Could rising gas prices kill the suburbs?
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 7,143
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 261 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 11 Times
in
10 Posts
Could rising gas prices kill the suburbs?
https://realestate.msn.com/buying/Art...42526>1=8479
Here's a good article on MSN.com about how gas prices could kill the suburban commuter. The figure below caught my eye because I could not even dream of paying that much for transportation each month. My entire monthly savings would have to pay for an expensive engine.
From the article:
<<<<Assuming a full-time job, $3 gas, 26 mpg and 50 cents a mile for maintenance and no parking fees, a 50-mile roundtrip commute costs $646.15 a month, or $7,753.80 a year, according to the City of Bellevue, Wash.'s, Commute Cost Calculator<<<<<
Here's a good article on MSN.com about how gas prices could kill the suburban commuter. The figure below caught my eye because I could not even dream of paying that much for transportation each month. My entire monthly savings would have to pay for an expensive engine.
From the article:
<<<<Assuming a full-time job, $3 gas, 26 mpg and 50 cents a mile for maintenance and no parking fees, a 50-mile roundtrip commute costs $646.15 a month, or $7,753.80 a year, according to the City of Bellevue, Wash.'s, Commute Cost Calculator<<<<<
#2
GATC
We had an acquaintance at least partly driven (so to speak) to bankruptcy by trying to feed their GMC Yukon for a 50 mile each way commute back when gas was... well, certainly under $3, but maybe even under $2 (can't remember back that far; this was late 01/early 02). I'm sure debt service on their truck was a much bigger contributor to their overall hole than just gas, but at that point they were buying a *lot* of gas. At 30mpg, biking is saving me ~2-3 gal a week, nothing to sneeze at, but not a big part of our financial picture. Then again, I guess we're not out in the burbs, the exact point of the article.
#3
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 211
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Eventually rising prices will change the suburbs. but we are nowhere near that point. Do the math:
50cents per mile x 50 miles = $25 maintenance
$3 / 26mpg x 50 = $5.77 gas
When you consider that the 50 cents per mile figure generally includes depreciation, and most people are going to have similar depreciation even after cutting miles it just isn't worth it. That article fails to look at the true cost to an individual of a drive like that. That 50 mile drive is at least an hour also.
$30 per hour
$25 maintenance
$5.77 gas
$60.77 per day x 5 days x 50 weeks = $15192
50cents per mile x 50 miles = $25 maintenance
$3 / 26mpg x 50 = $5.77 gas
When you consider that the 50 cents per mile figure generally includes depreciation, and most people are going to have similar depreciation even after cutting miles it just isn't worth it. That article fails to look at the true cost to an individual of a drive like that. That 50 mile drive is at least an hour also.
$30 per hour
$25 maintenance
$5.77 gas
$60.77 per day x 5 days x 50 weeks = $15192
#4
Senior Citizen
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: no
Posts: 1,346
Bikes: yes
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
If we had no cars that got better than 26mpg, then sure, those with long commutes would force people to find closer work or quit. But we're not there yet.
#5
Geosynchronous Falconeer
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Sacramento, CA
Posts: 6,312
Bikes: 2006 Raleigh Rush Hour, Campy Habanero Team Ti, Soma Double Cross
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
We can only hope.
__________________
Bring the pain.
Bring the pain.
#6
Sophomoric Member
Originally Posted by recursive
We can only hope.
Actually the suburbs probably won't die. I see 3 scenarios that are more likely:
1. Since the rich people will now want to ride on public transit, the governments will have a sudden change of course and pour billions into plush new light rail systems so the burbanites can continue to go into the city to work and do lunch and a matinee.
2. Housing prices will crash in the 'burbs and rise in the core cities. The rich will enjoy city living. The poor will be forced to live in the suburbs, 3 or 4 families in each decaying McMansion, and they'll commute to jobs in the city on rusty old hybrid buses. 1...2...3...Everybody switch houses!
3. We won't make any changes at all, the climate will go to hell, and billions of people will die off. The survivors will rocket to Mercury for a cooler climate.
I guess I see # 3 as the most likely outcome. But maybe I'm just having a bad day.
2. Housing prices will crash in the 'burbs and rise in the core cities. The rich will enjoy city living. The poor will be forced to live in the suburbs, 3 or 4 families in each decaying McMansion, and they'll commute to jobs in the city on rusty old hybrid buses. 1...2...3...Everybody switch houses!
3. We won't make any changes at all, the climate will go to hell, and billions of people will die off. The survivors will rocket to Mercury for a cooler climate.
__________________
"Think Outside the Cage"
#7
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Glendora, CA USA
Posts: 364
Bikes: Easy Racers EZ-1 and Lightning Thunderbolt Recumbent Bikes
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
This is a very real question for me.
I live in the burbs, and will be here
til they plant me. So, whatever
happens I will have to survive.
I am building a strategy around
being Car Free, and commuting
around on one of my 2 bikes or
Rhoades Car (for shopping) and
then get a Folder for the Bus so
I can take extended trips into major
cities and still have a method to get
around 'downtown.'
I am happy to say,... I am ready
and able to take on that challenge.
I live in the burbs, and will be here
til they plant me. So, whatever
happens I will have to survive.
I am building a strategy around
being Car Free, and commuting
around on one of my 2 bikes or
Rhoades Car (for shopping) and
then get a Folder for the Bus so
I can take extended trips into major
cities and still have a method to get
around 'downtown.'
I am happy to say,... I am ready
and able to take on that challenge.
#8
Senior Member
I agree that higher gas prices will at the very least force suburban commuters to adapt, either by using more efficient cars or moving closer to work. There are exceptions of course; some people have enough money that the cost of fuel isn't even an issue, but these are the minority.
Books like Suburban Nation and urban planners have been arguing that the growth of suburbs was inefficient and myopic. As a consequence of suburbanization, most cities were built more for autos than they are for people, and now, as a country, we are suffering the consequences.
Books like Suburban Nation and urban planners have been arguing that the growth of suburbs was inefficient and myopic. As a consequence of suburbanization, most cities were built more for autos than they are for people, and now, as a country, we are suffering the consequences.
#9
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 193
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Option number 2 is the one that actually makes economic sense, Roody. I interpret three layers in the near-future of energy austerity: wealth flying to the cities (with some pretty scary security arrangements, which we're seeing in Chicago already with blinking cameras on a growing number of high-crime street corners etc), and the poor breaking their bank to heat and drive to decaying suburban communities, while in more rural settings (and indeed at a low level everywhere) people experiment with eco-villages, community supported agriculture and other more durable solutions.
#10
Pedaled too far.
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: La Petite Roche
Posts: 12,851
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 11 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 7 Times
in
7 Posts
Originally Posted by Roody
Amen brother!
Actually the suburbs probably won't die. I see 3 scenarios that are more likely:
Actually the suburbs probably won't die. I see 3 scenarios that are more likely:
1. Since the rich people will now want to ride on public transit, the governments will have a sudden change of course and pour billions into plush new light rail systems so the burbanites can continue to go into the city to work and do lunch and a matinee.
2. Housing prices will crash in the 'burbs and rise in the core cities. The rich will enjoy city living. The poor will be forced to live in the suburbs, 3 or 4 families in each decaying McMansion, and they'll commute to jobs in the city on rusty old hybrid buses. 1...2...3...Everybody switch houses!
3. We won't make any changes at all, the climate will go to hell, and billions of people will die off. The survivors will rocket to Mercury for a cooler climate.
2. Housing prices will crash in the 'burbs and rise in the core cities. The rich will enjoy city living. The poor will be forced to live in the suburbs, 3 or 4 families in each decaying McMansion, and they'll commute to jobs in the city on rusty old hybrid buses. 1...2...3...Everybody switch houses!
3. We won't make any changes at all, the climate will go to hell, and billions of people will die off. The survivors will rocket to Mercury for a cooler climate.
#11
Mad scientist w/a wrench
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Chucktown
Posts: 760
Bikes: none working atm
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I'm rooting for the idea of homogenization of the suburbs (read: tearing down a few houses to build businesses,community farms,shops,etc bringing the "city" back into the burbs)
#12
Junior Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Boston
Posts: 81
Bikes: Too numerous to note
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Will Rising Gas Prices Kill the Suburbs
Not for a long time: the new Smart for the US will arrive in late 2007, getting 62+ mpg using a small turbodiesel engine and costing $15k or so. That's a whole lot more reasonable than a $40k Suburban getting 17 mpg. People will adapt.
#13
Plays in traffic
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 6,971
Bikes: 1996 Litespeed Classic, 2006 Trek Portland, 2013 Ribble Winter/Audax, 2016 Giant Talon 4
Mentioned: 21 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 76 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 14 Times
in
9 Posts
Originally Posted by Roody
1. Since the rich people will now want to ride on public transit, the governments will have a sudden change of course and pour billions into plush new light rail systems so the burbanites can continue to go into the city to work and do lunch and a matinee.
It was the tipping-point that got me off the bus and on to a bike. I didn't want to subsidize suburban SUV owners. Of course, in this first year of bike ownership with buying the bike, all the accessories, and whatnot, my transportation expenses are higher than they would be on the bus, but in the long haul it will work out.
#14
Senior Member
With credit cards topping off due to $ 400 a month gasoline bills, I think suburbs being abandoned a possibility. If alternative transportation were available, maybe this would have been avoided. Commuting to the suburbs is like everything else. It costs to commute. When no longer financially do-able, it will eventually go the way of the dinosaurs.
#15
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 7,143
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 261 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 11 Times
in
10 Posts
Originally Posted by Roody
2. Housing prices will crash in the 'burbs and rise in the core cities. The rich will enjoy city living. The poor will be forced to live in the suburbs, 3 or 4 families in each decaying McMansion, and they'll commute to jobs in the city on rusty old hybrid buses. 1...2...3...Everybody switch houses!
#16
Velocipedic Practitioner
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 488
Bikes: Specialized Sirrus, Bianchi Volpe, Trek 5000, Santana Arriva tandem, Pashley Sovereign, among others
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I live 20 miles from my office. But for me, it's a simple matter of biking two miles to a bike rack equipped express bus that has a stop right in front of my building. Interestingly, the number of suburbanite commuters using this bus continues to expand dramatically.
BTW, before I purchased my home, I made sure there were dependable alternatives which would enable me to avoid buying a motor vehicle.
BTW, before I purchased my home, I made sure there were dependable alternatives which would enable me to avoid buying a motor vehicle.
#17
Prefers Cicero
Another option for suburbs is urbanization. Presumably the population will continue to grow for a while, and instead of continuing sprawl into farther and farther out suburbs, existing suburbs could be rezoned for hgher density and mixed use. If they would allow in-fill low-rise apartments, "granny flats", subdivided houses, and mini-office complexes to be built in formerly pure single-family residential areas, that would make public transit more feasible and also permit shorter commutes and errands. The municipal voters would have to support that, but they might if their burb was otherwise going to die.
#18
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location: North of Detroit
Posts: 91
Bikes: Giant NRS2, C'dale R600
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Simple economics are partly to blame for gas prices being the way they are. Gas is a limited commodity and as demand for this commodity increases - so does the price. Right now if I want to purchase the 10 gallons of gas to fill my Neon's gas tank up (about every 2 weeks) I am competing with everyone else here in the Detroit suburbs that are filling up their 50 gallon SUV tanks every 4 days. If the demand for gasoline were to drop, I believe that the price would drop as well.
#19
Chubby super biker
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Nebraska
Posts: 1,980
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Well, I don't know about most of the US, but I personally am doing very careful planning on my upcoming house purchase. My main concerns are a mostly-central location in the city, near lots of necessities (grocery stores, fuel stations - there's nothing more asinine than driving 5 miles just to get gas, mechanics, a LBS, and any "optional" stores), near either a major bike path or arterial (the former is actually more prevelant in this city), and in a well-established neighborhood. Personally I HOPE that the suburbanites don't discover how nice it is to live in the city.
The suburbs drive me nuts. You go down a street, and they all look the same. The houses, the colors, the yards. There's really nothing appealing to me there.
Older classy neighborhoods, however, have.. character. Trees. Landscape that has evolved. Homes that the owners take pride in, as they can without having to worry about a monstorous payment. Neighbors that aren't in the rat race, but are geniuinely nice. That's the kind of thing I like.
But hey, maybe it's just me. Let the Tahoe driving masses keep their suburbs.
The suburbs drive me nuts. You go down a street, and they all look the same. The houses, the colors, the yards. There's really nothing appealing to me there.
Older classy neighborhoods, however, have.. character. Trees. Landscape that has evolved. Homes that the owners take pride in, as they can without having to worry about a monstorous payment. Neighbors that aren't in the rat race, but are geniuinely nice. That's the kind of thing I like.
But hey, maybe it's just me. Let the Tahoe driving masses keep their suburbs.
#20
Recumbent Evangelist
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Kitchener, Ontario
Posts: 2,991
Bikes: Rebel Cycles Trike, Trek 7500FX
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
It'll probably be a mix of all of them.
- Cars will get more efficient
- Houses in the city will get more expensive, compared to houses in the burbs
- public transit will be expanded to make it easier to commute from the burbs.
Luckily, I just bought a house in the city with nearly 1/4 acre of backyard (extremely rare!) so my house will probably go up in value like crazy. *crosses fingers*
- Cars will get more efficient
- Houses in the city will get more expensive, compared to houses in the burbs
- public transit will be expanded to make it easier to commute from the burbs.
Luckily, I just bought a house in the city with nearly 1/4 acre of backyard (extremely rare!) so my house will probably go up in value like crazy. *crosses fingers*
#21
Mister Goody Two Shoes
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 417
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
They'll just whine in direct relation to the price of all the gas one person can burn. Silly people.
High gas prices only give me a reason to point and say "Ha, ha!".
Rationing, on the other hand.... That would be a suburban catastrophe. We would see some actual fear then. For example; my own parents have two spare cars, because they're in just the right spot that all other transportation methods are impossible. They'd be completely stranded without a car. We might have to clear out the spare bedroom!
High gas prices only give me a reason to point and say "Ha, ha!".
Rationing, on the other hand.... That would be a suburban catastrophe. We would see some actual fear then. For example; my own parents have two spare cars, because they're in just the right spot that all other transportation methods are impossible. They'd be completely stranded without a car. We might have to clear out the spare bedroom!
#22
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Toronto
Posts: 970
Bikes: Miyata 600, Marin Larkspur, Marin Muirwoods, GT tequesta, Fuji Ace
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I'm with cooker on this one - there are a lot of relatively simple solutions to the high cost of suburban living. Probably the simplest is the residential intensification of the inner suburbs, which will lead to shorter distance commutes and also the intensification of commercial and public transportation development. Cities have many zoning restrictions and bylaws that have artificially restricted intensification, and have supported suburban, greenfield development. Take some of these controls away, and you would have fairly rapid intensification. Why - because the existing property owners will have the ability to cash in huge profits.
Examples include - legalization of basement apartments (Toronto did this years ago, but the intensification was muted by the fact that there were already thousands of illegal apartments out there) however, including a basement suite can reduce the carrying costs of a property by about $1000/month (tax benefits for this are higher for Canadians than Americans). Easing the parking requirements would accelerate this.
Allowing subdivision of lots to build/renovate one house into two houses. Apparently the good people of Calgary are unable to live in two storey houses if the lots are less than 35ft wide - the horror! Allowing existing property owners to build two semidetached houses on a 40ft lot with two basement suites can quadruple the density of a suburban neighbourhood, and the property owner converts a $300 000 property with no income to two $250 000 properties with between $500-$1000 dollars a month income. Of course you need to redevelop and spend capital to do this, but with that kind of profit available, you'll see people lining up to invest. Remember that in many cities there is a shortage of housing, particularly affordable housing.
With money making opportunities like this available, there is a lot of scope for urbanization, if only the nanny state would get out of the way of people realizing the potential value of their property.
Unfortunately the people who are most resistant to loosening the laws are local residents - the ones who stand to benefit the most from changes like this. Go Figure.
If I had to choose one bylaw change that would intensify our cities the most at the least cost - it would be to allow Parking Free Housing to be built. Give those of us who are car-free or car-lite the ability to benefit from our choices by not forcing the cost of parking down our throats.
Examples include - legalization of basement apartments (Toronto did this years ago, but the intensification was muted by the fact that there were already thousands of illegal apartments out there) however, including a basement suite can reduce the carrying costs of a property by about $1000/month (tax benefits for this are higher for Canadians than Americans). Easing the parking requirements would accelerate this.
Allowing subdivision of lots to build/renovate one house into two houses. Apparently the good people of Calgary are unable to live in two storey houses if the lots are less than 35ft wide - the horror! Allowing existing property owners to build two semidetached houses on a 40ft lot with two basement suites can quadruple the density of a suburban neighbourhood, and the property owner converts a $300 000 property with no income to two $250 000 properties with between $500-$1000 dollars a month income. Of course you need to redevelop and spend capital to do this, but with that kind of profit available, you'll see people lining up to invest. Remember that in many cities there is a shortage of housing, particularly affordable housing.
With money making opportunities like this available, there is a lot of scope for urbanization, if only the nanny state would get out of the way of people realizing the potential value of their property.
Unfortunately the people who are most resistant to loosening the laws are local residents - the ones who stand to benefit the most from changes like this. Go Figure.
If I had to choose one bylaw change that would intensify our cities the most at the least cost - it would be to allow Parking Free Housing to be built. Give those of us who are car-free or car-lite the ability to benefit from our choices by not forcing the cost of parking down our throats.
#23
GATC
Originally Posted by rajman
If I had to choose one bylaw change that would intensify our cities the most at the least cost - it would be to allow Parking Free Housing to be built. Give those of us who are car-free or car-lite the ability to benefit from our choices by not forcing the cost of parking down our throats.
#24
Sophomoric Member
Originally Posted by turkdc
Simple economics are partly to blame for gas prices being the way they are. Gas is a limited commodity and as demand for this commodity increases - so does the price. Right now if I want to purchase the 10 gallons of gas to fill my Neon's gas tank up (about every 2 weeks) I am competing with everyone else here in the Detroit suburbs that are filling up their 50 gallon SUV tanks every 4 days. If the demand for gasoline were to drop, I believe that the price would drop as well.
BTW Detroit and it's suburbs are an interesting case study. Racism and the automobile have nearly killed the city of Detroit. Most jobs and stores in southeastern Michigan are located in the suburbs, leaving the city itself as a hollow core of blight and misery. (Mostly--I know there are good things about Detroit! ) The flip-flopping of city and suburbs is another possible future for other cities in the US, as others here have pointed out.
__________________
"Think Outside the Cage"
#25
Dog is my copilot.
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Calgary, Alberta
Posts: 802
Bikes: Lemond Maillot Jaune, Specialized Stumpjumper, Kona Jake the Snake, Single-Speed Rigid Rocky Mtn Equipe, Soon-to-be fixed Bianchi Brava
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by rajman
Allowing subdivision of lots to build/renovate one house into two houses. Apparently the good people of Calgary are unable to live in two storey houses if the lots are less than 35ft wide - the horror! Allowing existing property owners to build two semidetached houses on a 40ft lot with two basement suites can quadruple the density of a suburban neighbourhood, and the property owner converts a $300 000 property with no income to two $250 000 properties with between $500-$1000 dollars a month income. Of course you need to redevelop and spend capital to do this, but with that kind of profit available, you'll see people lining up to invest. Remember that in many cities there is a shortage of housing, particularly affordable housing.
.