XT vs. XTR
#26
Ouch!!!
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Canada
Posts: 453
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by unsuspended
I just wonder why it is so hard for people to admit that XTR is just bike jewerly.
I put it there because:
a) I can afford it.
b) It makes me faster.
c) It makes me smoother.
d) I have no reliability issues at all with it - IT WORKS.
e) I do not find XT front derailleurs anywhere near the quality and functionality of XTR. The XT cage design sucks (FOR ME.)
f) I can feel a difference between XT and XTR with regards to smoothness of shifts.
g) It's my bike and it feels right FOR ME.
Why don't you start ragging on people that prefer a different level of fork quality - or frame type - or paint color? Why? Because it's all relative and highly subjective. What works for me, may not work for you. Don't criticize my bikes however, especially since you've never rode them.
Last edited by shane45; 10-14-05 at 01:59 PM.
#27
Senior Member
I don't care how much people spend on their bikes. I just wonder why it is so hard for people to admit that XTR is just bike jewelry. Spend all you want. Just don't tell me that XTR is 'worth it' for some functional reason.
In all fairness, I didn't say ALL those with DA or XTR are unknowledgable. I was just making the observation that some people who are unknowledgable do buy the top end products without just cause.
It's nothing to do with me how anyone spends their money - I'd obviously never think it was - I just think that it's not worth the extra 75% cost for a marginal performance benefit.
Oh, and to the chap who said that he prefers his components "handmade" with the extra-quality finish, I really hate to pee on his parade but WAKE UP!!! DA and XTR isn't handmade! It's made to the exact specs of XT and Ultegra! IT EVEN SAYS SO IN ALL THE SHIMANO LITERATURE!
I'd love XTR and DA, I really would. But only because it's got the badge on it, not because of performance benefits. I just hate the way it's priced to be elitist when the technology clearly costs so much less. And that doesn't mean I'd love my rides any more with that componentry on them. It's not possible.
#28
one less horse
Some of you folks are so judgemental, I swear.
Yeah, I have some XTR stuff...in fact, some of it dates back to 1997 and still functions just fine, thank you.
The difference is that I really don't give a rat's ass if someone is riding XT (or Deore, or a rigid fork, or a recumbent, whatever) as long as they're enjoying it.
I get my gear at dealer cost, does that make me less of an idiot than those who buy XT at retail?
Yeah, I have some XTR stuff...in fact, some of it dates back to 1997 and still functions just fine, thank you.
The difference is that I really don't give a rat's ass if someone is riding XT (or Deore, or a rigid fork, or a recumbent, whatever) as long as they're enjoying it.
I get my gear at dealer cost, does that make me less of an idiot than those who buy XT at retail?
#29
just try me!!
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 147
Bikes: turner flux
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
heres the deal.. if someone has extra money.. then whats wrong with XTR, if your looking for something thats budget yet good.. then XT is the best option.. just because someone is on XTR does not make him a wannbe.. he just wants the best money can buy.. someone on XT is someone who wants value for money.. but someone on XTR has the best money can buy.. value for money and best are 2 different things..
#30
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Between the mountains and the lake.
Posts: 16,681
Bikes: 8 bikes - one for each day of the week!
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times
in
3 Posts
I'll just point out that you don't "Need" XTR to be a better rider, and having it certainly won't make you a better rider.
What really irks me is that some guys think everyone should have XTR. More than one girl from the club I used to ride with (NRMB) would be advised by co-workers and shop employees that they needed to look only at XTR equipped bikes. At least the women were smart enough to figure out that there's more to a bike than just the group. One of the girls (a spin class junkie, apparently) rode a flourescent green, 1980's Diamond Back. Full rigid, ancient LX thumbies, cantilever brakes with pads hard as a rock. Valerie, a lovely UCLA nurse, would out-climb nearly everyone, and scream all the way down the hills. Rather humbling.
What really irks me is that some guys think everyone should have XTR. More than one girl from the club I used to ride with (NRMB) would be advised by co-workers and shop employees that they needed to look only at XTR equipped bikes. At least the women were smart enough to figure out that there's more to a bike than just the group. One of the girls (a spin class junkie, apparently) rode a flourescent green, 1980's Diamond Back. Full rigid, ancient LX thumbies, cantilever brakes with pads hard as a rock. Valerie, a lovely UCLA nurse, would out-climb nearly everyone, and scream all the way down the hills. Rather humbling.
#31
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: St. Louis, MO
Posts: 585
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Expatriate
I'll just point out that you don't "Need" XTR to be a better rider, and having it certainly won't make you a better rider.
#32
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 253
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Expatriate
What really irks me is that some guys think everyone should have XTR. More than one girl from the club I used to ride with (NRMB) would be advised by co-workers and shop employees that they needed to look only at XTR equipped bikes. At least the women were smart enough to figure out that there's more to a bike than just the group. One of the girls (a spin class junkie, apparently) rode a flourescent green, 1980's Diamond Back. Full rigid, ancient LX thumbies, cantilever brakes with pads hard as a rock. Valerie, a lovely UCLA nurse, would out-climb nearly everyone, and scream all the way down the hills. Rather humbling.
Personally I have XT because I got the whole group cheap when I was building my bike but feel that even XT is more than what I actually needed. I have not interest whatsoever to go beyond XT.
IMO LX is more than enough (at least for my level of skill) and is probably the best value “for me”. What LX lacks is the glamour of XT/XTR but for most amateurs it is clearly enough. Heck I will go farther and say that Deore is all someone like me needs. Deore is as far as I go down the line though.
#33
Senior Member
Originally Posted by dirtjumper66
Discuss your opinions on the both
I would like to apologise to Dirtjumper66 for corporately hijacking the thread and turning it into some sort of slanging match between XT- and XTR-users.
The thread is seriously mis-guided now, and I would like to say that I never meant to offend any XTR-user, any XT-user or even any LX- or Deore- or Acera-user. My original point was that I use XT because it works very very well. I don't need anything better than it, and I don't think XTR represents enough of a performance advantage to warrant paying the extra for it.
Anyone who thinks otherwise is not wrong. I didn't mean it to sound like that at all.
So can we all please concentrate on our (seperate!) opinions of XT and XTR?
Cheers fellas.
#34
Obeying Gravity
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Bellingham, WA
Posts: 2,962
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
I run all XT except LX shifters and I love the setup. XT is SO much better than Deore, its amazing. If I were to build a MTB i would run XT hands down.
#35
Shreddin' heaven on his 20"
Join Date: May 2005
Location: markham, ontario, canada aka chinatown north
Posts: 1,151
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
i still run acera front and rear, but i've just recently upgraded my altus shifters/levers to alivio shifters and deore LX levers (temporarily until i get my speed dial ti's), and they're good enough for me. the shifts are precise, no ghost shifts yet, they're fine for the riding i do... when my derailleurs finally do break, i'll probably upgrade to used deore just for cheap and functionality... to me, they shift fine, so i'm happy. i don't need XT or XTR, i use what works well.
in other words, i'm a poor bastard and you should all pitch in money to buy me a full XT group you rich *******s
in other words, i'm a poor bastard and you should all pitch in money to buy me a full XT group you rich *******s
#36
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Between the mountains and the lake.
Posts: 16,681
Bikes: 8 bikes - one for each day of the week!
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times
in
3 Posts
Originally Posted by revmonkey
in other words, i'm a poor bastard and you should all pitch in money to buy me a full XT group you rich *******s
#37
Still kicking.
Originally Posted by revmonkey
i still run acera front and rear, but i've just recently upgraded my altus shifters/levers to alivio shifters and deore LX levers (temporarily until i get my speed dial ti's), and they're good enough for me. the shifts are precise, no ghost shifts yet, they're fine for the riding i do... when my derailleurs finally do break, i'll probably upgrade to used deore just for cheap and functionality... to me, they shift fine, so i'm happy. i don't need XT or XTR, i use what works well.
in other words, i'm a poor bastard and you should all pitch in money to buy me a full XT group you rich *******s
in other words, i'm a poor bastard and you should all pitch in money to buy me a full XT group you rich *******s
Do the right thing. Go singlespeed.
__________________
Appreciate the old bikes more than the new.
Appreciate the old bikes more than the new.
#39
Still kicking.
Originally Posted by revmonkey
i will next summer.
when i get a bmx.
when i get a bmx.
__________________
Appreciate the old bikes more than the new.
Appreciate the old bikes more than the new.
#40
Shreddin' heaven on his 20"
Join Date: May 2005
Location: markham, ontario, canada aka chinatown north
Posts: 1,151
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
dude i know how to ride singlespeed. hell on my bike i only use 3 speeds really. 2-3, 2-5, 2-7.
normally 2-5 anyways (i dont shift very often) so i'm just about singlespeeding anyways.
normally 2-5 anyways (i dont shift very often) so i'm just about singlespeeding anyways.
#41
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Between the mountains and the lake.
Posts: 16,681
Bikes: 8 bikes - one for each day of the week!
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times
in
3 Posts
Ok, XT vs XTR. I've never like the M960/965 levers, and I never will. The M952 levers look like the M750 levers, and for the 158g weight saving, you're paying about an 80% premium. At the dealer level, that works out to 50 cents a gram.
Functionally, there's more to the debate than just the levers. Cable routing, quality, adjustment, and cleanliness all play a big role in shifting performance. All shifters require the connection from the lever to the derailleur to be in good working order, otherwise you've just wasted a wad of cash.
Without getting into the rapid rise debate, I'll point out that for years, the XTR rear derailleur has been the gold standard for road and MTB tandems. It stands up well to the power of 2 people, and shifts smoothly on a bike where the standard rear derailleur cable is 3000mm long, instead of the usual 1700mm. Front derailleurs have such a simple job, there's no reason to take one over the other. New bikes even spec the FD one step lower than the RD, simply because it saves a few bucks, without affecting performance.
On to the other bits now. Cranks are purely a matter of personal choice. Shimano copped some bad press for cranks that were hard to service, or had bad seals. It's my opinion that cranks are one of the parts you should rarely have to think about, once they're installed. As far as brakes, it's not usually XT vs XTR. I'm sure the choice is more often between Shimano and every other brand, so I won't offer opinion there.
p.s. Kona, the only bike I ever raced was a single speed.
Functionally, there's more to the debate than just the levers. Cable routing, quality, adjustment, and cleanliness all play a big role in shifting performance. All shifters require the connection from the lever to the derailleur to be in good working order, otherwise you've just wasted a wad of cash.
Without getting into the rapid rise debate, I'll point out that for years, the XTR rear derailleur has been the gold standard for road and MTB tandems. It stands up well to the power of 2 people, and shifts smoothly on a bike where the standard rear derailleur cable is 3000mm long, instead of the usual 1700mm. Front derailleurs have such a simple job, there's no reason to take one over the other. New bikes even spec the FD one step lower than the RD, simply because it saves a few bucks, without affecting performance.
On to the other bits now. Cranks are purely a matter of personal choice. Shimano copped some bad press for cranks that were hard to service, or had bad seals. It's my opinion that cranks are one of the parts you should rarely have to think about, once they're installed. As far as brakes, it's not usually XT vs XTR. I'm sure the choice is more often between Shimano and every other brand, so I won't offer opinion there.
p.s. Kona, the only bike I ever raced was a single speed.
#42
Rider From The Flats
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 43
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
The whole point of this topic was to let people figure out of XT or XTR was right for them and if it was really worth it to pay the extra money for the XTR my opologies to anyone that was offended or upset about the topic.
#43
Still kicking.
Originally Posted by dirtjumper66
The whole point of this topic was to let people figure out of XT or XTR was right for them and if it was really worth it to pay the extra money for the XTR my opologies to anyone that was offended or upset about the topic.
__________________
Appreciate the old bikes more than the new.
Appreciate the old bikes more than the new.
#44
Union of the Cow
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 266
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by KonaRider24
Your riding skills will thank you in a year if you go singlespeed now.
This forum is a laugh a minute.
#45
Ouch!!!
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Canada
Posts: 453
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by justsomeguy
So says the "mountain biker" who recently "discovered" being able to sit while climbing.
This forum is a laugh a minute.
This forum is a laugh a minute.
Glad you're perfect and we make you laugh, however. What's your NORBA ranking, by the way?
#46
Still kicking.
Originally Posted by justsomeguy
So says the "mountain biker" who recently "discovered" being able to sit while climbing.
This forum is a laugh a minute.
This forum is a laugh a minute.
__________________
Appreciate the old bikes more than the new.
Appreciate the old bikes more than the new.
#47
Knightryder
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: MD
Posts: 91
Bikes: '06 Trek Soho communter/hybrid, '05 Giant Trance 2, , '05 Scott CR1 Pro, 72 Gitane TDF converted fixie
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Absolutly right! The funny thing with MTBing as opposed to road riding is that your MTB rig gets crashed all the time. Why anyone who doesnt race would put XTR on a bike that gets crashed all the time is a mystery to me. They both, (xt/xtr) for MTBing and for the road (Ultegra/ DA) are functionally equivilent (and the weight difference is miniscule). I personally have XT on my mtb and Ultegra on my roadie. I would upgrade my roadie to DA over Ultegra if I had money to just throw away but for aesthetic reasons only. I like Ultegra but the DA stuff is so pretty, and there is nothing like a pretty road bike. Its like looking at a pretty woman.
#49
Train hard
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 86
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by justsomeguy
So says the "mountain biker" who recently "discovered" being able to sit while climbing.
This forum is a laugh a minute.
This forum is a laugh a minute.
I've been hitting it hard for over 20 years and will be the first to admit I'm still learning.
#50
Banned
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: take your time, enjoy the scenery, it will be there when you get to it
Posts: 7,281
Bikes: 07 IRO BFGB fixed-gear, 07 Pedal Force RS
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Originally Posted by KonaRider24
Both stink, go Singlespeed.