Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Mountain Biking
Reload this Page >

Why Run Different Tires Front and Back?

Search
Notices
Mountain Biking Mountain biking is one of the fastest growing sports in the world. Check out this forum to discuss the latest tips, tricks, gear and equipment in the world of mountain biking.

Why Run Different Tires Front and Back?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-06-06 | 10:48 AM
  #1  
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
Why Run Different Tires Front and Back?

Hia ll -- I'm a XC trail-riding newbie shopping tires. I ride mostly dry singletrack (includes roots, rock gardens, loose corners, small jumps, etc., but primarily dry hardpack), and also use my bike to commute to work.

I was lookin at reviews of the Maxxis Larsen TT tires, which seem appropriate for my dual trail-commuting needs. However, several of the reviewers say they put a Larsen on the back and something else (usually a bit wider, more knobby) on the front. Some say outright, with respect to trail use, "Do not use a Larsen on the front."

My newbie question is: what is it about the work the front tire does relative to the back tire that causes some to use different tires front and back?

Thanks much for any replies.
genny1 is offline  
Reply
Old 07-06-06 | 11:01 AM
  #2  
Maelstrom's Avatar
Wood Licker
Titanium Club Membership
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 16,966
Likes: 2
From: Whistler,BC

Bikes: Trek Fuel EX 8 27.5 +, 2002 Transition Dirtbag, Kona Roast 2002

On the back I run a slicker smaller tire for increase speed while on the front I run something bigger, usually run it a little softer and with larger knobs for increase steering.

This, for me, is just how I like it. When I lean the bike it hooks up really well. If I am riding xc I use rounder (instead of square profile) tires with smaller knobs. Usually matching as I am not going at speeds where I notice the smallest imperfection in my tires.
Maelstrom is offline  
Reply
Old 07-06-06 | 12:54 PM
  #3  
cyccommute's Avatar
Mad bike riding scientist
Titanium Club Membership
20 Anniversary
Community Builder
Community Influencer
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 29,135
Likes: 6,178
From: Denver, CO

Bikes: Some silver ones, a red one, a black and orange one, and a few titanium ones

Originally Posted by genny1
Hia ll -- I'm a XC trail-riding newbie shopping tires. I ride mostly dry singletrack (includes roots, rock gardens, loose corners, small jumps, etc., but primarily dry hardpack), and also use my bike to commute to work.

I was lookin at reviews of the Maxxis Larsen TT tires, which seem appropriate for my dual trail-commuting needs. However, several of the reviewers say they put a Larsen on the back and something else (usually a bit wider, more knobby) on the front. Some say outright, with respect to trail use, "Do not use a Larsen on the front."

My newbie question is: what is it about the work the front tire does relative to the back tire that causes some to use different tires front and back?

Thanks much for any replies.
The front and rear of the bike do very different things. The rear tire needs to have grip for traction as you climb while the front needs traction for steering. The traction for the rear needs to be more in the center of the tire rather than on the edge while you want good edge control for a front tire.
__________________
Stuart Black
Dreamin' of Bemidji Down the Mississippi (in part)
Plan Epsilon Around Lake Michigan in the era of Covid
Gold Fever Three days of dirt in Colorado
Pokin' around the Poconos A cold ride around Lake Erie
Dinosaurs in Colorado A mountain bike guide to the Purgatory Canyon dinosaur trackway
Solo Without Pie. The search for pie in the Midwest.
Picking the Scablands. Washington and Oregon, 2005. Pie and spiders on the Columbia River!





cyccommute is online now  
Reply
Old 07-06-06 | 02:11 PM
  #4  
SpiderMike's Avatar
eert a ekil yzarc
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 2,560
Likes: 0
From: Pasadena TX

Bikes: many bikes

On my fully rigid SS, I run a 26x2.5 up front, and a 26x2.2 in the back. The treads are different as stated above for getting the most out of that wheel. Another reason I run a bigger tire up front is to help soak up the bumps. When I first built up the bike I ran a 2.2 upfront. Since putting a 2.5 up front, I've noticed some difference in the steering characteristics. But I'm racking that up to a tire with better side grip.

Originally Posted by cyccommute
The front and rear of the bike do very different things. The rear tire needs to have grip for traction as you climb while the front needs traction for steering. The traction for the rear needs to be more in the center of the tire rather than on the edge while you want good edge control for a front tire.
A good example of what cyccomute is saying, would be the Panaracer Smoke and Dart tires. The rear (Smoke) has a "paddle" like design for laying down grip for acceleration/climbing. While the front (Dart) has an arrow like pattern for more lateral grip.
https://www.panaracer.com/eng/products/mtb/xc.html
SpiderMike is offline  
Reply
Old 07-06-06 | 03:34 PM
  #5  
cyccommute's Avatar
Mad bike riding scientist
Titanium Club Membership
20 Anniversary
Community Builder
Community Influencer
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 29,135
Likes: 6,178
From: Denver, CO

Bikes: Some silver ones, a red one, a black and orange one, and a few titanium ones

Originally Posted by SpiderMike
On my fully rigid SS, I run a 26x2.5 up front, and a 26x2.2 in the back. The treads are different as stated above for getting the most out of that wheel. Another reason I run a bigger tire up front is to help soak up the bumps. When I first built up the bike I ran a 2.2 upfront. Since putting a 2.5 up front, I've noticed some difference in the steering characteristics. But I'm racking that up to a tire with better side grip.



A good example of what cyccomute is saying, would be the Panaracer Smoke and Dart tires. The rear (Smoke) has a "paddle" like design for laying down grip for acceleration/climbing. While the front (Dart) has an arrow like pattern for more lateral grip.
https://www.panaracer.com/eng/products/mtb/xc.html
I was going to use that as an example but decided not to! When the Smoke came out...long ago...I ran them on both ends. Big mistake! The Smoke would hold on to the ground in a turn or on rocks to the very end and then suddenly break loose, usually leaving me on the ground. It was a very scary front tire. Put a Dart on and the bike goes where you point it. They are still a great tire and they wear like iron.
__________________
Stuart Black
Dreamin' of Bemidji Down the Mississippi (in part)
Plan Epsilon Around Lake Michigan in the era of Covid
Gold Fever Three days of dirt in Colorado
Pokin' around the Poconos A cold ride around Lake Erie
Dinosaurs in Colorado A mountain bike guide to the Purgatory Canyon dinosaur trackway
Solo Without Pie. The search for pie in the Midwest.
Picking the Scablands. Washington and Oregon, 2005. Pie and spiders on the Columbia River!





cyccommute is online now  
Reply
Old 07-07-06 | 08:14 AM
  #6  
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
Thanks

Thanks much for the responses! Definitely makes sense now. I guess in light of the advantages I'm surprised more tire sets don't do the Dart-Smoke type-combo, although I suppose a good all-around tire will do the job just fine front and back for the majority of typical riders (especially neophytes like me). I have IRC Mythos XC tires now, and am looking forward to trying a different set for comparison and contrast if nothing else. Maybe I'll try the wider up front, narrower in back combination as well.

Thanks again for taking the time to respond.
genny1 is offline  
Reply
Old 07-07-06 | 08:33 AM
  #7  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 654
Likes: 0
From: Ohio

Bikes: vintage Raleigh

Originally Posted by cyccommute
I was going to use that as an example but decided not to! When the Smoke came out...long ago...I ran them on both ends. Big mistake! The Smoke would hold on to the ground in a turn or on rocks to the very end and then suddenly break loose, usually leaving me on the ground. It was a very scary front tire. Put a Dart on and the bike goes where you point it. They are still a great tire and they wear like iron.
Have you ever tried a Dart in both front and back??
bfloyd is offline  
Reply
Old 07-07-06 | 08:46 AM
  #8  
Banned
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 964
Likes: 0
From: Toronto & Wasaga Beach, Ontario, Canada

Bikes: Ellsworth Id

we have some sandy trails here so i run a 1.95 rear and a 2.3 front on my HT...i've found that the fatter front keeps from sinking in the sand on the descents and gives better control...quite a slog on the climbs, though
jm01 is offline  
Reply
Old 07-07-06 | 08:51 AM
  #9  
cyccommute's Avatar
Mad bike riding scientist
Titanium Club Membership
20 Anniversary
Community Builder
Community Influencer
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 29,135
Likes: 6,178
From: Denver, CO

Bikes: Some silver ones, a red one, a black and orange one, and a few titanium ones

Originally Posted by bfloyd
Have you ever tried a Dart in both front and back??
No. I don't think the Dart would have grip for a rear tire even if you put it on backwards. Plus the Smoke is really an excellent rear tire especially for the hardpack/loose gravel of the Colorado.
__________________
Stuart Black
Dreamin' of Bemidji Down the Mississippi (in part)
Plan Epsilon Around Lake Michigan in the era of Covid
Gold Fever Three days of dirt in Colorado
Pokin' around the Poconos A cold ride around Lake Erie
Dinosaurs in Colorado A mountain bike guide to the Purgatory Canyon dinosaur trackway
Solo Without Pie. The search for pie in the Midwest.
Picking the Scablands. Washington and Oregon, 2005. Pie and spiders on the Columbia River!





cyccommute is online now  
Reply
Old 07-07-06 | 08:55 AM
  #10  
cyccommute's Avatar
Mad bike riding scientist
Titanium Club Membership
20 Anniversary
Community Builder
Community Influencer
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 29,135
Likes: 6,178
From: Denver, CO

Bikes: Some silver ones, a red one, a black and orange one, and a few titanium ones

Originally Posted by genny1
Thanks much for the responses! Definitely makes sense now. I guess in light of the advantages I'm surprised more tire sets don't do the Dart-Smoke type-combo, although I suppose a good all-around tire will do the job just fine front and back for the majority of typical riders (especially neophytes like me). I have IRC Mythos XC tires now, and am looking forward to trying a different set for comparison and contrast if nothing else. Maybe I'll try the wider up front, narrower in back combination as well.

Thanks again for taking the time to respond.
Be aware that tires can be rather specific to areas too. What works in Colorado doesn't in New England, for example. It's usually best to ask around at your local shops or clubs to see what works for people in your area.
__________________
Stuart Black
Dreamin' of Bemidji Down the Mississippi (in part)
Plan Epsilon Around Lake Michigan in the era of Covid
Gold Fever Three days of dirt in Colorado
Pokin' around the Poconos A cold ride around Lake Erie
Dinosaurs in Colorado A mountain bike guide to the Purgatory Canyon dinosaur trackway
Solo Without Pie. The search for pie in the Midwest.
Picking the Scablands. Washington and Oregon, 2005. Pie and spiders on the Columbia River!





cyccommute is online now  
Reply
Old 07-07-06 | 07:16 PM
  #11  
Dannihilator's Avatar
Still kicking.
Sheldon Brown Memorial - Registered
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 19,659
Likes: 47
From: Annandale, New Jersey

Bikes: Bike Count: Rising.

Originally Posted by cyccommute
Be aware that tires can be rather specific to areas too. What works in Colorado doesn't in New England, for example. It's usually best to ask around at your local shops or clubs to see what works for people in your area.
+10
__________________
Appreciate the old bikes more than the new.
Dannihilator is offline  
Reply
Old 07-09-06 | 10:05 PM
  #12  
lodi781's Avatar
was kung-fu fighting
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 72
Likes: 0
From: Connecticut

Bikes: '00 schwinn moab disk/06 specialized stumpy fsr expert, 06 look565

I was looking into those pana's for my fsr. Any one know anything about the wtb veloci-raptors? Same problems as with the pana's??
lodi781 is offline  
Reply
Old 07-09-06 | 10:26 PM
  #13  
Maelstrom's Avatar
Wood Licker
Titanium Club Membership
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 16,966
Likes: 2
From: Whistler,BC

Bikes: Trek Fuel EX 8 27.5 +, 2002 Transition Dirtbag, Kona Roast 2002

Originally Posted by lodi781
I was looking into those pana's for my fsr. Any one know anything about the wtb veloci-raptors? Same problems as with the pana's??
Maybe start a new thread, likely to get more responses as this is a little older and most won't check in on it
Maelstrom is offline  
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.