Uber Aims to Reduce Car Ownership
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Eugene, Oregon
Posts: 7,048
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 509 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 9 Times
in
8 Posts
Uber Aims to Reduce Car Ownership
There was a fun little blurb in the NYTimes today about car-share programs. One quote stuck out for me:
This has implications for the battle between urban cyclists and the traffic planners who give over huge amounts of street space to parked cars, even if we don't see significant numbers of people go car free in response to these growing services.
https://www.nytimes.com/2014/07/12/up...T.nav=top-news
“The whole point of price cuts is to get UberX pricing below the cost of owning a car,” Uber’s chief executive, Travis Kalanick, told me. “Let’s say you take three or four trips a day on average. If we can get the price of UberX low enough, we can get to where it’s cheaper to take Uber than to own a car.”
https://www.nytimes.com/2014/07/12/up...T.nav=top-news
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 7,143
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 261 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 11 Times
in
10 Posts
There was a fun little blurb in the NYTimes today about car-share programs. One quote stuck out for me:
This has implications for the battle between urban cyclists and the traffic planners who give over huge amounts of street space to parked cars, even if we don't see significant numbers of people go car free in response to these growing services.
https://www.nytimes.com/2014/07/12/up...T.nav=top-news
This has implications for the battle between urban cyclists and the traffic planners who give over huge amounts of street space to parked cars, even if we don't see significant numbers of people go car free in response to these growing services.
https://www.nytimes.com/2014/07/12/up...T.nav=top-news
The bus has it's limitation and we don't have to repeat all the issues. Being a bus user, I would love to take a taxi that cost 5 dollars for 5 miles of service. However, that is not the case.
The taxi model had promise but it's too expensive costing 15 dollars (or more) for the same 5 miles of transport. The system is top heavy with high salaries, franchise fees, taxes and administation making it impossible to have a service that's affordable for the casual user.
Now we have smart phones that can eliminate the entire "Taxi" eco-system and they are enraged that independants are going to undercut them. I hope Uber succeeds because we need more transport options in this country and not less.
#3
In Real Life
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Down under down under
Posts: 52,152
Bikes: Lots
Mentioned: 141 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3203 Post(s)
Liked 596 Times
in
329 Posts
+1
More transportation options are needed in many countries.
More transportation options are needed in many countries.
__________________
Rowan
My fave photo threads on BF
Century A Month Facebook Group
Machka's Website
Photo Gallery
Rowan
My fave photo threads on BF
Century A Month Facebook Group
Machka's Website
Photo Gallery
Last edited by Machka; 07-11-14 at 09:18 PM.
#4
Sophomoric Member
Maybe I'm paranoid, but I'm a little leery about Uber. It involves getting in a private car which may or may not have working brakes, driven by stranger who may or may not have a valid drivers license.
At least cabbies are licensed, tested, and insured. And the cabs are required to have regular maintenence.
The lower costs (some of the time) are attractive, of course.
At least cabbies are licensed, tested, and insured. And the cabs are required to have regular maintenence.
The lower costs (some of the time) are attractive, of course.
__________________
"Think Outside the Cage"
#5
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Eugene, Oregon
Posts: 7,048
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 509 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 9 Times
in
8 Posts
Maybe I'm paranoid, but I'm a little leery about Uber. It involves getting in a private car which may or may not have working brakes, driven by stranger who may or may not have a valid drivers license.
At least cabbies are licensed, tested, and insured. And the cabs are required to have regular maintenence.
At least cabbies are licensed, tested, and insured. And the cabs are required to have regular maintenence.
#6
Been Around Awhile
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Burlington Iowa
Posts: 29,974
Bikes: Vaterland and Ragazzi
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 12 Post(s)
Liked 1,536 Times
in
1,045 Posts
#7
Sophomoric Member
#8
Tractorlegs
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: El Paso, TX
Posts: 3,185
Bikes: Schwinn Meridian Single-Speed Tricycle
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 119 Post(s)
Liked 60 Times
in
42 Posts
Because cars are not transportation. They are symbols of power and affluence. They are a weak person's muscles. They are an expression of "freedom" and mobility.
__________________
********************************
Trikeman
Trikeman
#9
Sophomoric Member
Has anybody here actually used Uber? What was your experience?
__________________
"Think Outside the Cage"
#10
In Real Life
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Down under down under
Posts: 52,152
Bikes: Lots
Mentioned: 141 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3203 Post(s)
Liked 596 Times
in
329 Posts
That's what we want!
The only transportation solution that will work is one that will provide freedom and mobility.
The only transportation solution that will work is one that will provide freedom and mobility.
__________________
Rowan
My fave photo threads on BF
Century A Month Facebook Group
Machka's Website
Photo Gallery
Rowan
My fave photo threads on BF
Century A Month Facebook Group
Machka's Website
Photo Gallery
#11
Tractorlegs
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: El Paso, TX
Posts: 3,185
Bikes: Schwinn Meridian Single-Speed Tricycle
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 119 Post(s)
Liked 60 Times
in
42 Posts
Ironically I just spent some quality time at your website a couple of days ago lol. It always makes me want to go for a ride
__________________
********************************
Trikeman
Trikeman
#12
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: The Big City
Posts: 619
Bikes: Brompton M3L, Tern Verge P20, Citi Bike
Mentioned: 24 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 85 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 9 Times
in
7 Posts
I took Uber for the first time last weekend in Philadelphia. Someone else hailed it. He clicked once or twice on his iPhone, and it told him the car would be there in four minutes, specifying what kind of car to look for. He specified a larger car, as we were a group of five. No money chanced hands, no swipe of credit card; the ride, including tip, was billed automatically by the app. We could watch via GPS where the car was as it made it's way to us. It all seemed easy and seemless. I don't know what it cost, apparently a bit more than a regular cab, and there can be multipliers, so you pay more than base fare at busy times.
The guy who ordered the car chatted with the driver. As I recall, their contract with Uber requires that they be duly licensed, registered and insured. They can be independent, with their own insurance, as this driver was. He had his own car service company, so took Uber passengers as filler. Others can be exclusive to Uber, and under the Uber provided insurance umbrella. Drivers are entirely on their own schedule; they click a button to put themselves online or offline. Fares pop up on their iPhone, which they can accept or decline.
I hardly ever take cabs, so I won't be getting into Uber, but my brief encounter with it seemed pretty impressive.
The guy who ordered the car chatted with the driver. As I recall, their contract with Uber requires that they be duly licensed, registered and insured. They can be independent, with their own insurance, as this driver was. He had his own car service company, so took Uber passengers as filler. Others can be exclusive to Uber, and under the Uber provided insurance umbrella. Drivers are entirely on their own schedule; they click a button to put themselves online or offline. Fares pop up on their iPhone, which they can accept or decline.
I hardly ever take cabs, so I won't be getting into Uber, but my brief encounter with it seemed pretty impressive.
#14
Been Around Awhile
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Burlington Iowa
Posts: 29,974
Bikes: Vaterland and Ragazzi
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 12 Post(s)
Liked 1,536 Times
in
1,045 Posts
There was a fun little blurb in the NYTimes today about car-share programs. One quote stuck out for me:
“The whole point of price cuts is to get UberX pricing below the cost of owning a car,” Uber’s chief executive, Travis Kalanick, told me. “Let’s say you take three or four trips a day on average. If we can get the price of UberX low enough, we can get to where it’s cheaper to take Uber than to own a car.”
This has implications for the battle between urban cyclists and the traffic planners who give over huge amounts of street space to parked cars, even if we don't see significant numbers of people go car free in response to these growing services.
https://www.nytimes.com/2014/07/12/up...T.nav=top-news
“The whole point of price cuts is to get UberX pricing below the cost of owning a car,” Uber’s chief executive, Travis Kalanick, told me. “Let’s say you take three or four trips a day on average. If we can get the price of UberX low enough, we can get to where it’s cheaper to take Uber than to own a car.”
This has implications for the battle between urban cyclists and the traffic planners who give over huge amounts of street space to parked cars, even if we don't see significant numbers of people go car free in response to these growing services.
https://www.nytimes.com/2014/07/12/up...T.nav=top-news
#15
Sophomoric Member
The Uber’s chief executive's quote about Uber as a practical alternative to car ownership only makes sense for people who live in the city, own a car and never use it for anything but short trips within the same city. For those people, taxis have always been a possible and practical alternative to car ownership. Uber competes almost exclusively with taxi service and the change in Uber pricing only will affect the competition with taxi service. The only parking that Uber and similar services might affect are taxi parking stands.
__________________
"Think Outside the Cage"
#16
Sophomoric Member
I once was unable to ride for a couple months due to a knee injury. During the day, I got along fine on buses and walking short distances. But at night the buses didn't run, and I was working until 11:30 PM. So I took cabs home from work for that period. A co-workder said that must be expensive. It was $11 a trip, and I worked about 20 times a month. So the monthly expense was $220. I asked my co-worker how that compared to her car expenses and she admitted that it was a lot less.
BTW, if you owned a car ONLY for an occasional trip to the valley, a cab might be MUCH cheaper.
__________________
"Think Outside the Cage"
#17
Sophomoric Member
Some investment bankers recently valued Uber at 17 billion dollars based on its "disruption potential" in the transportation industry.
https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/...th-17-billion/
https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/...th-17-billion/
__________________
"Think Outside the Cage"
#19
Been Around Awhile
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Burlington Iowa
Posts: 29,974
Bikes: Vaterland and Ragazzi
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 12 Post(s)
Liked 1,536 Times
in
1,045 Posts
True, except that there might be people who decide that they can be carfree because they have Uber as an alternative to owning and driving a private car. Taxis work well as an alternative, but they have some serious limitations--such as price, wait time, and availability. These limitations will supposedly be lessened by Uber.
I'd be curious how well served are the so-called "bad" areas of major metropolitan cities by Uber and other smartphone dependent services. Any better or worse than regulated taxi service?
#20
Sophomoric Member
True there may be some, but the total of people who will now make the switch from car ownership to without because of Uber availability/pricing can probably be counted on the Uber CEO's fingers and toes.
I'd be curious how well served are the so-called "bad" areas of major metropolitan cities by Uber and other smartphone dependent services. Any better or worse than regulated taxi service?
I'd be curious how well served are the so-called "bad" areas of major metropolitan cities by Uber and other smartphone dependent services. Any better or worse than regulated taxi service?
__________________
"Think Outside the Cage"
#21
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Eugene, Oregon
Posts: 7,048
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 509 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 9 Times
in
8 Posts
Well, the greatest living economist has weighed in on this.
https://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/201...gs®ion=Body
I believe he has a better track record at predicting how things will work out than certain curmudgeons who post hereabouts.
Originally Posted by Paul Krugman
Anyway: the big benefit from new IT-mediated car services will come if they make it possible for lots of people — and not just people in Manhattan — to live without owning their own cars. And if you think about it, you can see how that might work.
I believe he has a better track record at predicting how things will work out than certain curmudgeons who post hereabouts.
#22
Been Around Awhile
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Burlington Iowa
Posts: 29,974
Bikes: Vaterland and Ragazzi
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 12 Post(s)
Liked 1,536 Times
in
1,045 Posts
Well, the greatest living economist has weighed in on this.
https://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/201...gs®ion=Body
I believe he has a better track record at predicting how things will work out than certain curmudgeons who post hereabouts.
https://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/201...gs®ion=Body
I believe he has a better track record at predicting how things will work out than certain curmudgeons who post hereabouts.
#23
Sophomoric Member
According to the NHTS, the average American drives 59.83 minutes on weekdays and 46.68 minutes on weekends. this means that their car is idle for more than 23 hours of every day. I think it's accurate to describe that as using the vehicle "only now and then."
If cars were quickly and economically available on an hourly-rental basis, I predict that a lot of people would forego 24 hour ownwership of an expensive machine that they use for less than an hour a day.
https://nhts.ornl.gov/2009/pub/stt.pdf (See Table 30)
If cars were quickly and economically available on an hourly-rental basis, I predict that a lot of people would forego 24 hour ownwership of an expensive machine that they use for less than an hour a day.
https://nhts.ornl.gov/2009/pub/stt.pdf (See Table 30)
__________________
"Think Outside the Cage"
#24
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 4,355
Mentioned: 90 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8084 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 14 Times
in
13 Posts
According to the NHTS, the average American drives 59.83 minutes on weekdays and 46.68 minutes on weekends. this means that their car is idle for more than 23 hours of every day. I think it's accurate to describe that as using the vehicle "only now and then."
If cars were quickly and economically available on an hourly-rental basis, I predict that a lot of people would forego 24 hour ownwership of an expensive machine that they use for less than an hour a day.
https://nhts.ornl.gov/2009/pub/stt.pdf (See Table 30)
If cars were quickly and economically available on an hourly-rental basis, I predict that a lot of people would forego 24 hour ownwership of an expensive machine that they use for less than an hour a day.
https://nhts.ornl.gov/2009/pub/stt.pdf (See Table 30)
#25
Been Around Awhile
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Burlington Iowa
Posts: 29,974
Bikes: Vaterland and Ragazzi
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 12 Post(s)
Liked 1,536 Times
in
1,045 Posts
According to the NHTS, the average American drives 59.83 minutes on weekdays and 46.68 minutes on weekends. this means that their car is idle for more than 23 hours of every day. I think it's accurate to describe that as using the vehicle "only now and then."
If cars were quickly and economically available on an hourly-rental basis, I predict that a lot of people would forego 24 hour ownwership of an expensive machine that they use for less than an hour a day.
https://nhts.ornl.gov/2009/pub/stt.pdf (See Table 30)
If cars were quickly and economically available on an hourly-rental basis, I predict that a lot of people would forego 24 hour ownwership of an expensive machine that they use for less than an hour a day.
https://nhts.ornl.gov/2009/pub/stt.pdf (See Table 30)
More relevant to the subject of "now and then" use of a motor vehicle, 7 days a week all year is found in Table 3.
It should also be noted that every car trip in the NHTS survey, may require two taxi or Uber fares unless the passenger chooses to leave the meter running while working, shopping, or spending a day in the park. Let's not forget Uber's crafty use of "surge pricing" to add cost uncertainty to every trip.
Also to be noted is that the survey was designed to collect only "daily" travel and exclude long distance travel in 2009. Therefore no data was captured for vacation use of a vehicle by anybody in the household.
Last edited by I-Like-To-Bike; 07-16-14 at 12:47 PM.