Official Trek FX Thread
08-20-18, 02:52 PM
#1377
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: Northern Shenandoah Valley
Posts: 4,141
Bikes: More bikes than riders
Mentioned: 36 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1446 Post(s)
Liked 762 Times
in
570 Posts
The $659 Trek FX 3 is the closest current bike to the 7.4 FX. Like the 7.4, the FX 3 has an Alpha Gold aluminum frame, a carbon fork, rim brakes, and a 3x9 drivetrain.
The next model up in the current Trek FX line is the FX 3 Disc, at $779. It's basically the same as the FX 3, but with hydraulic disc brakes instead of rim brakes. It's priced about the same as the 7.4 FX was, but you get discs instead of rim brakes.
The next model beyond that is the Trek FX Sport 4, at $1,149. It still has an aluminum frame (and carbon fork), but drops the mountain groupsets on the 3 and below and goes with a road Tiagra groupset, with a road double crank (2x10). This is getting pretty far away from what the 2016 7.4 FX was.
The next model up in the current Trek FX line is the FX 3 Disc, at $779. It's basically the same as the FX 3, but with hydraulic disc brakes instead of rim brakes. It's priced about the same as the 7.4 FX was, but you get discs instead of rim brakes.
The next model beyond that is the Trek FX Sport 4, at $1,149. It still has an aluminum frame (and carbon fork), but drops the mountain groupsets on the 3 and below and goes with a road Tiagra groupset, with a road double crank (2x10). This is getting pretty far away from what the 2016 7.4 FX was.
08-20-18, 02:53 PM
#1378
BF's Resident Dumbass
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
Posts: 1,566
Bikes: 1990 Raleigh Flyer (size 21"); 2014 Trek 7.6 FX (size 15"); 2014 Trek 7.6 FX (size 17.5"); 2019 Dahon Mu D9; 2020 Dahon Hemingway D9
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 792 Post(s)
Liked 1,494 Times
in
496 Posts
08-20-18, 03:12 PM
#1379
BF's Resident Dumbass
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
Posts: 1,566
Bikes: 1990 Raleigh Flyer (size 21"); 2014 Trek 7.6 FX (size 15"); 2014 Trek 7.6 FX (size 17.5"); 2019 Dahon Mu D9; 2020 Dahon Hemingway D9
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 792 Post(s)
Liked 1,494 Times
in
496 Posts
And let's not forget that up until about the 2016 model year, the FX line used to be much simpler: you got the popular alloy models and the pricier carbon models, with each available in men's and women's geometries, and that was it. Choices were simpler and more straightforward. Today, just look at how many versions there are of the FX 2!
08-20-18, 07:55 PM
#1380
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Vacaville, CA
Posts: 947
Bikes: 2011 Trek FX 7.3 | 2015 Trek FX 7.4 | Lotus Classique
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 171 Post(s)
Liked 22 Times
in
16 Posts
I believe you Congaree, the S 4 would be my pick today.
Shook, I looked for that gray 7.4 but at year end couldn't find one in my size so got a white 7.4 like Jarrettein's. Your's looks handsome with the fenders properly installed. I'm surprised a shop would have sent it out with the first version, the type of work that has resulted in me never returning to a bike shop once I get the bike out of their hands.
Shook, I looked for that gray 7.4 but at year end couldn't find one in my size so got a white 7.4 like Jarrettein's. Your's looks handsome with the fenders properly installed. I'm surprised a shop would have sent it out with the first version, the type of work that has resulted in me never returning to a bike shop once I get the bike out of their hands.
I love my bike now that I have it the way I want it with a few mods. Nowadays I usually have a bike trailer attached to it and take my 2 year old to local parks but I love how it’s setup. Still speedy but absolutely practical around town.
And yes, I was pretty annoyed I had to bring the bike back to have the fenders done properly. This shop has been around a while and I’m sure I’m not the only one that’s gotten fenders installed there. I will still go there bc when I got my fx’s there, they all cane with “free lifetime adjustments” so I still have to go to the shop and play nice
08-20-18, 08:19 PM
#1383
Member
Join Date: Dec 2017
Posts: 27
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 16 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
If you can afford it, S4 is a lot better. Weight alone makes it up for the money.
And the Tiagra 4700, didn't realize how powerful it is till I did a 1900 ft climb and 50 miles last week. Coming from Verve 2, climbing hills is now a breeze
And the Tiagra 4700, didn't realize how powerful it is till I did a 1900 ft climb and 50 miles last week. Coming from Verve 2, climbing hills is now a breeze
08-20-18, 08:31 PM
#1384
Junior Member
Join Date: Aug 2018
Posts: 14
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 11 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Hoping to purchase this weekend if I get time....sounds like S4 is the go! I'm hoping I like the colour of the frame better in real life. In the pictures it looks a bit "meh" (maybe it's just me).
08-21-18, 06:28 AM
#1385
BF's Resident Dumbass
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
Posts: 1,566
Bikes: 1990 Raleigh Flyer (size 21"); 2014 Trek 7.6 FX (size 15"); 2014 Trek 7.6 FX (size 17.5"); 2019 Dahon Mu D9; 2020 Dahon Hemingway D9
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 792 Post(s)
Liked 1,494 Times
in
496 Posts
08-21-18, 10:57 AM
#1386
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Vacaville, CA
Posts: 947
Bikes: 2011 Trek FX 7.3 | 2015 Trek FX 7.4 | Lotus Classique
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 171 Post(s)
Liked 22 Times
in
16 Posts
08-21-18, 11:23 AM
#1387
BF's Resident Dumbass
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
Posts: 1,566
Bikes: 1990 Raleigh Flyer (size 21"); 2014 Trek 7.6 FX (size 15"); 2014 Trek 7.6 FX (size 17.5"); 2019 Dahon Mu D9; 2020 Dahon Hemingway D9
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 792 Post(s)
Liked 1,494 Times
in
496 Posts
Oh, I was just trying to warn the new guy that things could get ugly around here sometimes.
08-21-18, 04:29 PM
#1388
Junior Member
Join Date: Aug 2018
Posts: 14
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 11 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Out of interest, has anyone ridden a Giant Toughroad SLR 0 (or SLR 1).
Decent components, 50mm tires.
How does this compare to Trek FX Sport 4?
Decent components, 50mm tires.
How does this compare to Trek FX Sport 4?
08-21-18, 05:11 PM
#1389
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: iOWA
Posts: 388
Bikes: Yep
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 50 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 8 Times
in
8 Posts
I don't know Giant but 50mm tire compared to 32mm means the two bikes play different games. FastRoad at a glance looks and sounds closer to the S 4.
08-21-18, 05:39 PM
#1391
Junior Member
Join Date: Aug 2018
Posts: 14
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 11 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I intend to put 35mm tires on the FX S4 (G-One Speed's). Was just making sure that the Toughroad wasn't a better option as there is a new Giant opening down the road from me and they are having good discounts due to the opening of the store.
08-21-18, 05:40 PM
#1392
Member
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Greenville, SC
Posts: 37
Bikes: Trek FX S 4
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
I noticed that when researching different brands...the FastRoad SLR appears to be Giant's version of the Trek S4 (or vice-versa). But it's obvious that both Trek and Giant have produced basically the same bike. Probably performs about the same for the same price.
08-21-18, 08:53 PM
#1393
Member
Join Date: Dec 2017
Posts: 27
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 16 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
I am sure that tire will suit well. If you need options check out Bontrager H5 Hardcase ultimate as well. I replaced stock tire with this (32mm version) and couldn't be happier. Had this on my verve 2, liked it and hence used the same when I got S4
https://www.trekbikes.com/us/en_US/e...-tire/p/09389/
https://www.trekbikes.com/us/en_US/e...-tire/p/09389/
Cheers. Yeah I would say Toughroad is 80% off road and 20% on road (FX probably opposite). Sounds like FX would suit me better.
I intend to put 35mm tires on the FX S4 (G-One Speed's). Was just making sure that the Toughroad wasn't a better option as there is a new Giant opening down the road from me and they are having good discounts due to the opening of the store.
I intend to put 35mm tires on the FX S4 (G-One Speed's). Was just making sure that the Toughroad wasn't a better option as there is a new Giant opening down the road from me and they are having good discounts due to the opening of the store.
Last edited by grayslaker; 08-21-18 at 08:56 PM.
08-21-18, 10:17 PM
#1394
Junior Member
Join Date: Aug 2018
Posts: 14
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 11 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I am sure that tire will suit well. If you need options check out Bontrager H5 Hardcase ultimate as well. I replaced stock tire with this (32mm version) and couldn't be happier. Had this on my verve 2, liked it and hence used the same when I got S4
https://www.trekbikes.com/us/en_US/e...-tire/p/09389/
https://www.trekbikes.com/us/en_US/e...-tire/p/09389/
08-22-18, 04:25 AM
#1395
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: iOWA
Posts: 388
Bikes: Yep
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 50 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 8 Times
in
8 Posts
I'm one of those people who can ride the hell out of a bike but is utterly incompetent on anything more mechanically sophisticated than changing a tire or adjusting a seat, so bear with me if I ask some stupid questions. Please note--I do not want advice on my shifting/riding style, which I know is highly unusual and one that I've adopted through a lifetime of trial and error. I have short stocky legs, and this works really well for me.
I have a 2017 FX 3, and I spend well over 90% of my riding time on the large chain ring. I go up most hills on the large chain ring. It is 48T. My smallest gear in the rear is 11T. I actually use the 48X11 quite a bit running level, not just downhill. I feel like I actually could make use of a higher gear ratio.
Everything on the drive train except the pedals is the original stock equipment on the bike.
So my questions are: 1) Can I replace the 48T ring on my particular bike without having to change a whole lot of the rest of the drive train? What else, if anything, would I have to change?
2) How much of a difference would I feel between 50 x 11 and 48 x 11?
I have a 2017 FX 3, and I spend well over 90% of my riding time on the large chain ring. I go up most hills on the large chain ring. It is 48T. My smallest gear in the rear is 11T. I actually use the 48X11 quite a bit running level, not just downhill. I feel like I actually could make use of a higher gear ratio.
Everything on the drive train except the pedals is the original stock equipment on the bike.
So my questions are: 1) Can I replace the 48T ring on my particular bike without having to change a whole lot of the rest of the drive train? What else, if anything, would I have to change?
2) How much of a difference would I feel between 50 x 11 and 48 x 11?
Likes For sail:
08-22-18, 05:59 AM
#1396
Senior Member
Cheers. Yeah I would say Toughroad is 80% off road and 20% on road (FX probably opposite). Sounds like FX would suit me better.
I intend to put 35mm tires on the FX S4 (G-One Speed's). Was just making sure that the Toughroad wasn't a better option as there is a new Giant opening down the road from me and they are having good discounts due to the opening of the store.
I intend to put 35mm tires on the FX S4 (G-One Speed's). Was just making sure that the Toughroad wasn't a better option as there is a new Giant opening down the road from me and they are having good discounts due to the opening of the store.
08-22-18, 08:57 AM
#1397
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Vacaville, CA
Posts: 947
Bikes: 2011 Trek FX 7.3 | 2015 Trek FX 7.4 | Lotus Classique
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 171 Post(s)
Liked 22 Times
in
16 Posts
I've mulled over converting my drivetrain to shimano 105 like the higher end fx model but i think i would miss the 3rd chainring...
Last edited by sh00k; 08-22-18 at 09:19 AM.
08-22-18, 12:40 PM
#1398
Member
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Greenville, SC
Posts: 37
Bikes: Trek FX S 4
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Congaree (and other FX S 4 and up owners) just wondering if you've taken your fx s 4 on any hills? I ask because your bike has 2 chain rings and I wanted to know if those 2 are enough for some steep climbs... my 7.4 fx came with a triple that i absolutely love - gears that perfect for climbing and for good speed on the flats.
I've mulled over converting my drivetrain to shimano 105 like the higher end fx model but i think i would miss the 3rd chainring...
I've mulled over converting my drivetrain to shimano 105 like the higher end fx model but i think i would miss the 3rd chainring...
08-22-18, 01:36 PM
#1399
Tragically Ignorant
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: New England
Posts: 15,613
Bikes: Serotta Atlanta; 1994 Specialized Allez Pro; Giant OCR A1; SOMA Double Cross Disc; 2022 Allez Elite mit der SRAM
Mentioned: 62 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8186 Post(s)
Liked 9,098 Times
in
5,054 Posts
Just saw this with no reply, Here is a gear calculator.https://www.sheldonbrown.com/gear-calc.html Difference between 48 and 50 not huge but noticeable. 117.8 inches compared to 122.7 inches, you could probably use the calculator to find this increment in your lower gears to feel the difference for some idea. But in looking at Acera if thats what you have I only see 48 and 44 large chain rings. If there is a 50 available the only other change would be possibly the need to add a few chain lengths and slight adjustment of front derailleur, but you might need to change the whole crank. Search ebay and shops for your crank. If the same group no problem and not real expensive but to change the crank to another 3x9 of a different group there could be bottom bracket compatibility.
Yeah, thanks for the informative response! I ended up buying a N+1 road bike with a 53x12 combination, which I have also been contemplating. I haven't ridden drop bars in 20+ years, but I test rode it and think I can adapt. So for now, I'm going to put off frankenbiking the FX drive train.
Looks like Trek is going to max out at 50T for all of their lines gong forward, btw.
08-23-18, 08:40 AM
#1400
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Vacaville, CA
Posts: 947
Bikes: 2011 Trek FX 7.3 | 2015 Trek FX 7.4 | Lotus Classique
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 171 Post(s)
Liked 22 Times
in
16 Posts
oh how things have changed... I used to live in the city and rode this fx (and my other ones: 7.2, 7.3, 7.7) around town... now i'm in the burbs and pulling a kiddy trailer with my 7.4 
the roads by me are 98% perfect so i am using nice and light 25mm tires on my fx, a huge difference from the 32mm that it came with. without the trailer, i can ride the bike 30 miles before getting tired thanks to the tires
I've even been debating attaching the kiddy trailer to my $3,800 16-pound carbon Trek Emonda SL6... Just because I like the contrast/irony of it haha
the roads by me are 98% perfect so i am using nice and light 25mm tires on my fx, a huge difference from the 32mm that it came with. without the trailer, i can ride the bike 30 miles before getting tired thanks to the tires
I've even been debating attaching the kiddy trailer to my $3,800 16-pound carbon Trek Emonda SL6... Just because I like the contrast/irony of it haha
Last edited by sh00k; 08-23-18 at 11:16 AM.