Bar Ends: Still Cool?
#1
Perma-clyde
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 198
Bikes: '05 Stumpy FSR 120, REK TEK Blitzkreig (Commuter)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Bar Ends: Still Cool?
I've just bought a Stumpy FS, and in stock form it came without bar ends. Every time I ride it, however, I feel I'd prefer to have bar-ends, particularly while climbing. I ride mostly XC. Interestingly, I don't see my colleagues / riding buddies with bar-ends on their bikes - is there a reason that bar-ends have fallen out of fashion? Is it for some safety / efficiency reason that I can't see, or is it just because the big-name high-buck freeride heroes don't use them, so they've been phased out.
Any thoughts?
Any thoughts?
#2
Flatland hack
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Nowhere near the mountains :/
Posts: 3,228
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Its just a cool factor thing i think.
Some people think they catch on branches, but i dont think thats really the case. If you like em, go with em.
Some people think they catch on branches, but i dont think thats really the case. If you like em, go with em.
#3
cptn. x-chains sidekick
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: san jose, ca
Posts: 455
Bikes: stumpie, xtr, sid, ultimate sd
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
barends are the best
i think its just been made a taboo barends and risers, risers do nearly the same thing, just lack the availabiliy for different hand positions
i think its just been made a taboo barends and risers, risers do nearly the same thing, just lack the availabiliy for different hand positions
#4
Eat my Dust... n00bs
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Area 51
Posts: 364
Bikes: Kona Cinder Cone 2006
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by gmoneyhobbit
barends are the best
i think its just been made a taboo barends and risers, risers do nearly the same thing, just lack the availabiliy for different hand positions
i think its just been made a taboo barends and risers, risers do nearly the same thing, just lack the availabiliy for different hand positions
#5
Flatland hack
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Nowhere near the mountains :/
Posts: 3,228
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I agree they look a little odd on risers. But i dont like riser bars anyway so its a non-issue for me. I just like having the different hand position on long rides and for climbing.
#6
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,295
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Bar ends are primarily for climbing while standing on the pedals. They should be adjusted so the hands are not cocked relative to the wrist on a steep climb and out of the saddle. That provides two advantages: more comfortable hand/arm position while standing for a while and extra leverage (longer lever arm) that puts more force (from your pulling on them) on the rear tire contact-patch to improve traction. My reference is Ned Overends book.
It's not a style item, it has real utility if you do steep climbs. Who cares how they look? They really work and mine are on riser bars. One can always ride with a mask (like Zoro) so your friends can't recognize you.
There is rumor of a safety issue with the ends doing some damage to the rider in a crash. I can certainly see that with the Aluminum ones. The nice carbon-fiber ones which are really neat, are so well curved at all points that I can't imagine getting hurt. I prefer the longer ones that curve-in and shield the outer half of the grips. They provide more leverage and they push the vines away. If you hang one, you would have done it with just the grips too. They also allow the bar to bounce of off trees with out hanging up.
The carbon fiber ones are also lighter so they don't impede the ability to snap the bar around as much.
Al
It's not a style item, it has real utility if you do steep climbs. Who cares how they look? They really work and mine are on riser bars. One can always ride with a mask (like Zoro) so your friends can't recognize you.
There is rumor of a safety issue with the ends doing some damage to the rider in a crash. I can certainly see that with the Aluminum ones. The nice carbon-fiber ones which are really neat, are so well curved at all points that I can't imagine getting hurt. I prefer the longer ones that curve-in and shield the outer half of the grips. They provide more leverage and they push the vines away. If you hang one, you would have done it with just the grips too. They also allow the bar to bounce of off trees with out hanging up.
The carbon fiber ones are also lighter so they don't impede the ability to snap the bar around as much.
Al
#7
Newbie
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 708
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I always needed bar ends, but the fear of hooking them to the trees kept me from getting them (used to hit the edge of the bars to the trees a lot).. Now that I don't ride in dense forests anymore, I want to try them. Actually, I'm gonna get a pair tomorrow
#8
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,295
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by erhan
I always needed bar ends, but the fear of hooking them to the trees kept me from getting them (used to hit the edge of the bars to the trees a lot).. Now that I don't ride in dense forests anymore, I want to try them. Actually, I'm gonna get a pair tomorrow
My riser bars are two inches wider than standard bars. Makes the trees even closer. That's OK as with the bar ends, your grips are about the same width apart as on a standard bar with no risers.
We also have lots of vines droopping onto the trail. Hung up one once. Manged to muscle the bars and keep going until the vine broke.
Al
#9
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: colonial heights Va
Posts: 1,200
Bikes: Devinci Guzzler, 04 Canadian version
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
try these www.canecreek.com/ergo_control_ii.html
I use them and love them a lot. in conjuntion with my Ergongrips www.ergon-bike.com/ergon_mp1.php now I can ride all day and get 0 arm or hand discomfort
I use them and love them a lot. in conjuntion with my Ergongrips www.ergon-bike.com/ergon_mp1.php now I can ride all day and get 0 arm or hand discomfort
Last edited by iamthetas; 04-23-06 at 04:02 PM.
#10
DEADBEEF
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Catching his breath alongside a road near Seattle, WA USA
Posts: 12,234
Bikes: 1999 K2 OzM, 2001 Aegis Aro Svelte
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 6 Times
in
4 Posts
I use them therefor they cannot be cool.
__________________
1999 K2 OzM 2001 Aegis Aro Svelte
"Be liberal in what you accept, and conservative in what you send." -- Jon Postel, RFC1122
1999 K2 OzM 2001 Aegis Aro Svelte
"Be liberal in what you accept, and conservative in what you send." -- Jon Postel, RFC1122
#12
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: NY midstate
Posts: 394
Bikes: 85 Ross Mt Rainier(for winter road use), 86 Centurion Ironman Master, 92 trek 2300,2005 Iron Horse HollowPoint Expert
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
the major disadvantage for me would be having to have my bars that little bit wider to make room for them.. and the increased likelihood of hooking them on something while on narrow trails.. like somebody already mentioned..
#13
Wood Licker
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Whistler,BC
Posts: 16,966
Bikes: Trek Fuel EX 8 27.5 +, 2002 Transition Dirtbag, Kona Roast 2002
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 23 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
I don't use them because they aren't cool. I don't find them functional for my riding. I don't think people should use them because they are cool. If they serve a purpose use them. I have considered the small ones for my xc ride, and may still do it, someday. But it sure ain't a priorrity.
#14
Banned
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: take your time, enjoy the scenery, it will be there when you get to it
Posts: 7,281
Bikes: 07 IRO BFGB fixed-gear, 07 Pedal Force RS
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
When were these ever cool ? I loved them on narrow 20.5" bars when I lived north of Boston , but I never thought they were cool . My 25" low-rise bars make them unnecessary on my current ride .
#15
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: southern oregon
Posts: 2,631
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
The last set I had I got rid of by '94 or so. I didn't think they really helped me all that much. I would say today they probably aren't "cool", but that shouldn't stop you from using them if they help you.
#18
[CTRL Z]
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: NJ
Posts: 139
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times
in
3 Posts
I need them on my SS. It is far easier to pull up on the bars with that somewhat underhand position than the overhand position of being on the grips. They really let you use all of your leg power by planting the back wheel. There's no need for them to be longer than a few inches though, or else everything flexes too much.
And to officially qualify myself as uncool, I used to rock 'em on a riser bar on the FS.
And to officially qualify myself as uncool, I used to rock 'em on a riser bar on the FS.