Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Mountain Biking
Reload this Page >

Quick request for help re: Santa Cruz Superlight sizing

Notices
Mountain Biking Mountain biking is one of the fastest growing sports in the world. Check out this forum to discuss the latest tips, tricks, gear and equipment in the world of mountain biking.

Quick request for help re: Santa Cruz Superlight sizing

Old 01-09-11, 09:06 PM
  #1  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
tkehler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: My family and I -- wife and two young children -- live in Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
Posts: 723

Bikes: TST ti 'cross bike (commuter); Guru ti road bike; recumbent; Airnimal Chameleon folding racing bike

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Quick request for help re: Santa Cruz Superlight sizing

Am thinking about buying a barely used 2009 Santa Cruz Superlight, sight unseen, to replace an older XC full susser frame. A possible problem is that it's an XL.

I'm 6' 1", and wear 34-35 dress shirts (when I'm forced into dress shirts ) and 34" jeans. I'm right between the L and XL

At their website, SC say that someone 6' 1" can fit an L or an XL... but I'm worried.

Anyone have any experience with this bike and this size?

Thanks in advance

PS -- I am aware that buying a bike sight unseen is not the smartest thing in the world...
tkehler is offline  
Old 01-10-11, 11:27 PM
  #2  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
tkehler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: My family and I -- wife and two young children -- live in Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
Posts: 723

Bikes: TST ti 'cross bike (commuter); Guru ti road bike; recumbent; Airnimal Chameleon folding racing bike

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Helllloooo -- Can someone with a bit of experience re: Santa Cruz sizing help out? Please? It would be much appreciated
tkehler is offline  
Old 01-10-11, 11:35 PM
  #3  
Still kicking.
 
Dannihilator's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Annandale, New Jersey
Posts: 19,659

Bikes: Bike Count: Rising.

Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 159 Post(s)
Liked 46 Times in 32 Posts
Xl.
__________________
Appreciate the old bikes more than the new.
Dannihilator is offline  
Old 01-11-11, 12:01 AM
  #4  
Custom User
 
never's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: T0L0K0
Posts: 3,739
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Figure out the ETT on your old frame and see how the Superlight compares. It might work as is or you might need to make some cockpit changes.
never is offline  
Old 01-11-11, 12:26 AM
  #5  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
tkehler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: My family and I -- wife and two young children -- live in Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
Posts: 723

Bikes: TST ti 'cross bike (commuter); Guru ti road bike; recumbent; Airnimal Chameleon folding racing bike

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Thanks!

My worry is that I read that in 07, Santa Cruz changed the geometry slightly and made the top tube a bit longer...

I'm going to go and measure my current bike in the basement and report back
tkehler is offline  
Old 01-11-11, 12:52 AM
  #6  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
tkehler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: My family and I -- wife and two young children -- live in Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
Posts: 723

Bikes: TST ti 'cross bike (commuter); Guru ti road bike; recumbent; Airnimal Chameleon folding racing bike

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
my ti hardtail frame is 19" c-to-c, and 21" c-to-top. The Effective Top Tube is 24". I'm using a 100mm stem.

The SC Superlight is 20.9 c-to-top, and the ETT is 25".
tkehler is offline  
Old 01-11-11, 11:08 AM
  #7  
Custom User
 
never's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: T0L0K0
Posts: 3,739
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
So if you run a shorter stem (like a 70mm), it should feel pretty similar when reaching for the bars. Handling will be a little different (i.e., shorter TT plus longer stem versus longer TT plus shorter stem) but the whole bike will be different so that's not really a big deal. As long as you have standover clearance, you should be good.
never is offline  
Old 01-11-11, 01:28 PM
  #8  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
tkehler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: My family and I -- wife and two young children -- live in Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
Posts: 723

Bikes: TST ti 'cross bike (commuter); Guru ti road bike; recumbent; Airnimal Chameleon folding racing bike

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by never
So if you run a shorter stem (like a 70mm), it should feel pretty similar when reaching for the bars. Handling will be a little different (i.e., shorter TT plus longer stem versus longer TT plus shorter stem) but the whole bike will be different so that's not really a big deal. As long as you have standover clearance, you should be good.
Thanks -- great. Can you elaborate a bit. What would be the most significant handling difference, if I went with a longer (XL) top tube and shorter stem as opposed to a slightly shorter TT and longer stem?
tkehler is offline  
Old 01-11-11, 01:46 PM
  #9  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
tkehler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: My family and I -- wife and two young children -- live in Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
Posts: 723

Bikes: TST ti 'cross bike (commuter); Guru ti road bike; recumbent; Airnimal Chameleon folding racing bike

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
What I meant was ... I do a fair bit of climbing. With a longer TT, and a shorter stem, am I going to have trouble keeping the front end down on climbs?
tkehler is offline  
Old 01-11-11, 02:12 PM
  #10  
Map maker
 
cbchess's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Richmond,VA
Posts: 728

Bikes: Ventana El Ciclon, Walt Works 29er, Specialized Enduro (fixed up for my son).

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
As you go shorter with a stem the rule of thumb is steering will quicken. but you also have to look at your Head Angle. I think Santa Cruz likes a slack head angle for their frames. So look at your old head angle and look and the new frame head angle. The slacker the angle the more relaxed the bike will handle. These are VERY generalized statements. I had a steep head angle on my XC rig years ago and put a short stem on it and it quickened up the handling a bunch. Now on my Mountain bikes I go for a longer top tube with a slacker angle and a shorter stem. Because of the slacker head angle the shorter stem doesn't matter AS much.
I much prefer a longer TT. The frame will feel like it fits better. You can also run Riser bars to further tune your cockpit.
cbchess is offline  
Old 01-11-11, 03:04 PM
  #11  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
tkehler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: My family and I -- wife and two young children -- live in Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
Posts: 723

Bikes: TST ti 'cross bike (commuter); Guru ti road bike; recumbent; Airnimal Chameleon folding racing bike

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by cbchess
As you go shorter with a stem the rule of thumb is steering will quicken. but you also have to look at your Head Angle. I think Santa Cruz likes a slack head angle for their frames. So look at your old head angle and look and the new frame head angle. The slacker the angle the more relaxed the bike will handle. These are VERY generalized statements. I had a steep head angle on my XC rig years ago and put a short stem on it and it quickened up the handling a bunch. Now on my Mountain bikes I go for a longer top tube with a slacker angle and a shorter stem. Because of the slacker head angle the shorter stem doesn't matter AS much.
I much prefer a longer TT. The frame will feel like it fits better. You can also run Riser bars to further tune your cockpit.
That's very informative, thanks very much!

FWIW, I recently put a 15 degree 100mm stem on my current ti hardtail, to get a bit more height on the bars. And the steering got remarkably squirrelly. (It's an older Seven hardtail and while I don't know the angles, I think the headtube is quite stubby, so the bars are way lower than the seat... That's what I tried to counteract with the goofy 15 degree stem. Now I'm going back to a 10 degree Thomson.)

PS -- On my (also older) Large Gary Fisher Sugar1, I have a top tube that's almost as long as the Superlight XL's! And it feels pretty nice.

It's as you say: it feels like it fits better. Thanks again
tkehler is offline  
Old 01-11-11, 03:36 PM
  #12  
Pint-Sized Gnar Shredder
 
Zephyr11's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Somewhere between heaven and hell
Posts: 3,549

Bikes: '09 Jamis Komodo, '09 Mirraco Blend One, '08 Cervelo P2C, '08 Specialized Ruby Elite, '07 Yeti AS-R SL, '07 DMR Drone

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
As the bike gets slacker, the reach also gets shorter, even when the top tube length stays the same. That's because along with the head tube angle, the seat tube angle also changes, so the bottom bracket moves forward in comparison to the end of the top tube that connects to the seat tube, and therefore, the horizontal distance from the top of the head tube to the bottom bracket decreases.

The other measurement you should concern yourself with is the stack (vertical distance from the bottom bracket to the top of the head tube). A different stack height might make the bike feel taller or shorter. This can be adjusted somewhat with spacers, different rise bar, or a different angle stem though.

As never said though, it's a different bike, and no matter what, it'll ride differently. There are a bunch of things you can do to tweak the fit, and it doesn't sound like it's so different that handling will be completely compromised getting it to fit comfortably.
Zephyr11 is offline  
Old 01-11-11, 07:54 PM
  #13  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
tkehler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: My family and I -- wife and two young children -- live in Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
Posts: 723

Bikes: TST ti 'cross bike (commuter); Guru ti road bike; recumbent; Airnimal Chameleon folding racing bike

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Zephyr11
As the bike gets slacker, the reach also gets shorter, even when the top tube length stays the same. That's because along with the head tube angle, the seat tube angle also changes, so the bottom bracket moves forward in comparison to the end of the top tube that connects to the seat tube, and therefore, the horizontal distance from the top of the head tube to the bottom bracket decreases.

The other measurement you should concern yourself with is the stack (vertical distance from the bottom bracket to the top of the head tube). A different stack height might make the bike feel taller or shorter. This can be adjusted somewhat with spacers, different rise bar, or a different angle stem though.

As never said though, it's a different bike, and no matter what, it'll ride differently. There are a bunch of things you can do to tweak the fit, and it doesn't sound like it's so different that handling will be completely compromised getting it to fit comfortably.
Great, that was very informative.

Thanks -- seems like I will be able to tweak the fit as you put it. It may take quite a short stem, but that can have its advantages too.

I also went and tried two bikes locally: a Specialized Camber and a Cove Hustler. The Camber was only available in a Large, but Specialized bikes have a longish top tube, and I tried the biggest version of the Hustler made. The Camber was good, but the Hustler was awesome. I had expanses of space, and no cockpit restrictions! I wouldn't ride it in tight twisty steep terrain though. Moreover, the Pike fork was set for 140mm of travel and the steerer hadn't been cut. So I was very upright on such a big bike. Still it was worth trying it to see what a long TT can be like (24.5" Est. TT, but with a 100mm stem too). Too bad the Santa Cruz dealer in my area is miles and miles away.
tkehler is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
RECfromPA
Clydesdales/Athenas (200+ lb / 91+ kg)
3
10-06-16 10:55 AM
JHendrix
Road Cycling
28
08-03-14 06:46 PM
moaii
Folding Bikes
1
03-07-13 05:41 PM
Nayf72
Hybrid Bicycles
2
08-18-10 06:10 PM
jNR
Mountain Biking
2
04-05-10 06:14 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.