Cycling and bicycle discussion forums. 
   Click here to join our community Log in to access your Control Panel  

Go Back   > >

Hybrid Bicycles Where else would you go to discuss these fun, versatile bikes?

User Tag List

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 07-09-12, 12:48 PM   #1
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 30
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Thoughts on Norco Ceres & Civia Hyland

I know these "which one is better" threads can be a bit repetitive and annoying, so I'll try and approach this a different way.

Between the Norco Ceres and the Civia Hyland, what are advantages/disadvantages you see? I can get the Ceres for $1,199 and the Hyland for $1,100 and I guess I lean more towards the Ceres because of the belt drive and maybe the looks, which I know have nothing to do with the performance though certainly are nice if you're going to be dropping that much on a bike! They're both outstanding bikes and I fell in love with the Alfine hubs at first shift but each offers +/- in my book. The bike will be used primarily for exercise riding roads/paths and some riding around in more urban environments and I'm hoping to ride it a bunch in all but the most nasty of weather. I chose a hybrid (and these 2 for a comparison) mostly for more of the upright riding position and quality of the frames/components; drop bars and road bikes just don't feel that great to me, especially since I'm 6'2 200lb. I'm biting the bullet and buying more upfront than I maybe should, simply because I want something quality that will last and I can rely on to be dependable and consistent.

Here are the main differences between the two that I would love to hear your thoughts on and why one feature is more desirable than another, knowing how I'll be using the bike.

- Steel vs. aluminum frame (will one be more suited for the riding I want to do)
- Belt vs. chain (don't want to start the "belt drives rule/suck" argument, it's more of knowing that the Hyland can never accept a belt drive without cutting the frame and is the added $100 expense of the Ceres worthwhile not only to have a belt-drive from the get-go but knowing that it can take a belt and the Hyland cannot)
- Fenders/rack vs nothing (will it make a big deal to me not having fenders and a rack, knowing that I'm not commuting or touring with the bike)

That's about all I can identify as the bikes are pretty similarly equipped past that and both wonderful bikes for that price; don't think I can go wrong either way. I chuckle how my budget has doubled through the selection process and my wants/needs in a bike have changed after just a handful of test rides, but I guess that's why you test ride...sure would be nice if your budget went DOWN after doing test rides! HA!
bmills313 is offline   Reply With Quote

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:50 PM.

We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to and affiliated sites.
  • Ask a Question
    get answers from real people!
Click to start entering your question.