Rocky Mountain Element
03-04-21, 06:15 PM
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Rocky Mountain Element
Is Rocky Mountain a good brand. I have a 1996 rocky mountain element that I am wondering about. The rims and shifters are currently not stock, but i do still have the original parts. What would this bike be worth?
03-04-21, 06:21 PM
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: se MIch.
Posts: 1,559
Bikes: 1938 claud butler,1983 Basso,teledyne titan,teocali super,nrs,1993 stumpjumper fsr,Paramountain,Paramount Buell(sold),4 banger,Zaskar LE,Colnago Master Ibex MTB,1987ish,.etc....
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 405 Post(s)
Liked 1,050 Times
in
633 Posts
rocky mountain.
worth more to a Canadian who savor the brand.try listing on Pinkbike.com-its free & caters to Canuks.
Likes For '02 nrs:
03-05-21, 09:09 AM
#3
Senior Member
Yes they are good respected brand. But that bike looks a bit old.
Two fiddy. Maybe tree hundred.
Two fiddy. Maybe tree hundred.
03-05-21, 07:40 PM
#5
Clark W. Griswold
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: ,location, location
Posts: 11,403
Bikes: Foundry Chilkoot Ti W/Ultegra Di2, Salsa Timberjack Ti, Cinelli Mash Work RandoCross Fun Time Machine, 1x9 XT Parts Hybrid, Co-Motion Cascadia, Specialized Langster, Phil Wood Apple VeloXS Frame (w/DA 7400), R+M Supercharger2 Rohloff, Habanero Ti 26
Mentioned: 48 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3528 Post(s)
Liked 2,847 Times
in
1,908 Posts
The Canucks would love it but I think it is a neat piece of history and if I didn't already have plenty of bikes might consider adding it to the family. I love that rear derailleur it is bomb proof. Some say ugly but honestly it works well and isn't as boxy as the previous generation of XT RDs which work fine.
Likes For veganbikes:
03-06-21, 07:05 PM
#6
Junior Member
Originally Posted by Z3027R
I
Likes For tungsten:
03-09-21, 09:43 AM
#7
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2019
Posts: 659
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 245 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 171 Times
in
132 Posts
Full suspension bikes from that era are a tough sell. The geometry and technology of trail bikes have changed so much since then that most people aren't interested in an older bike for technical riding, and the suspension makes it pretty clunky as a street bike or gravel grinder, for which a steel rigid MTB from 1996 would be in demand. For example, a Rocky Mountain Cardiac from 96 would probably sell more quickly now than this one will. It may take a little while to find the right buyer who appreciates it for what it was in 1996. And I would expect the fork needs an overhaul?
That said, it's an interesting bike. It looks like it didn't make it into the 1996 catalog (at least the one linked on the Rocky Mountain website). There's an Element with that frame color, but no "T.O." option, and yours seems to have at least an upgraded fork and brakes relative to the catalog specs for the non-T.O. The 97 catalog has an Element T.O., but with the new 97 frame colors.
That said, it's an interesting bike. It looks like it didn't make it into the 1996 catalog (at least the one linked on the Rocky Mountain website). There's an Element with that frame color, but no "T.O." option, and yours seems to have at least an upgraded fork and brakes relative to the catalog specs for the non-T.O. The 97 catalog has an Element T.O., but with the new 97 frame colors.
Likes For AeroGut:
