Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Mountain Biking
Reload this Page >

Big difference between fs and ht for xc racing

Mountain Biking Mountain biking is one of the fastest growing sports in the world. Check out this forum to discuss the latest tips, tricks, gear and equipment in the world of mountain biking.

Big difference between fs and ht for xc racing

Old 10-07-07, 09:12 PM
  #1  
picasso
Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 41
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Big difference between fs and ht for xc racing

I just bought a 2007 Bianchi Mutt 7700. I plan to start racing XC races in my area. I was wondering what is the big difference between fs and ht for racing. It just seems like a fs wouldnt be as fast as a ht. I know they probably are alot smoother through rough terrain. Also the fs that is compared to my ht in components is $1000 more atleast. My friend is planning on buying a bike and is asking the same questions.
picasso is offline  
Old 10-08-07, 09:54 AM
  #2  
picasso
Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 41
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Is there really a big advantage to riding full suspension**********????
picasso is offline  
Old 10-08-07, 10:24 AM
  #3  
ZeCanon
Writin' stuff
 
ZeCanon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Boulder, CO
Posts: 3,782
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
depends on where you ride, and how you ride. I race on a full suspension most of the time because it allows me to stay seated more over rough stuff, which saves a lot of energy. That said, for many race courses throughout the country, a hardtail is faster. Racing in colorado, I wish I had a HT most of the time, but when I race in New England all summer, I'm glad I have the FS Since I don't have 2 bikes, FS is the best choice for me.
ZeCanon is offline  
Old 10-08-07, 11:49 AM
  #4  
sjs731
Strob
 
sjs731's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 77

Bikes: Trek 4300 and Redline D460 29er

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
A FS bikes takes some momentum away especially if you are standing and really cranking hard. The momentum is going down instead of pushing you forward, so yes a hardtail is a faster bike. Uphills I find you need to stay seated and just crawl you way up with a FS bike especially if it is rough. You have to let the suspension work for you. Downhill on rough terrain there is no comparison to a FS.
sjs731 is offline  
Old 10-08-07, 12:00 PM
  #5  
born2bahick
Official Website Waterboy
 
born2bahick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 3,271

Bikes: a lot

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by sjs731 View Post
A FS bikes takes some momentum away especially if you are standing and really cranking hard. The momentum is going down instead of pushing you forward, so yes a hardtail is a faster bike. Uphills I find you need to stay seated and just crawl you way up with a FS bike especially if it is rough.
Not all FS bikes do that
born2bahick is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Hinge
Folding Bikes
4
05-23-19 12:02 PM
Branimir
Bicycle Mechanics
18
10-03-12 04:36 PM
bangkok
Folding Bikes
0
01-08-06 01:33 AM
sirshane13
Mountain Biking
0
08-22-05 10:57 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright 2018 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.