Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Mountain Biking
Reload this Page >

mongoose versus trek

Notices
Mountain Biking Mountain biking is one of the fastest growing sports in the world. Check out this forum to discuss the latest tips, tricks, gear and equipment in the world of mountain biking.

mongoose versus trek

Old 09-11-07, 10:15 PM
  #1  
NOOB
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Seattle
Posts: 92

Bikes: Diamondback MTB, Trek 1000

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
mongoose versus trek

hey fellow cyclists. i'm stuck in a decision to buy a bike to get around town while im in college. i dont need to tackle Everest, yet some rugged qualities are wanted. going off curbs and uneven ground happens alot.

i have these two options i came across while searching:

2005 Mongoose Tyax comp $200
2006 Mongoose Tyax comp $220
2007 Trek 820 $260


i know people are gunna say "trek over mongoose" but think about this. mongoose's tyax is one of the upper model hardtails they offer. while the 820 is Trek's lowest mountain bike available.

what do you think?
mendozer is offline  
Old 09-11-07, 10:18 PM
  #2  
Still kicking.
 
Dannihilator's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Annandale, New Jersey
Posts: 19,659

Bikes: Bike Count: Rising.

Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 159 Post(s)
Liked 46 Times in 32 Posts
This made me chuckle a bit.

The Tyax comp is a low end pile. While the 820 is not high end, it's leaps and bounds better than the Mongoose. Not to mention the 820 comes with a better warranty.
__________________
Appreciate the old bikes more than the new.
Dannihilator is offline  
Old 09-11-07, 10:23 PM
  #3  
NOOB
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Seattle
Posts: 92

Bikes: Diamondback MTB, Trek 1000

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
hmm ok then. looks like i'm going to the local bike shop. so you dont think the mongoose is ok just for commuting? or am i even aiming too high? i wanted aluminum frame, trigger shfiters, shimano parts.
mendozer is offline  
Old 09-11-07, 10:25 PM
  #4  
Still kicking.
 
Dannihilator's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Annandale, New Jersey
Posts: 19,659

Bikes: Bike Count: Rising.

Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 159 Post(s)
Liked 46 Times in 32 Posts
I'd still say the 820.
__________________
Appreciate the old bikes more than the new.
Dannihilator is offline  
Old 09-11-07, 10:27 PM
  #5  
Join the BLK MRKT
 
MulletArgyleman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: In western B.C.
Posts: 491

Bikes: KHS Alite 500(ht), CCM XR-4(fs).....08 Blk Mrkt Riot build(mint colour), w/ gold labels, juicy 3's, etc...

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by mendozer
hey fellow cyclists. i'm stuck in a decision to buy a bike to get around town while im in college. i dont need to tackle Everest, yet some rugged qualities are wanted. going off curbs and uneven ground happens alot.

i have these two options i came across while searching:

2005 Mongoose Tyax comp $200
2006 Mongoose Tyax comp $220
2007 Trek 820 $260


i know people are gunna say "trek over mongoose" but think about this. mongoose's tyax is one of the upper model hardtails they offer. while the 820 is Trek's lowest mountain bike available.

what do you think?

Is this a joke? Mongoose blows chunks! - except their seats(oops, saddles), they're ok.
MulletArgyleman is offline  
Old 09-11-07, 10:29 PM
  #6  
NOOB
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Seattle
Posts: 92

Bikes: Diamondback MTB, Trek 1000

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
ok cool thanks
mendozer is offline  
Old 09-11-07, 10:52 PM
  #7  
NOOB
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Seattle
Posts: 92

Bikes: Diamondback MTB, Trek 1000

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
actually the closer i look at it, i noticed the 820 comes with RST omni 191 front shocks. arent those crap? also, its steel-framed. wouldnt i be better off buying a cheap aluminum bike and fix up components? how is there warranty anyways?
mendozer is offline  
Old 09-11-07, 11:04 PM
  #8  
Still kicking.
 
Dannihilator's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Annandale, New Jersey
Posts: 19,659

Bikes: Bike Count: Rising.

Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 159 Post(s)
Liked 46 Times in 32 Posts
Originally Posted by mendozer
actually the closer i look at it, i noticed the 820 comes with RST omni 191 front shocks. arent those crap? also, its steel-framed. wouldnt i be better off buying a cheap aluminum bike and fix up components? how is there warranty anyways?
Buy new from trek, and they will take care of you. No bikes you get complete in the $200-$500 range have great forks.
__________________
Appreciate the old bikes more than the new.
Dannihilator is offline  
Old 09-11-07, 11:27 PM
  #9  
Obeying Gravity
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Bellingham, WA
Posts: 2,962
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by Mr. Smashy
Buy new from trek, and they will take care of you.
Amen brother! Go with the 820. End of story. Trek is an awesome company to work with. I have worked at a Trek dealer for a little over a year now and have yet to see a warranty claim denied. They are such a large company that replacing a frame, or a wheel or what have you, is essentially nothing to them. But it will buy them a customer in the long run.

Now, don't get me wrong, don't think that Trek is just all about $$ and what not. If you buy the Trek, you are guaranteed a good bike at the price range, and a company behind the bike that supports it.
MattP. is offline  
Old 09-12-07, 07:36 PM
  #10  
Spin my crank
 
rallykid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 108
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
If it is just between those 2 then go with the 820. If you can spare another $30 or $40 then step up to the Trek 3700 and get the aluminum frame. Big difference between the 820 steel and the 3700 aluminum for the little price increase.
rallykid is offline  
Old 09-12-07, 09:34 PM
  #11  
Senior Member
 
FlatFender's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Raleigh NC
Posts: 1,020
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I prefer steel.....
FlatFender is offline  
Old 09-13-07, 10:29 AM
  #12  
NOOB
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Seattle
Posts: 92

Bikes: Diamondback MTB, Trek 1000

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
ok sweet thanks
mendozer is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.