Fox 34 alternative
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2020
Location: Nevada County, California
Posts: 727
Bikes: Subject to change at any given moment but currently is...... Colnago Mapei, Colnago C40, Wilier Triestina Carbon, Wilier Triestina Ramato, Follis 472, Peugeot PX60, Razesa, Orbea Terra, Soma Pescadero and 1/2 owner of a Santana tandem.
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 296 Post(s)
Liked 726 Times
in
234 Posts
Fox 34 alternative
Given a situation where a rider is using their MTB for more of a mild gravel/easy trails type riding and would like to reduce the weight of the bike as much as possible, is there much weight to be saved by replacing the Fox34 (overkill for this rider) with some other unit ?
#2
Clark W. Griswold
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: ,location, location
Posts: 11,870
Bikes: Foundry Chilkoot Ti W/Ultegra Di2, Salsa Timberjack Ti, Cinelli Mash Work RandoCross Fun Time Machine, 1x9 XT Parts Hybrid, Co-Motion Cascadia, Specialized Langster, Phil Wood Apple VeloXS Frame (w/DA 7400), R+M Supercharger2 Rohloff, Habanero Ti 26
Mentioned: 50 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3694 Post(s)
Liked 3,125 Times
in
2,086 Posts
Generally the cheaper forks are going to be heavier. If you are looking to lose weight Fox 32 SC is going to be lighter but without any information one couldn't really tell. So long as the Axle to Crown match up and the steerer tube is right and thru-axle spacing is right you could make a swap. It sounds like maybe a mountain bike is not the right bike and gravel bike of some sort could do better maybe but there is little info on the bike and fork and such.
If you want to really reduce weight get some lighter wheels with lighter tires. Rotational weight is the worst weight but again hard to say much without knowing more on the bike and the rider as well.
If you want to really reduce weight get some lighter wheels with lighter tires. Rotational weight is the worst weight but again hard to say much without knowing more on the bike and the rider as well.
Likes For veganbikes:
#3
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2020
Location: Nevada County, California
Posts: 727
Bikes: Subject to change at any given moment but currently is...... Colnago Mapei, Colnago C40, Wilier Triestina Carbon, Wilier Triestina Ramato, Follis 472, Peugeot PX60, Razesa, Orbea Terra, Soma Pescadero and 1/2 owner of a Santana tandem.
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 296 Post(s)
Liked 726 Times
in
234 Posts
Generally the cheaper forks are going to be heavier. If you are looking to lose weight Fox 32 SC is going to be lighter but without any information one couldn't really tell. So long as the Axle to Crown match up and the steerer tube is right and thru-axle spacing is right you could make a swap. It sounds like maybe a mountain bike is not the right bike and gravel bike of some sort could do better maybe but there is little info on the bike and fork and such.
If you want to really reduce weight get some lighter wheels with lighter tires. Rotational weight is the worst weight but again hard to say much without knowing more on the bike and the rider as well.
If you want to really reduce weight get some lighter wheels with lighter tires. Rotational weight is the worst weight but again hard to say much without knowing more on the bike and the rider as well.
#4
Clark W. Griswold
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: ,location, location
Posts: 11,870
Bikes: Foundry Chilkoot Ti W/Ultegra Di2, Salsa Timberjack Ti, Cinelli Mash Work RandoCross Fun Time Machine, 1x9 XT Parts Hybrid, Co-Motion Cascadia, Specialized Langster, Phil Wood Apple VeloXS Frame (w/DA 7400), R+M Supercharger2 Rohloff, Habanero Ti 26
Mentioned: 50 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3694 Post(s)
Liked 3,125 Times
in
2,086 Posts
We are looking at wheels/tires as well. To put this gently…… this rider bought a 2022 Specialized Turbo Levo SL based on one test ride and then later decided it’s a bit heavy to manage. (Small rider) furthermore this rider is not an aggressive MTB rider so is attempting to turn the bike into something more passive…… but not too passive. Porridge just right I guess?
I would tell them to consider looking at the Vado SL line up it is not a mountain bike at all it is a gravel/hybrid bike but is lighter as it removes the suspension fork and goes to a carbon fork with a little bit of suspension in the headset (on the 5.0) and with a set of 650b wheels and wider tires (47 was the max width last I checked) you could hit plenty of gravel trails quite well and get the same electronics as the other bike.
#5
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Norman, Oklahoma
Posts: 5,280
Bikes: Too many to list
Mentioned: 36 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1724 Post(s)
Liked 1,065 Times
in
703 Posts
You are never going to make a 38 or 40 pound bike feel light.
However you can make it feel better on the roads, gravel paths and tame Trails with a more hybrid-y tire choice like the Specialized Renegade or similar. Finding tires like that and a true mountain bike width is not the easiest thing but would be a worthwhile search
I have a turbo levo and have considered this with the stock wheels as I upgraded the bike with a trendy set of Enve’s Shortly after its purchase. The bike really feels like a monster truck on the road with the stock tires. But admittedly the tires on your levo SL are probably a lighter option than a Levo
However you can make it feel better on the roads, gravel paths and tame Trails with a more hybrid-y tire choice like the Specialized Renegade or similar. Finding tires like that and a true mountain bike width is not the easiest thing but would be a worthwhile search
I have a turbo levo and have considered this with the stock wheels as I upgraded the bike with a trendy set of Enve’s Shortly after its purchase. The bike really feels like a monster truck on the road with the stock tires. But admittedly the tires on your levo SL are probably a lighter option than a Levo
#6
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: socal
Posts: 3,799
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 767 Post(s)
Liked 603 Times
in
457 Posts
A Rock Shox SID would reduce the weight by 1+ pound and the couple I've had were great. There are several SL's, so the one he purchased would dictate changes, but I'd look at the wheels and tires next. Since he's not gonzo, you should be able to design some very light aluminum wheels that would suffice.
#7
Senior Member
The problem is the bike is designed around a 150mm fork and any 150mm fork isn't going to be much lighter. It is just the wrong bike. It is built to power you to the top of a hill and then bomb down it at stupid speeds. It isn't designed to ride easy trails and gravel.
Last edited by Canker; 03-18-23 at 09:45 AM.
#8
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2019
Location: South Shore of Long Island
Posts: 2,325
Bikes: 2010 Carrera Volans, 2015 C-Dale Trail 2sl, 2017 Raleigh Rush Hour, 2017 Blue Proseccio, 1992 Giant Perigee, 80s Gitane Rallye Tandem
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 897 Post(s)
Liked 751 Times
in
554 Posts
looking at the specs, getting it set up with a tubeless gravel tire would shave an easy 2lbs rolling weight and reduce rolling resistance, that'll make the bike feel better but otherwise its just the wrong bike. Took my wife's new bike and ditched the nearly 1100g maxxis (similar to the weight Spec claims for the tires on the bike) for some 660g Schwalbe and tossed the tubes to make it tubeless. The difference was significant enough to get comments on how well it suddenly handled compared to the last time. Don't know if the Spec came tubeless already but that would help as well.
#9
Advanced Slacker
Join Date: Feb 2017
Posts: 5,934
Bikes: Soma Fog Cutter, Surly Wednesday, Canfielld Tilt
Mentioned: 26 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2637 Post(s)
Liked 2,367 Times
in
1,334 Posts
This is a 150mm fork, correct? Honestly, you’re not gonna be able to go much lighter without also going with a much shorter travel fork (such as the SiD) and that is going to screw up the geometry of the bike making the seat tube even steeper. And if they’re only using it for mostly xc/gravel riding, then it’s probably on the steep side as it is.
This is a highly capable mid-travel FS MTB, designed for aggressive riding in challenging terrain. Trying to turn it into a lightweight XC or gravel bike is a futile waste of money.
Sell the bike and get the right one. This will achieve better results for less money in the end.
This is a highly capable mid-travel FS MTB, designed for aggressive riding in challenging terrain. Trying to turn it into a lightweight XC or gravel bike is a futile waste of money.
Sell the bike and get the right one. This will achieve better results for less money in the end.
Last edited by Kapusta; 03-19-23 at 07:47 PM.