![]() |
Originally Posted by ed
(Post 13409144)
Not to discount a man's hard work and accomplishment...but that's kinda ghey. Not saying I could do it...but it's like watching paint dry. It's so much more interesting to watch someone clean something like that with the wheels actually rolling instead of "Hans Rey'ing" your way to the peak.
|
WOW...nice skills but why not just ride the dam trail?
I road once with a professional trails dude and was blown away by how easyhe makes thing like that look..Crazy skills |
I could definitely descend that on a rigid & most likely climb it (with the wheels spinning...I'm better that way), but what I couldn't do is ride a respectable distance on a trail with rocks like that all along it. For that, I would need the squishy.
|
Originally Posted by samburger
(Post 13410358)
I could definitely descend that on a rigid & most likely climb it (with the wheels spinning...I'm better that way), but what I couldn't do is ride a respectable distance on a trail with rocks like that all along it. For that, I would need the squishy.
|
more comfortable, less fatiguing. lock it out when you don't want it. it's there when you do.
|
Yeah see I'm not even sure I could do that whole trail on any bike, let alone a rigid. But if I could do it on a squishy, I could probably do it on a rigid, but it would be much less pleasant, & my #1 goal is to have as much fun out there as possible.
|
ROFL..I have to admit I had the same thought. The bike was irrelevant. Might as well have been a pogo stick or my kids wagon.
Originally Posted by ed
(Post 13409144)
Not to discount a man's hard work and accomplishment...but that's kinda ghey. Not saying I could do it...but it's like watching paint dry. It's so much more interesting to watch someone clean something like that with the wheels actually rolling instead of "Hans Rey'ing" your way to the peak.
|
+100
Originally Posted by samburger
(Post 13410452)
Yeah see I'm not even sure I could do that whole trail on any bike, let alone a rigid. But if I could do it on a squishy, I could probably do it on a rigid, but it would be much less pleasant, & my #1 goal is to have as much fun out there as possible.
|
Originally Posted by samburger
(Post 13410452)
Yeah see I'm not even sure I could do that whole trail on any bike, let alone a rigid. But if I could do it on a squishy, I could probably do it on a rigid, but it would be much less pleasant, & my #1 goal is to have as much fun out there as possible.
|
Originally Posted by ed
(Post 13407979)
OP: It depends on how fast you wanna go and how rough your terrain is. (as stated) I'm really wishing I had a dually trail bike now b/c my new town has some pretty rough trails.
|
Originally Posted by jettore
(Post 13408683)
formicaman, what trails are you riding? I recently got back into MTBing and have been riding the trails in Wissahickon and am finding them very difficult. I have a front suspension but rode rigids back in the 90's and don't remember having as much trouble as I've been having recently. Either the trails are harder or I'm getting older and out of shape. Man, I hope it's the former.
|
Originally Posted by formicaman
(Post 13411285)
Yes, I ride the Wiss, and yes, I'm pretty sure they are getting harder due to heavy rains and erosion over the past few years. 10 years ago, I remember riding them with a Toys R Us bike. I've been riding some old rail beds in Port Richmond for practice - much more path-like.
|
Originally Posted by formicaman
(Post 13411262)
I ride on what can barely be considered trails at all - basically just washed out gullies full of huge jutting rocks, with some fallen trees, roots and mudpiles for good measure.
|
I tested a Pugsley today. Thing hops curbs like riding over twigs. I can only imagine what it's like on the trails. As someone more interested in fun than speed, it might just be my next bike.
|
This might provoke the fully rigid fans, but I'll take even an entry level suspension fork over a rigid one (for my style of riding anyway).
|
Blasphemy!
I used to argue with my friend over that all the time when he first got his Giant box-store whatever the name was, saying that, to me, it felt like a pogo stick everywhere I went. He swore up & down it felt better to him. What I realize now is that was all that mattered, because it was HIS bike. Cheap forks still feel like pogo sticks to me, but who am I to tell you not to get one if you prefer it? |
Originally Posted by samburger
(Post 13413298)
Cheap forks still feel like pogo sticks to me, but who am I to tell you not to get one if you prefer it?
Sometime later on I picked up a '90s AL frame GT with a cromo fork, and since it was "cool" (and really light) I rode it around for a while. Guess where the GT with the cromo fork is now? Yep, gone. I think it mostly has to do with riding style. Not much finesse with me, I'm usually hitting stuff fast and hard when possible, and a rigid fork is just too brutal for me in those circumstances. |
Originally Posted by scyclops
(Post 13412633)
This might provoke the fully rigid fans, but I'll take even an entry level suspension fork over a rigid one (for my style of riding anyway).
My main issue with suspension forks and this is coming from riding a singlespeed most of my mountain bike career is how inefficient they can be on the uphills. My suspension for before this last rigid was a Cannondale Lefty so it's not like I was riding a Rock Shox Dart. |
Originally Posted by Mr Pink57
(Post 13413742)
My main issue with suspension forks and this is coming from riding a singlespeed most of my mountain bike career is how inefficient they can be on the uphills.
There's always a trade-off, and since I'm not a competition rider I prioritize based on personal preference - IOW, what I consider more fun. |
Originally Posted by scyclops
(Post 13413816)
There's always a trade-off, and since I'm not a competition rider I prioritize based on personal preference - IOW, what I consider more fun.
It's all about what works for you and what allows you to enjoy riding, and don't ever let someone else try to tell you other wise. If you like full suspension, then get full suspension. If you like ridged, go ridged. If you like HT with a suspension fork, get that. Its YOUR bike and YOU are riding it, not anyone else, so get what YOU like and works for YOU. |
Yes you do.....nuff said
|
both my MTB's used to have rigid forks, but, after doing some very step descents i came to the conclusion that my front-end was just to low even with so-called suspension corrected rigid forks. i don't mind the bumps but if you can't get your weight over the backend enough you will go over the bars!
|
I rode some trail otw home yesterday. Rode the rigid. I found myself more often than not...shifting up to a really hard gear so I could stand up the whole time. It just ain't fun when it's that rough. Pedaling an easy gear while standing is tough in itself b/c you just don't get anywhere.
|
Originally Posted by ed
(Post 13425541)
I rode some trail otw home yesterday. Rode the rigid. I found myself more often than not...shifting up to a really hard gear so I could stand up the whole time. It just ain't fun when it's that rough. Pedaling an easy gear while standing is tough in itself b/c you just don't get anywhere.
|
No real data here but both my wife and I bought new bikes (29ers) this year. Hers full suspension and mine with front shock and HT. Weights are almost identical but I can fly on her bike and suspect it is that peddling efficiency is so much better. This is my first hardtail and my back gets a bit stiff after 2.5 hours in the woods. Wish I had purchased the full suspension. regards.
|
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:25 AM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.