NRS vs XTC
#1
BadgerBadgerBadger!
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 27
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
NRS vs XTC
I recently got back into mountain biking after a few years out by buying a year 2000 rockhopper FSR, but I cant stand the way it bobs on climbs and its so heavy. Therefore im looking for something with a more hardtail feel. One i've looked at is the Giant XTC 3 (uk version) looks nice and looks good value, but i've also heard great things about the NRS system, most people say it does what it promises, ie climbs like a hardtail, it also has a negligible weight difference to the XTC.
What do people think, is it worth the little extra for the rear suspension which seems to have no downside, or can anyone give a reason why the XTC would be better.
I do 40% Road
40% dirt/rocky paths
20% Woodland.
Weigh 190lbs
Cheers.
What do people think, is it worth the little extra for the rear suspension which seems to have no downside, or can anyone give a reason why the XTC would be better.
I do 40% Road
40% dirt/rocky paths
20% Woodland.
Weigh 190lbs
Cheers.
#3
BadgerBadgerBadger!
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 27
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I have the suspension set as hard as it will go but it's still too soft, the spring is too soft for my weight but i'd rather get a new bike than change the spring.
Sorry for being such a neewbie but I think I need a definition on the difference between cross country and all mountain and exactly what you mean by ''How do you actually intend to ride''?
Sorry for being such a neewbie but I think I need a definition on the difference between cross country and all mountain and exactly what you mean by ''How do you actually intend to ride''?
#4
I drink your MILKSHAKE
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: St. Petersburg, FL
Posts: 15,061
Bikes: 2003 Specialized Rockhopper FSR Comp, 1999 Specialized Hardrock Comp FS, 1971 Schwinn Varsity
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times
in
3 Posts
Originally Posted by mala
I have the suspension set as hard as it will go but it's still too soft, the spring is too soft for my weight but i'd rather get a new bike than change the spring.
Sorry for being such a neewbie but I think I need a definition on the difference between cross country and all mountain and exactly what you mean by ''How do you actually intend to ride''?
Sorry for being such a neewbie but I think I need a definition on the difference between cross country and all mountain and exactly what you mean by ''How do you actually intend to ride''?
#6
Aut Vincere Aut Mori
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Chapel Hill, NC
Posts: 4,166
Bikes: Irish Cycles Tir na Nog, Jack Kane Team Racing, Fuji Aloha 1.0, GT Karakoram, Motobecane Fly Team
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
The current XTC is a hardtail ya know.
#8
you cant handle bars.
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 191
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
fsr's are inherently bobby- they are designed to bob a bit. upgrading to a stable platform shock will mostly eliminate this. however, with good pedaling technique, you can reduce bob to a minimum (after riding an fsr enduro for 5 years, i can pedal my 6" travel stinky and barely get any bob). smooth spinning, instead of pedaling in squares is far more effective than buying a new bike. and as raiyn said, changing a spring will cost you at most 50 bucks, vs. 2500 for a new bike.
#9
I drink your MILKSHAKE
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: St. Petersburg, FL
Posts: 15,061
Bikes: 2003 Specialized Rockhopper FSR Comp, 1999 Specialized Hardrock Comp FS, 1971 Schwinn Varsity
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times
in
3 Posts
Originally Posted by handlebarsfsr
fsr's are inherently bobby- they are designed to bob a bit. upgrading to a stable platform shock will mostly eliminate this. however, with good pedaling technique, you can reduce bob to a minimum (after riding an fsr enduro for 5 years, i can pedal my 6" travel stinky and barely get any bob). smooth spinning, instead of pedaling in squares is far more effective than buying a new bike. and as raiyn said, changing a spring will cost you at most 50 bucks, vs. 2500 for a new bike.
#10
BadgerBadgerBadger!
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 27
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
My bike is also a bit battered, is quite heavy, and is slightly too small for me. It may be cheaper to get a new spring, but it's not going to solve the other problems.
#11
JB star
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Adelaide Hills, South Australia
Posts: 101
Bikes: Trek 8900, giant AC 05.
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by handlebarsfsr
fsr's are inherently bobby- they are designed to bob a bit. upgrading to a stable platform shock will mostly eliminate this. however, with good pedaling technique, you can reduce bob to a minimum (after riding an fsr enduro for 5 years, i can pedal my 6" travel stinky and barely get any bob). smooth spinning, instead of pedaling in squares is far more effective than buying a new bike. and as raiyn said, changing a spring will cost you at most 50 bucks, vs. 2500 for a new bike.
#12
you cant handle bars.
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 191
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Raiyn
FSR's are NOT inherently bobby. Far from it. I don't even have a platform shock on mine and it doesn't bob at all while remaining nice and plush.
#13
JB star
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Adelaide Hills, South Australia
Posts: 101
Bikes: Trek 8900, giant AC 05.
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Thanks. I dont have clippless pedals and i dont think i will, but i'll keep it in mind.
by the way, i'v always wondered, why do they call pedals with clips clipless? I know its probably a stupid question, but i just dont understand.
by the way, i'v always wondered, why do they call pedals with clips clipless? I know its probably a stupid question, but i just dont understand.
#14
you cant handle bars.
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 191
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by mozzie_marshall
Thanks. I dont have clippless pedals and i dont think i will, but i'll keep it in mind.
by the way, i'v always wondered, why do they call pedals with clips clipless? I know its probably a stupid question, but i just dont understand.
by the way, i'v always wondered, why do they call pedals with clips clipless? I know its probably a stupid question, but i just dont understand.