Best Mountain Bike under $1000
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Best Mountain Bike under $1000
This should be a stickied post. Seems people keep asking this same question over and over.
https://reviews.mtbr.com/best-mountain-bikes-under-1000
https://reviews.mtbr.com/best-mountain-bikes-under-1000
#3
Full Member
#4
Member
Join Date: Mar 2020
Posts: 33
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 14 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
#5
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Bordering on junk bike territory. You'll end up spending $500 on it then not too long after you'll be replacing components meaning you should have just spent more money up front.
People should understand that mountain biking and cheap don't go in the same sentence. Pick any hobby...fishing, golf, shooting guns, skiing, playing guitar, scuba diving, baseball...the good equipment isn't cheap if you want quality equipment that lasts.
People should understand that mountain biking and cheap don't go in the same sentence. Pick any hobby...fishing, golf, shooting guns, skiing, playing guitar, scuba diving, baseball...the good equipment isn't cheap if you want quality equipment that lasts.
Last edited by prj71; 03-02-20 at 09:37 AM.
#6
Disco Infiltrator
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Folsom CA
Posts: 13,504
Bikes: Stormchaser, Paramount, Timberjack, Expert TG, Samba tandem
Mentioned: 69 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3009 Post(s)
Liked 1,937 Times
in
1,260 Posts
It really depends on your minimum-good-enough tolerance.
You will probably get...
Fork with oil damping
Hydraulic brakes
Tubeless rims
Quick release frame and rear hub, with cup and cone bearings
1X drivetrain with clutch rear derailleur
Do you need...
Name brand
Air spring fork, not coil. Better forks than that also are much lighter with aluminum, not steel stanchions and steerer
More range and ratios in the drivetrain
Dropper post (only sometimes at this price)
Hollow spindle crank (not at this price).
Rear thru axle with cartridge bearings
Tubeless tires (you are not likely going to get "real" tubeless tires at this price but the cheapies that come with work okay-ish until you wear them out. Then you can get sticker shock on the real thing but they seal and grip the trail much better)
Added some edits I thought of after reply below was posted
You will probably get...
Fork with oil damping
Hydraulic brakes
Tubeless rims
Quick release frame and rear hub, with cup and cone bearings
1X drivetrain with clutch rear derailleur
Do you need...
Name brand
Air spring fork, not coil. Better forks than that also are much lighter with aluminum, not steel stanchions and steerer
More range and ratios in the drivetrain
Dropper post (only sometimes at this price)
Hollow spindle crank (not at this price).
Rear thru axle with cartridge bearings
Tubeless tires (you are not likely going to get "real" tubeless tires at this price but the cheapies that come with work okay-ish until you wear them out. Then you can get sticker shock on the real thing but they seal and grip the trail much better)
Added some edits I thought of after reply below was posted
__________________
Genesis 49:16-17
Genesis 49:16-17
Last edited by Darth Lefty; 03-02-20 at 04:25 PM.
#7
Member
Join Date: Mar 2020
Posts: 33
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 14 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
It really depends on your minimum-good-enough tolerance.
You will probably get...
Fork with oil damping
Hydraulic brakes
Tubeless rims
Quick release frame and rear hub
1X drivetrain with clutch rear derailleur
Do you need...
Name brand
Air spring fork, not coil. Better forks than that also are much lighter with aluminum, not steel stanchions and steerer
More range and ratios in the drivetrain
Dropper post (only sometimes at this price)
Hollow spindle crank (not at this price).
Rear thru axle, not QR.
Tubeless tires (you are not likely going to get "real" tubeless tires at this price but the cheapies that come with work okay-ish until you wear them out. Then you can get sticker shock on the real thing but they seal and grip the trail much better)
You will probably get...
Fork with oil damping
Hydraulic brakes
Tubeless rims
Quick release frame and rear hub
1X drivetrain with clutch rear derailleur
Do you need...
Name brand
Air spring fork, not coil. Better forks than that also are much lighter with aluminum, not steel stanchions and steerer
More range and ratios in the drivetrain
Dropper post (only sometimes at this price)
Hollow spindle crank (not at this price).
Rear thru axle, not QR.
Tubeless tires (you are not likely going to get "real" tubeless tires at this price but the cheapies that come with work okay-ish until you wear them out. Then you can get sticker shock on the real thing but they seal and grip the trail much better)
#8
Disco Infiltrator
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Folsom CA
Posts: 13,504
Bikes: Stormchaser, Paramount, Timberjack, Expert TG, Samba tandem
Mentioned: 69 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3009 Post(s)
Liked 1,937 Times
in
1,260 Posts
#9
Junior Member
The Marin San Quentin 1 2020 bike caught my eye. I believe this was designed to be used on jump trails.
The angle of the head tube is 65°
im a complete novice and just bought the dragonslayer sport. That may have beem one of the poorly selling bikes out there. Its difficult to tell why but i think the older style geometry makes the tope tube too high for a lotnof riders when modern geometry bikes have the lower top tube to accomidate the 27.5 and 29er wheels.
So the marin bike cost 200 more. But i think i got the nicer drivetrain with the jamis bike. Probably better for my overall use. But the frame on the marin bike looks pretty sick.
The angle of the head tube is 65°
im a complete novice and just bought the dragonslayer sport. That may have beem one of the poorly selling bikes out there. Its difficult to tell why but i think the older style geometry makes the tope tube too high for a lotnof riders when modern geometry bikes have the lower top tube to accomidate the 27.5 and 29er wheels.
So the marin bike cost 200 more. But i think i got the nicer drivetrain with the jamis bike. Probably better for my overall use. But the frame on the marin bike looks pretty sick.
Last edited by theraddude; 03-03-20 at 06:27 PM.
#10
Disco Infiltrator
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Folsom CA
Posts: 13,504
Bikes: Stormchaser, Paramount, Timberjack, Expert TG, Samba tandem
Mentioned: 69 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3009 Post(s)
Liked 1,937 Times
in
1,260 Posts
That's a weird bike. The Nail Trail is more conventional. You shouldn't worry about it as long as you can still get tires for your Jamis - if at some point you can't then it'll also make a fine 27.5 bike
__________________
Genesis 49:16-17
Genesis 49:16-17
#11
Member
Dragonslayer
The Marin San Quentin 1 2020 bike caught my eye. I believe this was designed to be used on jump trails.
The angle of the head tube is 65°
im a complete novice and just bought the dragonslayer sport. That may have beem one of the poorly selling bikes out there. Its difficult to tell why but i think the older style geometry makes the tope tube too high for a lotnof riders when modern geometry bikes have the lower top tube to accomidate the 27.5 and 29er wheels.
So the marin bike cost 200 more. But i think i got the nicer drivetrain with the jamis bike. Probably better for my overall use. But the frame on the marin bike looks pretty sick.
The angle of the head tube is 65°
im a complete novice and just bought the dragonslayer sport. That may have beem one of the poorly selling bikes out there. Its difficult to tell why but i think the older style geometry makes the tope tube too high for a lotnof riders when modern geometry bikes have the lower top tube to accomidate the 27.5 and 29er wheels.
So the marin bike cost 200 more. But i think i got the nicer drivetrain with the jamis bike. Probably better for my overall use. But the frame on the marin bike looks pretty sick.
#12
Junior Member
so, while im waiting im looking at all the other bikes in this price range wondering if i made the right decision. But i have a good feeling about it.
Last edited by theraddude; 03-04-20 at 04:33 AM.
#13
Member
Join Date: Mar 2020
Posts: 33
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 14 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Ok so I think I narrowed it to:
The Scott scale 970
https://www.scott-sports.com/us/en/p...icle=274613008
and the specialized Rockhopper Expert 1x
Any thoughts pros? cons? one or the other?
Anything else to consider????
I know Giant has a bike but its 1155 Fathom 29 2
https://www.giant-bicycles.com/us/fathom-29-2
The Scott scale 970
https://www.scott-sports.com/us/en/p...icle=274613008
and the specialized Rockhopper Expert 1x
Any thoughts pros? cons? one or the other?
Anything else to consider????
I know Giant has a bike but its 1155 Fathom 29 2
https://www.giant-bicycles.com/us/fathom-29-2
#14
Senior Member
Pretty much a newbie to MTB but I love my Dragonslayer so far. I have already bought a set of spare tires just to insure the future. I got them on closeout.
Likes For Hobbit712:
#15
Disco Infiltrator
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Folsom CA
Posts: 13,504
Bikes: Stormchaser, Paramount, Timberjack, Expert TG, Samba tandem
Mentioned: 69 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3009 Post(s)
Liked 1,937 Times
in
1,260 Posts
Those three all have 100mm forks and pretty steep steering, ie they are XC not trail format... if that's what you want.
__________________
Genesis 49:16-17
Genesis 49:16-17
Likes For Darth Lefty:
#16
Full Member
Ok so I think I narrowed it to:
The Scott scale 970
https://www.scott-sports.com/us/en/p...icle=274613008
and the specialized Rockhopper Expert 1x
Any thoughts pros? cons? one or the other?
Anything else to consider????
I know Giant has a bike but its 1155 Fathom 29 2
https://www.giant-bicycles.com/us/fathom-29-2
The Scott scale 970
https://www.scott-sports.com/us/en/p...icle=274613008
and the specialized Rockhopper Expert 1x
Any thoughts pros? cons? one or the other?
Anything else to consider????
I know Giant has a bike but its 1155 Fathom 29 2
https://www.giant-bicycles.com/us/fathom-29-2
go with your gut all are equal and just pick one.
#17
Junior Member
Well the jamis dragon slayer showed up yesterday. The bike looks awesome. I didnt clear the top tube as well i as hoped though. But the bike is really nice. I got the sport version on the jensen super bargain deal.
i may try to sell or flip the bike later becuase i didnt get the best fit on the 17" frame but for the time being its perfect for me to do more casual riding with it. Fire trails and stuff.
as for the bike my impressions are that its just very solid feeling. Nice drive train, nice brakes. Nicer than anything ive ever had.
the last nice thing i had was a 2010 trek 4300 disc stoeln sadly. This is far better than that in terms of components.
i may try to sell or flip the bike later becuase i didnt get the best fit on the 17" frame but for the time being its perfect for me to do more casual riding with it. Fire trails and stuff.
as for the bike my impressions are that its just very solid feeling. Nice drive train, nice brakes. Nicer than anything ive ever had.
the last nice thing i had was a 2010 trek 4300 disc stoeln sadly. This is far better than that in terms of components.
Last edited by theraddude; 03-10-20 at 09:21 AM.
Likes For theraddude:
#18
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,373
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 257 Post(s)
Liked 70 Times
in
63 Posts
Well the jamis dragon slayer showed up yesterday. The bike looks awesome. I didnt clear the top tube as well i as hoped though. But the bike is really nice. I got the sport version on the jensen super bargain deal.
i may try to sell or flip the bike later becuase i didnt get the best fit on the 17" frame but for the time being its perfect for me to do more casual riding with it. Fire trails and stuff.
as for the bike my impressions are that its just very solid feeling. Nice drive train, nice brakes. Nicer than anything ive ever had.
the last nice thing i had was a 2010 trek 4300 disc stoeln sadly. This is far better than that in terms of components.
i may try to sell or flip the bike later becuase i didnt get the best fit on the 17" frame but for the time being its perfect for me to do more casual riding with it. Fire trails and stuff.
as for the bike my impressions are that its just very solid feeling. Nice drive train, nice brakes. Nicer than anything ive ever had.
the last nice thing i had was a 2010 trek 4300 disc stoeln sadly. This is far better than that in terms of components.
#19
Junior Member
its too bad becuase even if i look at other bikes in this range i dont think theyre equiped quite as nicely as this one. But this bike is pretty nice. I should be able to sell it to someone without taking a huge loss.
oh well.
#21
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Lol.
Available in one size only.
https://www.bikemag.com/gear/mountai...-the-398-axum/
* brakes are not quite enough for enthusiastic riding
* chain drops since no derailleur clutch or retention system
* 35 lbs is pretty heavy for a hardtail
* the one size available is huge
* front shock is very heavy and hardly moves
* Schrader valve tubes is not common in mountain bikes and is more difficult to convert to tubeless
https://reviews.mtbr.com/schwinn-axu...e-weight-specs
Available in one size only.
https://www.bikemag.com/gear/mountai...-the-398-axum/
* brakes are not quite enough for enthusiastic riding
* chain drops since no derailleur clutch or retention system
* 35 lbs is pretty heavy for a hardtail
* the one size available is huge
* front shock is very heavy and hardly moves
* Schrader valve tubes is not common in mountain bikes and is more difficult to convert to tubeless
https://reviews.mtbr.com/schwinn-axu...e-weight-specs
Last edited by prj71; 03-11-20 at 07:21 AM.
#22
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,373
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 257 Post(s)
Liked 70 Times
in
63 Posts
Lol.
Available in one size only.
https://www.bikemag.com/gear/mountai...-the-398-axum/
* brakes are not quite enough for enthusiastic riding
* chain drops since no derailleur clutch or retention system
* 35 lbs is pretty heavy for a hardtail
* the one size available is huge
* front shock is very heavy and hardly moves
* Schrader valve tubes is not common in mountain bikes and is more difficult to convert to tubeless
https://reviews.mtbr.com/schwinn-axu...e-weight-specs
Available in one size only.
https://www.bikemag.com/gear/mountai...-the-398-axum/
* brakes are not quite enough for enthusiastic riding
* chain drops since no derailleur clutch or retention system
* 35 lbs is pretty heavy for a hardtail
* the one size available is huge
* front shock is very heavy and hardly moves
* Schrader valve tubes is not common in mountain bikes and is more difficult to convert to tubeless
https://reviews.mtbr.com/schwinn-axu...e-weight-specs
In the past I've seen decent Mongooses for sale at Wallymart, this may appeal to 6 foot plus customers with little knowledge of bikes, and they should release a Small version to bridge the size gap
#24
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Left Coast, Canada
Posts: 5,126
Mentioned: 24 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2235 Post(s)
Liked 1,312 Times
in
706 Posts
Looks like a decent bike for the price point. Not a competitive technical front runner but then again, not everyone is pushing the envelope that way.
When someone quotes schrader valves as a determining factor for a bike I have to roll my eyes.
When someone quotes schrader valves as a determining factor for a bike I have to roll my eyes.