cannondale
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 256
Bikes: 1997 Schwinn Moab2 cross-country racing, highly modified, rebuilt many, many times. very fast!
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
what kinda bikers ride cannondales?
Last edited by ChroMo2; 08-26-05 at 06:43 PM.
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Richmond, VA
Posts: 613
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
What kinda question is that?
I suppose my answer would be bikers that like Cannondale's unique suspension design.
I suppose my answer would be bikers that like Cannondale's unique suspension design.
#3
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 256
Bikes: 1997 Schwinn Moab2 cross-country racing, highly modified, rebuilt many, many times. very fast!
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
oh yeah... the good ol' Cannondale Headshok. Do you think that was an attempt in vain, just to be different?
#4
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Philadelphia
Posts: 1,036
Bikes: Specialized AWOL, Soma Juice
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I just think everyone's trying to pioneer and get an angle, so a little of both. It both interests and annoys me, because I would be ok with them if it wasn't for all their proprietary stuff.
#5
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 256
Bikes: 1997 Schwinn Moab2 cross-country racing, highly modified, rebuilt many, many times. very fast!
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I like the K2 with the Noleen shock, u gotta be too cool to race with one of those.
#6
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 271
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by ChroMo2
oh yeah... the good ol' Cannondale Headshok. Do you think that was an attempt in vain, just to be different?
Always keep in mind before criticising different approaches in a market driven technology based sport that if they get it right you'll be the one with the obsolete technology.
That new fangled derailllier thang will never work either, it's as silly as riding without toeclips.
#7
The Rabbi
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 5,125
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 16 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times
in
3 Posts
The Lefty/Headshok are really a brilliant design. Substantially stiffer than virtually any other fork out there. I am particularly a fan of the headshock since it uses standard dropouts. The full rigid fork with a very large single stanchion means virtually NO FLEX into any corner. The lockout actually locks the fork out 100%, I don't think any other manufacturer can claim this. The roller bearings are easy to service and give smooth easily maintained action. Good chance my next bike will sport a Headshok.
#8
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 256
Bikes: 1997 Schwinn Moab2 cross-country racing, highly modified, rebuilt many, many times. very fast!
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
actually two stanchions work better because a bicycle only weighs 25 pounds. if you divide that by two and distribute the weight twice you provide a wider distribution area to handle the lateral forces on the load bearing axle, and you get better response and more control. Plus the finer adjustment of two stanchions instead if one moves at less the force and the bottom of the two stanchions intersepts the forces of motion from the ground to the working part of the suspension fastest with more actuation capabilities by transmitting shock through the rim first.
Last edited by ChroMo2; 10-07-05 at 05:27 PM.
#9
Norcal 29er
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Mendocino Norcal
Posts: 158
Bikes: Gary fisher Mt Tam 29er
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by ChroMo2
actually two stanchions work better because a bicycle only weighs 25 pounds. if you divide that by two and distribute the weight twice you provide a wider distribution area to handle the lateral forces on the load bearing axle, and you get better response and more control. Plus the finer adjustment of two stanchions instead if one moves at less the force and the bottom of the two stanchions intersepts the forces of motion from the ground to the working part of the suspension fastest with more actuation capabilities by transmitting shock through the rim first.
harris
#10
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 256
Bikes: 1997 Schwinn Moab2 cross-country racing, highly modified, rebuilt many, many times. very fast!
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by harris
yea, i suppose that that would be true, if the bike were riding itself. you are forgetting that a bike has more than its own 25 pounds on it. there is me and my fat butt sitting on it and pounding it off of jumps. the amount of force that i put on a bike is amazing. most peoples beef with the headshoks (i am assuming that you guys mean the old design, with a short shock and then a rigid fork beneath it.) is that there isn't very much travel. well, unless you are jumping, the only thing that you need suspension for is taking the edge off of bumps so that you can go over them faster. for that you only need an inch or two, so there is no problem with headshoks. for allmountain riding i can understand why most people dont like them. i cant blame them. if i am gunna jump, i need more than 3 inches of travel to support me. that is where the lefty shock comes in. the prophets with left shock have 5.5 inches up front. thats pretty good. plus they dont weigh much, and they are crazy strong. the hub is the only spot that seems like it seems weak, but it is pretty much as strong as a standard axle with dropouts. and, if you think about it, most forks just use one side of it for the spring, and the actual suspending of the bike. the other side just sorta chills there.
harris
harris
#11
Junior Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 7
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Interesting.
You guys can argue physics theory and schemantics all day long. Regardless, the seat of my pants tells me that the Headshok on my modded F400 is one of the best XC forks in existence - sufficient travel (80 mm), light weight, super stiff, ultra responsive and super-smooth, and with an on-the-fly total lockout. There is some additional maintanence required, but it is worth every extra minute.
You gotta love the 'oh, that's different - it's stupid and I hate it' crowd who arrive at conclusive opinions within 10 seconds and without ever even trying the product. Innovation and unconventional thinking should be suppressed!
See you on the trail.
You guys can argue physics theory and schemantics all day long. Regardless, the seat of my pants tells me that the Headshok on my modded F400 is one of the best XC forks in existence - sufficient travel (80 mm), light weight, super stiff, ultra responsive and super-smooth, and with an on-the-fly total lockout. There is some additional maintanence required, but it is worth every extra minute.
You gotta love the 'oh, that's different - it's stupid and I hate it' crowd who arrive at conclusive opinions within 10 seconds and without ever even trying the product. Innovation and unconventional thinking should be suppressed!
See you on the trail.
#12
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 256
Bikes: 1997 Schwinn Moab2 cross-country racing, highly modified, rebuilt many, many times. very fast!
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by TacoMunch
Interesting.
You guys can argue physics theory and schemantics all day long. Regardless, the seat of my pants tells me that the Headshok on my modded F400 is one of the best XC forks in existence - sufficient travel (80 mm), light weight, super stiff, ultra responsive and super-smooth, and with an on-the-fly total lockout. There is some additional maintanence required, but it is worth every extra minute.
You gotta love the 'oh, that's different - it's stupid and I hate it' crowd who arrive at conclusive opinions within 10 seconds and without ever even trying the product. Innovation and unconventional thinking should be suppressed!
See you on the trail.
You guys can argue physics theory and schemantics all day long. Regardless, the seat of my pants tells me that the Headshok on my modded F400 is one of the best XC forks in existence - sufficient travel (80 mm), light weight, super stiff, ultra responsive and super-smooth, and with an on-the-fly total lockout. There is some additional maintanence required, but it is worth every extra minute.
You gotta love the 'oh, that's different - it's stupid and I hate it' crowd who arrive at conclusive opinions within 10 seconds and without ever even trying the product. Innovation and unconventional thinking should be suppressed!
See you on the trail.
#13
Throw the stick!!!!
A lot of people win races on Cannondales. They must be doing something right.
__________________
I may be fat but I'm slow enough to make up for it.
#14
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 256
Bikes: 1997 Schwinn Moab2 cross-country racing, highly modified, rebuilt many, many times. very fast!
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Cannondale has some cool mountain bikes. I wouldn't mind owning one if it had a normal fork on it. I dont understand how it would be possible for suspension torque not to affect proper steering, especially by a wheel supported by one stanchion (fork blade)
#15
trail tamer
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: CT
Posts: 114
Bikes: Trek Bruiser II...custom build
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
go-ped's have the one sided fork thing going too, ive never heard of one breaking or having any problems...if you see one in person the lefty fork is really beefy and mounted on a 1.5 headtube...even stronger
#17
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: southern oregon
Posts: 2,631
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by ChroMo2
actually two stanchions work better because a bicycle only weighs 25 pounds. if you divide that by two and distribute the weight twice you provide a wider distribution area to handle the lateral forces on the load bearing axle, and you get better response and more control. Plus the finer adjustment of two stanchions instead if one moves at less the force and the bottom of the two stanchions intersepts the forces of motion from the ground to the working part of the suspension fastest with more actuation capabilities by transmitting shock through the rim first.
#20
Chillin' Chillin'
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: 828 hood
Posts: 141
Bikes: kona stinky, voodoo
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by ChroMo2
Dude, man! if your gonna be jumping your bike on a trail, you should be using a triple crown fork, not a cross country style fork, 4real.