Notices
Mountain Bike Racing Discuss pro racing, the big races, and even the small backyard races. Don't forget to update all the members with your own race results.

cannondale

Old 08-26-05, 03:01 PM
  #1  
ChroMo2
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 256

Bikes: 1997 Schwinn Moab2 cross-country racing, highly modified, rebuilt many, many times. very fast!

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
what kinda bikers ride cannondales?

Last edited by ChroMo2; 08-26-05 at 06:43 PM.
ChroMo2 is offline  
Old 08-26-05, 06:47 PM
  #2  
gwhunt23
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Richmond, VA
Posts: 613
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
What kinda question is that?

I suppose my answer would be bikers that like Cannondale's unique suspension design.
gwhunt23 is offline  
Old 08-26-05, 07:52 PM
  #3  
ChroMo2
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 256

Bikes: 1997 Schwinn Moab2 cross-country racing, highly modified, rebuilt many, many times. very fast!

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
oh yeah... the good ol' Cannondale Headshok. Do you think that was an attempt in vain, just to be different?
ChroMo2 is offline  
Old 08-29-05, 03:30 PM
  #4  
alcahueteria
Senior Member
 
alcahueteria's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Philadelphia
Posts: 1,036

Bikes: Specialized AWOL, Soma Juice

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I just think everyone's trying to pioneer and get an angle, so a little of both. It both interests and annoys me, because I would be ok with them if it wasn't for all their proprietary stuff.
alcahueteria is offline  
Old 08-30-05, 07:42 PM
  #5  
ChroMo2
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 256

Bikes: 1997 Schwinn Moab2 cross-country racing, highly modified, rebuilt many, many times. very fast!

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I like the K2 with the Noleen shock, u gotta be too cool to race with one of those.
ChroMo2 is offline  
Old 10-03-05, 09:10 PM
  #6  
bikejack
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 271
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by ChroMo2
oh yeah... the good ol' Cannondale Headshok. Do you think that was an attempt in vain, just to be different?
No, I think it was an attempt to try something different and get an edge, the level of engineering in the headshock is pretty impressive for a production bike and the concept of getting the unsprung weight out of the forks is valid.

Always keep in mind before criticising different approaches in a market driven technology based sport that if they get it right you'll be the one with the obsolete technology.

That new fangled derailllier thang will never work either, it's as silly as riding without toeclips.
bikejack is offline  
Old 10-03-05, 10:22 PM
  #7  
seely
The Rabbi
 
seely's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 5,125
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 16 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
The Lefty/Headshok are really a brilliant design. Substantially stiffer than virtually any other fork out there. I am particularly a fan of the headshock since it uses standard dropouts. The full rigid fork with a very large single stanchion means virtually NO FLEX into any corner. The lockout actually locks the fork out 100%, I don't think any other manufacturer can claim this. The roller bearings are easy to service and give smooth easily maintained action. Good chance my next bike will sport a Headshok.
seely is offline  
Old 10-06-05, 04:12 PM
  #8  
ChroMo2
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 256

Bikes: 1997 Schwinn Moab2 cross-country racing, highly modified, rebuilt many, many times. very fast!

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
actually two stanchions work better because a bicycle only weighs 25 pounds. if you divide that by two and distribute the weight twice you provide a wider distribution area to handle the lateral forces on the load bearing axle, and you get better response and more control. Plus the finer adjustment of two stanchions instead if one moves at less the force and the bottom of the two stanchions intersepts the forces of motion from the ground to the working part of the suspension fastest with more actuation capabilities by transmitting shock through the rim first.

Last edited by ChroMo2; 10-07-05 at 05:27 PM.
ChroMo2 is offline  
Old 10-11-05, 06:13 PM
  #9  
harris
Norcal 29er
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Mendocino Norcal
Posts: 158

Bikes: Gary fisher Mt Tam 29er

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by ChroMo2
actually two stanchions work better because a bicycle only weighs 25 pounds. if you divide that by two and distribute the weight twice you provide a wider distribution area to handle the lateral forces on the load bearing axle, and you get better response and more control. Plus the finer adjustment of two stanchions instead if one moves at less the force and the bottom of the two stanchions intersepts the forces of motion from the ground to the working part of the suspension fastest with more actuation capabilities by transmitting shock through the rim first.
yea, i suppose that that would be true, if the bike were riding itself. you are forgetting that a bike has more than its own 25 pounds on it. there is me and my fat butt sitting on it and pounding it off of jumps. the amount of force that i put on a bike is amazing. most peoples beef with the headshoks (i am assuming that you guys mean the old design, with a short shock and then a rigid fork beneath it.) is that there isn't very much travel. well, unless you are jumping, the only thing that you need suspension for is taking the edge off of bumps so that you can go over them faster. for that you only need an inch or two, so there is no problem with headshoks. for allmountain riding i can understand why most people dont like them. i cant blame them. if i am gunna jump, i need more than 3 inches of travel to support me. that is where the lefty shock comes in. the prophets with left shock have 5.5 inches up front. thats pretty good. plus they dont weigh much, and they are crazy strong. the hub is the only spot that seems like it seems weak, but it is pretty much as strong as a standard axle with dropouts. and, if you think about it, most forks just use one side of it for the spring, and the actual suspending of the bike. the other side just sorta chills there.

harris
harris is offline  
Old 10-13-05, 04:52 PM
  #10  
ChroMo2
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 256

Bikes: 1997 Schwinn Moab2 cross-country racing, highly modified, rebuilt many, many times. very fast!

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by harris
yea, i suppose that that would be true, if the bike were riding itself. you are forgetting that a bike has more than its own 25 pounds on it. there is me and my fat butt sitting on it and pounding it off of jumps. the amount of force that i put on a bike is amazing. most peoples beef with the headshoks (i am assuming that you guys mean the old design, with a short shock and then a rigid fork beneath it.) is that there isn't very much travel. well, unless you are jumping, the only thing that you need suspension for is taking the edge off of bumps so that you can go over them faster. for that you only need an inch or two, so there is no problem with headshoks. for allmountain riding i can understand why most people dont like them. i cant blame them. if i am gunna jump, i need more than 3 inches of travel to support me. that is where the lefty shock comes in. the prophets with left shock have 5.5 inches up front. thats pretty good. plus they dont weigh much, and they are crazy strong. the hub is the only spot that seems like it seems weak, but it is pretty much as strong as a standard axle with dropouts. and, if you think about it, most forks just use one side of it for the spring, and the actual suspending of the bike. the other side just sorta chills there.

harris
Dude, man! if your gonna be jumping your bike on a trail, you should be using a triple crown fork, not a cross country style fork, 4real. suspension puts the wheel back where it's supposed to be after it does it's job, if your in the air or even less than the weight of gravity. the weight of your body doesn't totally rest on the suspension and when your body hits ground it can exert more than 100% your body weight. and there's also the force on the suspension that doesn't hit at a 90 degree angle to the ground, where dividing those forces by two equal forces (the stanchions) will double it's working efficiency. The weight to performace is not a gain, because any slight difference in weight is not worth lowering your performance for a design that was made just to be different, and not based to actually be a higher perfoming working part of a bicycle.
ChroMo2 is offline  
Old 10-28-05, 12:13 PM
  #11  
TacoMunch
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 7
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Interesting.

You guys can argue physics theory and schemantics all day long. Regardless, the seat of my pants tells me that the Headshok on my modded F400 is one of the best XC forks in existence - sufficient travel (80 mm), light weight, super stiff, ultra responsive and super-smooth, and with an on-the-fly total lockout. There is some additional maintanence required, but it is worth every extra minute.

You gotta love the 'oh, that's different - it's stupid and I hate it' crowd who arrive at conclusive opinions within 10 seconds and without ever even trying the product. Innovation and unconventional thinking should be suppressed!

See you on the trail.
TacoMunch is offline  
Old 10-28-05, 05:37 PM
  #12  
ChroMo2
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 256

Bikes: 1997 Schwinn Moab2 cross-country racing, highly modified, rebuilt many, many times. very fast!

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by TacoMunch
Interesting.

You guys can argue physics theory and schemantics all day long. Regardless, the seat of my pants tells me that the Headshok on my modded F400 is one of the best XC forks in existence - sufficient travel (80 mm), light weight, super stiff, ultra responsive and super-smooth, and with an on-the-fly total lockout. There is some additional maintanence required, but it is worth every extra minute.

You gotta love the 'oh, that's different - it's stupid and I hate it' crowd who arrive at conclusive opinions within 10 seconds and without ever even trying the product. Innovation and unconventional thinking should be suppressed!

See you on the trail.
it's cool to be different but if you wanna be the best, you gotta do it right!
ChroMo2 is offline  
Old 10-28-05, 08:42 PM
  #13  
LowCel 
Throw the stick!!!!
 
LowCel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Charleston, WV
Posts: 18,150

Bikes: GMC Denali

Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 176 Post(s)
Liked 92 Times in 31 Posts
A lot of people win races on Cannondales. They must be doing something right.
__________________
I may be fat but I'm slow enough to make up for it.
LowCel is offline  
Old 10-30-05, 07:23 PM
  #14  
ChroMo2
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 256

Bikes: 1997 Schwinn Moab2 cross-country racing, highly modified, rebuilt many, many times. very fast!

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Cannondale has some cool mountain bikes. I wouldn't mind owning one if it had a normal fork on it. I dont understand how it would be possible for suspension torque not to affect proper steering, especially by a wheel supported by one stanchion (fork blade)
ChroMo2 is offline  
Old 12-03-05, 09:03 PM
  #15  
Ds900Rider
trail tamer
 
Ds900Rider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: CT
Posts: 114

Bikes: Trek Bruiser II...custom build

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
go-ped's have the one sided fork thing going too, ive never heard of one breaking or having any problems...if you see one in person the lefty fork is really beefy and mounted on a 1.5 headtube...even stronger
Ds900Rider is offline  
Old 12-08-05, 09:07 AM
  #16  
apclassic9
Caustic Soccer Mom
 
apclassic9's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Millstone WV
Posts: 1,761
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 11 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Lefties RULE - especailly in winter when regular forks get mucked up with frozen mud & slush
apclassic9 is offline  
Old 01-01-06, 02:39 PM
  #17  
mcoine
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: southern oregon
Posts: 2,631
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by ChroMo2
actually two stanchions work better because a bicycle only weighs 25 pounds. if you divide that by two and distribute the weight twice you provide a wider distribution area to handle the lateral forces on the load bearing axle, and you get better response and more control. Plus the finer adjustment of two stanchions instead if one moves at less the force and the bottom of the two stanchions intersepts the forces of motion from the ground to the working part of the suspension fastest with more actuation capabilities by transmitting shock through the rim first.
Then why don't bikes and motorcycles use two in the back like my old honda. The reason: two is sloppy, and heavy. Full suspension bikes have one shock in the back and should have one in the front for the same reason. i love my f2000 with fatty sl
mcoine is offline  
Old 01-02-06, 07:04 PM
  #18  
Brian
Senior Member
 
Brian's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Between the mountains and the lake.
Posts: 16,681

Bikes: 8 bikes - one for each day of the week!

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
ChroMo2, how many Headshok-equipped bikes have you ridden?
Brian is offline  
Old 01-23-06, 05:17 AM
  #19  
sngltrackdufus
Banned.
 
sngltrackdufus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: tartarus
Posts: 1,258

Bikes: MTB's & a Cyclocross

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
sniff,sniff,sniff........... I think i smell something smoldering.
sngltrackdufus is offline  
Old 01-23-06, 06:35 AM
  #20  
Girlscout13
Chillin' Chillin'
 
Girlscout13's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: 828 hood
Posts: 141

Bikes: kona stinky, voodoo

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by ChroMo2
Dude, man! if your gonna be jumping your bike on a trail, you should be using a triple crown fork, not a cross country style fork, 4real.
Thats amazing. There are lots of single crown forks you can beat the crap out of.Jumping a SC fork should not be a problem.
Girlscout13 is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information -

Copyright © 2023 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.