Tires & inches
#1
Newbie
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 3
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Tires & inches
Hello,
I just bought a Bike Computer but I've stuck at the part with the inches. My tire has so many numbers.. But i've no idea what all these mean. If you could help me by telling me which of that is the inches.. I googled it but I didn't find a solution..
So, here is the numbers:
Pressure 40-65PSI 2.8-4.6kgf/cm2 280-460 KPa (56-559) 28x1.95 k-849-010


So, here is the numbers:
Pressure 40-65PSI 2.8-4.6kgf/cm2 280-460 KPa (56-559) 28x1.95 k-849-010


#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Champlin, MN
Posts: 141
Bikes: 1994 Mongoose Switchback, 1983 Schwinn Voyageur SP, Cheap unnamed ssfg road bike
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
28x1.95. If your computer doesn't have that size in the menu, you'll have to look at the book for manually entering, and (for the computers I've owned) measure the circumference and manually enter that number.
#3
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: 25 miles northwest of Boston
Posts: 24,862
Bikes: Bottecchia Sprint, GT Timberline 29r
Mentioned: 103 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3723 Post(s)
Liked 851 Times
in
592 Posts
Sheldon Brown has a bike computer page that might help
Harris Cyclery articles about Cyclecomputers by Sheldon Brown
Harris Cyclery articles about Cyclecomputers by Sheldon Brown
#5
The Improbable Bulk
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Wilkes-Barre, PA
Posts: 8,401
Bikes: Many
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times
in
3 Posts
Something is wrong...
Looking at 56-559
559 = 26"
56 = width (in mm) or about 2.2 inches
So, I would expect to see something like 26 x 2.2
I have noticed that some tire manufacturers are confusing things by applying measurements, and who knows, theirs may be more sensible, but if you look at Sheldon's site noted above, you'll see we already have enough different ways to get confused.
However, the 56-559 should be the most "standard" thing related to size in what you show.
Looking at 56-559
559 = 26"
56 = width (in mm) or about 2.2 inches
So, I would expect to see something like 26 x 2.2
I have noticed that some tire manufacturers are confusing things by applying measurements, and who knows, theirs may be more sensible, but if you look at Sheldon's site noted above, you'll see we already have enough different ways to get confused.
However, the 56-559 should be the most "standard" thing related to size in what you show.
__________________
Slow Ride Cyclists of NEPA
People do not seem to realize that their opinion of the world is also a confession of character.
- Ralph Waldo Emerson
Slow Ride Cyclists of NEPA
People do not seem to realize that their opinion of the world is also a confession of character.
- Ralph Waldo Emerson
#6
Life is good
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Not far from the Withlacoochee Trail. 🚴🏻
Posts: 18,211
Bikes: 2018 Lynskey Helix Pro
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 522 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 6 Times
in
6 Posts
The manual/instructions that came with the computer should have a list with tire sizes and the corresponding number you'll need to enter into the computer when setting it up.
If you don't have the manual/instructions they're probably online. What computer did you get? Brand and model.
If you don't have the manual/instructions they're probably online. What computer did you get? Brand and model.
__________________
The Lord is merciful and gracious, slow to anger and abounding in steadfast love. - Psalm 103:8
I am a cyclist. I am not the fastest or the fittest. But I will get to where I'm going with a smile on my face.
The Lord is merciful and gracious, slow to anger and abounding in steadfast love. - Psalm 103:8
I am a cyclist. I am not the fastest or the fittest. But I will get to where I'm going with a smile on my face.
#7
Newbie
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 3
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Yes, I have the direction paper and it says that I can calculate the tyre circumference by multiplying my tire diameter by 3.1416
And then there's a list of mosto common cicle tyres circumferences..
20'' = 1598mm
22'' = 1759mm
24'' = 1916mm
26'' (650A) = 2073mm etc.
But what I should multiply? My computer accept 3 numbers to fill it. The 2 first are big and the third smaller.
And then there's a list of mosto common cicle tyres circumferences..
20'' = 1598mm
22'' = 1759mm
24'' = 1916mm
26'' (650A) = 2073mm etc.
But what I should multiply? My computer accept 3 numbers to fill it. The 2 first are big and the third smaller.
Last edited by popcorns; 03-26-14 at 01:22 PM.
#8
The Improbable Bulk
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Wilkes-Barre, PA
Posts: 8,401
Bikes: Many
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times
in
3 Posts
I searched for: circumference of 56-559 tire
And found this: https://202.215.251.86/data/resources...e_chart_v2.pdf
And it lists 2068 for 55-559 and 2070 for 57-559, so you can use 2069
And found this: https://202.215.251.86/data/resources...e_chart_v2.pdf
And it lists 2068 for 55-559 and 2070 for 57-559, so you can use 2069
__________________
Slow Ride Cyclists of NEPA
People do not seem to realize that their opinion of the world is also a confession of character.
- Ralph Waldo Emerson
Slow Ride Cyclists of NEPA
People do not seem to realize that their opinion of the world is also a confession of character.
- Ralph Waldo Emerson
#9
Newbie
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 3
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I searched for: circumference of 56-559 tire
And found this: https://202.215.251.86/data/resources...e_chart_v2.pdf
And it lists 2068 for 55-559 and 2070 for 57-559, so you can use 2069
And found this: https://202.215.251.86/data/resources...e_chart_v2.pdf
And it lists 2068 for 55-559 and 2070 for 57-559, so you can use 2069
Thank you all for your help!


#10
Señor Member
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 5,048
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 632 Post(s)
Liked 275 Times
in
200 Posts
the easiest and most accurate way to figure out your wheel circumference
is a roll out test
put the bike with the valve on the front wheel at the bottom of the rotation
and put a mark on the ground beside it
then roll the bike forward until the valve is at the bottom again and mark that point
then measure between the two marks
this is most accurate if you are sitting on the bike during this test
but i dont think it makes a noticeable difference
is a roll out test
put the bike with the valve on the front wheel at the bottom of the rotation
and put a mark on the ground beside it
then roll the bike forward until the valve is at the bottom again and mark that point
then measure between the two marks
this is most accurate if you are sitting on the bike during this test
but i dont think it makes a noticeable difference
#11
rebmeM roineS
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Metro Indy, IN
Posts: 16,012
Bikes: Bacchetta Giro A20, RANS V-Rex, RANS Screamer
Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 602 Post(s)
Liked 251 Times
in
163 Posts
the easiest and most accurate way to figure out your wheel circumference
is a roll out test
put the bike with the valve on the front wheel at the bottom of the rotation
and put a mark on the ground beside it
then roll the bike forward until the valve is at the bottom again and mark that point
then measure between the two marks
this is most accurate if you are sitting on the bike during this test
but i dont think it makes a noticeable difference
is a roll out test
put the bike with the valve on the front wheel at the bottom of the rotation
and put a mark on the ground beside it
then roll the bike forward until the valve is at the bottom again and mark that point
then measure between the two marks
this is most accurate if you are sitting on the bike during this test
but i dont think it makes a noticeable difference
__________________
Bacchetta Giro A20, RANS V-Rex, RANS Screamer
Bacchetta Giro A20, RANS V-Rex, RANS Screamer
#13
The Improbable Bulk
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Wilkes-Barre, PA
Posts: 8,401
Bikes: Many
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times
in
3 Posts
A difference of a few mm is not a big deal for most riders. Assuming a true measurement of 2000 mm entering any random number between 1980 and 2020 is less than 1% off....
However, if accuracy is critical, you should measure the rollout of several revolutions, while sitting on the bike with any equipment and accessories you normally carry. If you do as an example 7 revolutions, measure total rollout to the nearest mm and divide by 7. To ensure even closer accuracy, this should be done at the usual riding speed on the usual surface you ride, and should be redone periodically to allow for tire wear.
Then after that, you should still realize that it is just an estimate, since a bicycle trip involves a little side to side motion which will reduce accuracy.
However, if accuracy is critical, you should measure the rollout of several revolutions, while sitting on the bike with any equipment and accessories you normally carry. If you do as an example 7 revolutions, measure total rollout to the nearest mm and divide by 7. To ensure even closer accuracy, this should be done at the usual riding speed on the usual surface you ride, and should be redone periodically to allow for tire wear.
Then after that, you should still realize that it is just an estimate, since a bicycle trip involves a little side to side motion which will reduce accuracy.

__________________
Slow Ride Cyclists of NEPA
People do not seem to realize that their opinion of the world is also a confession of character.
- Ralph Waldo Emerson
Slow Ride Cyclists of NEPA
People do not seem to realize that their opinion of the world is also a confession of character.
- Ralph Waldo Emerson
#14
Banned
Its all about circumference. all the computer does is count rotations ..
measure .. mark the sidewalk when the valve stem is at the bottom
roll the wheel once . ideally you are sitting on it. to compress the tire.
and then measure the difference between the 2 marks on the sidewalk .
you can ride thru a dog poo-pile and then the next time that deposit on the tire
marks the sidewalk again would do the same..
measure .. mark the sidewalk when the valve stem is at the bottom
roll the wheel once . ideally you are sitting on it. to compress the tire.
and then measure the difference between the 2 marks on the sidewalk .
you can ride thru a dog poo-pile and then the next time that deposit on the tire
marks the sidewalk again would do the same..
#15
Senior Member
You've already gotten the correct answers. 56x559 is a regular 26" mountain bike tire, with a width of 56mm or, actually, 2.2 inches. A roll-out will be the most accurate method of determining the actual circumference, which is what the bike computer will need. Most roadies try to get within 1%. IMHO being 10% off would render the speedo almost useless; but maybe for a mountain bike it's all you need, which can be done by calculation.
The wheel's height will be the diameter of the rim plus twice the diameter (roughly, although different rim widths will affect that measurement.) So, 559mm + 112mm = 671mm. The circumference is that times pi, or 671 X 3.14 = 2107 (the computer won't accept fractions, even if tenths of millimeters would be too small to measure with a tape.)
Where the accurate measurements become a problem is in tire deflection, which depends on pressure and load. A properly-inflated tire will compress by about 10-15% with the rider on it. Even more than that if you run your tires soft for extra traction or flotation. Not only can it can be tough to get an accurate roll-out unless you have someone helping you; if your tire pressure varies, so will your speedo's accuracy.
The wheel's height will be the diameter of the rim plus twice the diameter (roughly, although different rim widths will affect that measurement.) So, 559mm + 112mm = 671mm. The circumference is that times pi, or 671 X 3.14 = 2107 (the computer won't accept fractions, even if tenths of millimeters would be too small to measure with a tape.)
Where the accurate measurements become a problem is in tire deflection, which depends on pressure and load. A properly-inflated tire will compress by about 10-15% with the rider on it. Even more than that if you run your tires soft for extra traction or flotation. Not only can it can be tough to get an accurate roll-out unless you have someone helping you; if your tire pressure varies, so will your speedo's accuracy.
#16
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: southeastern PA - a mile west of Philadelphia
Posts: 430
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Hello,
I just bought a Bike Computer but I've stuck at the part with the inches. My tire has so many numbers.. But i've no idea what all these mean. If you could help me by telling me which of that is the inches.. I googled it but I didn't find a solution..
So, here is the numbers:
Pressure 40-65PSI 2.8-4.6kgf/cm2 280-460 KPa (56-559) 28x1.95 k-849-010



So, here is the numbers:
Pressure 40-65PSI 2.8-4.6kgf/cm2 280-460 KPa (56-559) 28x1.95 k-849-010


#17
Cathedral City, CA
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Cathedral City, CA
Posts: 1,504
Bikes: 2016 RITCHEY BreakAway (full Chorus 11), 2005 Ritchey BreakAway (full Chorus 11, STOLEN), 2001 Gary Fisher Tassajara mountain bike (sold), 2004 Giant TRC 2 road bike (sold)
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Brocephus
General Cycling Discussion
8
08-08-18 05:20 PM
DrRobert
Electronics, Lighting, & Gadgets
8
04-26-16 10:13 AM
totalnewbie
Road Cycling
19
08-20-13 04:50 PM
IndyTim
Bicycle Mechanics
11
08-18-10 02:55 PM