Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Mountain Biking
Reload this Page >

Disc brake calipers, front and rear specific?

Search
Notices
Mountain Biking Mountain biking is one of the fastest growing sports in the world. Check out this forum to discuss the latest tips, tricks, gear and equipment in the world of mountain biking.

Disc brake calipers, front and rear specific?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-25-08, 07:52 AM
  #1  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 17
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Disc brake calipers, front and rear specific?

Hey, I am building a winter commuting/play in the mud cyclocross-ish bike, but since this question is about disc brakes, I thought I might find more information in the mountain bike forum.

My question is this: I want to put 140mm disc brakes front AND rear, but obviously they only make "rear." In my googling around, I've noticed a lot of 160mm rotor/calipers are marked front OR rear. and they mount in the same direction, either way, right?

So is there any physical reason that I can't buy two 140mm "rear" calipers and mount them front and rear on my no-suspension bike? Other than that I shouldn't? I weigh 110 lbs, and live in Ohio- not so much with the ever riding down "hill."

Thanks for the input!
clausti is offline  
Old 09-25-08, 07:58 AM
  #2  
use your best eye
 
kenhill3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Olympia, Washington
Posts: 3,050

Bikes: '75 Bertin, '93 Parkpre Team 925, '04 Kona King Kikapu, '05 Bianchi Vigorelli

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Which disc brake uses 140mm rotors?
__________________
"I tell you, We are here on earth to fart around, and don't let anybody tell you any different." - Kurt Vonnegut jr.
kenhill3 is offline  
Old 09-25-08, 07:59 AM
  #3  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 17
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
avid makes 140mm in the road version of both bb5 and bb7.
clausti is offline  
Old 09-25-08, 08:15 AM
  #4  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 624
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
idk about 140mm stuff (didn't even know they existed) but with the 160s the only diff is the little adapter piece that attaches to the 2 bolts on the frame and fork, this piece https://www.jensonusa.com/store/produ...r.aspx?sc=FRGL
so if you put fronts on the rear then the caliper woudln't line up with the rotor, you need new adapter, same if you wanna run larger rotors, you can change out that little piece and run 180mm rotors on some mtn bikes (not cross bikes and some forks only rated to max rotor size of 160)

as I said idk if this is same for 140 rotors,
sirtigersalot is offline  
Old 09-25-08, 01:43 PM
  #5  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: San Luis Obispo/San Diego
Posts: 223

Bikes: Norco Rampage

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Not sure if you could get a bracket to get the caliper close enough unless you have a fork designed for 140mm rotors. My advice to you is to get 203mm and be done with it.
jcook1989 is offline  
Old 09-26-08, 08:23 PM
  #6  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 511
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by clausti
Hey, I am building a winter commuting/play in the mud cyclocross-ish bike, but since this question is about disc brakes, I thought I might find more information in the mountain bike forum.

My question is this: I want to put 140mm disc brakes front AND rear, but obviously they only make "rear." In my googling around, I've noticed a lot of 160mm rotor/calipers are marked front OR rear. and they mount in the same direction, either way, right?

So is there any physical reason that I can't buy two 140mm "rear" calipers and mount them front and rear on my no-suspension bike? Other than that I shouldn't? I weigh 110 lbs, and live in Ohio- not so much with the ever riding down "hill."

Thanks for the input!
This is a bad idea. When you brake, you transfer your weight to the front axel. This means the front takes the brunt of the braking. You want a larger rotor on the front than the rear.
BearSquirrel is offline  
Old 09-27-08, 04:15 PM
  #7  
****** (can I say this?)
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: CO
Posts: 1,900
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by BearSquirrel
This is a bad idea. When you brake, you transfer your weight to the front axel. This means the front takes the brunt of the braking. You want a larger rotor on the front than the rear.
For cyclocross a 140 up front and back would do fine. Besides, in theory a larger rotor will have no more actual stopping power.
ca7erham is offline  
Old 09-27-08, 04:25 PM
  #8  
Banned.
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,569
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by ca7erham
For cyclocross a 140 up front and back would do fine. Besides, in theory a larger rotor will have no more actual stopping power.
You should take some physics classes.
Cyclist30907654 is offline  
Old 09-27-08, 04:42 PM
  #9  
****** (can I say this?)
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: CO
Posts: 1,900
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
What I'm saying is that a larger rotor should offer more modulation and heat dissipation, but won't have any more stopping power (perhaps "locking power" would be a better term?). I'm not going on physics knowledge, but on what my limited experience has been. I can lock up the front wheel of a bike with 6 inch rotors just as easily as I can with 8 inch rotor (Avid J3s), and same with disc Vs V (but the modulation on Vs sucks). Just my 2 cents.
ca7erham is offline  
Old 09-27-08, 04:48 PM
  #10  
Banned.
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,569
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Torque equals the amount of perpendicular force applied multiplied by the distance from the pivot (lever arm).

An 8 inch rotor means that the torque applied to the hub should be approximately 33% more than the same caliper with 6 inch rotors.
Cyclist30907654 is offline  
Old 09-27-08, 04:49 PM
  #11  
****** (can I say this?)
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: CO
Posts: 1,900
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by ca7erham
I'm not going on physics knowledge, but on what my limited experience has been.
...
ca7erham is offline  
Old 09-27-08, 04:54 PM
  #12  
Senior Member
 
taylor p's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Brainerd MN
Posts: 999
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
[QUOTE=ca7erham;7557752 I'm not going on physics knowledge, but on what my limited experience has been. [/QUOTE]
your limited experience is wrong
taylor p is offline  
Old 09-27-08, 06:18 PM
  #13  
use your best eye
 
kenhill3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Olympia, Washington
Posts: 3,050

Bikes: '75 Bertin, '93 Parkpre Team 925, '04 Kona King Kikapu, '05 Bianchi Vigorelli

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by ca7erham
Besides, in theory a larger rotor will have no more actual stopping power.
Sorry, wrong. The braking force applied to the wheel (at the hub) is greater for an 8inch rotor because there is more distance (moment arm) from the center (hub). This is basic physics as BenLi pointed out. You're young, yet. Plenty of time to get some physics study under your belt. I guarantee it will help you in understanding the world happenin' around you, as well as your bike.
__________________
"I tell you, We are here on earth to fart around, and don't let anybody tell you any different." - Kurt Vonnegut jr.
kenhill3 is offline  
Old 09-27-08, 08:06 PM
  #14  
****** (can I say this?)
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: CO
Posts: 1,900
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by taylor p
your limited experience is wrong
My experience is very limited. Limited to avid J3s on used bikes and various Vs and mechs
ca7erham is offline  
Old 09-27-08, 08:08 PM
  #15  
****** (can I say this?)
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: CO
Posts: 1,900
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by kenhill3
Sorry, wrong. The braking force applied to the wheel (at the hub) is greater for an 8inch rotor because there is more distance (moment arm) from the center (hub). This is basic physics as BenLi pointed out. You're young, yet. Plenty of time to get some physics study under your belt. I guarantee it will help you in understanding the world happenin' around you, as well as your bike.
Bad set up for the big rotor maybe? Because I am 100% positive that the big rotors gave almost nothing over the small ones.
ca7erham is offline  
Old 09-28-08, 06:28 AM
  #16  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 93
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by kenhill3
Sorry, wrong. The braking force applied to the wheel (at the hub) is greater for an 8inch rotor because there is more distance (moment arm) from the center (hub). This is basic physics as BenLi pointed out. You're young, yet. Plenty of time to get some physics study under your belt. I guarantee it will help you in understanding the world happenin' around you, as well as your bike.
The thing is, even if the 8-inch CAN offer more stopping power, as long as the 6-inch can lock the front, then they're both limited by the traction of your tires, not by the power of your brakes. In this way, a 140 is the same as a 203. They can both lock you up, so they both stop you just as quick, and they're both just as strong. Sure, takes more hand strength with the 140, but you're not a weenie, right? And the 203 can dissipate heat better and has better modulation, but if you're limited by front traction, then your brakes are all equal.
the_mac is offline  
Old 09-28-08, 10:18 AM
  #17  
****** (can I say this?)
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: CO
Posts: 1,900
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by the_mac
The thing is, even if the 8-inch CAN offer more stopping power, as long as the 6-inch can lock the front, then they're both limited by the traction of your tires, not by the power of your brakes. In this way, a 140 is the same as a 203. They can both lock you up, so they both stop you just as quick, and they're both just as strong. Sure, takes more hand strength with the 140, but you're not a weenie, right? And the 203 can dissipate heat better and has better modulation, but if you're limited by front traction, then your brakes are all equal.
I might be wrong, but I think that is whatish I was trying to say(ish), but I cant talk very well and my brain seems to be a bit slower than usual this weekend.
ca7erham is offline  
Old 09-28-08, 10:21 AM
  #18  
Banned.
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Georgia
Posts: 1,831

Bikes: Trek 3900

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
^true.
I can lock up my front bb7 and its not a huge rotor.
tires is where its at, as my V's can do the same.
Cheeto is offline  
Old 09-28-08, 05:34 PM
  #19  
Senior Member
 
taylor p's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Brainerd MN
Posts: 999
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
for the love of peter fagerlin
taylor p is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.