Go Back  Bike Forums > Community Connections > Regional Discussions > Northeast
Reload this Page >

GPS accuracy controversy

Notices
Northeast Connecticut | Maine | Massachusetts | New Hampshire | New Jersey | New York |Rhode Island | Vermont |

GPS accuracy controversy

Old 12-21-11, 11:01 PM
  #1  
Member
Thread Starter
 
mcccliv's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 44
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
GPS accuracy controversy

Many are picking up on NYT article about unreliable GPS receivers:
https://www.nytimes.com/2011/12/20/he...ccurately.html

The AMC is not surprised:
https://equipped.outdoors.org/2011/12...gps-watch.html

Ray Maker strongly disagrees:
https://www.dcrainmaker.com/2011/12/w...g-article.html

The author of the article, Ms Kolata, does not say where the route was, the density of trees, the surrounding high rises of NYC, or weather conditions. These can cause major distraction to the GPS signal.

I use the Edge 705 on my bicycle. The altimeter is more random than the stock market. But the distance has very small error. For example, here are a few rides I charted and recorded:

122.28km GPS vs 123.7km map (98.9%)
76.6km GPS vs 76.8km map (99.7%)
113.2km GPS vs 111.5km map (101.5%)
36.8km GPS vs 36.9km map (99.7%)

This works for me.
mcccliv is offline  
Old 12-22-11, 11:41 AM
  #2  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Long Island, NY
Posts: 636
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I use an HTC Incredible Android phone with the My Tracks App. I find the accuracy to be pretty good, usually about 1/10 to 2/10 of a mile over a 25 mile ride as compared to a calibrated bike computer.

When I upload to Google Maps, you do see that the route does not track on to the on-line map accurately, in that the track is on the wrong side of the road in many instances, or slightly off-road in some cases. That is not an inaccuracy in the track, but instead an inaccuracy in the on-line map. Which makes sense when you consider that the on-line map is hand drawn - I.E. using a computer program, but still done by a human. You can see discrepancies when you toggle between satellite and map view.

Thus it's easy to see where an on-line mapping program will have an error as well, especially since all (excepting Garmin and other GPS manufacturers) seem to use Google Maps as there data base.

As well, the GPS devices themselves induce errors by losing a signal, then assuming a track, then re-acquiring, then re-drawing the track, all the while the device is dropping "breadcrumbs" as it where, as track points. The more breadcrumbs the better the resolution. My old Garmin Vista had terrible tracking resolution as compared to the Google Maps app in the phone. It seemingly is related to the amount of allotted memory for beadcrumbs, with newer devices having more memory available, thus better resolution.

Last edited by Lightingguy; 12-22-11 at 11:47 AM.
Lightingguy is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
FedericoMena
Electronics, Lighting, & Gadgets
3
02-19-14 05:53 PM
sen2two
Road Cycling
2
10-28-12 07:38 AM
burbankbiker
Touring
13
09-02-12 05:25 AM
LCI_Brian
Electronics, Lighting, & Gadgets
7
12-05-11 09:37 PM
gpsfan
General Cycling Discussion
0
06-29-10 09:43 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Your Privacy Choices -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.