Bike Forums

Bike Forums (https://www.bikeforums.net/forum.php)
-   Mountain Biking (https://www.bikeforums.net/mountain-biking/)
-   -   Rigid fork on aluminum frame? (https://www.bikeforums.net/mountain-biking/128823-rigid-fork-aluminum-frame.html)

PoorBehavior 08-08-05 06:03 PM

Rigid fork on aluminum frame?
 
Like it says, will an aluminum frame hold up with something like a Surly 1x1 rigid steel fork if I take it to the singletrack every once in a while? Mostly a commuter. Oh, I aint light ,(215-20).

joelsp 08-08-05 06:12 PM

I believe Raiyn Put that fork on his commuter, and has nothing but good things to say about it. I honestly can't see why it would be a problem, I think suspension forks put more torque on the frame than a rigid fork does.

koine2002 08-08-05 07:36 PM

My KHS Sport, Aluminum Frame, steel rigid fork. It came that way. You should be fine.

badsac 08-08-05 07:45 PM

Yeah, my old Trek 7000 was the same. Used to be a common setup before suspension forks became common.

Raiyn 08-09-05 12:34 AM


Originally Posted by joelsp
I believe Raiyn Put that fork on his commuter, and has nothing but good things to say about it.

It's true. Good fork

matheprat 08-09-05 11:40 AM


Originally Posted by PoorBehavior
Like it says, will an aluminum frame hold up with something like a Surly 1x1 rigid steel fork if I take it to the singletrack every once in a while? Mostly a commuter. Oh, I aint light ,(215-20).

Do you think Aluminium frames are made of cheese or something? You honestly thought that every single Aluminium frame on the market comes with a suspension fork?

royalflash 08-09-05 11:45 AM

My Scott Sub 10 comes as standard with an aluminium frame and a rigid aluminium fork

PoorBehavior 08-09-05 06:51 PM


Originally Posted by matheprat
Do you think Aluminium frames are made of cheese or something? You honestly thought that every single Aluminium frame on the market comes with a suspension fork?

Uh, No.
The frame is only two or three years old, and as far as I know, no engineer sat around running extra calculations to see how the head tube would hold up if someone took a $250 off the shelf diamondback and decided to slap on a solid steel fork and hit some single track.
Thats why I decided to ask.

I mean what is the worst that can happen, some guy flames you for asking a question in a forum? I can live with that.

cryptid01 08-09-05 07:20 PM


Originally Posted by joelsp
I think suspension forks put more torque on the frame than a rigid fork does.

Can you defend this statement?

joelsp 08-09-05 08:11 PM


Originally Posted by gastro
Can you defend this statement?

I don't know. It just seems like there is more strain on the headtube when a suspension fork is in place. I kind of noticed that as suspension forks became more and more popular some years ago, the head tube sections of bikes became gussetted more and more, I figured this was because suspension forks are succeptable to a bit of twisting and things, and so they put more strain ont he headtube.

Raiyn 08-09-05 11:54 PM


Originally Posted by joelsp
I don't know. It just seems like there is more strain on the headtube when a suspension fork is in place. I kind of noticed that as suspension forks became more and more popular some years ago, the head tube sections of bikes became gussetted more and more, I figured this was because suspension forks are succeptable to a bit of twisting and things, and so they put more strain ont he headtube.

It's actually due to the fact that riders tried bigger and bigger stuff

matheprat 08-10-05 02:30 AM


Originally Posted by PoorBehavior
The frame is only two or three years old, and as far as I know, no engineer sat around running extra calculations to see how the head tube would hold up if someone took a $250 off the shelf diamondback and decided to slap on a solid steel fork and hit some single track.

...Umm, you'll be fine.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:25 PM.


Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.