Fisher Cake 2 DLX
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Southern California
Posts: 2,191
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 114 Post(s)
Liked 119 Times
in
92 Posts
Fisher Cake 2 DLX
Anybody here have a Fisher Cake 2 DLX? It's been reviewed in a few recent magazines, with decent write-ups. Any opinions or experience with the Cake 2 DLX? I'm also considering a Trek Liquid 25.
Thanks!
Thanks!
#3
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Parrish, FL
Posts: 7,963
Bikes: Lots
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Never been a big fan of TREK or Gary Fisher products. This year's lineup is no exception. They're not bad bikes, just not for my style of riding.
L8R
L8R
__________________
"Life is not a journey to the grave with the intention of arriving safely in a pretty and well preserved body, but rather to skid in broadside, thoroughly used up, totally worn out, and loudly proclaiming, "WOW, What a Ride!" - unknown
"Your Bike Sucks" - Sky Yaeger
"Life is not a journey to the grave with the intention of arriving safely in a pretty and well preserved body, but rather to skid in broadside, thoroughly used up, totally worn out, and loudly proclaiming, "WOW, What a Ride!" - unknown
"Your Bike Sucks" - Sky Yaeger
#4
...and bless the trails
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: King, North Carolina
Posts: 180
Bikes: 02' Jamis Dakar Sport (just built), 05' Trek 1000
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I've only talked to one person with a Cake (a dealer, actually...so take it with a couple grains of salt). He said it was a great all-around ride; with the new stable platform tech, it climbed fairly well (altho, he said it wasn't as good as his $3500 Klein...that he also had in stock).
As far as the Liquid, I haven't heard ANYTHING good...one lil' huckster said he loved his at one of the LBS, but everyone else has not had anything good to say (Too heavy, poor climbing).
My take on the Cake is this: GF is using an old design (single pivot) in it's simlest form and using the stable platform shock to compensate for flaws...The exciting part is that it works.
As far as the Liquid, I haven't heard ANYTHING good...one lil' huckster said he loved his at one of the LBS, but everyone else has not had anything good to say (Too heavy, poor climbing).
My take on the Cake is this: GF is using an old design (single pivot) in it's simlest form and using the stable platform shock to compensate for flaws...The exciting part is that it works.
#5
Rick James!!!
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Mobile AL
Posts: 19
Bikes: 2003 Giant NRS 3
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Yea GF is using an old design, MTB Action has a shoot out with the '04 Stumpjumper and the Cake 2 dlx. and 3 other bikes the Stumpjumper came in 1st and the Fisher cameon 4th... Ide just get a Stumpjumper... or have you looked at the Gaint NRS series? I love my NRS 3, if course you talkin about a much higher bike than mine, but doesn't sag at all and is a great climber...
Later
Jake
Later
Jake
#6
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Arkansas
Posts: 607
Bikes: Giant OCR1/Specialized Epic
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I demo-ed a Cake at the local trailhead. I wasn't impressed with it's climbing, but on descents it was plush. I wasn't impressed enough to drop $2,000 on it, though. I'd keep shopping.
BTW: I'm 135 pounds and ride a small frame, if that matters to you any.
BTW: I'm 135 pounds and ride a small frame, if that matters to you any.