![]() |
rear suspension leverage ratios ?
I recall reading an article about leverage ratios for rear suspension.
I am an overweight guy and am looking for the most appropriate frame for my next new bike. While I recall something about leverage ratios I do not recall what is on the member for a heavier rider (265 lbs of solid steel -- :thumb:) my current ride is a Santa Cruz superlight, which is a single pivot design and is set up with absolutely no sag and 250 psi in the back shock (Fox RP 23) it is basically a hard tail until I hit something pretty brutal or big. I do not know what the leverage ratio is of the Santa Cruz, if it is good then maybe I just need to have my shock re-valve and stick with Santa Cruz for my next bike. So I guess my question if anybody knows it is what is the leverage ratio for a Santa Cruz superlight, and if it is not appropriate for bigger guy what would be a frame choice that might be more suitable? I realize it's hard to get supple suspension action out of only 4 or 5 inches of travel but I would like to have a little bit of suspension action to smooth out trail chatter, braking bumps, and things like that in the way the Santa Cruz is set up it barely moves until I hit a rock or root at a pretty good rate of speed thanks in advance if anybody has any input |
Leverage ratio is computed by dividing rear wheel travel by shock stroke. Lower ratios are better insofar as they generally yield greater shock tuneability and a commensurate improvement in performance. This is more important for heavier riders. I'd aim for a ratio not much higher than 2.5:1.
If you're over 2 bills on an air shock, a revalve by someone like Push industries will give you signficant benefits. If you're over 250 I wouldn't recommend a single pivot frame, particularly an SC superlight, due to the relative lack of lateral stiffness inherent in that design. |
Quote:
The lateral stiffness hasn't been bad for me --- i have had some knee issues over the years, which pretty much makes me a pre-dominately sit down rider . I probably put out the wattage of a healthy 13 year old girl at the rear wheels (LOL !) |
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:24 AM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.