Should "All Mountain" MTB's Be Sized one Size Smaller?
#1
Baby it's cold outside...
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: SK, Canada
Posts: 7,310
Bikes: Trek 5000, Rocky Mountain Wedge, GT Karakoram K2, Litespeed Tuscany
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Should "All Mountain" MTB's Be Sized one Size Smaller?
I'm considering an All Mountain style of MTB. Should the frame be sized smaller than what a person typically rides?
I ask for it seems these bikes have a lot more suspension travel, as such they seem to sit higher from the ground. I realize some of this will be compensated with suspension squat once on the bike.
I ride a 17.5" Hard Tail, However the bikes I'm interested in come in 16.5" or 18". I have tried a few 18" AM's and they seem a bit bigger than I would like. They Boys seem to be at risk with the 18" AM bikes.
Thoughts?
I ask for it seems these bikes have a lot more suspension travel, as such they seem to sit higher from the ground. I realize some of this will be compensated with suspension squat once on the bike.
I ride a 17.5" Hard Tail, However the bikes I'm interested in come in 16.5" or 18". I have tried a few 18" AM's and they seem a bit bigger than I would like. They Boys seem to be at risk with the 18" AM bikes.
Thoughts?
#2
.
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: The Summit of Lee
Posts: 10,939
Bikes: Hecklah
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
This should be an interesting thread...smaller than what?
I run a size 19"-20" on my XC hardtail and my AM bike.
I'd prob. run an 18-19 on a hucker or DH, but not AM. Unless that is you're just going to do nothing but technical riding. You still want it to be somewhat efficient which is difficult when you're cramped up in the cockpit.
I run a size 19"-20" on my XC hardtail and my AM bike.
I'd prob. run an 18-19 on a hucker or DH, but not AM. Unless that is you're just going to do nothing but technical riding. You still want it to be somewhat efficient which is difficult when you're cramped up in the cockpit.
#3
Custom User
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: T0L0K0
Posts: 3,739
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Buy what fits and feels comfortable, don't worry if it's not the same size as your other bikes. My FS and HT have a 3" difference in the seat tube sizing...the FS is smaller yet when I have it set up for trail riding, it's harder to get onto than the HT because of the height (higher BB and sag in the shock).
#4
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Toronto
Posts: 4,063
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Is this at the XC end of 'all mountain' or the DH end of 'all mountain'?
Generally, for more technical riding, a smaller frame is used, but sometimes manufacturers adjust for this in their sizing ahead of time.
Generally, for more technical riding, a smaller frame is used, but sometimes manufacturers adjust for this in their sizing ahead of time.
#6
Obeying Gravity
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Bellingham, WA
Posts: 2,962
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Look at the geometry of the frames/bikes you are looking and compare them to a current bike of yours. Maybe you will find in Size X, the effective toptube is an inch longer than on your current bike. Now in your mind you can simulate what it will be like.
#7
Baby it's cold outside...
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: SK, Canada
Posts: 7,310
Bikes: Trek 5000, Rocky Mountain Wedge, GT Karakoram K2, Litespeed Tuscany
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
#8
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: chicago
Posts: 318
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
this is all so very personal prefrence, but in that regard, here is mine.
for myXC bikes, i size it mostly with the same requirements as my road bike. an emphasis on pedaling efficiancy. a larger frame is better.
on my freeride/DJ/Urban bike i went allot smaller, i need to be able to get behind the seat easily, i need lots of clearance for bunnyhops, and need to be able to get off the thing easily when i crash.
an AM bike is a compromise, you'll adjust the seat regularly to get it up for climbing, and down for clearance on the descents. you'll need to split the diffrence and compromise. its an all around bike, which means you may not be able to get into that ideal XC pedaling position, but very close to it, you'll need to get behind the seat for descending, but never as well as a freeride bike.
is that sufficiantly confusing?
for myXC bikes, i size it mostly with the same requirements as my road bike. an emphasis on pedaling efficiancy. a larger frame is better.
on my freeride/DJ/Urban bike i went allot smaller, i need to be able to get behind the seat easily, i need lots of clearance for bunnyhops, and need to be able to get off the thing easily when i crash.
an AM bike is a compromise, you'll adjust the seat regularly to get it up for climbing, and down for clearance on the descents. you'll need to split the diffrence and compromise. its an all around bike, which means you may not be able to get into that ideal XC pedaling position, but very close to it, you'll need to get behind the seat for descending, but never as well as a freeride bike.
is that sufficiantly confusing?
#9
Baby it's cold outside...
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: SK, Canada
Posts: 7,310
Bikes: Trek 5000, Rocky Mountain Wedge, GT Karakoram K2, Litespeed Tuscany
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by euroford
this is all so very personal prefrence, but in that regard, here is mine.
for myXC bikes, i size it mostly with the same requirements as my road bike. an emphasis on pedaling efficiancy. a larger frame is better.
on my freeride/DJ/Urban bike i went allot smaller, i need to be able to get behind the seat easily, i need lots of clearance for bunnyhops, and need to be able to get off the thing easily when i crash.
an AM bike is a compromise, you'll adjust the seat regularly to get it up for climbing, and down for clearance on the descents. you'll need to split the diffrence and compromise. its an all around bike, which means you may not be able to get into that ideal XC pedaling position, but very close to it, you'll need to get behind the seat for descending, but never as well as a freeride bike.
is that sufficiantly confusing?
for myXC bikes, i size it mostly with the same requirements as my road bike. an emphasis on pedaling efficiancy. a larger frame is better.
on my freeride/DJ/Urban bike i went allot smaller, i need to be able to get behind the seat easily, i need lots of clearance for bunnyhops, and need to be able to get off the thing easily when i crash.
an AM bike is a compromise, you'll adjust the seat regularly to get it up for climbing, and down for clearance on the descents. you'll need to split the diffrence and compromise. its an all around bike, which means you may not be able to get into that ideal XC pedaling position, but very close to it, you'll need to get behind the seat for descending, but never as well as a freeride bike.
is that sufficiantly confusing?
No, thats as good an explanation as I read, and I subscribe to the same thoughts.
Man, just when I think I need to update my MTB bike I realize I need about 3 new MTB bikes. An XC Racer, a FS-AM, and a maybe a 29'er or other
#10
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Regina, SK, CA
Posts: 945
Bikes: 2002 Rocky HT
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Oooohh, do tell, what ya getting? The ETSX that's in your sig?
Of course everyone needs a bunch of MTB's. Personally I NEED:
1) a sub 20lb ht race bike
2) a ti hardtail with a Rolhoff and disc brakes for winter/mud
3) a XC fully for marathon races
4) a rigid singlespeed
That should do it!
Of course everyone needs a bunch of MTB's. Personally I NEED:
1) a sub 20lb ht race bike
2) a ti hardtail with a Rolhoff and disc brakes for winter/mud
3) a XC fully for marathon races
4) a rigid singlespeed
That should do it!
#11
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 203
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
personally id size your AM bike based on horizontal top tube length rather then seat tube length.
typical medium travel full sus AM bikes tend to have longer top tubes compared to their seat tubes, meaning if you use a long seat post you can avhieve a nice stretched tall position for pedaling, while still beig able to drop the seat right down when needed.
typical medium travel full sus AM bikes tend to have longer top tubes compared to their seat tubes, meaning if you use a long seat post you can avhieve a nice stretched tall position for pedaling, while still beig able to drop the seat right down when needed.
#12
.
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: The Summit of Lee
Posts: 10,939
Bikes: Hecklah
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Originally Posted by KrisA
Oooohh, do tell, what ya getting? The ETSX that's in your sig?
Of course everyone needs a bunch of MTB's. Personally I NEED:
1) a sub 20lb ht race bike
2) a ti hardtail with a Rolhoff and disc brakes for winter/mud
3) a XC fully for marathon races
4) a rigid singlespeed
That should do it!
Of course everyone needs a bunch of MTB's. Personally I NEED:
1) a sub 20lb ht race bike
2) a ti hardtail with a Rolhoff and disc brakes for winter/mud
3) a XC fully for marathon races
4) a rigid singlespeed
That should do it!
Ya forgot your Heckler with a Fox 36 and Session 10 bikes, ya weight weenie!
#13
Time for a change.
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: 6 miles inland from the coast of Sussex, in the South East of England
Posts: 19,913
Bikes: Dale MT2000. Bianchi FS920 Kona Explosif. Giant TCR C. Boreas Ignis. Pinarello Fp Uno.
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 5 Times
in
4 Posts
Originally Posted by KrisA
Oooohh, do tell, what ya getting? The ETSX that's in your sig?
Of course everyone needs a bunch of MTB's. Personally I NEED:
1) a sub 20lb ht race bike
2) a ti hardtail with a Rolhoff and disc brakes for winter/mud
3) a XC fully for marathon races
4) a rigid singlespeed
That should do it!
Of course everyone needs a bunch of MTB's. Personally I NEED:
1) a sub 20lb ht race bike
2) a ti hardtail with a Rolhoff and disc brakes for winter/mud
3) a XC fully for marathon races
4) a rigid singlespeed
That should do it!
Now onto the MtB sizing- One critical measurement- Standover height should be 4". I get away with "2 but then I never get off the bike Till I fall off. Small guy and I have a Bianchi Grizzly as my main XC Solo. Only a 15 1/2" frame and This one fits. Went to the next size up and it was too big- on standover and reach.
Forget what it says on the packet and the small print- Try a frame out and see if it fits-
__________________
How long was I in the army? Five foot seven.
Spike Milligan
How long was I in the army? Five foot seven.
Spike Milligan
#14
Baby it's cold outside...
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: SK, Canada
Posts: 7,310
Bikes: Trek 5000, Rocky Mountain Wedge, GT Karakoram K2, Litespeed Tuscany
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by KrisA
Oooohh, do tell, what ya getting? The ETSX that's in your sig?
Of course everyone needs a bunch of MTB's. Personally I NEED:
1) a sub 20lb ht race bike
2) a ti hardtail with a Rolhoff and disc brakes for winter/mud
3) a XC fully for marathon races
4) a rigid singlespeed
That should do it!
Of course everyone needs a bunch of MTB's. Personally I NEED:
1) a sub 20lb ht race bike
2) a ti hardtail with a Rolhoff and disc brakes for winter/mud
3) a XC fully for marathon races
4) a rigid singlespeed
That should do it!
On Number 2 It must be living in Saskatchewan that makes us want to have a Ti bike for winter slop and slush. Your spec sounds like something I want too.
The Rocky Mountain is a barely used ETSX 70 2004 frame I picked up, it is a 18". I thought it may make a fun build. I'm not sure I really needed a FS-AM type bike for my intended use, but I may as well try it out. I think I really wanted a Rocky Element, but this will do for now.
I have decided against the 29'er for now as it just doesn't seem right for me. I can't get over that big road bike feel.
The seller told me it's a 2004, howver I think it's a 2003 as it looks just like this 2003 with the burnished Flame Job.
Originally Posted by The Great Stonk
personally id size your AM bike based on horizontal top tube length rather then seat tube length.
typical medium travel full sus AM bikes tend to have longer top tubes compared to their seat tubes, meaning if you use a long seat post you can avhieve a nice stretched tall position for pedaling, while still beig able to drop the seat right down when needed.
typical medium travel full sus AM bikes tend to have longer top tubes compared to their seat tubes, meaning if you use a long seat post you can avhieve a nice stretched tall position for pedaling, while still beig able to drop the seat right down when needed.
While I understand what you are saying, I'm not sure I totally agree. Top Tube length while critical can always be adjusted with stems and set back, and some times the top tube measurement doesn't vary as much as a seat tube does between sizes.
Sure seat tube can be adjusted with seat post as well, but sizing by seat tube puts you in a ballpark range for stand over clearance, which I find to be more important. I could be wrong, but that's my take on it.
However when I was playing with a 17" Trek Fuel X and a 18" Specialized FSR. I like the stand over and feel of the Trek, however it's cockpit felt cramped due to it's smaller size and shorter stem. The 18" specialized fit as I like in the cockpit, but the stand over was marginal, and over all the bike felt bigger than I was use to.
__________________
-Trek 5000* -Project Litespeed* -The Italian Job* -Rocky Wedge* -The Canadian Connection*
-Trek 5000* -Project Litespeed* -The Italian Job* -Rocky Wedge* -The Canadian Connection*
Last edited by ViperZ; 12-02-06 at 07:05 PM.
#15
Baby it's cold outside...
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: SK, Canada
Posts: 7,310
Bikes: Trek 5000, Rocky Mountain Wedge, GT Karakoram K2, Litespeed Tuscany
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by stapfam
Now onto the MtB sizing- One critical measurement- Standover height should be 4". I get away with "2 but then I never get off the bike Till I fall off. Small guy and I have a Bianchi Grizzly as my main XC Solo. Only a 15 1/2" frame and This one fits. Went to the next size up and it was too big- on standover and reach.
Forget what it says on the packet and the small print- Try a frame out and see if it fits-
Forget what it says on the packet and the small print- Try a frame out and see if it fits-
This is howmuch Standover I'm use to having
My saddle is about 1 inch lower than usual for winter.
#16
Living the n+1
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Off the back
Posts: 2,745
Bikes: 2019 RM Blizzard, 2013 SuperX, 2007 Litespeed Vortex, 1970 Falcon Olympic, 2008 RM Metropolis IGH, 2004 Specialized Enduro, 2006 Langster
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
Originally Posted by ViperZ
......Rocky Mountain is a barely used ETSX ....I think I really wanted a Rocky Element..... the 29'er for now as it just doesn't seem right for me....
T.J.
Last edited by Tequila Joe; 12-03-06 at 10:15 AM.
#17
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Regina, SK, CA
Posts: 945
Bikes: 2002 Rocky HT
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
That's a 2002.5, first year they were made and the only year with the cool flame paint job.
Beware these early ETSX's are very prone to brakeage on the seat tube where the upper pivot is. Rocky has been VERY good at replacing frames under warantee but only to the original owners and the warantee was 5 years. Both of which likely mean you can't get this replaced under warantee if it brakes. Keep this in mind, if the price is right it still will be a fabulous bike, but keep in mind you might need to invest in a new frame sometime down the road.
Beware these early ETSX's are very prone to brakeage on the seat tube where the upper pivot is. Rocky has been VERY good at replacing frames under warantee but only to the original owners and the warantee was 5 years. Both of which likely mean you can't get this replaced under warantee if it brakes. Keep this in mind, if the price is right it still will be a fabulous bike, but keep in mind you might need to invest in a new frame sometime down the road.
#18
Time for a change.
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: 6 miles inland from the coast of Sussex, in the South East of England
Posts: 19,913
Bikes: Dale MT2000. Bianchi FS920 Kona Explosif. Giant TCR C. Boreas Ignis. Pinarello Fp Uno.
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 5 Times
in
4 Posts
Originally Posted by ViperZ
This is howmuch Standover I'm use to having
My saddle is about 1 inch lower than usual for winter.
My saddle is about 1 inch lower than usual for winter.
Surprised you can use Mudguards in the snow? Snow collects on the guards worse than thick clay in my part of the world, but we don't get much of it over here.
__________________
How long was I in the army? Five foot seven.
Spike Milligan
How long was I in the army? Five foot seven.
Spike Milligan
#19
Baby it's cold outside...
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: SK, Canada
Posts: 7,310
Bikes: Trek 5000, Rocky Mountain Wedge, GT Karakoram K2, Litespeed Tuscany
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by KrisA
That's a 2002.5, first year they were made and the only year with the cool flame paint job.
Beware these early ETSX's are very prone to brakeage on the seat tube where the upper pivot is. Rocky has been VERY good at replacing frames under warantee but only to the original owners and the warantee was 5 years. Both of which likely mean you can't get this replaced under warantee if it brakes. Keep this in mind, if the price is right it still will be a fabulous bike, but keep in mind you might need to invest in a new frame sometime down the road.
Beware these early ETSX's are very prone to brakeage on the seat tube where the upper pivot is. Rocky has been VERY good at replacing frames under warantee but only to the original owners and the warantee was 5 years. Both of which likely mean you can't get this replaced under warantee if it brakes. Keep this in mind, if the price is right it still will be a fabulous bike, but keep in mind you might need to invest in a new frame sometime down the road.
#20
Baby it's cold outside...
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: SK, Canada
Posts: 7,310
Bikes: Trek 5000, Rocky Mountain Wedge, GT Karakoram K2, Litespeed Tuscany
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by stapfam
About the same as I use on the Bianchi- but if I get my feet on the ground- my crotch will be in front of the saddle and I only have about 2" standover. Those compact frames are very deceptive to look at.
Surprised you can use Mudguards in the snow? Snow collects on the guards worse than thick clay in my part of the world, but we don't get much of it over here.
Surprised you can use Mudguards in the snow? Snow collects on the guards worse than thick clay in my part of the world, but we don't get much of it over here.
The tires I'm running are Continental Spike Claws, which seem to clear very well. Even in deep sticky snow I have not encountered any problems. I actaully put the fenders on during the transistion season when it would snow and then melt, but now that it is colder (we get a very dry cold), they work so well, I'll just leave them on. I too was concerned about the packing, but I just haven't encountered it yet.
Even in this soft sticky stuff the fenders didn't pack up Temp was about -12C.
This was from my joy ride yesterday at -27C.
#21
Baby it's cold outside...
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: SK, Canada
Posts: 7,310
Bikes: Trek 5000, Rocky Mountain Wedge, GT Karakoram K2, Litespeed Tuscany
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
#22
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Toronto
Posts: 4,063
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Don't put too much stake in the breakage thing.
Most everyone promised me my 2000 Rocky RM6 would break at the swingarm if I looked at it the wrong way. Instead, it lasted an ungodly long time, and eventually cracked somewhere completely different from plain old metal fatigue.
Edit: I wish the roads around here could look like that last picture all winter long, instead of the "brown brine soup" look we go for in Toronto.
Most everyone promised me my 2000 Rocky RM6 would break at the swingarm if I looked at it the wrong way. Instead, it lasted an ungodly long time, and eventually cracked somewhere completely different from plain old metal fatigue.
Edit: I wish the roads around here could look like that last picture all winter long, instead of the "brown brine soup" look we go for in Toronto.
Last edited by ghettocruiser; 12-03-06 at 02:59 PM.
#23
Baby it's cold outside...
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: SK, Canada
Posts: 7,310
Bikes: Trek 5000, Rocky Mountain Wedge, GT Karakoram K2, Litespeed Tuscany
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by ghettocruiser
Don't put too much stake in the breakage thing.
Most everyone promised me my 2000 Rocky RM6 would break at the swingarm if I looked at it the wrong way. Instead, it lasted an ungodly long time, and eventually cracked somewhere completely different from plain old metal fatigue.
Edit: I wish the roads around here could look like that last picture all winter long, instead of the "brown brine soup" look we go for in Toronto.
Most everyone promised me my 2000 Rocky RM6 would break at the swingarm if I looked at it the wrong way. Instead, it lasted an ungodly long time, and eventually cracked somewhere completely different from plain old metal fatigue.
Edit: I wish the roads around here could look like that last picture all winter long, instead of the "brown brine soup" look we go for in Toronto.
I too like it when it's colder and the roads are firmer and more consistent. I took a ride today down to our River and was able to rid on the frozen South Saskatchewan for quite a way. it was nice to break new tracks, and while riding on the firm ice.
#25
Baby it's cold outside...
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: SK, Canada
Posts: 7,310
Bikes: Trek 5000, Rocky Mountain Wedge, GT Karakoram K2, Litespeed Tuscany
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts