Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Mountain Biking
Reload this Page >

Newbie needs advice on fit and purchase of trek 930 or 950

Notices
Mountain Biking Mountain biking is one of the fastest growing sports in the world. Check out this forum to discuss the latest tips, tricks, gear and equipment in the world of mountain biking.

Newbie needs advice on fit and purchase of trek 930 or 950

Old 08-26-13, 12:31 PM
  #1  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 14
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Newbie needs advice on fit and purchase of trek 930 or 950

Hey there,

I'm a female, new to the forum and to mountain bikes. I've recently lost quite a bit of weight but have some more to go. Im looking to get into biking for some fun but also fitness. Im honestly not sure how deep ill get into it though, so I'm buying used. I've done a bit of research and found that the old trek 9xx had solid frames and because of my weight (5'4 220#), I'm interested in a sturdy frame. Aside from that, I'd like something that that can grow with me a bit if need be.

I havent really seen any female treks of the models im looking for... did they even make them?!? I do see alot of 8xx models, but the price often averages $140. I'd rather pay the same or less for a better model. Soooo I'm now looking at mens frames.

My question is this... Can anyone give me advice on what trek frame sizes i may need ased on my height? Oh, my inseam (I think its called) is 28.5". On the old schwinn frontiers I easily fit the female 13" which seems identical to the mens 15" with room to spare. I could go up to the next frame size with no problems.

The bike I'm looking at right now is a trek 950. The seller thinks its a 16" but is going to measure it tonight. The specs are as follows:

$135, hopefully negotiable
Small Frame Trek Blue
Manitou Front shock,
Tires good,
Ridden on Paved Trails only
LX rear derailer add
Avid cable Brakes
Presta Tubes
Smooth Rider
New front rim and hub
Original owner
Possibly has purchase documentations

Thanks for your help!!
sunsurfer is offline  
Old 08-26-13, 02:25 PM
  #2  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: West Yorkshire, United Kingdom
Posts: 5,772
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 452 Post(s)
Liked 103 Times in 86 Posts
Female specific (in Trek terms WSD) is a relatively new thing, think last 10 years or so, the 930/950 were long before this, and neither has been produced since 1998/9.

For the sizing, thinking that for your height, 16" may be too large, but you would need to try this, as it may be fine.

For the specs you have listed, would take be prepared to replace the fork if you have any issues, as spares for 90's Answer Manitou forks are hard to source, and they weren't that good BITD, wonder why it has had a new front wheel? For the basic bike, a steel trek from the 9** series from the late 90's are as good as you get for mainstream Cro-mo framed bikes from that era.

Regardless of what you get, would look at investing in a female specific saddle, would go to a good LBS, preferably with female sales staff for advice, as this will benefit any bike you were to get.
jimc101 is offline  
Old 08-26-13, 02:47 PM
  #3  
cowboy, steel horse, etc
 
LesterOfPuppets's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: The hot spot.
Posts: 43,460

Bikes: everywhere

Mentioned: 71 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 11700 Post(s)
Liked 6,626 Times in 3,490 Posts
Pretty tough to advise. If one of these Schwinns you had fit you perfectly then i'd measure the Effective top tube length and try to find a bike with the same.

In 1990 the smallest 950, 16.5" had a pretty long top tube, about 55cm. 55cm seems like it would be a bit of a long stretch for you unless a stubby stem was deployed. They did, however offer compact versions of the 950 with a shorter TT, though.

By 1996 the 16.5" 950 had a slightly longer TT than the 1990 one but they offered a 13" which had a 54cm ETT.

Further confusing matters, sometime in the Early 1990s, Trek seems to have changed their measuring from Center-to-center to center-to-top, at least the pics in their specs charts reflect this.
LesterOfPuppets is offline  
Old 08-26-13, 03:01 PM
  #4  
Senior Member
 
bbbean's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Missouri
Posts: 2,652

Bikes: Giant Propel, Cannondale SuperX, Univega Alpina Ultima

Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 649 Post(s)
Liked 393 Times in 233 Posts
Get thee to a bike shop! At the very least test ride the two bikes you're considering, better yet, test a variety of bikes that might be suitable so you have a better idea what works for YOUR body.
bbbean is online now  
Old 08-26-13, 03:31 PM
  #5  
cowboy, steel horse, etc
 
LesterOfPuppets's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: The hot spot.
Posts: 43,460

Bikes: everywhere

Mentioned: 71 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 11700 Post(s)
Liked 6,626 Times in 3,490 Posts
Originally Posted by sunsurfer

I havent really seen any female treks of the models im looking for... did they even make them?!? I do see alot of 8xx models, but the price often averages $140. I'd rather pay the same or less for a better model. Soooo I'm now looking at mens frames.
jim's mention of WSD made me zero in on this part and like he says the WSD stuff is newfangled, pretty sure the 950 you're looking at came out a good 10 years before WSD happened.

The 8xx series often came in ladies versions, with a step-through frame but the 9xx series was mostly more racing/enthusiast level so no step-through frames were made, just the "compact" ones I mentioned above.
LesterOfPuppets is offline  
Old 08-26-13, 10:33 PM
  #6  
Bike Junkie
 
roccobike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: South of Raleigh, North of New Hill, East of Harris Lake, NC
Posts: 9,622

Bikes: Specialized Tarmac, Specialized Roubaix, Giant OCR-C, Specialized Stumpjumper FSR, Stumpjumper Comp, 88 & 92Nishiki Ariel, 87 Centurion Ironman, 92 Paramount, 84 Nishiki Medalist

Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 68 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 36 Times in 27 Posts
16" for a person 5' 4" seems a little large, especially if the top tube is longer than average as indicated in an earlier post. Be prepared to pass on that bike if it isn't comfortable. With mountain bikes you can make a small bike expand with seatpost changes and stem changes, but it's pretty hard to shrink a bike that's too big. Check the 950 out carefully. Also, what jimc101 said about the Manitou shocks is correct. I have two in the basement, one 80mm that I'd love to rebuild, but the parts for these shocks are difficult to find, some harder to find than others.
A new bike would be a good investment. You'll get a proper fit and everything will work correctly.
__________________
Roccobike BF Official Thread Terminator
roccobike is offline  
Old 08-28-13, 08:19 AM
  #7  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 14
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Thanks for the replies! The bike ended up being 17", not 16", which was far too big for me. So I'm still looking, but I think I'm going to expand my search to other frames.
sunsurfer is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
fredder9
Mountain Biking
2
05-03-14 09:12 AM
donrhummy
Road Cycling
5
11-27-12 08:51 AM
discocarp
Singlespeed & Fixed Gear
16
10-04-10 10:50 AM
Boujaman
Mountain Biking
2
09-03-10 09:26 AM
larryloh
Hybrid Bicycles
1
04-03-10 10:00 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information -

Copyright © 2023 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.