Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Mountain Biking
Reload this Page >

Manitou forks on Trek 6500...

Mountain Biking Mountain biking is one of the fastest growing sports in the world. Check out this forum to discuss the latest tips, tricks, gear and equipment in the world of mountain biking.

Manitou forks on Trek 6500...

Old 02-25-06, 01:06 AM
  #1  
blue_neon
Elite Rep
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Melbourne - Australia
Posts: 2,096
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Manitou forks on Trek 6500...

are they any good? There is Manitou Axel Comp, and Manitou Axel Elite. Both with 80mm and lockout. I couldn't find any reviews on Mtbr.com for them though!

Anyone ridden one? How do they compare the the Rock Shock J series?

blue_neon is offline  
Old 02-25-06, 01:20 AM
  #2  
concernicus
Senior Member
 
concernicus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Santa Cruz
Posts: 425

Bikes: doesnt matter. just ride.

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
theyre terrible. the only good thing is the lockout. i was able to bottom mine out just by standing up. the judys are much better
concernicus is offline  
Old 02-25-06, 01:37 AM
  #3  
blue_neon
Elite Rep
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Melbourne - Australia
Posts: 2,096
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Yeh i didn't think they were the best. Why Manitou? Arh.I agree, J2 would have SEEMED better in my opion. Then again the bike has XT rear deraillure and Deore Hydro's...
blue_neon is offline  
Old 02-25-06, 03:56 AM
  #4  
chis51hd
Senior Member
 
chis51hd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Davao City, Philippines
Posts: 182
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
On that topic, I'm considering a Manitou Axel super, or Rockshox Judy J2 or J4. Anyone else tried these? I think the J series is new for 2006, just want to make sure they're worth my money.
chis51hd is offline  
Old 02-25-06, 05:35 AM
  #5  
Tag1
Senior Member
 
Tag1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Northern California
Posts: 292
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
My wife's 6500wsd has the Axel Elite 80, and it works well for her. Then again, she's only 130 lbs, and she doesn't do any 6 ft drops, so it's not getting much abuse. Not sure if that helps...
Tag1 is offline  
Old 02-25-06, 07:46 AM
  #6  
bykeryder
Signor Memba
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 9
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Elite should have the rebound adjuster, which is important if you are serious about riding. J1 has no damping, J2 has no rebound adj. Also J2 is about 400g heavier than Axel. I'd take the Elite.
bykeryder is offline  
Old 02-25-06, 04:07 PM
  #7  
blue_neon
Elite Rep
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Melbourne - Australia
Posts: 2,096
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Elite fork comes with the LX rear deraillure on the 6500, Comp fork comes with XT derailleur (i think!). They're the same price...which one would be the better one to go for in your opinion?
blue_neon is offline  
Old 02-25-06, 07:28 PM
  #8  
idleuser
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Chicagoland
Posts: 287

Bikes: Specialized Epic Comp 2013, Specialized Allez Elite 2005

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I would go with the one that comes with the Elite. You can always up the rear D. to something even better later on. BTW XT D. are only 35$ or so at jensonusa.

I'd much rather get something that has the LO option with a slightly... heavier derailleur which is close to what the LX is compared to the XT.
idleuser is offline  
Old 02-25-06, 07:52 PM
  #9  
135crewchief
Senior Member
 
135crewchief's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Spokane, Wa
Posts: 85

Bikes: 05 Trek 4300, 05 Gary Fisher Tassajarra Disc

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
My bike came with a manitou axle elite 100 mm. I am not impressed at all with it. I have actually been looking for a replacement for it.
135crewchief is offline  
Old 02-25-06, 07:53 PM
  #10  
Taerom
Hazardous
 
Taerom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Quarantine
Posts: 727

Bikes: 2005 Trek Liquid 55, 2009 Haro Mary SS

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Ditto. My rockhopper came with one. I'll probably replace it sometime this summer when I get the extra money.
Taerom is offline  
Old 02-26-06, 06:00 AM
  #11  
bykeryder
Signor Memba
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 9
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Hardly anybody can feel the difference in performance between LX and XT derailleurs. It's a different story with forks.
bykeryder is offline  
Old 02-26-06, 09:27 AM
  #12  
Dannihilator
Still kicking.
 
Dannihilator's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Annandale, New Jersey
Posts: 19,605

Bikes: 2008 Trek Portland, 1989 Nishiki Altron

Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 121 Post(s)
Liked 10 Times in 10 Posts
Originally Posted by idleuser
I would go with the one that comes with the Elite. You can always up the rear D. to something even better later on. BTW XT D. are only 35$ or so at jensonusa.

I'd much rather get something that has the LO option with a slightly... heavier derailleur which is close to what the LX is compared to the XT.
You're head is on backwards, XT is higher up the totem pole than LX is.
__________________
Appreciate the old bikes more than the new.
Dannihilator is offline  
Old 02-26-06, 11:31 AM
  #13  
idleuser
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Chicagoland
Posts: 287

Bikes: Specialized Epic Comp 2013, Specialized Allez Elite 2005

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by KonaRider24
You're head is on backwards, XT is higher up the totem pole than LX is.
=P Well I look at it this way. If he's not going to up his fork anytime soon, might as well settle with a slightl lower class rear derailleur. I mean using the LX compared to an XT isn't exactly a bad thing.
idleuser is offline  
Old 02-26-06, 01:34 PM
  #14  
EdV
Newbie
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: London ON
Posts: 1

Bikes: 2005 Trek 6500

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
i just picked up my 05 6500 last month. I have not had a chance to ride it too much. I bought the bike and had them swap out the fork at the same time. I ended up with a RockShox Pilot SL. Not sure how much better the Pilot actually is over the Manitou, but it sure feels better... I will hopefully have a better idea once the snow melts..
EdV is offline  
Old 02-27-06, 12:20 AM
  #15  
blue_neon
Elite Rep
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Melbourne - Australia
Posts: 2,096
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Frame comes first, fork follows, then brakes and rear deraillure. Fork is a higher priority then rear deriallure, its more $$ so that would be the key feature. Basically I have the choice of:

6500 with XT rear deraillure, Deore hydro's and Axel Fork.
XTC3 with LX rear deraillure, Hayes HFX9 and Rock Shox Tora 318 Air

XTc3 is $50 more. Thats the best option at the moment I think, however i like the Trek's rear deraillure and brakes, however i'm not very much fussed between the LX and the XT however XT would be heaps better to have.

If I can get the fork changed on the Trek, i will consider, but it will work out more $$ probalby since the Axels retail at a lot less then the Tora's!
blue_neon is offline  
Old 02-27-06, 12:56 AM
  #16  
ankush
Senior Member
 
ankush's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 182
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
if you prefer the fit of the 6500, and can spring a little more cash, then try the 6700. it has the tora and a notably better spec sheet.
ankush is offline  
Old 02-27-06, 01:40 AM
  #17  
blue_neon
Elite Rep
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Melbourne - Australia
Posts: 2,096
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
The thing I love about the Trek 6500 is the frame. The blue frame, it looks a hell of a lot more better then the XTC 3 IMO, however looks can only take you so far. 6700 is a bit out of my price range unfortuently! I'll be test riding the 6500 and the Fuel 70 (just for the heck of it) this saturday. I'll have to pop down to the shop that stocks the XTC3 and test ride it this week two.
The 6500 looks great except for the Fork and the seat!
blue_neon is offline  
Old 02-27-06, 08:44 PM
  #18  
Portis
Banned.
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Home alone
Posts: 6,020

Bikes: Trek 4300 X 2. Trek 1000, Trek 6000

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by chis51hd
On that topic, I'm considering a Manitou Axel super, or Rockshox Judy J2 or J4. Anyone else tried these? I think the J series is new for 2006, just want to make sure they're worth my money.
I've got a J3 on my Trek 4300. I think it is fine, but i am no expert.
Portis is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright 2018 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.