MTB tube "stretchability"
08-20-23, 07:32 PM
#1
Full Member
Thread Starter
MTB tube "stretchability" wrt to tire width
Went into REI today to look for a 26-2.20 tube. Turned out my location only carries their own CO-OP brand of 26" tubes, which are available in 1.5-1.75, 1.9-2.125 and 2.3-2.4 widths. The 2.2 width is not covered by these ranges. Meanwhile, when I look for 26" tubes on Amazon, I see Continental-branded offerings that cover 1.75-2.50 range.
My question is why REI CO-OP tubes are sized with such surprisingly narrow precision, especially compared to overwhelmingly wider range covered by Continental tubes? Are they really made differently? Different material? Different thickness?
In a pinch, would 1.9-2.125 be suitable for 2.2 tire? Or should I opt for 2.3-2.4 in such a situation?
My question is why REI CO-OP tubes are sized with such surprisingly narrow precision, especially compared to overwhelmingly wider range covered by Continental tubes? Are they really made differently? Different material? Different thickness?
In a pinch, would 1.9-2.125 be suitable for 2.2 tire? Or should I opt for 2.3-2.4 in such a situation?
Last edited by AndreyT; 08-20-23 at 11:27 PM.
08-20-23, 10:41 PM
#2
Senior Member
It will be fine. Back in the day I'd carry 26er tubes as backups because they are smaller and work in everything including 29ers.
Likes For Canker:
08-21-23, 05:28 AM
#3
Senior Member
Personally I prefer to run undersized tubes when using butyl tubes. They are lighter and less bulky when carrying spares. They are easier to install without pinching. I have not had a reliability issue, but you could concievably experience one if you go too far. I have gone pretty far undersized on touring bike tires with no issues though. They do lose air a bit quicker so may need topping off a bit more often if way undersized. That effect would not be noticeable unless very undersized though.
08-21-23, 09:15 AM
#4
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: socal
Posts: 4,101
Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 834 Post(s)
Liked 725 Times
in
550 Posts
I was an early 29er adopter and the only tubes available were 26" when I assembled it; it was that way for at least a year. BTW, FME, REI tubes are excellent and relatively inexpensive lately.
08-22-23, 11:09 AM
#5
Senior Member
I've used 26 x 2.4 tubes on my fat bike tires which are 26 x 4.8 with zero issues. And that's what I still carry around for back up in case my tubeless setup deflates.
Those tubes stretch farther than you think.
Those tubes stretch farther than you think.
08-22-23, 12:32 PM
#6
working on my sandal tan
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: CID
Posts: 22,577
Bikes: 1991 Bianchi Eros, 1964 Armstrong, 1988 Diamondback Ascent, 1988 Bianchi Premio, 1987 Bianchi Sport SX, 1980s Raleigh mixte (hers), All-City Space Horse (hers)
Mentioned: 98 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3856 Post(s)
Liked 2,526 Times
in
1,555 Posts
08-22-23, 06:30 PM
#7
Clark W. Griswold
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: ,location, location
Posts: 12,660
Bikes: Foundry Chilkoot Ti W/Ultegra Di2, Salsa Timberjack Ti, Cinelli Mash Work RandoCross Fun Time Machine, 1x9 XT Parts Hybrid, Co-Motion Cascadia, Specialized Langster, Phil Wood Apple VeloXS Frame (w/DA 7400), R+M Supercharger2 Rohloff, Habanero Ti 26
Mentioned: 52 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4003 Post(s)
Liked 3,511 Times
in
2,347 Posts
Went into REI today to look for a 26-2.20 tube. Turned out my location only carries their own CO-OP brand of 26" tubes, which are available in 1.5-1.75, 1.9-2.125 and 2.3-2.4 widths. The 2.2 width is not covered by these ranges. Meanwhile, when I look for 26" tubes on Amazon, I see Continental-branded offerings that cover 1.75-2.50 range.
My question is why REI CO-OP tubes are sized with such surprisingly narrow precision, especially compared to overwhelmingly wider range covered by Continental tubes? Are they really made differently? Different material? Different thickness?
In a pinch, would 1.9-2.125 be suitable for 2.2 tire? Or should I opt for 2.3-2.4 in such a situation?
My question is why REI CO-OP tubes are sized with such surprisingly narrow precision, especially compared to overwhelmingly wider range covered by Continental tubes? Are they really made differently? Different material? Different thickness?
In a pinch, would 1.9-2.125 be suitable for 2.2 tire? Or should I opt for 2.3-2.4 in such a situation?
In terms of Continental Tubes, they make great tubes have run them for years but get them from a shop to make sure you are getting legitimate ones as always. They can be a bit more expensive but they are high quality rubber and I probably have quite a few sitting in bikes that have been there for 5-10 years.
08-22-23, 07:21 PM
#8
Disco Infiltrator
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Folsom CA
Posts: 13,735
Bikes: Stormchaser, Paramount, Tilt, Samba tandem
Mentioned: 71 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3097 Post(s)
Liked 2,064 Times
in
1,346 Posts
It will work at like 2:1 size because it herniates. There’s a chance if it punctures it will pop like a party balloon. It leaves an unpatchable flappy hole. It’s happened to me but only once
Last edited by Darth Lefty; 08-22-23 at 07:25 PM.
