Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Mountain Biking
Reload this Page >

Wireless Computer that will work with wide fork ?

Search
Notices
Mountain Biking Mountain biking is one of the fastest growing sports in the world. Check out this forum to discuss the latest tips, tricks, gear and equipment in the world of mountain biking.

Wireless Computer that will work with wide fork ?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-28-05, 09:25 AM
  #1  
JoeWolcottCT
Thread Starter
 
JoeOxfordCT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Wolcott, CT
Posts: 1,656

Bikes: Cannondale

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Hi All,

I recently purchased and 2005 Gary Fisher Hoo Koo E Koo and am slowly making the transition from riding it on the roads to riding off road. My last mtb was a Trek 950 Singletrack that had slicks and I had a wireless computer that worked fine. It was a dB 4LW Wireless Cyclocomputer: https://www.performancebike.com/shop/...tegory_ID=4110

However, when I tried to mount it to my new bike I couldn't move the pickup close enough to the spokes to get the computer to work.

Can anyone recommend a good, not ridiculously expensive wireless computer for an mtb ???

Thanks,

J.
JoeOxfordCT is offline  
Old 06-28-05, 12:09 PM
  #2  
LSU Alum
 
jameyj's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: TX
Posts: 332

Bikes: 2006 Trek 2100D - 2005 Giant NRS - 2004.5 Giant Suede

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Cateye Micro Wireless - https://www.cateye.com/en/products/vi...d=6&subCatId=0

I have a Rockshox Duke XC fork on my NRS and the wired computer would not fit. I put the Cateye Micro Wireless on and it works perfectly. Great computer and the new ones have a nice little backlight now. Great for when you ride at night.
__________________
Please consider supporting my efforts to help those with MS. -<>- jbj2
jameyj is offline  
Old 06-28-05, 12:14 PM
  #3  
Throw the stick!!!!
 
LowCel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Charleston, WV
Posts: 18,150

Bikes: GMC Denali

Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 176 Post(s)
Liked 92 Times in 31 Posts
That's the computer I have on my Marzocchi Marathon SL as well. I also had it on my White Brothers with no problems.
__________________
I may be fat but I'm slow enough to make up for it.
LowCel is offline  
Old 06-28-05, 12:25 PM
  #4  
JoeWolcottCT
Thread Starter
 
JoeOxfordCT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Wolcott, CT
Posts: 1,656

Bikes: Cannondale

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Ok, Cateye seems to be the way to go....
Do you understand my problem though ?
It's not that I can't get the sensor to attach to the fork blade.
It's that the fork blade is so far away from the spokes that I had my old sensor
perpendicular to the fork blade and it still wasn't picking up the magnet on the spoke.

Thanks again guys !

Haven't been on the Bike Forums in awhile....lot of us New Englanders spent alot of time on the forum grumbling about the weather in February, March, & April but as soon as the weather turned I forgot all about the computer and have been out riding or working in the yard

J.
JoeOxfordCT is offline  
Old 06-28-05, 12:35 PM
  #5  
LSU Alum
 
jameyj's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: TX
Posts: 332

Bikes: 2006 Trek 2100D - 2005 Giant NRS - 2004.5 Giant Suede

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
That is the same problem I had with my wired computer until I switched to the wireless one. So it should work. I would go down to your LBS and ask them to look at your bike and verify that it will work.

What type of fork, bike and wheel are you using this for? That might help to know as others might have the same similar combination and could tell you what they use.
__________________
Please consider supporting my efforts to help those with MS. -<>- jbj2
jameyj is offline  
Old 06-28-05, 12:56 PM
  #6  
JoeWolcottCT
Thread Starter
 
JoeOxfordCT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Wolcott, CT
Posts: 1,656

Bikes: Cannondale

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Totally stock Gary Fisher Hoo Koo E Koo w/RockShox Pilot SL 100mm travel...rest of the specs are on the link.
https://www.fisherbikes.com/bikes/bik...esis&bike=HKEK

Originally Posted by jameyj
That is the same problem I had with my wired computer until I switched to the wireless one. So it should work. I would go down to your LBS and ask them to look at your bike and verify that it will work.

What type of fork, bike and wheel are you using this for? That might help to know as others might have the same similar combination and could tell you what they use.
JoeOxfordCT is offline  
Old 06-28-05, 12:57 PM
  #7  
Throw the stick!!!!
 
LowCel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Charleston, WV
Posts: 18,150

Bikes: GMC Denali

Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 176 Post(s)
Liked 92 Times in 31 Posts
Stupid question, but will it not even work when you get down close to the hub since that is closer to the fork?
__________________
I may be fat but I'm slow enough to make up for it.
LowCel is offline  
Old 06-28-05, 01:17 PM
  #8  
JoeWolcottCT
Thread Starter
 
JoeOxfordCT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Wolcott, CT
Posts: 1,656

Bikes: Cannondale

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
The spacing difference is not that great until you get real close to the hub. Plus, there is a 60cm limit between the sending unit on the fork blade & the receiving unit on the handlebars too...
Their site is www.filzer.com it's the DB4 model. You can check the manual that's in PDF format.


Whoa, wait I just checked, 60cm translates to nearly 24 inches.....I don't know why it won't work
Maybe it's the operator


Originally Posted by LowCel
Stupid question, but will it not even work when you get down close to the hub since that is closer to the fork?
JoeOxfordCT is offline  
Old 06-28-05, 01:26 PM
  #9  
Throw the stick!!!!
 
LowCel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Charleston, WV
Posts: 18,150

Bikes: GMC Denali

Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 176 Post(s)
Liked 92 Times in 31 Posts
LOL, it was just a thought. A lot of the time the simplest solution is overlooked, was hoping this would be one of those times.
__________________
I may be fat but I'm slow enough to make up for it.

Last edited by LowCel; 06-28-05 at 01:31 PM.
LowCel is offline  
Old 06-28-05, 01:30 PM
  #10  
LSU Alum
 
jameyj's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: TX
Posts: 332

Bikes: 2006 Trek 2100D - 2005 Giant NRS - 2004.5 Giant Suede

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Sounds like a product design issue. The Cateye will work just fine and it is a rock solid product. I have two Cateye computers and one of them has taken some tough abuse and I has never given me a problem.
__________________
Please consider supporting my efforts to help those with MS. -<>- jbj2
jameyj is offline  
Old 06-28-05, 01:43 PM
  #11  
JoeWolcottCT
Thread Starter
 
JoeOxfordCT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Wolcott, CT
Posts: 1,656

Bikes: Cannondale

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by jameyj
Sounds like a product design issue. The Cateye will work just fine and it is a rock solid product. I have two Cateye computers and one of them has taken some tough abuse and I has never given me a problem.
Well I'm going to try and slide the sending unit down the fork blade to see if I can get it to read properly. (someone was nice enough to point that out )
If that doesn't work I'm heading straight for a Cateye...
JoeOxfordCT is offline  
Old 06-28-05, 02:16 PM
  #12  
pnj
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: seattle
Posts: 1,083
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
if it's a 'line of site' device, you need to make sure that the two devices (transmitter and receiver) can 'see' each other.

like with your TV remote, if your wife stands in front of the TV, you can't change the channel.....
pnj is offline  
Old 06-28-05, 02:18 PM
  #13  
JoeWolcottCT
Thread Starter
 
JoeOxfordCT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Wolcott, CT
Posts: 1,656

Bikes: Cannondale

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by pnj
if it's a 'line of site' device, you need to make sure that the two devices (transmitter and receiver) can 'see' each other.

like with your TV remote, if your wife stands in front of the TV, you can't change the channel.....
Now if that isn't the voice of experience I don't know what is.....
JoeOxfordCT is offline  
Old 06-28-05, 04:40 PM
  #14  
Senior Member
 
CranxOC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: OC, California
Posts: 504

Bikes: '04 Specialized Stumpy FSR Pro (Frame and Shock Only)

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by JoeOxfordCT
Hi All,

I recently purchased and 2005 Gary Fisher Hoo Koo E Koo and am slowly making the transition from riding it on the roads to riding off road. My last mtb was a Trek 950 Singletrack that had slicks and I had a wireless computer that worked fine. It was a dB 4LW Wireless Cyclocomputer: https://www.performancebike.com/shop/...tegory_ID=4110

However, when I tried to mount it to my new bike I couldn't move the pickup close enough to the spokes to get the computer to work.

Can anyone recommend a good, not ridiculously expensive wireless computer for an mtb ???

Thanks,

J.

Dude, it's not the fork, it's the user. There's really no such thing as a "wide fork" so you really just need to figure out how to mount your sensor so that it works. If you're not able to figure it out, take it to your LBS and have them put it on; I guarantee your current computer will work with your current fork.
CranxOC is offline  
Old 06-28-05, 05:01 PM
  #15  
pnj
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: seattle
Posts: 1,083
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by CranxOC
Dude, it's not the fork, it's the user. There's really no such thing as a "wide fork" so you really just need to figure out how to mount your sensor so that it works. If you're not able to figure it out, take it to your LBS and have them put it on; I guarantee your current computer will work with your current fork.

not with mine.
there was no way to mount the sensor so that the computer could 'see' it.

when I took it back to the store they looked at me like a deer caught in the headlights......:|
pnj is offline  
Old 06-28-05, 05:05 PM
  #16  
DEADBEEF
 
khuon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Catching his breath alongside a road near Seattle, WA USA
Posts: 12,234

Bikes: 1999 K2 OzM, 2001 Aegis Aro Svelte

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 6 Times in 4 Posts
Originally Posted by pnj
like with your TV remote, if your wife stands in front of the TV, you can't change the channel.....
Weird... My wife's always complaining about me standing in front of the TV when she's trying to change the channel.
__________________
1999 K2 OzM 2001 Aegis Aro Svelte
"Be liberal in what you accept, and conservative in what you send." -- Jon Postel, RFC1122
khuon is offline  
Old 06-29-05, 06:40 AM
  #17  
JoeWolcottCT
Thread Starter
 
JoeOxfordCT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Wolcott, CT
Posts: 1,656

Bikes: Cannondale

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I did look again at the setup this morning and I noted 2 things:

Moving the magnet/sensor towards the hub will not make much of a difference until you get right on top of the hub, there's just not that much taper.

I think the crown in my fork may be blocking the line of sight between the sending unit & receiving unit.

I haven't pulled my old bike down from the garage to check and see if the line of sight is any different but I am going to check tonight when I have more time....



Originally Posted by CranxOC
Dude, it's not the fork, it's the user. There's really no such thing as a "wide fork" so you really just need to figure out how to mount your sensor so that it works. If you're not able to figure it out, take it to your LBS and have them put it on; I guarantee your current computer will work with your current fork.
JoeOxfordCT is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.