![]() |
2016 Diamondback Interval ?
1 Attachment(s)
Opinions about this bike? I don't see it mentioned on this forum much at all (or I missed it) but I do notice that a google search seems to be carefully showing only what appear to be 'sponsored' links and not a lot of first hand experience by mortals. :-)
Diamondback Bicycles - Interval Carbon http://bikeforums.net/attachment.php...hmentid=502536 |
Nice looking bike!
|
20lbs 8oz
|
Looks nice, light
Cons: it ain't much of a climber, the transmission is more for flat roads, and hills, no mountains. I dont know whether you can fit bigger tyres, I prefer 700x35 instead of 28... but you may be fine with it. |
Also I noticed that the cables are routed externally. Seems that at this price point the competing carbon frames route internally.
|
and no palm rests on the grips
|
On the plus side it is the only carbon flat bar frame that I know of that incorporates rack mounts. It that is important to you.
|
Not really. I use Revelate frame bags if I need to transport stuff.
What do you think about the rest of the components for this price range?
Originally Posted by DowneasTTer
(Post 18513504)
On the plus side it is the only carbon flat bar frame that I know of that incorporates rack mounts. It that is important to you.
|
Originally Posted by PedalingWalrus
(Post 18513526)
Not really. I use Revelate frame bags if I need to transport stuff.
What do you think about the rest of the components for this price range? Good luck on your choice. As the real fun begins when you own it.... |
Originally Posted by CadenceBoy
(Post 18513245)
Looks nice, light
Cons: it ain't much of a climber, the transmission is more for flat roads, and hills, no mountains. I dont know whether you can fit bigger tyres, I prefer 700x35 instead of 28... but you may be fine with it. |
Originally Posted by PedalingWalrus
(Post 18513487)
Also I noticed that the cables are routed externally. Seems that at this price point the competing carbon frames route internally.
|
Thanks for the correction. Would be nice to find one locally. On the dealer map they show Dicks Sporting Goods and Sports Authority but browsing those web sites doesn't show this bike.
Originally Posted by FrozenBiker
(Post 18513731)
That is the rear brake hose. The derailleur cables are routed internally.
|
|
Originally Posted by PedalingWalrus
(Post 18513772)
Thanks for the correction. Would be nice to find one locally. On the dealer map they show Dicks Sporting Goods and Sports Authority but browsing those web sites doesn't show this bike.
|
Agreed. The thing is I (I) don't really need a bike ;-) but I am now looking for something that would fit well with my significant other as well as something that could do a double duty for me or my kids with the emphasis that it would be fitted and it would have the looks that she approves. :-)
I'm not only looking at carbon bikes, however, I am also eyeing some older frames on craigslist or ebay that would fit the bill. This Diamondback is just one of the considerations.
Originally Posted by MRT2
(Post 18513973)
Keep in mind you aren't just buying the bike but rather, you are buying the services of the bike shop as well. On paper, the Diamondback looks like a nice, fairly light flat bar road bike. If this is what you are looking for, worth putting on the list. If your LBS doesn't carry the Diamondback, they probably carry something similar.
|
Looks like a decent bike but priced a tad high. Interesting that Performance calls it a road bike. Diamondback is still a respectable brand and has been introducing some sweet looking rides lately.
|
Originally Posted by yashinon
(Post 18516446)
Looks like a decent bike but priced a tad high. Interesting that Performance calls it a road bike. Diamondback is still a respectable brand and has been introducing some sweet looking rides lately.
|
Originally Posted by CadenceBoy
(Post 18513245)
Looks nice, light
Cons: it ain't much of a climber, the transmission is more for flat roads, and hills, no mountains. I dont know whether you can fit bigger tyres, I prefer 700x35 instead of 28... but you may be fine with it. |
Originally Posted by trailangel
(Post 18513681)
HUH? 34 in front and a 30 in the rear is a 30 inch gear.... you can't climb anything with that? You could get off and walk faster.....Wimp!!
Originally Posted by wphamilton
(Post 18516519)
How so? It's light and got a compact crank and 12-30 cogset, way more gear than you'd need unless you're climbing mountains in Colorado or something.
|
Could you perhaps cite bikes that have similar or better componentry costing less?
Thanks.
Originally Posted by yashinon
(Post 18516446)
Looks like a decent bike but priced a tad high. Interesting that Performance calls it a road bike. Diamondback is still a respectable brand and has been introducing some sweet looking rides lately.
|
Originally Posted by PedalingWalrus
(Post 18519441)
Could you perhaps cite bikes that have similar or better componentry costing less?
Thanks. |
Thanks. I have checked surrounding LBS stores but none had their in stock. I agree with you the Comax looks great. If the price is indeed matched or better for same quality of components then I would rather get the Comax.
However, I just purchased a used frame for Lemond Poprad. I will be building that up instead (hybrid style). I might start a thread on that when I get the frame at home. Cheers. |
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:37 PM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.