Two hybrids
 

2011 Jamis Coda or 2011 Trek 7.2?

I like the Coda, because it has skinnier tires which probably will make it roll faster than the 7.2. I like the 7.2, because it has a one step up in derailleurs. Both bike looks great and are the same price. Which is $499 in my area.

It's almost spring time, so it's time for me to finally decide to which bike to get.

Thanks in advance.

Don't base your decision on the spec list. Ride them both, then buy the one your body likes better.

^^^^^ This. Get fit to both, (test) ride both as much as you can; pick the one that 'speaks' to you. That is all that matters.

I think those are close enough that(assuming you like the way both of them ride) you're in "flip a coin" or "I like this color better" territory. I'd probably pick the Coda because I'm biased in favor of chromoly and generally like skinnier tires better but fatter tires have good qualities, too.

IMHO

Not only will you thoroughly enjoy riding your award-winning Jamis Coda Sport, but you'll be able to pass that same miraculous bicycle to your grandkids, provided that you keep it dry and ride it responsibly.

I own a Trek 7.5FX. It doesn't feel as comfortable as the Coda Sport, nor does it ride as smoothly. Furthermore, you won't be passing it on to any of your grandkids, if you ride it with any regularity at all.

- Slim :)

PS.

However, don't just take my word for it. Try them both out for yourself and come to your own conclusion.

It won't take/cost much to fit skinnier tyres on the Trek...

The Jamis is more appealing to the eyes.

Jamis Coda looks more stylish. Cro-Mo rule

The cost to put different tires on the Trek won't be that much and even if you get the Jamis you may decide that you want better tires on that bike as well. Personally I like the Matte Black look on that 7.2 over the Jamis but everybody has their own opinion. My cousin has a 7.2 and I like it alot and both of my bikes are Trek so I might be a little biased toward the Trek but I would say ride both and see what you like better. Remember nobody making the comments is riding the bike so you gotta go with what you like rather than what everybody else likes.

The good news here is that there really isn't a bad choice.

I prefer the feel of the steel frame (Jamis Coda) over the stiffer feel of an aluminum frame. Steel seems to absorb the road buzz better and gives a smoother feeling ride. Just my personal preference. Both bikes you're considering are nice, so you can't go wrong either way.
Ciao

I owned a 2009 Coda Sport and just got a 2011 7.5FX. I don't really notice a smoothness difference between the two and the geometries are similar so comfort is pretty close. I did notice the extra weight of steel when climbing. The 7.2FX doesn't have a carbon fork so you may feel extra vibration over rough pavement. Test drive both if you can and buy the one you like better.

The Jamis Coda weights about 26 lbs. What's the weight on the Trek 7.2?

The store in my area doesn't have the metallic charcoal and chi red in my size. They only have the champagne color in my size and the color that I wanted is the metallic charcoal.

True, I got a Schwinn 1987 Sienna and it's chro-mo. It's still in pretty good shape.

It's the 2011 model and it is not available in matte black for the year.

FYI, the 2012 Jamis Coda Sport "does not" have a carbon fiber fork, that was the 2011 model. To get the carbon fiber fork for 2012 you have to step up to the "Coda Comp"!

http://www.evanscycles.com/products/...20760#features
This link says 26.49 lbs. for the 2010 7.2FX. I'd expect the 2011 to be about the same. Weights given in specification lists aren't very useful though because you don't know what size bike the weight applies to. They're probably okay for comparing weights within a particular company's offerings but beyond that, I wouldn't rely on them. A pound or two difference in weight isn't something to be concerned about anyway, if you like the bike.

I have a 2012 Trek 7.5FX with disc in 17.5" frame. With M520 clipless pedals, my bike weighs 23-24 lbs. YMMV. The fork isn't carbon and the discs add weight. You might be able to get your LBS to weigh the bikes for you. Or bring your bathroom/luggage scale shopping with you :-)

Here's something I found. Says a 15" 2011 Trek 7.2FX weighs 25 lbs. 10 oz.

http://forums.bicycletutor.com/thread-3688.html

More 7.2fX weight's from the following thread: 2012 models 17.5" - 26.4lbs ; 20" - 26.6lbs. I'd be surprised if the all steel Coda Sport wasn't a good 2-3lbs heavier measured on a scale (not manufacturer spec.) When I bought my Coda Sport I test rode a 7.3FX and it definitely felt lighter.

http://www.bikeforums.net/showthread...ht=weigh+7.2fx

More actual bike weights: http://www.thebicycleescape.com/bicycleweights.html

No 2011s left in my area BUT I did recently buy the 2012 7.2 FX and love it. Looks great (matte black), rides great and gears shift smoothly. Oh, not sure what it actually weighs but it is light.....:thumb:

Is it quick?
I want a bike that is smooth riding, shifts good and plus is quick.

Hey there ChowChow,

Tell ya what. Just go to a Trek dealership. Try the top of the line Trek FX that they have in stock. Then go to a Jamis dealership and test-ride the entry-level Coda Sport. Next, test-ride the Coda Comp and the Elite. Then make your decision as to which bike suits your fancy.

You want quick? ...The Coda is one of the quickest! ____You want smooth? ...It is one of the smoothest!

Never rode a Jamis that didn't shift well!

- Slim :)