Go Back  Bike Forums > The Racer's Forum > Mountain Bike Racing
Reload this Page >

Best lightweight MTB CC Racing Fork?

Mountain Bike Racing Discuss pro racing, the big races, and even the small backyard races. Don't forget to update all the members with your own race results.

Best lightweight MTB CC Racing Fork?

Old 04-02-08, 10:24 PM
  #1  
patentcad
Peloton Shelter Dog
Thread Starter
 
patentcad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Chester, NY
Posts: 90,401

Bikes: 2017 Scott Foil, 2016 Scott Addict SL, 2018 Santa Cruz Blur CC MTB

Mentioned: 70 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1027 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Best lightweight MTB CC Racing Fork?

3" of travel, preferably sub 3 lbs.

What's your favorite suspension fork?
patentcad is offline  
Old 04-03-08, 10:10 AM
  #2  
C Law
Too Much Crazy
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: NY
Posts: 3,659

Bikes: A bunch

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 114 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
you have 2 choices

fox f80 or rock shox sid.

(Although, another option would be the DT swiss/pace fork xrc80.)

My favorite would be the fox. stiffer platform and lovely buttery travel. a few grams heavier though.
C Law is offline  
Old 04-03-08, 11:50 AM
  #3  
patentcad
Peloton Shelter Dog
Thread Starter
 
patentcad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Chester, NY
Posts: 90,401

Bikes: 2017 Scott Foil, 2016 Scott Addict SL, 2018 Santa Cruz Blur CC MTB

Mentioned: 70 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1027 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Originally Posted by C Law View Post
you have 2 choices

fox f80 or rock shox sid.

(Although, another option would be the DT swiss/pace fork xrc80.)

My favorite would be the fox. stiffer platform and lovely buttery travel. a few grams heavier though.
Fly Ti MTB that I ordered comes with the SID fork (2006 model). MTB Action didn't like that fork, my LBS tells me any newer race fork from the past 2-3 years will blow away my c. 1999 Manitou Carbon that's on my Jamis. We'll see.
patentcad is offline  
Old 04-03-08, 01:40 PM
  #4  
C Law
Too Much Crazy
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: NY
Posts: 3,659

Bikes: A bunch

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 114 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
your LBS is correct. You can't even compare the two.


The biggest knock I have heard on the SID is its noodly qualities.

The only people I know who like them weigh 150lbs or less.

But it might feel stiff compared to your 1999 fork.
C Law is offline  
Old 04-03-08, 01:49 PM
  #5  
patentcad
Peloton Shelter Dog
Thread Starter
 
patentcad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Chester, NY
Posts: 90,401

Bikes: 2017 Scott Foil, 2016 Scott Addict SL, 2018 Santa Cruz Blur CC MTB

Mentioned: 70 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1027 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Originally Posted by C Law View Post
your LBS is correct. You can't even compare the two.


The biggest knock I have heard on the SID is its noodly qualities.

The only people I know who like them weigh 150lbs or less.

But it might feel stiff compared to your 1999 fork.
The MB Action review of the Fly Ti was hard to figure. They liked the handling, lightness, climbing, didn't like the descending - but they tested it on the stock 1.8 Kenda Lite tires inflated to 50psi. You put those tires on any MTB and it will wash out on any technical terrain and descend like crap. Then in another section they call the Fly Ti 'harsh', but then they say it 'absorbs trail vibration and doesn't punish the rider'. Go figure. Ultimately they criticize the bike because you might want to upgrade the tires, cassette (12-27) and SID fork, and that's unacceptable for a bike that has an MSRP of $4300 (or whatever number Mike of BD gave them). I paid $1900. At that price it was sort of a no-brainer.

I still can't quite figure out that review. But they did characterize the Ti frame and finish as 'stunning'. That's hopeful. If the bike sucks I'll probably keep the components and get another CF or Ti frame. I'm sure the frame on that bike will bring pretty good $ on eBay if it came to that. But my guess is I'll like the bike.
patentcad is offline  
Old 04-03-08, 04:01 PM
  #6  
Frunkin
nom nom nom
 
Frunkin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 2,096

Bikes: Lemond Tete de Course, Slingshot DDX, Fuji Track Pro, Surly Steamroller

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
The new sids have larger stantions, and are much stiffer.
I would czech those out.
Frunkin is offline  
Old 04-03-08, 05:01 PM
  #7  
xcracer13
Nitro
 
xcracer13's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: canyon lake, tx
Posts: 829

Bikes: Salsa

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Yah it only weighs like 100grams less than the Reba though...
xcracer13 is offline  
Old 04-03-08, 06:12 PM
  #8  
patentcad
Peloton Shelter Dog
Thread Starter
 
patentcad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Chester, NY
Posts: 90,401

Bikes: 2017 Scott Foil, 2016 Scott Addict SL, 2018 Santa Cruz Blur CC MTB

Mentioned: 70 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1027 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Originally Posted by patentcad View Post
Fly Ti MTB that I ordered comes with the SID fork (2006 model). MTB Action didn't like that fork, my LBS tells me any newer race fork from the past 2-3 years will blow away my c. 1999 Manitou Carbon that's on my Jamis. We'll see.
Mike from BD says the MTB Action article is inaccurate, the SID Fork on the Fly Ti is the 2008 model after all, so that should be pretty good from what everyone is saying here.
patentcad is offline  
Old 04-08-08, 08:49 PM
  #9  
BlueTrain
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Missoula, MT
Posts: 68

Bikes: A coupla Schwinns

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
i'd be skeptical of anything written in MBA...
BlueTrain is offline  
Old 04-09-08, 10:08 PM
  #10  
patentcad
Peloton Shelter Dog
Thread Starter
 
patentcad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Chester, NY
Posts: 90,401

Bikes: 2017 Scott Foil, 2016 Scott Addict SL, 2018 Santa Cruz Blur CC MTB

Mentioned: 70 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1027 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
I am skeptical of everything.
patentcad is offline  
Old 04-10-08, 09:56 AM
  #11  
Fat Boy
Wheelsuck
 
Fat Boy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 6,158
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by patentcad View Post
Ultimately they criticize the bike because you might want to upgrade the tires, cassette (12-27) and SID fork, and that's unacceptable for a bike that has an MSRP of $4300 (or whatever number Mike of BD gave them). I paid $1900. At that price it was sort of a no-brainer.
So I've got an 11-32 cassette on the shelf that might get stuck on the bike early. I find tires a replacement item on pretty much every bike. I'm still curious about how fat a tire you can stick on that bike. I'd like to be able to run at least a 2.1" wide tire, weight be damned.

As far as the fork goes, my present mountain bike has an old school, lowest end Judy fork with Englund air cartridges (can I get an AMEN!?). I'm thinking the SID will be a pretty substantial upgrade.
Fat Boy is offline  
Old 04-11-08, 09:02 PM
  #12  
patentcad
Peloton Shelter Dog
Thread Starter
 
patentcad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Chester, NY
Posts: 90,401

Bikes: 2017 Scott Foil, 2016 Scott Addict SL, 2018 Santa Cruz Blur CC MTB

Mentioned: 70 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1027 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Originally Posted by Fat Boy View Post
So I've got an 11-32 cassette on the shelf that might get stuck on the bike early. I find tires a replacement item on pretty much every bike. I'm still curious about how fat a tire you can stick on that bike. I'd like to be able to run at least a 2.1" wide tire, weight be damned.

As far as the fork goes, my present mountain bike has an old school, lowest end Judy fork with Englund air cartridges (can I get an AMEN!?). I'm thinking the SID will be a pretty substantial upgrade.
I'm almost certain you can fit a 2.1" tire on there, I'll check with Bikes Direct. I run Conti Explorer Pros that would add 300 grams to the bike weight (150 grams per tire), but they're great all around CC tires that can handle just about anything. That cassette won't bother me, I'm a roadie racer and for me a 39 x 23 is a granny gear on the road. A 32 x 27 or whatever that bike has for a bail out gear will get me up anything I could ever technically handle climbing. If you need a smaller gear than that it's probably over my limited MTB handling/climbing skills anyway. All I have to add besides that are bar ends.
patentcad is offline  
Old 04-13-08, 07:35 PM
  #13  
ronbridal
Senior Member
 
ronbridal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Illinois
Posts: 524
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I am a roadie and just recently started to race xc. I ride a Motobecane Fly 9357. The stock SID Race fork has been more than great for me. The bike is light, fast, and responsive. The components rock. I couldn't be happier. I've raced it twice (13th ,2nd) and have ridden it on trails two other times. No complaints so far. Let me know if you have any questions.

RON
ronbridal is offline  
Old 04-13-08, 09:56 PM
  #14  
patentcad
Peloton Shelter Dog
Thread Starter
 
patentcad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Chester, NY
Posts: 90,401

Bikes: 2017 Scott Foil, 2016 Scott Addict SL, 2018 Santa Cruz Blur CC MTB

Mentioned: 70 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1027 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Originally Posted by ronbridal View Post
I am a roadie and just recently started to race xc. I ride a Motobecane Fly 9357. The stock SID Race fork has been more than great for me. The bike is light, fast, and responsive. The components rock. I couldn't be happier. I've raced it twice (13th ,2nd) and have ridden it on trails two other times. No complaints so far. Let me know if you have any questions.

RON
Thanks Ron, I'll do that. I am planning on looking for an not so technical MTB race to stretch
out the Fly Ti on later this year, perhaps in the Fall. You can fit 2.1" tires on that bike. I won't bother with the stock 350 gram 1.9" Kendas, I'll need a beefier tire than that around here.
patentcad is offline  
Old 04-15-08, 11:12 PM
  #15  
giant rules!!!
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 144
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by xcracer13 View Post
Yah it only weighs like 100grams less than the Reba though...


Actually, the Sid weighs close to 300 grams lighter than the Reba.
giant rules!!! is offline  
Old 04-16-08, 10:20 AM
  #16  
ZeCanon
Writin' stuff
 
ZeCanon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Boulder, CO
Posts: 3,782
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
The fox is nowhere near 3lbs, by the way.

I went from 2007 sid team to a new 2009 sid this weekend, and the difference is huge. I will give up 100g any day for a fork that actually goes where I point it. In my opinion, the new sid is the way to go.

Another option is the manitou R7 MRD, but those have been coming in heavier than expected and have 30mm stanchions, compared to the '09 sid's 32.
ZeCanon is offline  
Old 04-16-08, 12:07 PM
  #17  
fosmith
my brain hurts!
 
fosmith's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Oak Knoll
Posts: 680

Bikes: Numerous bicycles.

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
dude...check out the Manitou MRD R7 Absolute. for real sub 3 pounder and it works! not noodly and it's easy to service.
fosmith is offline  
Old 04-17-08, 06:22 PM
  #18  
patentcad
Peloton Shelter Dog
Thread Starter
 
patentcad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Chester, NY
Posts: 90,401

Bikes: 2017 Scott Foil, 2016 Scott Addict SL, 2018 Santa Cruz Blur CC MTB

Mentioned: 70 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1027 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Originally Posted by ZeCanon View Post
The fox is nowhere near 3lbs, by the way.

I went from 2007 sid team to a new 2009 sid this weekend, and the difference is huge. I will give up 100g any day for a fork that actually goes where I point it. In my opinion, the new sid is the way to go.

Another option is the manitou R7 MRD, but those have been coming in heavier than expected and have 30mm stanchions, compared to the '09 sid's 32.
I think the Fly Ti comes with the current SID, and the MTB Action article was wrong. We'll find out soon enough...
patentcad is offline  
Old 04-24-08, 04:24 PM
  #19  
ZeCanon
Writin' stuff
 
ZeCanon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Boulder, CO
Posts: 3,782
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
This current SID has only been out for a few weeks. It may be specced on an 08 bike, but I doubt it.

If it comes with the new sid, keep it.
ZeCanon is offline  
Old 04-24-08, 06:36 PM
  #20  
patentcad
Peloton Shelter Dog
Thread Starter
 
patentcad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Chester, NY
Posts: 90,401

Bikes: 2017 Scott Foil, 2016 Scott Addict SL, 2018 Santa Cruz Blur CC MTB

Mentioned: 70 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1027 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
The Fly Ti frames aren't even in the US yet. Due to land in the next week or so. The SID forks are in the hands of Bikes Direct, so they may well be the current SID. It think they're calling the Fly Ti a 2009 model. In any event, none of the bikes have been assembled or shipped to customers yet. Soon.
patentcad is offline  
Old 04-24-08, 06:47 PM
  #21  
ZeCanon
Writin' stuff
 
ZeCanon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Boulder, CO
Posts: 3,782
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I look forward to stories of your ever-increasing self-loathing Pcad
ZeCanon is offline  
Old 04-24-08, 07:45 PM
  #22  
patentcad
Peloton Shelter Dog
Thread Starter
 
patentcad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Chester, NY
Posts: 90,401

Bikes: 2017 Scott Foil, 2016 Scott Addict SL, 2018 Santa Cruz Blur CC MTB

Mentioned: 70 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1027 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Originally Posted by ZeCanon View Post
I look forward to stories of your ever-increasing self-loathing Pcad
Nothing will ramp the S.L. more than a few days on the single track. Trust me. I may fancy myself some kind of hard core Road Nazi, but MTBs can make me cry for Mommy pretty fast.
patentcad is offline  
Old 04-25-08, 06:24 PM
  #23  
Fat Boy
Wheelsuck
 
Fat Boy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 6,158
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by patentcad View Post
The Fly Ti frames aren't even in the US yet.
They are now, BAAAAAAAAAAAAABYYYYYY!
Fat Boy is offline  
Old 04-26-08, 03:29 PM
  #24  
patentcad
Peloton Shelter Dog
Thread Starter
 
patentcad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Chester, NY
Posts: 90,401

Bikes: 2017 Scott Foil, 2016 Scott Addict SL, 2018 Santa Cruz Blur CC MTB

Mentioned: 70 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1027 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
My Fly Ti will ship early next week. I am psyched.
patentcad is offline  
Old 04-26-08, 11:35 PM
  #25  
AKRX
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 83
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Man, 300 grams, 100 grams... I don't start caring until there's at least about a pound in difference...

I'm partial to Marzocchi, though I'm riding Rockshox right now. Check out the Corsa's.
AKRX is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright 2018 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.