Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Mountain Biking
Reload this Page >

Iron Horse MkIII Comp vs. Commecal Meta 4.3?

Mountain Biking Mountain biking is one of the fastest growing sports in the world. Check out this forum to discuss the latest tips, tricks, gear and equipment in the world of mountain biking.

Iron Horse MkIII Comp vs. Commecal Meta 4.3?

Old 05-09-09, 11:10 AM
  #1  
Unagidon
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Unagidon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Lawrence, KS
Posts: 1,331

Bikes: 15 Niner Jet9 RDO, 08 Cervelo RS, 08 Surly Crosscheck, Mid-90's Python Mtb

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Iron Horse MkIII Comp vs. Commecal Meta 4.3?

Which is a better bike?

Use: non-technical single track, gravel roads - maybe graduate to more technical trails with more experience in the future. Cost difference: Iron Horse is $200 > Meta 4.2.

Please provide feedback - I'm a MTB newbie. THANKS!
Unagidon is offline  
Old 05-10-09, 11:05 AM
  #2  
akahn
Member
 
akahn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 36
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I'm going to go out on a limb and say neither. For gravel roads and non-technical singletrack, these bikes will be overkill. You could spend the same amount of money and get a real nice hardtail, which will be more efficient, lighter weight, and easier to maintain. I just think at this level of riding, and even on more technical stuff, you don't need 5" travel (on the Mk III at least).

In all, the Meta seems better suited for the kind of riding you do. The extra $200 for the Mk III gets you the nicer fork and suspension design. The extra $200 gets you a lot more but it might be "too much bike" for what you want to ride.
akahn is offline  
Old 05-10-09, 11:35 AM
  #3  
yellowjeep
Senior Member
 
yellowjeep's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Lawrence
Posts: 3,269
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I don't agree with the hardtail recommendation.* If you can afford it and want to get a squishy bike then do it. You say non-tech single track but the bug will bite soon enough you will be looking for crazier stuff to hit.

IH is dead now so no CS. Get the Meta.

*I like to steal my views from people smarter than me. AKA dminor
yellowjeep is offline  
Old 05-10-09, 04:45 PM
  #4  
Unagidon
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Unagidon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Lawrence, KS
Posts: 1,331

Bikes: 15 Niner Jet9 RDO, 08 Cervelo RS, 08 Surly Crosscheck, Mid-90's Python Mtb

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I'm leaning towards full suspension because I'm simply not that great a bike rider. So, a basic knowledge of physics tells me that a full suspension will be easier to handle on trails, especially with any type of obstacles, vs a hardtail. Heck, I don't know what "line to take" and so, the suspension, I'm hoping will help me roll right through it.

Anyone with experience on IBEX? Saw an IBEX Ignition Super ($999) and Pro ($1299) while surfing around - how are IBEX frames? Definitely get good components, so I'm assuming the cost difference is in the frame.
Unagidon is offline  
Old 05-10-09, 06:48 PM
  #5  
troie
:\ ping of death
 
troie's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: GA
Posts: 1,382
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
You want to spend $1700+ on a bike that youre only going to take on a gravel road?! Thats like spending a million bucks on a fast car and only going 60mph.

Even spending a grand for the Ibex is too much. Get a good hardtail and learn how to ride. Anyone who tells you it doesnt make you a good rider is a fool and has been blinded by dual suspension.
troie is offline  
Old 05-10-09, 07:14 PM
  #6  
yellowjeep
Senior Member
 
yellowjeep's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Lawrence
Posts: 3,269
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Unagidon View Post
I'm leaning towards full suspension because I'm simply not that great a bike rider.
Oh in that case you will for sure no doubt about it absolutely NEED a hard tail. It will make you a better cyclist.




yellowjeep is offline  
Old 05-10-09, 11:16 PM
  #7  
Unagidon
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Unagidon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Lawrence, KS
Posts: 1,331

Bikes: 15 Niner Jet9 RDO, 08 Cervelo RS, 08 Surly Crosscheck, Mid-90's Python Mtb

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by troie View Post
You want to spend $1700+ on a bike that youre only going to take on a gravel road?! Thats like spending a million bucks on a fast car and only going 60mph.

Even spending a grand for the Ibex is too much. Get a good hardtail and learn how to ride. Anyone who tells you it doesnt make you a good rider is a fool and has been blinded by dual suspension.
No one told me that a hardtail won't make me a better rider. But someone, and logic, tells me a dually will be easier to ride, kinda like the wider pivot skis, and Callaway Big Bertha golf clubs. As for the $, I can afford to splurge a little on a bike ($1k to $1.3k outlay) 'cause it's a toy. As long as it will be more fun, I'm okay with that. So the question is, which is a better bike for the $?
Unagidon is offline  
Old 05-11-09, 02:16 AM
  #8  
troie
:\ ping of death
 
troie's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: GA
Posts: 1,382
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Unagidon View Post
No one told me that a hardtail won't make me a better rider. But someone, and logic, tells me a dually will be easier to ride, kinda like the wider pivot skis, and Callaway Big Bertha golf clubs. As for the $, I can afford to splurge a little on a bike ($1k to $1.3k outlay) 'cause it's a toy. As long as it will be more fun, I'm okay with that. So the question is, which is a better bike for the $?
Dont use logic and fun is completely relative. The HT vs FS battle has been going on forever. But in the last 6 years I can tell you that nearly every rider that has both has told me that their HT was fun. Try renting both and ride the same trail. We cant tell you which will be fun and which wont. Only you can decide.
troie is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
raleighrenew
Classic & Vintage
2
10-03-18 08:54 PM
CHUD II
Bicycle Mechanics
20
06-08-09 06:23 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright 2018 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.