Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Mountain Biking
Reload this Page >

Specialized Hardrock 2009's are lighter...True/False?

Search
Notices
Mountain Biking Mountain biking is one of the fastest growing sports in the world. Check out this forum to discuss the latest tips, tricks, gear and equipment in the world of mountain biking.

Specialized Hardrock 2009's are lighter...True/False?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-19-08 | 12:59 AM
  #1  
S.D.XC's Avatar
Thread Starter
Motivation is the key...
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 346
Likes: 0
From: Bangkok, Thailand

Bikes: Trek Series 3 3900

Specialized Hardrock 2009's are lighter...True/False?

Has anyone tried the 2009 models yet?

It's claimed to be lighter on Specialized's website...
S.D.XC is offline  
Reply
Old 10-19-08 | 01:27 AM
  #2  
Banned.
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,568
Likes: 0
It could well be possible. It seems Specialized has departed from the traditional formula of making the Hardrock heavy but tough. The front wheel on the Sport model looks like radial lacing, and tires are thinner and with less agressive treads across the board.

I think lighter is plausible, but is it desireable?
Cyclist30907654 is offline  
Reply
Old 10-19-08 | 02:07 AM
  #3  
S.D.XC's Avatar
Thread Starter
Motivation is the key...
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 346
Likes: 0
From: Bangkok, Thailand

Bikes: Trek Series 3 3900

So it might be not be strong as before...but you'll never know till you ride one!!

My LBS has a whole bunch of Specialized coming in late November, maybe they'll have the 2009 models, and I'll test it out!!

BenLi, do you ride a Hardrock?
S.D.XC is offline  
Reply
Old 10-19-08 | 07:10 AM
  #4  
****** (can I say this?)
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,900
Likes: 0
From: CO
Originally Posted by BenLi
It could well be possible. It seems Specialized has departed from the traditional formula of making the Hardrock heavy but tough. The front wheel on the Sport model looks like radial lacing, and tires are thinner and with less agressive treads across the board.

I think lighter is plausible, but is it desireable?
Yeah, I was looking at their site and it looks like they are marketing it more as a bomb around town bike.
ca7erham is offline  
Reply
Old 10-19-08 | 07:43 AM
  #5  
mtnbiker66's Avatar
Old School Rad
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 8,206
Likes: 0
From: The old Mountains

Bikes: Blur LT

The 2009 HR frame is (acording to the owner of my LBS about 2 pounds lighter than last years model. The P.All Mountain frame is closer to the burly Hardrock of previous years. I also dropped weight buy swapping out the fork.

I've had mine for a couple of months now......
__________________
Like a circus monkey on a stolen Harley......
mtnbiker66 is offline  
Reply
Old 10-19-08 | 02:24 PM
  #6  
Banned.
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,568
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by S.D.XC

BenLi, do you ride a Hardrock?
Yes. It's held up for me decently. The components are beginning to fail though.
Cyclist30907654 is offline  
Reply
Old 10-20-08 | 04:39 AM
  #7  
S.D.XC's Avatar
Thread Starter
Motivation is the key...
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 346
Likes: 0
From: Bangkok, Thailand

Bikes: Trek Series 3 3900

mtnbiker66,

do you think the Hardrock would be a good second bike to buy? (especially the frame, to upgrade)

rite now i have a Trek 3900, and i wanted to upgrade some components, but my LBS said it wasn't worth. getting a new bike would be better...

and you upgraded your fork...does it hold up well for the more hardcore stuff?
S.D.XC is offline  
Reply
Old 10-20-08 | 08:22 PM
  #8  
DirtPedalerB's Avatar
unofficial roadie
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,440
Likes: 0
From: Out in the woods you see

Bikes: 2004 Marin bobcat trail, 2006 trek fuel ex7, 2007 iron horse road bike

the 3900 - 4300 seems about the same as the hardrock to me.. I'm not a jumper.. I'd get a rockhopper if I was going specialized.. if your wanting a jump bike there may be some better choices than a hardrock with stock components as you'll want to upgrade the hard rock as soon as you get it.
DirtPedalerB is offline  
Reply
Old 10-21-08 | 05:01 AM
  #9  
mtnbiker66's Avatar
Old School Rad
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 8,206
Likes: 0
From: The old Mountains

Bikes: Blur LT

Originally Posted by S.D.XC
mtnbiker66,

do you think the Hardrock would be a good second bike to buy? (especially the frame, to upgrade)

rite now i have a Trek 3900, and i wanted to upgrade some components, but my LBS said it wasn't worth. getting a new bike would be better...

and you upgraded your fork...does it hold up well for the more hardcore stuff?
Thats the reason I got one. I wanted something to ride around on some smoother trails and just play around on. That fork held up great for a long time and took a lot of abuse, no complaints there.
__________________
Like a circus monkey on a stolen Harley......
mtnbiker66 is offline  
Reply
Old 10-21-08 | 08:17 AM
  #10  
S.D.XC's Avatar
Thread Starter
Motivation is the key...
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 346
Likes: 0
From: Bangkok, Thailand

Bikes: Trek Series 3 3900

thanks for the replies everyone...
S.D.XC is offline  
Reply
Old 10-21-08 | 11:10 AM
  #11  
junkyard's Avatar
Fourth Degree Legend
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 3,826
Likes: 0
From: American Gardens Building

Bikes: 2005 Kona Cinder Cone & 2010 Cannondale SuperSix

specialized sucks.
junkyard is offline  
Reply
Old 10-23-08 | 08:29 AM
  #12  
Bike Lover's Avatar
Should be riding
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,602
Likes: 0
From: S.E. Michigan

Bikes: C-dale- moutain, Pedal Force RS- Campy Record, Quiring Ti XTR, Red line Monocog, S E F@r

LOL! Somethings never change.
Bike Lover is offline  
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.