Cycling and bicycle discussion forums. 
   Click here to join our community Log in to access your Control Panel  

Go Back   > >

Mountain Biking Mountain biking is one of the fastest growing sports in the world. Check out this forum to discuss the latest tips, tricks, gear and equipment in the world of mountain biking.

User Tag List

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 11-08-09, 01:22 PM   #1
Trail Jogger
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Columbus, OH
Bikes: Schwinn Mirada Sport
Posts: 6
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Trek and Gary Fisher

Trek and Gary Fisher bikes are similar and are generally sold in the same stores although the Gary Fisher bikes are often much cheaper than their similar Trek counterparts. Is there a big difference between the two?

I had been considering a Trek Remedy 9.9 for quite awhile but now that I'm seeing the Gary Fisher Superfly 100 I'm starting to reconsider because the components are so similar...except for the fork. The Remedy has 150 mm as compared to the Superfly's 100mm.

Any thoughts on reputation, quality, stability, value, etc. would be greatly appreciated. If they both cost the same, which would you consider to be the better bike? BTW, I'm 6'4" and weigh 240 lbs so I'm now considering the Gary Fisher for the 29" wheels and 23" frame...but I really need some credible advice.

Thanks in advance.

Last edited by Trail Jogger; 11-08-09 at 01:29 PM.
Trail Jogger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-08-09, 01:43 PM   #2
I have senior moments...
bikinfool's Avatar
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Woodside, CA
Bikes: Many
Posts: 2,151
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
How similar are those two other than being from the same company? One's a race-oriented 29" wheeled carbon bike with 4 inches of suspension, the other's a 26" wheeled carbon trail bike with 6 inches of suspension, the former with a list of $5600, the latter $6800. Why just these two brands? Only dealers near you? Me, if I absolutely had to have carbon (which I really don't want in a mountain bike) I'd look at the new Santa Cruz Tallboy for the 29er, Blur LT for the 26er but I'm not fond of the Trek Corp.
bikinfool is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-09-09, 09:05 AM   #3
Trail Ninja
shaderider's Avatar
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: North carolina
Posts: 61
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)

The Gary fisher line is made by the same frame manufacturer. They are designed by the fisher staff though. I started back into cycling on a fisher. I am 6'2" and was 270 lbs when I got back into it.
shaderider is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-09-09, 06:16 PM   #4
Road, XC and Cross
Join Date: Jul 2009
Bikes: Motobecane Outcast 29er, Motobecane Fantom Comp, Motobecane Fantom CX and Fuji 2.0 acr
Posts: 312
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I have no experience with dual suapension fishers and treks but a gf wahoo compared to a trek 6 series with the dart 3, they were totally different. the wahoo had a ridiculously long top tube and I felt really far away from the handle bars. I heard gfs were for people with long arms and short legs. Im the opposite so I liked the trek better.
mtb_man_14 is offline   Reply With Quote

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:00 PM.

  • Ask a Question
    get answers from real people!
Click to start entering your question.