Mountain Biking Mountain biking is one of the fastest growing sports in the world. Check out this forum to discuss the latest tips, tricks, gear and equipment in the world of mountain biking.

no, mines better!

Old 08-27-07, 07:04 PM
  #1  
norco_rider77
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Middleton, Nova Scotia, Canada
Posts: 684

Bikes: 2007 Norco Katmandu, building a 2006 Norco Bigfoot

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
no, mines better!

well, my friend just built a bike, and im doing the same, but im just starting it. he's one of those people who always have to be right and have the best or be the best. so heres the story...

i just got my frame, and while i was in the area i got the bike shop there to put in a bottom bracket for me. I just told the guy to give me a bb to fit the truvativ hussefelt crank. so he asks me if the price is good and i say sure, so he installs it. i find out its the truvativ gigapipe team DH. so anyway, he has the same crank as im getting (we like a lot of the same stuff) but his bb is the truvativ howitzer Team DH.

so my question is, which one is actually better? i dont really care, but i just would like to know. in my opinion, mines better, cuz i looked at the specs thing and there are some advantages. it was also more expensive. heres the links to them...

Gigapipe team DH (mine)
http://www.sram.com/en/truvativ/bott...ipe/teamdh.php

howitzer Team DH (his)
http://www.sram.com/en/truvativ/bott...itzer/team.php
norco_rider77 is offline  
Old 08-27-07, 07:54 PM
  #2  
ed 
.
 
ed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: The Summit of Lee
Posts: 10,939

Bikes: Hecklah

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
http://www.sram.com/en/truvativ/bott...kets/index.php

See if ya can get your answers there...I think he 1-upped ya though.

Looks like the Howy has pretty massive external bearings with a chunk'a cromo spindle.
ed is offline  
Old 08-27-07, 09:24 PM
  #3  
norco_rider77
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Middleton, Nova Scotia, Canada
Posts: 684

Bikes: 2007 Norco Katmandu, building a 2006 Norco Bigfoot

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
dang, o well, theyre still both nice bb's, and also, my frame is a dark grey, so i think the silver howy would kinda look a little weird... and his frame is black and i think it looks a little stupid. whatever, as long as it wroks right?
norco_rider77 is offline  
Old 08-27-07, 10:18 PM
  #4  
M_S
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 3,693
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by norco_rider77 View Post
dang, o well, theyre still both nice bb's, and also, my frame is a dark grey, so i think the silver howy would kinda look a little weird... and his frame is black and i think it looks a little stupid. whatever, as long as it wroks right?
Despite your assertions, it is quite obvious that you do care, otherwise you wouldn't be posting this here, would you?

As an aside: function then form. Though I admit I have winced when putting a silver part on a bike with mostly black stuff. Oh well.
M_S is offline  
Old 08-27-07, 10:30 PM
  #5  
norco_rider77
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Middleton, Nova Scotia, Canada
Posts: 684

Bikes: 2007 Norco Katmandu, building a 2006 Norco Bigfoot

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
k, i care to see if hes right or not, but not if im right or if i have a better part.

and im goin for a black bike with red details (red spokes would be kinda cool, but i wont bother painting anything)
norco_rider77 is offline  
Old 08-28-07, 06:10 AM
  #6  
ed 
.
 
ed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: The Summit of Lee
Posts: 10,939

Bikes: Hecklah

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by norco_rider77 View Post
k, i care to see if hes right or not, but not if im right or if i have a better part.

and im goin for a black bike with red details (red spokes would be kinda cool, but i wont bother painting anything)
No need to paint
Attached Images
File Type: bmp
untitled.bmp (35.2 KB, 38 views)
ed is offline  
Old 08-28-07, 07:28 AM
  #7  
JonathanGennick 
Senior Member
 
JonathanGennick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Munising, Michigan, USA
Posts: 3,987

Bikes: Priority 600, Priority Continuum, Devinci Dexter

Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 632 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
...so my question is, which one is actually better?
...
and also, my frame is a dark grey, so i think the silver howy would kinda look a little weird...
Do bear in mind that the word "better" must always be used with respect to some set of requirements. To say that one bottom-bracket is "better" than another in any sort of absolute sense is meaningless. In casual conversation there is often an implicit set of requirements that is unspoken, but those requirements exist nonetheless. Sometimes, when people argue about which part is better, they are actually arguing from different sets of requirements. That's when the arguments begin to get entertaining .

In your case, it sounds like a good color match might be a requirement. And thus one could argue that the bottom-bracket that you bought is "better" in terms of meeting your requirements than the Howitzer.
JonathanGennick is offline  
Old 08-28-07, 07:37 AM
  #8  
born2bahick
Official Website Waterboy
 
born2bahick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 3,271

Bikes: a lot

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by JonathanGennick View Post
Do bear in mind that the word "better" must always be used with respect to some set of requirements. To say that one bottom-bracket is "better" than another in any sort of absolute sense is meaningless. In casual conversation there is often an implicit set of requirements that is unspoken, but those requirements exist nonetheless. Sometimes, when people argue about which part is better, they are actually arguing from different sets of requirements. That's when the arguments begin to get entertaining .

In your case, it sounds like a good color match might be a requirement. And thus one could argue that the bottom-bracket that you bought is "better" in terms of meeting your requirements than the Howitzer.
Good Post! If I had an applauding emoticon I would give it to you!
born2bahick is offline  
Old 08-28-07, 05:46 PM
  #9  
norco_rider77
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Middleton, Nova Scotia, Canada
Posts: 684

Bikes: 2007 Norco Katmandu, building a 2006 Norco Bigfoot

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by JonathanGennick View Post
Do bear in mind that the word "better" must always be used with respect to some set of requirements. To say that one bottom-bracket is "better" than another in any sort of absolute sense is meaningless. In casual conversation there is often an implicit set of requirements that is unspoken, but those requirements exist nonetheless. Sometimes, when people argue about which part is better, they are actually arguing from different sets of requirements. That's when the arguments begin to get entertaining .

In your case, it sounds like a good color match might be a requirement. And thus one could argue that the bottom-bracket that you bought is "better" in terms of meeting your requirements than the Howitzer.
great post, that sounds about right. but his frame is black... o well, as long as he likes his bike right
norco_rider77 is offline  
Old 08-28-07, 06:20 PM
  #10  
TheFlip
Senior Member
 
TheFlip's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Santa Cruz, CA
Posts: 209

Bikes: 70s Motobecane and '06 Enduro (and a kickass little pink and purple schwinn)

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by JonathanGennick View Post
Do bear in mind that the word "better" must always be used with respect to some set of requirements. To say that one bottom-bracket is "better" than another in any sort of absolute sense is meaningless. In casual conversation there is often an implicit set of requirements that is unspoken, but those requirements exist nonetheless. Sometimes, when people argue about which part is better, they are actually arguing from different sets of requirements. That's when the arguments begin to get entertaining .

In your case, it sounds like a good color match might be a requirement. And thus one could argue that the bottom-bracket that you bought is "better" in terms of meeting your requirements than the Howitzer.
Logic and reason has no place in this forum... you have looked at other posts on this forum before, right?

*edit* Should it be have or has there. I always get confused with that.
TheFlip is offline  
Old 08-28-07, 06:32 PM
  #11  
norco_rider77
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Middleton, Nova Scotia, Canada
Posts: 684

Bikes: 2007 Norco Katmandu, building a 2006 Norco Bigfoot

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
i think its has, but anyway
norco_rider77 is offline  
Old 08-28-07, 06:32 PM
  #12  
Dannihilator
Still kicking.
 
Dannihilator's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Annandale, New Jersey
Posts: 19,615

Bikes: 2008 Trek Portland, 1989 Nishiki Altron

Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 121 Post(s)
Liked 10 Times in 10 Posts
Meh, it's just truvativ.
__________________
Appreciate the old bikes more than the new.
Dannihilator is offline  
Old 08-28-07, 06:36 PM
  #13  
norco_rider77
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Middleton, Nova Scotia, Canada
Posts: 684

Bikes: 2007 Norco Katmandu, building a 2006 Norco Bigfoot

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
why meh? Truvativ makes awesome components (especially for my budget)
norco_rider77 is offline  
Old 08-28-07, 06:47 PM
  #14  
Dannihilator
Still kicking.
 
Dannihilator's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Annandale, New Jersey
Posts: 19,615

Bikes: 2008 Trek Portland, 1989 Nishiki Altron

Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 121 Post(s)
Liked 10 Times in 10 Posts
If you like parts that will fall apart on you for no apparent reason.
__________________
Appreciate the old bikes more than the new.
Dannihilator is offline  
Old 08-28-07, 06:49 PM
  #15  
norco_rider77
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Middleton, Nova Scotia, Canada
Posts: 684

Bikes: 2007 Norco Katmandu, building a 2006 Norco Bigfoot

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
ive had Truvativ on my bike since i knew what a bike was (i mean the good stuff) and its never let me down. you must have had a bad experience with them
norco_rider77 is offline  
Old 08-28-07, 06:57 PM
  #16  
Dannihilator
Still kicking.
 
Dannihilator's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Annandale, New Jersey
Posts: 19,615

Bikes: 2008 Trek Portland, 1989 Nishiki Altron

Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 121 Post(s)
Liked 10 Times in 10 Posts
I've had a bunch of their cranks break on me, all at where the pedal spindle threads in, I tend to prefer Race Face or Shimano cranks. With your bb, you might have gotten a better bb. From the last I heard those howitzer bb's tend to fail rather easily.
__________________
Appreciate the old bikes more than the new.
Dannihilator is offline  
Old 08-28-07, 07:02 PM
  #17  
wethepeople
Long haired freak.
 
wethepeople's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Still stuck in hell.
Posts: 6,281

Bikes: 2011 SE Old Man Flyer.

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I'm with MR. Smashy, Truvativ is for the most part junk. I've broken many of their cranks, and a few of their BB's. The only reason I keep going back is because their stuff is dirt cheap. My price for a Howitzer BB and cranks was $60 and thats the only reason they're on my bike.
__________________

"the bus came by and I got on, that's when it all began...there was Cowboy Neal at the wheel of a bus to never-ever land."

wethepeople is offline  
Old 08-28-07, 07:03 PM
  #18  
cryptid01
one less horse
 
cryptid01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: East Jesus NY
Posts: 5,600

Bikes: are better than yours

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Other than the lack of durability (I kill a giga every year), no complaints.
cryptid01 is offline  
Old 08-28-07, 07:04 PM
  #19  
santiago
sarcasm meter: jerk mode
 
santiago's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Montréal, QC, Canada
Posts: 4,510

Bikes: 2005 Kona Blast; 2005 Turner Flux, 2006 Felt F3C

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Same thing happened to my Truvativ 5D cranks. The crank arm material on my particular cranks was very soft and the thread got ruined. I was able to get it re-tapped by my LBs but it is not a crank I feel comfortable adding and removing pedals often.
__________________
First Class Jerk
santiago is offline  
Old 08-28-07, 08:52 PM
  #20  
norco_rider77
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Middleton, Nova Scotia, Canada
Posts: 684

Bikes: 2007 Norco Katmandu, building a 2006 Norco Bigfoot

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
o well, i dont ride super hard, i probably give my bike the best beating out of my friends, and i still havent broken any truvativ stuff. also, what do you think of SRAM, rockshox, and avid? since SRAM makes them and truvativ
norco_rider77 is offline  
Old 08-28-07, 09:02 PM
  #21  
Dannihilator
Still kicking.
 
Dannihilator's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Annandale, New Jersey
Posts: 19,615

Bikes: 2008 Trek Portland, 1989 Nishiki Altron

Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 121 Post(s)
Liked 10 Times in 10 Posts
Rock Shox I can tolerate, love my Avid Juicy 7's, and refuse to run a sram deraillieur.
__________________
Appreciate the old bikes more than the new.
Dannihilator is offline  
Old 08-28-07, 09:07 PM
  #22  
mtnbk3000
Senior Member
 
mtnbk3000's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 1,072
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Mr. Smashy View Post
Rock Shox I can tolerate, love my Avid Juicy 7's, and refuse to run a sram deraillieur.
hey smashy why is that. I am the oposite way, because i have had a shimano derailluer litteraly fall apart on me, but sram derailluers will never fall apart, just bend.

also norco go with avid brakes the bb7s are awesome, hook them up with some compressionless cables and they are bomb
mtnbk3000 is offline  
Old 08-28-07, 09:10 PM
  #23  
DylanTremblay
...is my hero!
 
DylanTremblay's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Edmonton, Alberta
Posts: 864

Bikes: 2008 Kink Whip, 2006 Specialized Enduro, 2006 Norco Wolverine, 2006 Iron Horse FsZ

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
SRAM...good, Avid....good, Rockshox...never rode them much, Truvativ...****ty...broke a bunch of BB and one set for cranks from them. But they have a pretty good warrenty so it wasn't that big a deal.
DylanTremblay is offline  
Old 08-28-07, 09:10 PM
  #24  
norco_rider77
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Middleton, Nova Scotia, Canada
Posts: 684

Bikes: 2007 Norco Katmandu, building a 2006 Norco Bigfoot

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
im actually planning to get the bb7's as for the cables, ill make sure i get those. is there a specific housing that works best too?
norco_rider77 is offline  
Old 08-28-07, 09:13 PM
  #25  
mtnbk3000
Senior Member
 
mtnbk3000's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 1,072
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
i fractured the crank arms(truvativ) on my new P.2 within a month, luckily i decided it would be a good idea to bring the bike to the shop, i would never have checked for the fracture in the cranks arms i figured the bashguard shattering would prevent damage to the cranks. anyways they were warranteed didn't have to pay for the cranks but i had to shell out 90.00 for a bashguard, a new chainring and instalation.
mtnbk3000 is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2018 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.