Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Mountain Biking
Reload this Page >

new hardtail...please help.

Mountain Biking Mountain biking is one of the fastest growing sports in the world. Check out this forum to discuss the latest tips, tricks, gear and equipment in the world of mountain biking.
View Poll Results: help me pick a hardtail basher
Kona----scab
6
33.33%
Surly----instigator
4
22.22%
specialized----stumpjumper
2
11.11%
other----please specify
6
33.33%
Voters: 18. You may not vote on this poll

new hardtail...please help.

Old 12-01-03, 11:22 PM
  #1  
knemo77
Alpe D'Instigator
Thread Starter
 
knemo77's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Richmond Virginia
Posts: 51

Bikes: lemond alp de huez

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
new hardtail...please help.

looking for a good frame to build up and bash with...need to be steel and very strong...thanks
knemo77 is offline  
Old 12-02-03, 12:25 AM
  #2  
Dannihilator
Still kicking.
 
Dannihilator's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Annandale, New Jersey
Posts: 19,605

Bikes: 2008 Trek Portland, 1989 Nishiki Altron

Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 116 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 9 Times in 9 Posts
Evil.
__________________
Appreciate the old bikes more than the new.
Dannihilator is offline  
Old 12-02-03, 01:02 AM
  #3  
bentrim
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Mentioned: Post(s)
Tagged: Thread(s)
Quoted: Post(s)
The Stumpjumper is an XC bike. Although the frame is overbuilt for an XC, it won't take a bashing for long.

Also, its parts are fairly light and not meant for hard use.

The Surly, being a cro mo frame will probably take a pounding for you. The Kona is sweet too.

Last edited by bentrim; 12-02-03 at 01:08 AM.
 
Old 12-02-03, 03:08 AM
  #4  
bentrim
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Mentioned: Post(s)
Tagged: Thread(s)
Quoted: Post(s)
...also the Stumpjumper is aluminum.

Not sure for 2004 but they might still make the Hardrock in steel. Specialized has also introduced the P. Street in steel if you don't mind a dirtjumper style frame.

Since you mention you want to build the bike up from scratch, check out .243 Racing which is gaining a pretty big following. You can check their website at www.243racing.com
 
Old 12-02-03, 08:09 AM
  #5  
rasheed
mmm babaghanouj.
 
rasheed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: toronto, canada.
Posts: 848

Bikes: 2003 norco fluid 3.0, 2016 Intense Tracer 275C Expert

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by bentrim
Since you mention you want to build the bike up from scratch, check out .243 Racing which is gaining a pretty big following. You can check their website at www.243racing.com
if it weren't for the fact that i already have two bikes, i'd seriously consider getting one of these. .243 make some ultra sweet frames.
rasheed is offline  
Old 12-02-03, 11:36 AM
  #6  
Maelstrom 
Wood Licker
 
Maelstrom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Whistler,BC
Posts: 16,966

Bikes: Trek Fuel EX 8 27.5 +, 2002 Transition Dirtbag, Kona Roast 2002

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 23 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I vote 243 racing...the bikes KICK ass...been on one personally and met the builder...my next ht will be a 243 for sure
Maelstrom is offline  
Old 12-02-03, 04:36 PM
  #7  
bentrim
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Mentioned: Post(s)
Tagged: Thread(s)
Quoted: Post(s)
I almost bought a .243.

It's the perfect example of the K.I.S.S. principle: no fancy paintjobs, no gimmicky designs,...

It's simple, it works, it's black, not the prettiest to look at but devastating. They should have called it The Glock!

Last edited by bentrim; 12-02-03 at 04:42 PM.
 
Old 12-14-03, 10:15 AM
  #8  
TTT
Newbie
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 1
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I'm looking into building a bike as well. My main use of a bike is hunting. I climb all morning and come screaming down at night. I carry the bike quite a bit also so I realize this heavier .243 frame is probably not the best choice but I'm still intrigued. Is it crazy to use this frame for climbing & Xcountry???
TTT is offline  
Old 12-14-03, 12:44 PM
  #9  
rasheed
mmm babaghanouj.
 
rasheed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: toronto, canada.
Posts: 848

Bikes: 2003 norco fluid 3.0, 2016 Intense Tracer 275C Expert

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by TTT
I'm looking into building a bike as well. My main use of a bike is hunting. I climb all morning and come screaming down at night. I carry the bike quite a bit also so I realize this heavier .243 frame is probably not the best choice but I'm still intrigued. Is it crazy to use this frame for climbing & Xcountry???
the .243 is designed more for north shore type riding and also urban riding... so iím not sure how good it would be for climbing and xc riding.

about the weight, i was checking some other forum earlier and a guy posted a picture of his new .243 built up. if i remember correctly, he said it weighed about 31 lbs. thatís kind of heavy for an xc bike, but my gary fisher tassajara only weighs a pound less than that, and itís a pretty good entry level xc bike. still though, since you say you carry the bike around a lot, i donít know if youíd want to be lugging around a 30 lb bike all day while out hunting.
rasheed is offline  
Old 12-14-03, 12:53 PM
  #10  
ParamountScapin
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 899
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Either Nashbar or Jensen (I don't recall which) has new Jamis Dragon frames (Reynolds 853) HT for $399, which is a great price. They also have the Jamis Komondo for $269, also a steel frame.
ParamountScapin is offline  
Old 12-14-03, 01:46 PM
  #11  
Jim311
Senior Member
 
Jim311's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Gainesville, Florida
Posts: 1,791
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
1) Snipes Elemental. Strong as hell with a lifetime warrantee if you ever break it (Assuming you live to claim your warrantee) can take a 3 inch tire, works with dual crown forks up to 8 inches, they'll paint it any color you like, isn't heavy, and only costs like 330 bucks.

2) Evil Imperial. Unbreakable, accepts a 3 inch tire and any fork you want. Looks cool as hell but has some wierd geometry that might be odd for some. Awesome for urban/freeride stuff too.

3) .243 Cheap, strong, heavy.. just a nice frame.



You can probably tell that none of these choices should be used for XC..
Jim311 is offline  
Old 12-14-03, 02:26 PM
  #12  
bentrim
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Mentioned: Post(s)
Tagged: Thread(s)
Quoted: Post(s)
Originally Posted by Jim311
1)

3) .243 Cheap, strong, heavy...just a nice frame.

TTT,

By "cheap", I'm sure Jim311 means it in the context of cost: affordable, competitively priced, etc...

It is, by no means, cheaply made. It uses thick cromoly tubing so it is strong but heavy so I wouldn't bother considering it if you want a bike that you can sling over your shoulder.

If you're looking for a strong frame without the weight, you're better off with a Cove Stiffee FR (available through Jensons USA, or www.covebike.com) made of Easton RAD aluminum.

It is also a "North Shore bike" but is lighter, and has a much more neutral ride which is probably what you're looking for.

If you're looking for a cromoly steel frame which is a bit lighter than the .243, then the Cove Handjob is reputed to be incredible (although I've never ridden one personally).

Both of these frames are also competitively priced.
 
Old 12-14-03, 02:45 PM
  #13  
Jim311
Senior Member
 
Jim311's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Gainesville, Florida
Posts: 1,791
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Correct sir, the .243 is by no means a junky frame.. I wouldn't recommend something that sucked
Jim311 is offline  
Old 12-14-03, 05:03 PM
  #14  
Maelstrom 
Wood Licker
 
Maelstrom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Whistler,BC
Posts: 16,966

Bikes: Trek Fuel EX 8 27.5 +, 2002 Transition Dirtbag, Kona Roast 2002

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 23 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I can't believe people think 31 pounds is heavy for a ht trailbike. It is more than light enough to 'sling' onto your shoulder. The biggest concern is actually geometry. It isn't suited to climbing but proper body positioning and some patience the .243 is fine. Don't let weights throw you off of a good bike. 31 pounds isn't THAT heavy. haha

Jeez I use a 44 pound trail bike and a 35 pound ht
Maelstrom is offline  
Old 12-14-03, 05:04 PM
  #15  
Maelstrom 
Wood Licker
 
Maelstrom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Whistler,BC
Posts: 16,966

Bikes: Trek Fuel EX 8 27.5 +, 2002 Transition Dirtbag, Kona Roast 2002

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 23 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Oh as for a recommendation I would go .243...best bang for your buck.
Maelstrom is offline  
Old 12-14-03, 05:33 PM
  #16  
bentrim
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Mentioned: Post(s)
Tagged: Thread(s)
Quoted: Post(s)
Originally Posted by Maelstrom
I can't believe people think 31 pounds is heavy for a ht trailbike. It is more than light enough to 'sling' onto your shoulder. The biggest concern is actually geometry. It isn't suited to climbing but proper body positioning and some patience the .243 is fine. Don't let weights throw you off of a good bike. 31 pounds isn't THAT heavy. haha

Jeez I use a 44 pound trail bike and a 35 pound ht
True, but if you're counting bike calories, it's like an 8 lb frame, whereas a comparable aluminum frame is almost half that (around 4.5 to 5 lbs). Those few pounds do make a difference if this fellow is going to be riding the bike from dawn 'til dusk, or if he's not a very big guy (he didn't say), or since he's going to be carrying a lot of stuff with his bike: full panniers, maybe a rack, backpack, etc.

However, you're right. 31 pounds (or less with a lighter build) is not that far off from many full-suspension cross-country bikes. One rider/LBS shop guy said it's such a nice ride that you don't even notice the difference.

But I don't think the .243 Racing frame is meant for everybody. Personally, I would go with a Cove Stiffee FR (or similar frame), but - then again - I'm biased (note avatar).
 
Old 12-14-03, 05:46 PM
  #17  
Maelstrom 
Wood Licker
 
Maelstrom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Whistler,BC
Posts: 16,966

Bikes: Trek Fuel EX 8 27.5 +, 2002 Transition Dirtbag, Kona Roast 2002

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 23 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by bentrim
But I don't think the .243 Racing frame is meant for everybody. Personally, I would go with a Cove Stiffee FR (or similar frame), but - then again - I'm biased (note avatar).
Agreed. That bike is more suited to trail riding with the better geometry. The 2002 Kona Roast has the same geometry and suits pefectly as a decent all rounder
Maelstrom is offline  
Old 12-14-03, 08:16 PM
  #18  
rasheed
mmm babaghanouj.
 
rasheed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: toronto, canada.
Posts: 848

Bikes: 2003 norco fluid 3.0, 2016 Intense Tracer 275C Expert

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Maelstrom
I can't believe people think 31 pounds is heavy for a ht trailbike. It is more than light enough to 'sling' onto your shoulder. The biggest concern is actually geometry. It isn't suited to climbing but proper body positioning and some patience the .243 is fine. Don't let weights throw you off of a good bike. 31 pounds isn't THAT heavy. haha

Jeez I use a 44 pound trail bike and a 35 pound ht
bentrim beat me to the reply, heh. donít get me wrong, i donít think 31 lbs is heavy at all. i was just saying itís heavy for an xc bike (not that the .243 was intended to be one) because thatís the general perception. most xc ht bikes weigh in the low to mid 20 lb range. my tassajara is 30 lbs and is considered to be heavy by a few people whoíve reviewed the bike... but for me itís perfectly fine. i can still climb most hills i come across with it... and itís not too much of a burden to sling over my shoulder to lug around if need be either Ė and iím not that big of a guy, nor am i that strong.
rasheed is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2018 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.