Is going Tubeless worth it
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 267
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Is going Tubeless worth it
Hey All
Got a 29er and the shop informed me it is setup to go tubeless if i want. They will charge me $25 bucks to setup both tires. I have heard from some there is great advantages with going tubeless; however, others say it can be a pain...specially with flats. I have been riding for a bit but never ventured or looked into tubeless tires before. Can anyone share their thoughts on the pros and cons of going tubeless or share some experience. I am searching the forum as well. Thanks
Got a 29er and the shop informed me it is setup to go tubeless if i want. They will charge me $25 bucks to setup both tires. I have heard from some there is great advantages with going tubeless; however, others say it can be a pain...specially with flats. I have been riding for a bit but never ventured or looked into tubeless tires before. Can anyone share their thoughts on the pros and cons of going tubeless or share some experience. I am searching the forum as well. Thanks
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 628
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I have a couple tubeless wheelsets (Mavic 823 and DT Swiss 4.1 rims) and they are OK. However I mainly ride fast dirt roads or even pavement so
I don't take advantage of their strengths. I tend to run high psi 45-55 (so hi that I blew a tire off the rim after I filled it up in a 70
degree room and rode on a 95 degree day). They are meant to be run at low psi so you have better grip on wet roots/rocks and don't pinch flat.
And without a tube the tire rubber can conform better to the terrain.
If that isn't your main riding (and you like higher psi) I say go with tubes, especially if you don't have a true tubeless rim and want to convert using a rimstrip and liquid flat stop.
That's a mjor pain. The main reason I kept riding the "true tubeless" was they sealed well enough without sealant, they would need a top up every other ride or so.
Once the valve stem on one went, I went back to tubes since a replacement stem was $20+. And if you do get a flat, a mini pump wont reset the bead,
and if you have a C02 you have 1 shot at success, so tubes are way easier/safer to fix.
I don't take advantage of their strengths. I tend to run high psi 45-55 (so hi that I blew a tire off the rim after I filled it up in a 70
degree room and rode on a 95 degree day). They are meant to be run at low psi so you have better grip on wet roots/rocks and don't pinch flat.
And without a tube the tire rubber can conform better to the terrain.
If that isn't your main riding (and you like higher psi) I say go with tubes, especially if you don't have a true tubeless rim and want to convert using a rimstrip and liquid flat stop.
That's a mjor pain. The main reason I kept riding the "true tubeless" was they sealed well enough without sealant, they would need a top up every other ride or so.
Once the valve stem on one went, I went back to tubes since a replacement stem was $20+. And if you do get a flat, a mini pump wont reset the bead,
and if you have a C02 you have 1 shot at success, so tubes are way easier/safer to fix.
Last edited by gbg; 04-17-11 at 09:19 PM.
#3
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Shanghai, West Virginia
Posts: 524
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 7 Times
in
4 Posts
As a 50+ Refugee, I just the last two years made the jump to tubeless on my mountain rig. I'll share that the new setup is functionally flawless. They perform...light as a fart...LOVE 'EM.
That said...and as a long-time cyclist...I'm "reliability-oriented". I'm fastidious to top up the "goo" every three months...and to clean-replace the "goo" annually.
After all, it's the "goo" kept in a fluid state that forms the critical piece that makes "tubeless" an advantage in the Real World. If the "goo" dries, you're just another Fred taking a d@mn long walk if you flat.]
On long unsupported outings, I carry all the stuff to seat a tube if need-be. As GBG noted, seating a "tubeless" bead on the trail is a problem.
That said...and as a long-time cyclist...I'm "reliability-oriented". I'm fastidious to top up the "goo" every three months...and to clean-replace the "goo" annually.
After all, it's the "goo" kept in a fluid state that forms the critical piece that makes "tubeless" an advantage in the Real World. If the "goo" dries, you're just another Fred taking a d@mn long walk if you flat.]
On long unsupported outings, I carry all the stuff to seat a tube if need-be. As GBG noted, seating a "tubeless" bead on the trail is a problem.
#4
Did I catch a niner?
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: a van down by the river
Posts: 542
Bikes: Vassago Fisticuff/Surly Ogre/Surly Pugsley/Surly Pugsley 29+
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 9 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Tubeless systems are hands down the best invention brought to MTB'ing.
#5
8 Full Hours of Sleep
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Hayward, CA
Posts: 640
Bikes: IRO Mark V, Yeti 575, Italvega Nuovo Sport
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
#6
Did I catch a niner?
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: a van down by the river
Posts: 542
Bikes: Vassago Fisticuff/Surly Ogre/Surly Pugsley/Surly Pugsley 29+
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 9 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Cheaper
More grippy
Less frequently Punctured and fixable
Easy to fit (most recommend using just fingers)
Lighter than tyre and normal inner tube
Less resistant to rolling
More grippy
Less frequently Punctured and fixable
Easy to fit (most recommend using just fingers)
Lighter than tyre and normal inner tube
Less resistant to rolling
#7
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: fruita, co
Posts: 1,701
Bikes: rocky mountain SLAYER!!!! trek, voodoo, surly, spot, bianchi, ibis
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
i ride tubeless, i like it a lot, only one flat in a year and a half and that was my fault for letting the stan's run dry. i think tubeless is totally the way to go.
i also ride tubes, and i like them a lot. i probably had about one flat in a year. i also think regular tube set up is totally the way to go.
hope this helps.
i also ride tubes, and i like them a lot. i probably had about one flat in a year. i also think regular tube set up is totally the way to go.
hope this helps.
#8
Reppin' the hacks
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: North Alabama, or Auburn
Posts: 325
Bikes: '07 Diamondback Respones XE-based frankenbike (since deceased). '92 Schwinn Hurricane. '97 Trek 800.
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I trust pablo's word the most, I'm goin with him.