HELP ME! I need a XC Race/Trail BikeTrek Fuel ex, Santa Cruz Superlight, Giant Anthem
#1
Shut Up and Ride
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2005
Location: PA (Worst roads in existence)
Posts: 1,969
Bikes: 05 Cannondale Six 13 (Record 2008 with DT rr 1.1 rims, WI H2 Hubs and CX-ray spokes), OLMO Antares (Micx of 06 Record and Chorus), 1988 Tunturri, 1980's Fuji, 1970's Crescent (Sweeden)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
HELP ME! I need a XC Race/Trail BikeTrek Fuel ex, Santa Cruz Superlight, Giant Anthem
Hey everyone,
I need your help on deciding on a Full Suspension XC/race/trail bike
I am a 150 pound leg shaving, road racer (Cannondale six13 with Campy Record, custom DT wheels).
I want to get into mountain biking, and more specifically into XC and 12-24 hour marathon races. I am looking for a bike that is full suspension (around 100-130 mm of travel) and it has to be light enough to race XC, but also durable enough to take it off 2-3 foot drops when I’m trail riding.
What I want:
-100-130 mm of travel
-XC race able (comfortable for 12 hour marathons)
-Trail ride capable (2-3 foot drops)
-Weighs less then 28 pounds stock (will upgrade later)
-Less then 2,500 dollars
So far, I have looked at:
*Trek Fuel EX 8
*Giant Anthem
*Santa Cruz Superlight R XC
*Yeti ASR alloy
My budget is 1,800-2,300 dollars. I am only interested in aluminum frame bikes, I would prefer SRAM over Shimano, and Fox over Rock Shox.
I had looked at the Cannondale Scalpel and felt it was too XC oriented, and not tough enough for hard trail riding, I also looked at the C’dale Rush, but none of their packages were eye catching (too bad they no longer make the Rush 04 option).
Out of these bikes, does anyone have any experience with them? Good, bad, indifferent?
Are there any other bikes I should be looking at in my criteria?
Thanks a lot!
I need your help on deciding on a Full Suspension XC/race/trail bike
I am a 150 pound leg shaving, road racer (Cannondale six13 with Campy Record, custom DT wheels).
I want to get into mountain biking, and more specifically into XC and 12-24 hour marathon races. I am looking for a bike that is full suspension (around 100-130 mm of travel) and it has to be light enough to race XC, but also durable enough to take it off 2-3 foot drops when I’m trail riding.
What I want:
-100-130 mm of travel
-XC race able (comfortable for 12 hour marathons)
-Trail ride capable (2-3 foot drops)
-Weighs less then 28 pounds stock (will upgrade later)
-Less then 2,500 dollars
So far, I have looked at:
*Trek Fuel EX 8
*Giant Anthem
*Santa Cruz Superlight R XC
*Yeti ASR alloy
My budget is 1,800-2,300 dollars. I am only interested in aluminum frame bikes, I would prefer SRAM over Shimano, and Fox over Rock Shox.
I had looked at the Cannondale Scalpel and felt it was too XC oriented, and not tough enough for hard trail riding, I also looked at the C’dale Rush, but none of their packages were eye catching (too bad they no longer make the Rush 04 option).
Out of these bikes, does anyone have any experience with them? Good, bad, indifferent?
Are there any other bikes I should be looking at in my criteria?
Thanks a lot!
#2
Pint-Sized Gnar Shredder
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Somewhere between heaven and hell
Posts: 3,549
Bikes: '09 Jamis Komodo, '09 Mirraco Blend One, '08 Cervelo P2C, '08 Specialized Ruby Elite, '07 Yeti AS-R SL, '07 DMR Drone
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I have an '07 AS-R alloy and love the bike. Since '07, they've moved production to Taiwan, and it's gotten even stiffer and lighter (and the '07 is light and stiff to begin with). It's a very capable bike. It does come with Shimano, though I've swapped out to X.0 shifters and an X.9 RD, so it's not like you can't swap parts. It does cost well over $2300 though...the base model goes for $3440, so unless you can find a previous year's model, you'd have to stretch your budget. Nothing wrong with the other bikes you named though. I'd suggest getting on all of them and trying them out. Demo them if you can...no sense dropping that kind of money on a bike that doesn't fit you perfectly.
If you can afford the Yeti, I'd check out the Blur XC too. More expensive than the Superlight, but supposed to be a good bike. I also have a friend who loves the Specialized Epic...might be worth a look.
If you can afford the Yeti, I'd check out the Blur XC too. More expensive than the Superlight, but supposed to be a good bike. I also have a friend who loves the Specialized Epic...might be worth a look.
#3
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: New England
Posts: 380
Bikes: 2008 Trek Fuel EX8
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I have a 2008 Fuel 8, I like it, I bought it because it had pretty decent components that are quality, and I wanted a bike that was, not a downhill ridiculous mountain bike, but still, something that felt more capable on the trails I do than the Specialized XC rockhopper I had before did.
My mindset was, if I'm going to spend 1300 on some new bike that really isn't much of a step higher than my lame XC bike, why not spend 1000 more and make the investment 10x more worth it by getting an exponentially better bike?
The only thing with the Fuel 8 for me is its handlebar, it is a little too XC oriented but it's no big deal to me for now.
I can't speak for the other bikes, I think I skipped over the Santa Cruz because it was too expensive or I didn't like the components, I forget.
My mindset was, if I'm going to spend 1300 on some new bike that really isn't much of a step higher than my lame XC bike, why not spend 1000 more and make the investment 10x more worth it by getting an exponentially better bike?
The only thing with the Fuel 8 for me is its handlebar, it is a little too XC oriented but it's no big deal to me for now.
I can't speak for the other bikes, I think I skipped over the Santa Cruz because it was too expensive or I didn't like the components, I forget.
#4
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 138
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I ride an '08 Turner Flux. Honestly, this is the nicest XC bike I have ever ridden. For your price point, you could definitely build one. I had the choice of a few bikes when i bought mine, and the Turner blew them away. However, the Yeti AS-R is an amazing bike as well. If it were me, it would be between these 2 bikes.
#5
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Lenexa KS
Posts: 3,268
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
The only one I have had anytime on was a Superlight and it was awesome. I rode it in Breckenridge about 35 miles over 2 days. Not enough time to give good review but I really did like it, it just seemed to fit really well off the bat. YMMV
#6
Don't call me sir
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Charlottesville, VA
Posts: 615
Bikes: 1954 Holdsworth 3 speed, 1969 Bob Jackson, 1988 Miyata Twelve Hundred (retired), 1989 Schwinn Paramount, 2004 Santa Cruz Blur Classic, 2012 Specialized P3, 2013 Specialized Roubaix Expert Disc
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
This is my vote for the Anthem. I have been riding an X2 for about five months and I swear it is the best full suss design I have come across. I do about 12 miles a day on and off road and I can crank up hills with the suspension full open and not get any bob. It tracks really well in corners and with the full XT group and Fox F100 RL it is pretty much bomb-proof.
#7
Frozen in carbonite
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 805
Bikes: '85 Full Cycle Cycle.
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Another vote for the Anthem. The X1 and the X2 are both killer bikes for the money. I eventually went with the Trance X2 because I'm not going to do any racing but if that's your thing, the Anthems are more than capable and zippy as hell.
#8
No Compromise.
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Northern Virginia
Posts: 80
Bikes: 1990 Trek 820 (Commuter), 1980s Bianchi (In Storage), 1970s Windsor fixed (Sold), BMC Superstroke 01 (Sold), Access XCL ss, Ellsworth Sub 22 (Sold), Trek 930 (Lending to a Friend), Voodoo Bokor One
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
The Anthem is an excellent choice, cost-effective, entire frame production is controlled by Giant. Thy Maestro system is pretty good too, smooth. Test ride them.
#9
Pint-Sized Gnar Shredder
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Somewhere between heaven and hell
Posts: 3,549
Bikes: '09 Jamis Komodo, '09 Mirraco Blend One, '08 Cervelo P2C, '08 Specialized Ruby Elite, '07 Yeti AS-R SL, '07 DMR Drone
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Ooh, one more possibility I just thought of. Keep an eye on Chainlove. I sometimes see Titus Racer X's and Intense Spyders pop up for super cheap. They're frames, so you could hang whatever components you wanted on them. Only downside is you wouldn't get to play with them first.
#10
Shut Up and Ride
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2005
Location: PA (Worst roads in existence)
Posts: 1,969
Bikes: 05 Cannondale Six 13 (Record 2008 with DT rr 1.1 rims, WI H2 Hubs and CX-ray spokes), OLMO Antares (Micx of 06 Record and Chorus), 1988 Tunturri, 1980's Fuji, 1970's Crescent (Sweeden)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Thanks a lot for all the input.
I know in my gut the Anthem would be the better buy for racing and climbing (also more geared to the riding I do now on the road).... but the little devil inside of me would love the Trance or Fuel EX to get into some Super D eventually........
I know in my gut the Anthem would be the better buy for racing and climbing (also more geared to the riding I do now on the road).... but the little devil inside of me would love the Trance or Fuel EX to get into some Super D eventually........