Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Mountain Biking
Reload this Page >

Building up a Jamis Dragon 29er from frameset, got a coupla questions

Mountain Biking Mountain biking is one of the fastest growing sports in the world. Check out this forum to discuss the latest tips, tricks, gear and equipment in the world of mountain biking.

Building up a Jamis Dragon 29er from frameset, got a coupla questions

Old 10-20-09, 07:54 PM
  #1  
well biked 
biked well
Thread Starter
 
well biked's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 7,251
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 68 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Building up a Jamis Dragon 29er from frameset, got a coupla questions

I've been out of mountain biking for awhile, but have the urge to get back into it. My plan is to go 29", steel frame, fully rigid. Something I've had on my mind for quite a while.

I've ordered an '09 Jamis Dragon 29er frame (Reynolds 853 steel), and I'm planning to build it up with a rigid Salsa 29er steel fork. I've got some pretty nice parts laying around, including some new old stock Shimano XT stuff from a few years ago that I plan to use for the drivetrain. I'm going to build what I hope will be a nice durable wheelset from new XT disc hubs, Mavic TN717 rims, 36 double butted spokes for both the front and rear. I'll go with Avid mechanical discs for the brakes.

I've never owned a bike with disc brakes, and never owned a 29er. So here's a question regarding the rotor size: 160mm or 185mm, and why one over the other? My planned use for the bike is XC trail riding. As for tires, I've used Stan's tubeless system on 26ers and loved it, so I plan on going that route with the 29er. I want a fairly large volume tire, say 29 x 2.2 to 2.4. I'm not sure what the Dragon 29er frame can handle as far as tire clearance, but I'm hoping it can handle most of the 29 x 2.4's out there(?). Tires I'm considering so far are Maxxis Ardent in 29 x 2.25, Panaracer Rampage in 29 x 2.35, and Continental Mountain King in both 29 x 2.4 and 29 x 2.2. Any tire recommendations, insight, etc. is much appreciated-
well biked is offline  
Old 10-22-09, 10:52 AM
  #2  
IAMTB
Senior Member
 
IAMTB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Iowa
Posts: 349
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
160mm rotors will be fine. Go 185 in front if your worried about it. I'm a heavy rider and have 160s on my 29ers and have no issues.

As far as tires go you'll have to see what the frame can handle. I'm running a Bontrager XDX tubeless on the rear of my geared 29er(GF Ferrous). I am pretty happy with it's performance. I don't have any experience with any of the tires you listed.

You will get more responses by going here: http://forums.mtbr.com/forumdisplay.php?f=61
This forum is mostly anti-29er.
IAMTB is offline  
Old 10-22-09, 10:57 AM
  #3  
kenhill3
use your best eye
 
kenhill3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Olympia, Washington
Posts: 3,058

Bikes: '75 Bertin, '93 Parkpre Team 925, '04 Kona King Kikapu, '05 Bianchi Vigorelli

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by IAMTB View Post
This forum is mostly anti-29er.
Really?
__________________
"I tell you, We are here on earth to fart around, and don't let anybody tell you any different." - Kurt Vonnegut jr.
kenhill3 is offline  
Old 10-22-09, 11:06 AM
  #4  
Elisdad
Bike rider
 
Elisdad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: SW Chicago suburbs
Posts: 353

Bikes: Redline D460, Redline Monocog Flight 29er, IRO Rob Roy, Specialized P1

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I run 160mm rotors on both of my 29ers. I've had no problems with them stopping my 170 lbs of weight.

As for tires, I've got the 2.4 Mtn Kings on my rigid SS and they are wonderful tires in all kinds of trail conditions. Be aware that they run smaller than Conti claims them to be. I think these tires are only marginally wider than the 2.1 Ignitors I have on my hardtail. FWIW, the Ignitors are a great tire on dry hardpack, not so great on slick trails or in the mud.
Elisdad is offline  
Old 10-22-09, 11:28 AM
  #5  
well biked 
biked well
Thread Starter
 
well biked's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 7,251
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 68 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Thanks for the responses so far. I think I'll go with 160mm rotors, I'm just new to discs and wasn't sure. As for tires, thanks for the info on the Conti's, Elisdad, I may give them a try, but still not sure. Good to know about their actual size. If I get them, I'll try the 2.4's. With no suspension, and with Stan's system, I want a high volume tire at low-pressure to soak up the trail-

Last edited by well biked; 10-22-09 at 11:50 AM.
well biked is offline  
Old 10-22-09, 12:44 PM
  #6  
craigcraigcraig
Don't really have a bike.
 
craigcraigcraig's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Wenatchee, WA
Posts: 3,358
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
we don't dislike 29ers
craigcraigcraig is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright 2018 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.