Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Mountain Biking
Reload this Page >

'01 Judy vs '03 Skareb Comp?

Notices
Mountain Biking Mountain biking is one of the fastest growing sports in the world. Check out this forum to discuss the latest tips, tricks, gear and equipment in the world of mountain biking.

'01 Judy vs '03 Skareb Comp?

Old 10-26-02, 07:18 PM
  #1  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Fort Worth, TX
Posts: 17
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
'01 Judy vs '03 Skareb Comp?

I have been test riding bikes like crazy trying to determine my next ride. I finally decided on the Giant XTC 2. Well I figured now it was no problem just go get the bike. Unfortunately my LBS threw me another curve. They just built up a '03 XTC 2 frame in my size that was special ordered but never picked up. It has XT front and rear derailliers, LX shifters, Avid SD5 brakes, LX hollowtech cranks, time pedals and the remain components basically like a factory XTC. They have it priced exactly the same as the factory bike. The only thing holding me back from jumping on this deal is the built bike has the top of the line Judy from '01. I'm not sure of the exact model, but the salesman refered to it as a race model with 95mm or travel. I only found a '00 Race Judy so maybe it isn't even a '01. Would I be better off with the new Skareb Comp and just upgrade the derailliers (which I figure is cheaper than a nice shock) or is the Judy comparable enough that I should jump on the built bike they have?

Kevin:confused:

Last edited by KevinST4; 10-26-02 at 07:21 PM.
KevinST4 is offline  
Old 10-26-02, 07:24 PM
  #2  
xc AND road
 
WoodyUpstate's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Upstate NY
Posts: 503
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Go with the Skareb Comp. Stiffer, newer tech, lighter.

'nough said.
WoodyUpstate is offline  
Old 10-26-02, 07:31 PM
  #3  
0^0
 
fubar5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Rolla, MO
Posts: 4,056

Bikes: Redline Monocog,Surly Crosscheck, Lemond Reno

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Judy's are crap, there you have it short and sweet.
__________________
Booyah!!
fubar5 is offline  
Old 10-26-02, 07:32 PM
  #4  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: MI
Posts: 691
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
i agree, the 01 Judy Race was a good fork but it'd be next to impossible to find parts for anymore. But i didnt like the feel much of the skared that i rode. So if i were you i'd do the tried and tested try them out and see which one you like
PeterG1185 is offline  
Old 10-27-02, 11:40 AM
  #5  
New to bikeforùms.net
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 2,202
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally posted by fubar5
Judy's are crap, there you have it short and sweet.
You dont have any reasons.....so.....why even say that???

I would turn you away from the skareb comp, they are flimsy as hell and when we got our epic up here I took it on a xc ride and the tiny reverse arch cracked off on one side of the fork. I did hear though that when they were shipped, they had the forks turned around in the box which shouldent be done on manitou reverse arch forks. It may have cracked then because we didnt notice the crack until we let a few other people use the bike and they brought it back and the owner noticed that the arch was cracked. The skarebs look really flimsy though, and thats why I wouldent get one. The 2K1 judy is a fine fork.

Last edited by KleinMp99; 10-27-02 at 11:43 AM.
KleinMp99 is offline  
Old 10-27-02, 01:17 PM
  #6  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Fort Worth, TX
Posts: 17
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I think I am going to take my chances with the Judy. Considering I will get better cranks, shifters, brakes, pedals and tires with only what appears to be a slight down grade in forks it just makes sense. Thanks to all who replied.

Kevin
KevinST4 is offline  
Old 10-27-02, 01:46 PM
  #7  
Senior Member
 
palooka's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Maine, USA
Posts: 139
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Good choice! Not only on the fork but on the XTC. Enjoy it I love mine!
palooka is offline  
Old 10-27-02, 11:49 PM
  #8  
Senior Member
 
CycleMON's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 141
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
The only thing the Skareb has going for it - lockout. The Judy could use an oil weight change to 7.5 to make it feel a whole better.
CycleMON is offline  
Old 10-28-02, 06:27 AM
  #9  
0^0
 
fubar5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Rolla, MO
Posts: 4,056

Bikes: Redline Monocog,Surly Crosscheck, Lemond Reno

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally posted by KleinMp99

You dont have any reasons.....so.....why even say that???
How do you know?
__________________
Booyah!!
fubar5 is offline  
Old 10-28-02, 12:28 PM
  #10  
Senior Member
 
palooka's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Maine, USA
Posts: 139
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally posted by fubar5


How do you know?
Well what are they? :confused:
palooka is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.