullitt Milk Plus with Alfine 11s; Dahon Smooth Hound
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
You are missing the point: You compared the age of people buying Brooks to people buying Porsches, the car you think is a flawed design. I pointed out that the age of people buying Porsches has little to do with being old, but more to do with having the money to buy one. I am not saying that you need to have that kind of money to buy a saddle, but rather that you can't put too much into the average age of a buyer of an expensive super car, other than because it is very expensive, very few young people will have the means to buy such a car.
#39
Thread Killer
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 12,428
Bikes: 15 Kinesis Racelight 4S, 76 Motebecane Gran Jubilée, 17 Dedacciai Gladiatore2, 12 Breezer Venturi, 09 Dahon Mariner, 12 Mercier Nano, 95 DeKerf Team SL, 19 Tern Rally, 21 Breezer Doppler Cafe+, 19 T-Lab X3, 91 Serotta CII, 23 3T Strada
Mentioned: 30 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3129 Post(s)
Liked 1,697 Times
in
1,026 Posts
#40
Thread Killer
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 12,428
Bikes: 15 Kinesis Racelight 4S, 76 Motebecane Gran Jubilée, 17 Dedacciai Gladiatore2, 12 Breezer Venturi, 09 Dahon Mariner, 12 Mercier Nano, 95 DeKerf Team SL, 19 Tern Rally, 21 Breezer Doppler Cafe+, 19 T-Lab X3, 91 Serotta CII, 23 3T Strada
Mentioned: 30 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3129 Post(s)
Liked 1,697 Times
in
1,026 Posts
You are missing the point: You compared the age of people buying Brooks to people buying Porsches, the car you think is a flawed design. I pointed out that the age of people buying Porsches has little to do with being old, but more to do with having the money to buy one. I am not saying that you need to have that kind of money to buy a saddle, but rather that you can't put too much into the average age of a buyer of an expensive super car, other than because it is very expensive, very few young people will have the means to buy such a car.
You're explanation didn't do anything to clarify your point for me, so I'll just add that perception is important; maybe the reason the young folk don't buy Brooks' saddles even though they could afford one is because they see them as something for geezers. That, or perhaps they see them as low-tech, poorly suited, alternatives to saddles better suited to their needs and wants.
#41
Thread Killer
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 12,428
Bikes: 15 Kinesis Racelight 4S, 76 Motebecane Gran Jubilée, 17 Dedacciai Gladiatore2, 12 Breezer Venturi, 09 Dahon Mariner, 12 Mercier Nano, 95 DeKerf Team SL, 19 Tern Rally, 21 Breezer Doppler Cafe+, 19 T-Lab X3, 91 Serotta CII, 23 3T Strada
Mentioned: 30 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3129 Post(s)
Liked 1,697 Times
in
1,026 Posts
I agree on both counts, and came quite close to getting a Kurve Chameleon myself, but wound up going with SMP's Dynamic, which I adore. I'd still love to try one, though.
#42
~>~
To find out if you have direct experience in using the subject of your post.
It's not unknown to find that folk on the inter-web post opinions about kit that they have never used, shocking but true.
-Bandera
It's not unknown to find that folk on the inter-web post opinions about kit that they have never used, shocking but true.
-Bandera
Last edited by Bandera; 12-16-13 at 08:19 AM.
#43
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Middle Earth (aka IA)
Posts: 20,433
Bikes: A bunch of old bikes and a few new ones
Mentioned: 178 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5888 Post(s)
Liked 3,470 Times
in
2,079 Posts
I bought a brooks in the 80s, broke it in, and sold it. Nothing wrong with the saddle but I liked the selle italia turbo better. That was my favorite all time saddle. Fast forward 30 years and I'm starting to dig Brooks saddles partly for the style and partly for the comfort. They just look right on a bike and they are comfortable. I just picked up a selle anatomica for my drop bar mtb conversion. I've heard great things about it and took advantage of the sale to pick one up.
#44
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Copenhagen, Denmark
Posts: 403
Bikes: Bullitt Milk Plus with Alfine 11s; Dahon Smooth Hound
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Only in an unimportant sense: FrenchFit compared the age of owners of Brooks saddles with the age of Porsche owners. I responded to that. You then responded with a post saying that a Brooks saddle wasn't as expensive as a supercar, to which I explained why I responded in the first place: That one couldn't compare them just because it happens to be older persons driving them both. If I at some point confused you and FrenchFirst, so be it, but I doubt it. You were the one comparing the "flawed" design of the Porsche with the "flawed" design of the Brooks.
If it did nothing to clarify my point to you, that is your loss. Sometimes people are willingly ignoring things. There is nothing I can do to alleviate problems on your end with the reception.
As for image; Yes, perhaps younger people perceive it to be for "geezers", but that too is their problem. If you or the young people see them as "low-tech, poorly suited, alternatives", then again that is their problem. What's your point? That because a group of people (which seems to be mostly you) is poorly informed and/or care mostly about image, then therefore the reality is what it is according to that group (or rather, you who claim to speak on behalf of them)?
You're explanation didn't do anything to clarify your point for me, so I'll just add that perception is important; maybe the reason the young folk don't buy Brooks' saddles even though they could afford one is because they see them as something for geezers. That, or perhaps they see them as low-tech, poorly suited, alternatives to saddles better suited to their needs and wants.
As for image; Yes, perhaps younger people perceive it to be for "geezers", but that too is their problem. If you or the young people see them as "low-tech, poorly suited, alternatives", then again that is their problem. What's your point? That because a group of people (which seems to be mostly you) is poorly informed and/or care mostly about image, then therefore the reality is what it is according to that group (or rather, you who claim to speak on behalf of them)?
#45
Thread Killer
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 12,428
Bikes: 15 Kinesis Racelight 4S, 76 Motebecane Gran Jubilée, 17 Dedacciai Gladiatore2, 12 Breezer Venturi, 09 Dahon Mariner, 12 Mercier Nano, 95 DeKerf Team SL, 19 Tern Rally, 21 Breezer Doppler Cafe+, 19 T-Lab X3, 91 Serotta CII, 23 3T Strada
Mentioned: 30 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3129 Post(s)
Liked 1,697 Times
in
1,026 Posts
Sure, but remember, this is not a thread about that, really; it's about exploring the commonalities between the development of the 911 and Brooks saddles, and one doesn't need first hand experience of either to do that, I don't think.
#46
Thread Killer
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 12,428
Bikes: 15 Kinesis Racelight 4S, 76 Motebecane Gran Jubilée, 17 Dedacciai Gladiatore2, 12 Breezer Venturi, 09 Dahon Mariner, 12 Mercier Nano, 95 DeKerf Team SL, 19 Tern Rally, 21 Breezer Doppler Cafe+, 19 T-Lab X3, 91 Serotta CII, 23 3T Strada
Mentioned: 30 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3129 Post(s)
Liked 1,697 Times
in
1,026 Posts
Only in an unimportant sense: FrenchFit compared the age of owners of Brooks saddles with the age of Porsche owners. I responded to that. You then responded with a post saying that a Brooks saddle wasn't as expensive as a supercar, to which I explained why I responded in the first place: That one couldn't compare them just because it happens to be older persons driving them both. If I at some point confused you and FrenchFirst, so be it, but I doubt it. You were the one comparing the "flawed" design of the Porsche with the "flawed" design of the Brooks.
If it did nothing to clarify my point to you, that is your loss. Sometimes people are willingly ignoring things. There is nothing I can do to alleviate problems on your end with the reception.
As for image; Yes, perhaps younger people perceive it to be for "geezers", but that too is their problem. If you or the young people see them as "low-tech, poorly suited, alternatives", then again that is their problem. What's your point? That because a group of people (which seems to be mostly you) is poorly informed and/or care mostly about image, then therefore the reality is what it is according to that group (or rather, you who claim to speak on behalf of them)?
If it did nothing to clarify my point to you, that is your loss. Sometimes people are willingly ignoring things. There is nothing I can do to alleviate problems on your end with the reception.
As for image; Yes, perhaps younger people perceive it to be for "geezers", but that too is their problem. If you or the young people see them as "low-tech, poorly suited, alternatives", then again that is their problem. What's your point? That because a group of people (which seems to be mostly you) is poorly informed and/or care mostly about image, then therefore the reality is what it is according to that group (or rather, you who claim to speak on behalf of them)?
#47
~>~
One either has direct experience of a product or not, pretty simple.
The last 911 that I drove was a '72 911E. I found it to be a significant improvement in every way over the 356B and not particularly flawed, idiosyncratic surely. Modern 911s are beyond my ken but I'd love to give one a run on the Hill Country roads I drive in my roadster. Having never driven one I have no opinion on their driving qualities beyond a pure guess that "pretty nice" would be accurate, but don't quote me.
The only Brooks saddle on my bikes "lately", a B-72 of a certain age, was retired and replaced with the B-17 "Aged" model on my town bike. After only a few miles on the new Brooks I was certain that it met my requirements quite well, no big surprise.
Any serious comparison of the development process of items as different as a simple bicycle seat and a complex sports car strikes me as so nebulous as to be meaningless. Apple are more comparable to oranges.
-Bandera
Last edited by Bandera; 12-16-13 at 09:53 AM.
#48
Thread Killer
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 12,428
Bikes: 15 Kinesis Racelight 4S, 76 Motebecane Gran Jubilée, 17 Dedacciai Gladiatore2, 12 Breezer Venturi, 09 Dahon Mariner, 12 Mercier Nano, 95 DeKerf Team SL, 19 Tern Rally, 21 Breezer Doppler Cafe+, 19 T-Lab X3, 91 Serotta CII, 23 3T Strada
Mentioned: 30 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3129 Post(s)
Liked 1,697 Times
in
1,026 Posts
If you've never driven a 911 or put miles on a Brooks saddle you wouldn't know what you were posting about.
One either has direct experience of a product or not, pretty simple.
The last 911 that I drove was a '72 911E. I found it to be a significant improvement in every way over the 356B and not particularly flawed, idiosyncratic surely. Modern 911s are beyond my ken but I'd love to give one a run on the Hill Country roads I drive in my roadster.
Any serious comparison of the development process of items as different as a simple bicycle seat and a complex sports car strikes me as so nebulous as to be meaningless. Apple are more comparable to oranges.
-Bandera
One either has direct experience of a product or not, pretty simple.
The last 911 that I drove was a '72 911E. I found it to be a significant improvement in every way over the 356B and not particularly flawed, idiosyncratic surely. Modern 911s are beyond my ken but I'd love to give one a run on the Hill Country roads I drive in my roadster.
Any serious comparison of the development process of items as different as a simple bicycle seat and a complex sports car strikes me as so nebulous as to be meaningless. Apple are more comparable to oranges.
-Bandera
#49
~>~
I don't share that perspective. I mean, if a NASA engineer or an F1 engineer, for example, can help build a space shuttle or a race car yet never pilot one, I still think they are pretty qualified to speak about them! No, they wouldn't be the go-to guys for input on what it's like to pilot one, but in the same sense, where not here talking about what it's like to sit on a Brooks or in a 911, either.
-Bandera