Stick with a HT for my first MTB or spend the extra money and get a FS?
#26
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Appleton WI
Posts: 519
Bikes: Specialized Roubaix - Soma Double Cross Disc - Pivot Mach 429SL - Canfield Brothers Yelli Screamy - Specialized Carve SL - Trek Farley 7 - GT Dyno VFR
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
FS all the way. I have over $2K into my freshly built hardtail. I've recently ridden a few bottom end FS bikes in the $2K price range. Yes the forks could use an upgrade, but there really is no comparison. I am second guessing my decision now and looking really hard at either selling the HT or finding an appropriate FS frame.
#27
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Lewisburg, TN
Posts: 1,356
Bikes: Mikkelsen custom steel, Santa Cruz Chameleon SS, old trek trainer bike
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 70 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 6 Times
in
4 Posts
I would go hard tail, but I didn't really like FS when I had it a few years ago. Everything I ride now is either on a rigid 29er, a front sus 29er, or a rigid fatbike. I can honestly say that I haven't tried any new FS designs in recent years though, nor do I have a desire to at the moment.
#28
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2015
Posts: 9
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I think I decided to hold off and save a little more and go with a Giant Anthem SX. From everyone that I have talked that has ridden one said its a great bike. I want to try and stay away from hardtails if I can since I will be going to multiple trails some being really technical and some nice and smooth.
#30
Old Fart In Training
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 2,268
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 12 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 22 Times
in
16 Posts
My Rear suspension helps me keep my back tire on the ground more, so I can pedal harder and get more power on the ground and that,,,Is faster for me.
I used to get light on my hard tail and pedal when I could in the roots ,, hopefully holding the speed I needed to get past that section.
I can now motor along steady with full rear tire contact and traction right through the roots n rock, and sand with Hidden roots n rocks oh my
I used to get light on my hard tail and pedal when I could in the roots ,, hopefully holding the speed I needed to get past that section.
I can now motor along steady with full rear tire contact and traction right through the roots n rock, and sand with Hidden roots n rocks oh my

#31
Bike Junkie
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: South of Raleigh, North of New Hill, East of Harris Lake, NC
Posts: 9,622
Bikes: Specialized Tarmac, Specialized Roubaix, Giant OCR-C, Specialized Stumpjumper FSR, Stumpjumper Comp, 88 & 92Nishiki Ariel, 87 Centurion Ironman, 92 Paramount, 84 Nishiki Medalist
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 68 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 36 Times
in
27 Posts
Good choice. With lock out rear shocks, the only real penalty you pay with a rear suspension is weight. You can lock out the rear sus and make it dang close to a HT. BUT, there's no way your going to make a HT have a rear sus. Giant makes great bikes, you'll be pleased.
__________________
Roccobike BF Official Thread Terminator
Roccobike BF Official Thread Terminator
#32
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2015
Posts: 9
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Yeah I'm hoping I'll enjoy the bike. I ride a giant road bike now and absolutely love it. I just worry that with a hard tail I'll find trails where I absolutely will hate it. Have a buddy who won't ride some trails around here because he doesn't have FS.
#33
Old Fart In Training
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 2,268
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 12 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 22 Times
in
16 Posts
My take on Mtb'ing is unless you are riding down hill only, then full suspension is overkill, and heavy.
It has been a long time since I owned FS but back then I found it very bouncy and not very efficient for climbing or riding on flat ground. going downhills felt great.
It has been a long time since I owned FS but back then I found it very bouncy and not very efficient for climbing or riding on flat ground. going downhills felt great.
Things have changed, Full squish is no longer bouncy and are starting to show up on race day with the hard tails because of very efficient power to the ground ratio's...
Yeah things have changed..
#34
Junior Member
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 15
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I like endurance events and I am 45 years old. My cannondale flash alloy 29er was as comfortable as night in jail! After 4 hours on it I was done. I replaced it with a carbon epic expert, still a very racy bike but way more comfortable at the 3+ hour mark.
#35
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2015
Posts: 9
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
So I think I finally decided I want to do some XC racing with whatever bike I go with. The two I am seriously looking at are the Giant XTC Advanced 1 XTC Advanced 29er 1 (2015) | Giant Bicycles | United States or a Trek Superfly (undecide on which version I would go with) Has anyone raced with the xtc? I like the price point and the components as well as being a carbon fiber frame.
#36
Two-Wheeled Aficionado
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Wichita
Posts: 4,903
Bikes: Santa Cruz Blur TR, Cannondale Quick CX dropbar conversion & others
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times
in
4 Posts
I would not suggest a carbon frame for a new MTB rider, let alone new XC racer.
I met a guy over the weekend while visiting family in Ohio, who loves endurance MTB races and does singlespeed XC (Niner One9). His wife races too, and she has an aluminum XTC 27.5.
His road and CX bikes are carbon. When I asked him why his MTBs were aluminum, he said "out of all the races I've done, the only frames I have ever seen leaving an event in 2 pieces are ALWAYS carbon." He's seen aluminum dented severely enough to retire/replace the frame, but they finished the event on 2 wheels at least.
You're going to crash. If you repair small scuffs and cracks in the carbon properly, it'll be ok. But if you ignore issues, and treat it like aluminum (where people ignore small dents), the cracks will worsen and moisture will intrude.
I met a guy over the weekend while visiting family in Ohio, who loves endurance MTB races and does singlespeed XC (Niner One9). His wife races too, and she has an aluminum XTC 27.5.
His road and CX bikes are carbon. When I asked him why his MTBs were aluminum, he said "out of all the races I've done, the only frames I have ever seen leaving an event in 2 pieces are ALWAYS carbon." He's seen aluminum dented severely enough to retire/replace the frame, but they finished the event on 2 wheels at least.
You're going to crash. If you repair small scuffs and cracks in the carbon properly, it'll be ok. But if you ignore issues, and treat it like aluminum (where people ignore small dents), the cracks will worsen and moisture will intrude.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
JohnFyf
Mountain Biking
7
04-19-18 03:00 PM
CliftonGK1
Clydesdales/Athenas (200+ lb / 91+ kg)
13
05-15-12 04:51 PM
urbanknight
Mountain Biking
57
04-30-10 10:07 AM