Trail Difficulty Rating
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 85
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Trail Difficulty Rating
Hi MTBers,
Whitewater kayakers have a well-defined system for rating the difficulty of running rapids. Each rapid on a river is given a rating from I to VI based on its technical difficulty and potential consequences (injury, drowning) of messing up the rapid.
Do MTBers have a well-defined system for rating trail sections? What is it?
Whitewater kayakers have a well-defined system for rating the difficulty of running rapids. Each rapid on a river is given a rating from I to VI based on its technical difficulty and potential consequences (injury, drowning) of messing up the rapid.
Do MTBers have a well-defined system for rating trail sections? What is it?
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Parrish, FL
Posts: 7,963
Bikes: Lots
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Yes and No.
It all depends on the trail builders (and maintainers). There is no "set" system.
Most of the trails I've seen use a color coded system similar to skiing. With Black being the most difficult, blue is advanced, and green is beginner.
Many times Red is used in lieu of Black for the trails.
It all depends on the trail builders (and maintainers). There is no "set" system.
Most of the trails I've seen use a color coded system similar to skiing. With Black being the most difficult, blue is advanced, and green is beginner.
Many times Red is used in lieu of Black for the trails.
__________________
"Life is not a journey to the grave with the intention of arriving safely in a pretty and well preserved body, but rather to skid in broadside, thoroughly used up, totally worn out, and loudly proclaiming, "WOW, What a Ride!" - unknown
"Your Bike Sucks" - Sky Yaeger
"Life is not a journey to the grave with the intention of arriving safely in a pretty and well preserved body, but rather to skid in broadside, thoroughly used up, totally worn out, and loudly proclaiming, "WOW, What a Ride!" - unknown
"Your Bike Sucks" - Sky Yaeger
#3
Wood Licker
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Whistler,BC
Posts: 16,966
Bikes: Trek Fuel EX 8 27.5 +, 2002 Transition Dirtbag, Kona Roast 2002
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 23 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
They do in bc.
But really to take that world wide would require pics and stuff. Difficulty is subjective.
Green - Easy as pie. Usually smooth with no steep climbs or descents. Usually a double track
Blue - single track. Not very technical, no stunts, pretty groomed with roots and rocks. This is typically like most xc courses with lung busting climbs. Can have some basic stunts.
Black - single track. Steep technical descents. Usually nothing that can't be walked. But still very difficult for average riders This is usually a typical dh level type run. A true big mountain experience. Can also have some stunts and skinnies that are highish and narrow.
Double Black - Creme de la creme. High skinny stunts, big drops or REALLY steep lines. This requires, nuts, skills and a good bike.
Thats more or less how bc breaks it down.
But really to take that world wide would require pics and stuff. Difficulty is subjective.
Green - Easy as pie. Usually smooth with no steep climbs or descents. Usually a double track
Blue - single track. Not very technical, no stunts, pretty groomed with roots and rocks. This is typically like most xc courses with lung busting climbs. Can have some basic stunts.
Black - single track. Steep technical descents. Usually nothing that can't be walked. But still very difficult for average riders This is usually a typical dh level type run. A true big mountain experience. Can also have some stunts and skinnies that are highish and narrow.
Double Black - Creme de la creme. High skinny stunts, big drops or REALLY steep lines. This requires, nuts, skills and a good bike.
Thats more or less how bc breaks it down.
#5
Wood Licker
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Whistler,BC
Posts: 16,966
Bikes: Trek Fuel EX 8 27.5 +, 2002 Transition Dirtbag, Kona Roast 2002
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 23 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
Skinnies are north shore stunts. This pic is of a wide one. I would put this at a blue or low black stunt for example.
#7
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: OC, California
Posts: 504
Bikes: '04 Specialized Stumpy FSR Pro (Frame and Shock Only)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
There is a very refined system in place.
We look at the trail in front of us and say one of the following:
It's very scientific and involves a lot of cataloging of data but, in the end, we have a highly technical classification system ready to roll!!
We look at the trail in front of us and say one of the following:
- "Looks easy enough to me..."
- "Hmmm, there are a couple of ruts/rocks I need to watch out for, this might be interesting..."
- "Damn! That's steep! There's a good chance I might break my a**/have to hike...oh well, here goes!!"
- *looks at friend* "Dude, there's no way I'm doing THAT! You're insane!"
It's very scientific and involves a lot of cataloging of data but, in the end, we have a highly technical classification system ready to roll!!
#8
Wood Licker
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Whistler,BC
Posts: 16,966
Bikes: Trek Fuel EX 8 27.5 +, 2002 Transition Dirtbag, Kona Roast 2002
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 23 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
Hahahaha...thats how I setup my suspension. We sit in a circle and talk about how flexy the bike would be with the shock in this position. Completely scientific. Beer is required though
#9
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Spain, although I'm Hungarian
Posts: 1,855
Bikes: Check signature
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
It's very scientific and involves a lot of cataloging of data but, in the end, we have a highly technical classification system ready to roll!!
Completely scientific. Beer is required though
#10
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 85
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Maelstrom
They do in bc.
But really to take that world wide would require pics and stuff. Difficulty is subjective.
Green - Easy as pie. Usually smooth with no steep climbs or descents. Usually a double track
Blue - single track. Not very technical, no stunts, pretty groomed with roots and rocks. This is typically like most xc courses with lung busting climbs. Can have some basic stunts.
Black - single track. Steep technical descents. Usually nothing that can't be walked. But still very difficult for average riders This is usually a typical dh level type run. A true big mountain experience. Can also have some stunts and skinnies that are highish and narrow.
Double Black - Creme de la creme. High skinny stunts, big drops or REALLY steep lines. This requires, nuts, skills and a good bike.
Thats more or less how bc breaks it down.
But really to take that world wide would require pics and stuff. Difficulty is subjective.
Green - Easy as pie. Usually smooth with no steep climbs or descents. Usually a double track
Blue - single track. Not very technical, no stunts, pretty groomed with roots and rocks. This is typically like most xc courses with lung busting climbs. Can have some basic stunts.
Black - single track. Steep technical descents. Usually nothing that can't be walked. But still very difficult for average riders This is usually a typical dh level type run. A true big mountain experience. Can also have some stunts and skinnies that are highish and narrow.
Double Black - Creme de la creme. High skinny stunts, big drops or REALLY steep lines. This requires, nuts, skills and a good bike.
Thats more or less how bc breaks it down.
#12
Wood Licker
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Whistler,BC
Posts: 16,966
Bikes: Trek Fuel EX 8 27.5 +, 2002 Transition Dirtbag, Kona Roast 2002
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 23 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
Sure. Doesn't matter to me much. I just couldn't find a good example and in reality they are both based on the same idea.
#13
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Worcester, Mass
Posts: 306
Bikes: Giant Anthem, Giant TCR 2
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Mael, isnt that a ladder bridge?
This is a skinny.
This is a skinny.
Sure. Doesn't matter to me much. I just couldn't find a good example and in reality they are both based on the same idea.
#14
Wood Licker
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Whistler,BC
Posts: 16,966
Bikes: Trek Fuel EX 8 27.5 +, 2002 Transition Dirtbag, Kona Roast 2002
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 23 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
Not really. The pic I showed isn't as difficult as the pic Troie picked. Not difficult to seperate at all.
But yes, one issue I find is people coming out here, experienced in technical trails, then find they are in over their head. Their black diamond is closer to what I consider a blue for example. Especially if they hit the shore, lots of people get smoked by the 'easy' trails on fromme.
The real difficulty would be in creating a national standard. Some people would likely be heavily offended if one was ever implemented.
But yes, one issue I find is people coming out here, experienced in technical trails, then find they are in over their head. Their black diamond is closer to what I consider a blue for example. Especially if they hit the shore, lots of people get smoked by the 'easy' trails on fromme.
The real difficulty would be in creating a national standard. Some people would likely be heavily offended if one was ever implemented.
#15
Old School Rad
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: The old Mountains
Posts: 8,206
Bikes: Blur LT
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I saw a guide book from Arizona that rated trails "puck" factor.The gnarlier the trail the more your butt pucked up. Another very scientific method. Guess that puck helps you lock on to the seat.
__________________
Like a circus monkey on a stolen Harley......
Like a circus monkey on a stolen Harley......
#16
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 85
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Maelstrom
Not really. The pic I showed isn't as difficult as the pic Troie picked. Not difficult to seperate at all.
But yes, one issue I find is people coming out here, experienced in technical trails, then find they are in over their head. Their black diamond is closer to what I consider a blue for example. Especially if they hit the shore, lots of people get smoked by the 'easy' trails on fromme.
The real difficulty would be in creating a national standard. Some people would likely be heavily offended if one was ever implemented.
But yes, one issue I find is people coming out here, experienced in technical trails, then find they are in over their head. Their black diamond is closer to what I consider a blue for example. Especially if they hit the shore, lots of people get smoked by the 'easy' trails on fromme.
The real difficulty would be in creating a national standard. Some people would likely be heavily offended if one was ever implemented.
Whitewater kayakers are about as independent and self-reliant as athletes get. They're not offended by national and international whitewater standards. These standards help avoid injuries and save lives.
Many whitewater kayakers are mtb'ers also, as the sports are quite similar. E.g., done in wilderness, need to pick lines, know your limits.
#17
Wood Licker
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Whistler,BC
Posts: 16,966
Bikes: Trek Fuel EX 8 27.5 +, 2002 Transition Dirtbag, Kona Roast 2002
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 23 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
I realize that not everyone is going to be offended. I think a national ranking system would work well.
I think you could do one for xc based trails too. Long extended technical climbs are ranked pretty high here. This has potential (all intrawest sites use ranking systems like this)
Personally, I think its a good idea. Its not hard to define difficulties etc.
I think you could do one for xc based trails too. Long extended technical climbs are ranked pretty high here. This has potential (all intrawest sites use ranking systems like this)
Personally, I think its a good idea. Its not hard to define difficulties etc.
#18
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 85
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Maelstrom
I realize that not everyone is going to be offended. I think a national ranking system would work well.
I think you could do one for xc based trails too. Long extended technical climbs are ranked pretty high here. This has potential (all intrawest sites use ranking systems like this)
Personally, I think its a good idea. Its not hard to define difficulties etc.
I think you could do one for xc based trails too. Long extended technical climbs are ranked pretty high here. This has potential (all intrawest sites use ranking systems like this)
Personally, I think its a good idea. Its not hard to define difficulties etc.
Let's start a project to do it. If you agree, how do you recommend we go about getting it started?
Al
#19
Wood Licker
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Whistler,BC
Posts: 16,966
Bikes: Trek Fuel EX 8 27.5 +, 2002 Transition Dirtbag, Kona Roast 2002
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 23 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
Ipersonally like the system intrawest uses (stated above)...it is consistent with all other big mountain sports. It makes sense to anyone who has skied or snowboarded. That covers a lot of people
#20
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 1,398
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Maelstrom
They do in bc.
But really to take that world wide would require pics and stuff. Difficulty is subjective.
Green - Easy as pie. Usually smooth with no steep climbs or descents. Usually a double track
Blue - single track. Not very technical, no stunts, pretty groomed with roots and rocks. This is typically like most xc courses with lung busting climbs. Can have some basic stunts.
Black - single track. Steep technical descents. Usually nothing that can't be walked. But still very difficult for average riders This is usually a typical dh level type run. A true big mountain experience. Can also have some stunts and skinnies that are highish and narrow.
Double Black - Creme de la creme. High skinny stunts, big drops or REALLY steep lines. This requires, nuts, skills and a good bike.
Thats more or less how bc breaks it down.
But really to take that world wide would require pics and stuff. Difficulty is subjective.
Green - Easy as pie. Usually smooth with no steep climbs or descents. Usually a double track
Blue - single track. Not very technical, no stunts, pretty groomed with roots and rocks. This is typically like most xc courses with lung busting climbs. Can have some basic stunts.
Black - single track. Steep technical descents. Usually nothing that can't be walked. But still very difficult for average riders This is usually a typical dh level type run. A true big mountain experience. Can also have some stunts and skinnies that are highish and narrow.
Double Black - Creme de la creme. High skinny stunts, big drops or REALLY steep lines. This requires, nuts, skills and a good bike.
Thats more or less how bc breaks it down.
One thing to remember about the SKI system though is that it is proportionate to the local terrain. So a small resort in Michigan may have a double black diamond that an intermediate can ride (it's regional). But a double black in Colorado may be likely to demolish that same intermediate rider.
#21
Old School Rad
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: The old Mountains
Posts: 8,206
Bikes: Blur LT
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I thik you guys have a great idea.It takes the guess work out when someone ask "how hard is it".I ran into some guys in Pisgah the other day who had kinda gotten in over their heads.
__________________
Like a circus monkey on a stolen Harley......
Like a circus monkey on a stolen Harley......
#22
Wood Licker
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Whistler,BC
Posts: 16,966
Bikes: Trek Fuel EX 8 27.5 +, 2002 Transition Dirtbag, Kona Roast 2002
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 23 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
Yeah and likely the biggest difficulty is dealing with resorts that have real dh tracks on them. They are above and beyond most double blacks in whistler for example.
Definately. When you look at garbonzo it is 30 to 40minutes for an average rider to descend. Steep, technical, drops, jumps, steep (I said that already). Its a double black because it is sooooo long. Its tough to come up with a standard system. In my world that track in michigan can't be double black, intermediates can't ride double blacks, they walk 40% of it.
I think, if this was to work, you would have to work from the lowest common denominator (rail to trail for example) and the hardest (north shore, platekill, cali dh racing) and then work inwards.
Definately. When you look at garbonzo it is 30 to 40minutes for an average rider to descend. Steep, technical, drops, jumps, steep (I said that already). Its a double black because it is sooooo long. Its tough to come up with a standard system. In my world that track in michigan can't be double black, intermediates can't ride double blacks, they walk 40% of it.
I think, if this was to work, you would have to work from the lowest common denominator (rail to trail for example) and the hardest (north shore, platekill, cali dh racing) and then work inwards.
#23
chopsockey
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Seattle
Posts: 253
Bikes: Monkey SS everythingbike, Ti frankenroadbike
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
How do you deal with difficulty based on direction? 18" drop is a lot harder (for me at least) to ride UP than down. I just think back to Austin and Emma Long (likely a single black). I got to the point of riding down everything, but up was another matter completely.
Do you have a different trail rating for each direction? This stuff doesn't apply to other down[hill/stream] activities. Even rock-climbing rating is generally based on one direction.
I guess if it's technical one way, it's technical the other. I guess I'm answering my own question here. An 18" drop is 18" down or up, so be it. Aerobic difficulty should be on a different scale, and not consdered here.
Do you have a different trail rating for each direction? This stuff doesn't apply to other down[hill/stream] activities. Even rock-climbing rating is generally based on one direction.
I guess if it's technical one way, it's technical the other. I guess I'm answering my own question here. An 18" drop is 18" down or up, so be it. Aerobic difficulty should be on a different scale, and not consdered here.
#24
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 1,398
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Al K
Hi MTBers,
Whitewater kayakers have a well-defined system for rating the difficulty of running rapids. Each rapid on a river is given a rating from I to VI based on its technical difficulty and potential consequences (injury, drowning) of messing up the rapid.
Do MTBers have a well-defined system for rating trail sections? What is it?
Whitewater kayakers have a well-defined system for rating the difficulty of running rapids. Each rapid on a river is given a rating from I to VI based on its technical difficulty and potential consequences (injury, drowning) of messing up the rapid.
Do MTBers have a well-defined system for rating trail sections? What is it?
Thus, one needs a consistent system of grading rapids to comply with the law.
#25
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 1,398
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by mtnbiker66
I saw a guide book from Arizona that rated trails "puck" factor.The gnarlier the trail the more your butt pucked up. Another very scientific method. Guess that puck helps you lock on to the seat.
* Steep Descent
* Narrow Elevation
* Steep Climb
* Rock Gardens
* Jumps
* Creek Crossings
* etc...
And each warning label would have an international symbol. Dots next to the symbol would indicated the difficulty of each hazard. 1 to five dots.