Traffic Deaths a Global Scourge, Health Agency Says [Wash. Post Article]
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 462
Bikes: 2006 Specialized S-Works Tricross
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Traffic Deaths a Global Scourge, Health Agency Says [Wash. Post Article]
Forget War, Famine, Disease ... meet the real global terror.
Traffic Deaths a Global Scourge, Health Agency Says
By David Brown
Washington Post Staff Writer
Friday, April 20, 2007; Page A09
Traffic injuries are the leading cause of death in people ages 10 to 24 around the world -- a huge, overlooked and largely preventable public health problem, the World Health Organization said yesterday.
Traffic Deaths a Global Scourge, Health Agency Says
By David Brown
Washington Post Staff Writer
Friday, April 20, 2007; Page A09
Traffic injuries are the leading cause of death in people ages 10 to 24 around the world -- a huge, overlooked and largely preventable public health problem, the World Health Organization said yesterday.
Traffic Deaths a Global Scourge, Health Agency Says
#2
370H-SSV-0773H
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Penniless Park, Fla.
Posts: 2,750
Bikes: Merlin Fortius, Specialized Crossroads & Rockhopper, Serotta Fierte, Pedal Force RS2
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
- there's something to be said for Drivers Ed!
(of course, i didn't had a car until i turned 25)...
(of course, i didn't had a car until i turned 25)...
#3
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Toronto (again) Ontario, Canada
Posts: 6,931
Bikes: Old Bike: 1975 Raleigh Delta, New Bike: 2004 Norco Bushpilot
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 5 Times
in
5 Posts
Originally Posted by linux_author
- there's something to be said for Drivers Ed!
(of course, i didn't had a car until i turned 25)...
(of course, i didn't had a car until i turned 25)...
#4
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: San Francisco!
Posts: 909
Bikes: 2010 Surly LHT (main rider and do-everything bike), 2011 Bike Friday NWT (back-up bike and multi-modal)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I got my first, and so far only, car when I was 17.
Yep. A financial black hole. Too bad the realization didn't hit me until I seriously sat down to calculate it with everything in...gas, insurance, maintenance, repairs, depreciation (the model I chose was/is one of the fastest depreciating models of cars out there).
I wanna sell it soon...
Yep. A financial black hole. Too bad the realization didn't hit me until I seriously sat down to calculate it with everything in...gas, insurance, maintenance, repairs, depreciation (the model I chose was/is one of the fastest depreciating models of cars out there).
I wanna sell it soon...
#5
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 7,143
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 261 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 11 Times
in
10 Posts
From the article
>>>>WHO is asking the World Bank and other institutions making loans for road building in the developing world to require that 10 percent of the money go for safety features, such as guardrails, barrier-protected lanes for bicyclists or pedestrians, speed bumps, traffic- calming roundabouts and lighting.<<
The article goes on to say that in order to cut back on the number of road deaths, we need to build MORE roads! Only 10% of the money is to go for safety features! This is insane.
It should be the other way around as building more roads will only increase the number of deaths because drivers will be able to go faster on improved roads. If you've been to some third world countries, traffic calming is badly needed and 90% of the money should be spent there.
>>>>WHO is asking the World Bank and other institutions making loans for road building in the developing world to require that 10 percent of the money go for safety features, such as guardrails, barrier-protected lanes for bicyclists or pedestrians, speed bumps, traffic- calming roundabouts and lighting.<<
The article goes on to say that in order to cut back on the number of road deaths, we need to build MORE roads! Only 10% of the money is to go for safety features! This is insane.
It should be the other way around as building more roads will only increase the number of deaths because drivers will be able to go faster on improved roads. If you've been to some third world countries, traffic calming is badly needed and 90% of the money should be spent there.
#6
Utility Cyclist
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 79
Bikes: Surly Long Haul Trucker, KHS Urban-X ; Dahon D7; Specialized Streetstomper (awaiting rebirth)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
So many thoughts...one can either expound for pages or say very little.
We rarely (ever?) question the 'right' of a technology to exist. We rail against the carnage caused by drunk drivers, young drivers, elderly drivers, etc, but do NOT question driving itself. A state/federal official actually advocating drastic automobile restrictions, and the obvious lifestyle changes, would be branded a Luddite and laughed off the national stage. With apologies to Gil Scott Heron, this revolution will NOT be televised.
We rarely (ever?) question the 'right' of a technology to exist. We rail against the carnage caused by drunk drivers, young drivers, elderly drivers, etc, but do NOT question driving itself. A state/federal official actually advocating drastic automobile restrictions, and the obvious lifestyle changes, would be branded a Luddite and laughed off the national stage. With apologies to Gil Scott Heron, this revolution will NOT be televised.
#7
In the right lane
Originally Posted by biketony
We rarely (ever?) question the 'right' of a technology to exist. We rail against the carnage caused by drunk drivers, young drivers, elderly drivers, etc, but do NOT question driving itself. A state/federal official actually advocating drastic automobile restrictions, and the obvious lifestyle changes, would be branded a Luddite and laughed off the national stage. With apologies to Gil Scott Heron, this revolution will NOT be televised.
However, there have been a few examples where the right of technology was questioned. For example, the growth of nuclear power plants stopped in the US right after 3 Mile Island. We may also be in the middle of questioning some of the more advanced gene-alterign technology. (Germline, rather than somatic, might see use actually cloning human being at some point...) .
In the case above, I don't think we as a society are yet at the point where we see "more roads" as being a questionable move. But there is hope that this might change.
#8
Sophomoric Member
I know how much life changes when you get that phone call, "There's been an accident, you need to get to the hospital as fast as you can."
One more damn good reason to get these horrible machines off the road.
One more damn good reason to get these horrible machines off the road.
__________________
"Think Outside the Cage"
#9
Senior Citizen
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: no
Posts: 1,346
Bikes: yes
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Roody
I know how much life changes when you get that phone call, "There's been an accident, you need to get to the hospital as fast as you can."
One more damn good reason to get these horrible machines off the road.
One more damn good reason to get these horrible machines off the road.
#10
Sophomoric Member
Originally Posted by lyeinyoureye
What a wonderful post. If it weren't for it, we may have a reasonable, sensible thread on a valid concern. I figure it's only a matter of time before the zealots come out of the woodwork in any discussion...
I'm grateful that Slow Train brought up this topic.
The accident I referred to made me realize the dark side of the automobile culture. The public today is so jaded about car accidents that we rarely stop to think that these accidents are unacceptable and unnecessary. We've come so far in our blind acceptance of cars that we think the deaths and injuries are just a small price to pay for the convenience of cars.
__________________
"Think Outside the Cage"
#11
Membership Not Required
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: On the road-USA
Posts: 16,855
Bikes: Giant Excursion, Raleigh Sports, Raleigh R.S.W. Compact, Motobecane? and about 20 more! OMG
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 70 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 15 Times
in
14 Posts
This is sort of on topic. When I think about automobiles and the "personal freedom" that people claim I get very irritated. People driving cars kill way too many people. If I killed that percentage of people on my jobsite OSHA would have shut me down years ago. When it comes to safety on jobsites "personal freedom" takes a back seat. Perhaps this needs to be done in the general public sector when it comes to accidents and drivers. I know of no other "industry" that is allowed to wreak as much havoc on the general public with no or such limited consequences. [/rant off]
Aaron
Aaron
__________________
Webshots is bailing out, if you find any of my posts with corrupt picture files and want to see them corrected please let me know. :(
ISO: A late 1980's Giant Iguana MTB frameset (or complete bike) 23" Red with yellow graphics.
"Cycling should be a way of life, not a hobby.
RIDE, YOU FOOL, RIDE!"_Nicodemus
"Steel: nearly a thousand years of metallurgical development
Aluminum: barely a hundred
Which one would you rather have under your butt at 30mph?"_krazygluon
Webshots is bailing out, if you find any of my posts with corrupt picture files and want to see them corrected please let me know. :(
ISO: A late 1980's Giant Iguana MTB frameset (or complete bike) 23" Red with yellow graphics.
"Cycling should be a way of life, not a hobby.
RIDE, YOU FOOL, RIDE!"_Nicodemus
"Steel: nearly a thousand years of metallurgical development
Aluminum: barely a hundred
Which one would you rather have under your butt at 30mph?"_krazygluon
#12
In the right lane
Another aspect of this that scares me are all the suburban bars and restaurants that are set up far, far from the homes of their clients. I wonder how everyone gets home after a night out. They certainly seldom take cabs. Mostly they drive and I'm pretty sure that most of them shouldn't get behind a wheel.
It seems to me that if you own a bar in a strip mall, you should be required to have some means of transporting your clients back home.
It seems to me that if you own a bar in a strip mall, you should be required to have some means of transporting your clients back home.
#13
Membership Not Required
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: On the road-USA
Posts: 16,855
Bikes: Giant Excursion, Raleigh Sports, Raleigh R.S.W. Compact, Motobecane? and about 20 more! OMG
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 70 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 15 Times
in
14 Posts
Originally Posted by gerv
Another aspect of this that scares me are all the suburban bars and restaurants that are set up far, far from the homes of their clients. I wonder how everyone gets home after a night out. They certainly seldom take cabs. Mostly they drive and I'm pretty sure that most of them shouldn't get behind a wheel.
It seems to me that if you own a bar in a strip mall, you should be required to have some means of transporting your clients back home.
It seems to me that if you own a bar in a strip mall, you should be required to have some means of transporting your clients back home.
FWIW this is yet another issue brought on by urban sprawl. When I was temporarily living in Mansfield, OH I was surprised by the number of "neighborhood" bars. I could walk to at least 4 from where my apartment was located. And just for reference I have spent most of my life in the deep south where bars were hidden on the "bad" side of town or waaaay out in the country. I would love to be able to ride my bike to a local brew pub for a pint every now and again, but I don't see that happening anytime soon...I live in a dry county
Aaron
__________________
Webshots is bailing out, if you find any of my posts with corrupt picture files and want to see them corrected please let me know. :(
ISO: A late 1980's Giant Iguana MTB frameset (or complete bike) 23" Red with yellow graphics.
"Cycling should be a way of life, not a hobby.
RIDE, YOU FOOL, RIDE!"_Nicodemus
"Steel: nearly a thousand years of metallurgical development
Aluminum: barely a hundred
Which one would you rather have under your butt at 30mph?"_krazygluon
Webshots is bailing out, if you find any of my posts with corrupt picture files and want to see them corrected please let me know. :(
ISO: A late 1980's Giant Iguana MTB frameset (or complete bike) 23" Red with yellow graphics.
"Cycling should be a way of life, not a hobby.
RIDE, YOU FOOL, RIDE!"_Nicodemus
"Steel: nearly a thousand years of metallurgical development
Aluminum: barely a hundred
Which one would you rather have under your butt at 30mph?"_krazygluon
#14
Utility Cyclist
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 79
Bikes: Surly Long Haul Trucker, KHS Urban-X ; Dahon D7; Specialized Streetstomper (awaiting rebirth)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by gerv
Another aspect of this that scares me are all the suburban bars and restaurants that are set up far, far from the homes of their clients. I wonder how everyone gets home after a night out. They certainly seldom take cabs. Mostly they drive and I'm pretty sure that most of them shouldn't get behind a wheel.
It seems to me that if you own a bar in a strip mall, you should be required to have some means of transporting your clients back home.
It seems to me that if you own a bar in a strip mall, you should be required to have some means of transporting your clients back home.
Is there really any wonder at the notion that we'd actually have a war for oil?
To veer back to this thread's topic, cars as a health/safety issue: Society wrings it's collective hands about all the deaths and injuries that result from all of our driving. Still, every time we start the engine we are declaring these deaths/maimings to be 'acceptable losses'.
And I am not above any of this; I still own a car. One of those ironies of modern life, is that some of us move to more rural areas-and then drive even more. My wife and I are moving to a city, and are very much looking forward to, among many other things, NO driving. I wonder if a Nissan Frontier would make a nice planter box?
#15
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Spur TX
Posts: 1,991
Bikes: Schwinn folder; SixThreeZero EvryJourney
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by biketony
I wonder if a Nissan Frontier would make a nice planter box?
#16
Membership Not Required
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: On the road-USA
Posts: 16,855
Bikes: Giant Excursion, Raleigh Sports, Raleigh R.S.W. Compact, Motobecane? and about 20 more! OMG
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 70 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 15 Times
in
14 Posts
You could use it for a guest house
Aaron
Aaron
__________________
Webshots is bailing out, if you find any of my posts with corrupt picture files and want to see them corrected please let me know. :(
ISO: A late 1980's Giant Iguana MTB frameset (or complete bike) 23" Red with yellow graphics.
"Cycling should be a way of life, not a hobby.
RIDE, YOU FOOL, RIDE!"_Nicodemus
"Steel: nearly a thousand years of metallurgical development
Aluminum: barely a hundred
Which one would you rather have under your butt at 30mph?"_krazygluon
Webshots is bailing out, if you find any of my posts with corrupt picture files and want to see them corrected please let me know. :(
ISO: A late 1980's Giant Iguana MTB frameset (or complete bike) 23" Red with yellow graphics.
"Cycling should be a way of life, not a hobby.
RIDE, YOU FOOL, RIDE!"_Nicodemus
"Steel: nearly a thousand years of metallurgical development
Aluminum: barely a hundred
Which one would you rather have under your butt at 30mph?"_krazygluon
#17
not a role model
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 4,659
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Originally Posted by wahoonc
This is sort of on topic. When I think about automobiles and the "personal freedom" that people claim I get very irritated. People driving cars kill way too many people.
Aaron
Aaron
I couldn't care less about death rates, but that we, as a society, continue to label vehicle-based maiming and murdering as accidents does annoy me. A couple kids die on a 3-wheeler and they're outlawed. Thousands of kids die in cars and we try to fix it with safety-features.
#18
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Toronto (again) Ontario, Canada
Posts: 6,931
Bikes: Old Bike: 1975 Raleigh Delta, New Bike: 2004 Norco Bushpilot
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 5 Times
in
5 Posts
Originally Posted by JeffS
Bolded to make my point. Indept drivers are the primary cause of these deaths and no amount of "safety features" is going to change that. A competent driver, paying attention doesn't need guard rails (with a few exceptions) or five signs to warn of each impending turn.
I couldn't care less about death rates, but that we, as a society, continue to label vehicle-based maiming and murdering as accidents does annoy me. A couple kids die on a 3-wheeler and they're outlawed. Thousands of kids die in cars and we try to fix it with safety-features.
I couldn't care less about death rates, but that we, as a society, continue to label vehicle-based maiming and murdering as accidents does annoy me. A couple kids die on a 3-wheeler and they're outlawed. Thousands of kids die in cars and we try to fix it with safety-features.
#19
Utility Cyclist
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 79
Bikes: Surly Long Haul Trucker, KHS Urban-X ; Dahon D7; Specialized Streetstomper (awaiting rebirth)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Wogsterca
One of the traffic reporters here in Toronto also uses the term collision instead of accident, he says because not all collisions are accidents, and until the police investigation is complete, you can't know, so he refers to them as collisions. Cars are special, because politicians are in the pockets of the automobile and oil industries, so special laws apply. However if regular people, decided to stop driving, and demanded that the government do something about it, and elected green candidates, rather then the ones with the biggest election contributions, then cars would probably be banned.
#20
Sophomoric Member
I call them "crashes" and so do a lot of traffic engineers and safety advocates.
__________________
"Think Outside the Cage"
#21
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: San Francisco!
Posts: 909
Bikes: 2010 Surly LHT (main rider and do-everything bike), 2011 Bike Friday NWT (back-up bike and multi-modal)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I've been calling them collisions ever since I took a close look at the definition of "accident" in the dictionary.
#22
Stooge
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Bay Area
Posts: 847
Bikes: one of each
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Roody
I know how much life changes when you get that phone call, "There's been an accident, you need to get to the hospital as fast as you can."
One more damn good reason to get these horrible machines off the road.
One more damn good reason to get these horrible machines off the road.
#23
Senior Citizen
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: no
Posts: 1,346
Bikes: yes
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Roody
The accident I referred to made me realize the dark side of the automobile culture. The public today is so jaded about car accidents that we rarely stop to think that these accidents are unacceptable and unnecessary. We've come so far in our blind acceptance of cars that we think the deaths and injuries are just a small price to pay for the convenience of cars.
#24
Sophomoric Member
Originally Posted by lyeinyoureye
Don'tcha think that's a half-truth? Strict licensing and enforcement would do nearly as much for accidents as removing all cars from the road. The problem is a blind acceptance of standards, not cars. Although the blind acceptance of cars does apply in other areas, such as urban pollution, it doesn't apply to operator safety. If every driver had to go through what a semi driver does, as well as a thorough course on automotive maintenance, I doubt we would have this "epidemic". We've come so far in our blind acceptance of lax standards that we think the deaths and injuries are just a small price to pay for the convenience of easy licensing.
I think a big cause of crashes is that there are just too many cars on the roads. There are literally more cars than drivers in the US, as you probably know. The number of cars on the roads has more than doubled since I learned to drive in the 1970s, but the actual linear mileage of roadways has increased by a much smaller proportion. Congestion makes roads more dangerous and also contributes to road rage and reckless driving. This situation is bad for everybody, but especially distressing for cyclists and pedestrians.
A related danger is that the speed limits are too high. They're high because of the increased number of cars on the road. The existing roads can handle a bigger volume of traffic if speeds are faster, much like more water can get through a pipe if it's going faster.
Another way they handle more cars on the existing roads is through creative highway engineering. Examples of this include intersections with multiple turn lanes, roundabouts and complex traffic signals with vehicle activation and advanced and delayed green lights. These traffic innovations generally work well for cars, but not so well for bikes and walkers. You probably know how difficult it can be to get your bike over into the proper left turn lane, only to discover there isn't enough metal mass on the bike to activate the left turn arrow, and the cars behind you are honking.....
__________________
"Think Outside the Cage"
#25
tired
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 5,651
Bikes: Breezer Uptown 8, U frame
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
Originally Posted by Wogsterca
One of the traffic reporters here in Toronto also uses the term collision instead of accident, he says because not all collisions are accidents, and until the police investigation is complete, you can't know, so he refers to them as collisions.
__________________
"Real wars of words are harder to win. They require thought, insight, precision, articulation, knowledge, and experience. They require the humility to admit when you are wrong. They recognize that the dialectic is not about making us look at you, but about us all looking together for the truth."
"Real wars of words are harder to win. They require thought, insight, precision, articulation, knowledge, and experience. They require the humility to admit when you are wrong. They recognize that the dialectic is not about making us look at you, but about us all looking together for the truth."