Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > General Cycling Discussion
Reload this Page >

aero brake type test:

Notices
General Cycling Discussion Have a cycling related question or comment that doesn't fit in one of the other specialty forums? Drop on in and post in here! When possible, please select the forum above that most fits your post!

aero brake type test:

Old 12-10-14, 09:32 PM
  #1  
sdmc530
Heft On Wheels
Thread Starter
 
sdmc530's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: South Dakota
Posts: 2,883

Bikes: Specialized,Cannondale,Argon 18

Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 785 Post(s)
Liked 389 Times in 260 Posts
aero brake type test:

Saw this on Bicycling.com and thought it was interesting. I just copied and pasted the article for all to read.

Do Disc Brakes Cost You Aero Speed? | Bicycling

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HXQuSnKkS-I


As disc brakes have gotten more popular on road bikes, the industry is slowly answering questions about their relevance for skinny-tire riders in terms of reliability, safety, power and, for performance-minded riders, aerodynamics.

Specialized, currently the only bike company with its own wind tunnel, attempted to answer that last question in the newest video in its “Wind Tunnel” series.

The company ran two identically equipped 2015 Tarmacs through its wind tunnel: one with conventional rim brakes and one with Shimano’s new R785 hydraulic brakes. The results may surprise you.

Head-on, there was no quantifiable difference in drag. Only when the bike was angled 10 degrees to simulate a sidewind did Specialized see a split. In this scenario, disc brakes are slightly slower.

How much? About eight seconds over a 26-mile course, the company estimates, based on an analysis that takes into account a wider variety of speeds than the standard 30mph wind-tunnel fan speed.

One interesting quirk: Since discs are only on the non-drive side of the bike, the aero deficit is most significant when the sidewind comes from the rider’s left. Chris Yu, Specialized’s aerodynamics engineer, said they found that when testing yaw on the drive side, the spinning wheels effectively shielded the brakes and minimized the difference.

So in the real world, where yaw angle (the direction of a sidewind) shifts dynamically depending on weather and terrain, the aero gap from rim to disc brakes may be even less. And, Yu reminds us in the video, the speed boost from being able to brake later, ride with more confidence, and better modulate speed could make up for the rest of the time difference.
sdmc530 is offline  
Old 12-10-14, 10:38 PM
  #2  
GhostSS
Senior Member
 
GhostSS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Hawaii
Posts: 639

Bikes: 2012 Switch Performance BlackSkin LE Urban, 2013 Leader 725, 1975 Fuji America, 1990 Giant Cadex 980c, 1986 Peugeot PH10LE, 1995 Trek 2120 Carbon ZX

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5 Post(s)
Liked 19 Times in 11 Posts
I remember when I used to be into motorsports the mantra was always "better brakes and traction in the corners will always beat straight line power and aerodynamics when on a track with actual turns" of course, it's best to have both, but I assume the loss in aero advantage can be made up for with the ability to brake later into the corners and better braking modulation.

EDIT
Must've been TL;DR, just realized I repeated what the article said in the last paragraph.

Last edited by GhostSS; 12-10-14 at 10:40 PM. Reason: TL;DR whoopsie
GhostSS is offline  
Old 12-11-14, 12:29 AM
  #3  
hueyhoolihan
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Above ground, Walnut Creek, Ca
Posts: 6,681

Bikes: 8 ss bikes, 1 5-speed touring bike

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 86 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
these kinds of tests are ridiculous (no disrespect to the OP for starting the thread though ). 30MPH? 26 miles? ya, right. we do that all the time.

i know why they do it though. they must test under completely unrealistic conditions in order to be able to measure the differences. they know it would sound foolish to test at, say, 18MPH for 5 miles (just as an example) and come up with, like, .6 seconds difference. i don't even know why they bother...
hueyhoolihan is offline  
Old 12-11-14, 10:29 AM
  #4  
fietsbob
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: NW,Oregon Coast
Posts: 43,599

Bikes: 8

Mentioned: 197 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7607 Post(s)
Liked 1,309 Times in 822 Posts
John Howard wheel sucking behind Don Vesco, on the Bonneville Salt Flats , the aerodynamics did not matter to John , like it did to Don.
fietsbob is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
sloar
Classic & Vintage
5
09-24-18 03:24 PM
PedalingAlong
Road Cycling
7
10-11-16 09:25 PM
kstryapko
Road Cycling
6
01-29-12 07:12 PM
roflmao147
Road Cycling
6
11-11-11 05:16 PM
jerry4
Framebuilders
6
04-26-11 05:53 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Do Not Sell My Personal Information -

Copyright © 2021 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.