Can anyone help?
#1
Full Member
Thread Starter
Can anyone help?
Wondering if anyone knows anything about this bike. I'm especially interested



in its age and what would be involved in making sure these old shocks are good to go.



in its age and what would be involved in making sure these old shocks are good to go.
#2
Junior Member
Looks like a walmart level bso, worth basically nothing. Fork is total junk, if you are thinking of buying it, don’t.
Likes For Kevin stafford:
#3
Full Member
Thread Starter
#5
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2019
Posts: 661
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 245 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 171 Times
in
132 Posts
Looks like it previously had cantilever brakes so maybe late 90’s? Sticker says it’s 1020 steel which means it’s heavy and low quality. Thruster was a dept store brand. If it’s rideable ride it, but Iwouldn’t put any money into fixing it.
#6
Full Member
Thread Starter
Definitely Heavy, but I'm used to heavy as I pretty much on antique and vintage steel most of the time. It doesn't have cantilever mounts. The brakes that were replaced were the same style. Still I think it was fairly new when I got it so that would make mid to late 90's makes sense. This is a budget build hoping to reuse as many parts as possible. The main reason I was asking about the fork. I'd like to just give it some maintenance if that is even possible.
#7
Habitual User
Join Date: Jan 2020
Location: Altadena, CA
Posts: 5,534
Bikes: 2019 Trek Procliber 9.9 SL, 2018 Storck Fascenario.3 Platinum, 2017 Bear Big Rock 1, 2003 Time VX Special Pro, 2001 Colnago VIP, 1999 Trek 9900 singlespeed, 1977 Nishiki ONP
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3402 Post(s)
Liked 5,434 Times
in
2,573 Posts
Definitely Heavy, but I'm used to heavy as I pretty much on antique and vintage steel most of the time. It doesn't have cantilever mounts. The brakes that were replaced were the same style. Still I think it was fairly new when I got it so that would make mid to late 90's makes sense. This is a budget build hoping to reuse as many parts as possible. The main reason I was asking about the fork. I'd like to just give it some maintenance if that is even possible.
If you're trying to restore it for some sort of sentimental reason, fine. However, there is no value in the bike, and even if you spend a bunch of money to get it mechanically operational, it will still have no value. In all likelihood, if you take the fork apart to do any sort of maintenance, there is a high probability of it not going back together properly.
That said, good luck on your project.
__________________
"Swedish fish. They're protein shaped." - livedarklions
"Swedish fish. They're protein shaped." - livedarklions
#8
Disco Infiltrator
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Folsom CA
Posts: 13,562
Bikes: Stormchaser, Paramount, Timberjack, Expert TG, Samba tandem
Mentioned: 69 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3029 Post(s)
Liked 1,964 Times
in
1,278 Posts
Thruster is a department store BMX brand owned by Kent. It looks pretty good for a department store bike but it’s not bike store quality. It’s 20 or 25 years old. There’s probably nothing to rebuild inside the shocks. Just a spring and maybe a rubber bump stop.
__________________
Genesis 49:16-17
Genesis 49:16-17
#9
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2019
Posts: 661
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 245 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 171 Times
in
132 Posts
For the fork, you won’t really know until you open it up, but a lot of those old forks used elastomers (ie rubber) instead of springs. The rubber will be totally decayed by now and it’s very hard to find replacements except for the higher end forks. However you might be able to just clean out the elastomer residue and put in a cheap hardware store steel spring. I’ve read of that being done for old SR forks. Then lube the sliding parts and put it back together and it might be okay.
or just try to find a scrap rigid fork and swap it.
or just try to find a scrap rigid fork and swap it.
#10
Full Member
Thread Starter
Cantilever mounts and v-brake (the kind you have) mounts are the same.
If you're trying to restore it for some sort of sentimental reason, fine. However, there is no value in the bike, and even if you spend a bunch of money to get it mechanically operational, it will still have no value. In all likelihood, if you take the fork apart to do any sort of maintenance, there is a high probability of it not going back together properly.
That said, good luck on your project.
If you're trying to restore it for some sort of sentimental reason, fine. However, there is no value in the bike, and even if you spend a bunch of money to get it mechanically operational, it will still have no value. In all likelihood, if you take the fork apart to do any sort of maintenance, there is a high probability of it not going back together properly.
That said, good luck on your project.
#11
Habitual User
Join Date: Jan 2020
Location: Altadena, CA
Posts: 5,534
Bikes: 2019 Trek Procliber 9.9 SL, 2018 Storck Fascenario.3 Platinum, 2017 Bear Big Rock 1, 2003 Time VX Special Pro, 2001 Colnago VIP, 1999 Trek 9900 singlespeed, 1977 Nishiki ONP
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3402 Post(s)
Liked 5,434 Times
in
2,573 Posts
For the fork, you won’t really know until you open it up, but a lot of those old forks used elastomers (ie rubber) instead of springs. The rubber will be totally decayed by now and it’s very hard to find replacements except for the higher end forks. However you might be able to just clean out the elastomer residue and put in a cheap hardware store steel spring. I’ve read of that being done for old SR forks. Then lube the sliding parts and put it back together and it might be okay.
or just try to find a scrap rigid fork and swap it.
or just try to find a scrap rigid fork and swap it.
__________________
"Swedish fish. They're protein shaped." - livedarklions
"Swedish fish. They're protein shaped." - livedarklions
#13
Disco Infiltrator
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Folsom CA
Posts: 13,562
Bikes: Stormchaser, Paramount, Timberjack, Expert TG, Samba tandem
Mentioned: 69 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3029 Post(s)
Liked 1,964 Times
in
1,278 Posts
It probably didn't. My guess would be rubber bump stops and maybe not even that. Open it up and find out. If you can't find a way to open it up then it definitely didn't.
__________________
Genesis 49:16-17
Genesis 49:16-17
#14
Habitual User
Join Date: Jan 2020
Location: Altadena, CA
Posts: 5,534
Bikes: 2019 Trek Procliber 9.9 SL, 2018 Storck Fascenario.3 Platinum, 2017 Bear Big Rock 1, 2003 Time VX Special Pro, 2001 Colnago VIP, 1999 Trek 9900 singlespeed, 1977 Nishiki ONP
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3402 Post(s)
Liked 5,434 Times
in
2,573 Posts
Depends. If elastomers were the only device serving as the spring, probably not. That said, I have a 20+ year old Trek that has a hybrid coil/elastomer spring (Manitou SX-Ti fork) It still works. It's not as good as it was when it was new, but it still moves well enough to ride it. However, that was a pro-level fork in its day, and was built with a lot of precision and high-quality materials.
__________________
"Swedish fish. They're protein shaped." - livedarklions
"Swedish fish. They're protein shaped." - livedarklions