![]() |
Originally Posted by vol
(Post 18166985)
Thanks. So the one I saw is already in use.
Now if there were also something like Citi Boats or Citi Kayaks on Hudson and East River... :D |
Originally Posted by dendawg
(Post 18171758)
Downtown Boathouse offers free kayaking, and runs trips across the river and back.
|
According to this link, the kayaking from the Downtown Boathouse is only between Manhattan piers, not across the river:
Free Kayaking ? The Downtown Boathouse I have seen kayaking in the Hudson River at the north end of Battery Park City and in Hoboken, and on the East River at Powell's Cove in Queens. All of these kayakers stay close to shore; none go across the river. But if there is shore-to-shore kayaking somewhere, I'd like to know the details about it. A side note: one thing that has always baffled me is the act of kayaking in waters in which swimming is not allowed. A kayak must occasionally tip over. So, if kayaking is allowed, then surely the water is OK for swimming, right? |
I would say it is one thing to tip over in a kayak and get dunked, and another to allow swimming. You don't want to tip over, and the kayaking at the piers is meant for you to stay upright. I've seen kayaking in Newtown Creek, can you imagine diving into that muck? I wouldn't kayak in it either as it is so loaded with toxic waste.
There have been articles too of people moving into spaces that are directly on top of the toxic waste sites in industrial Brooklyn. There was a reason nobody lived there and these neighborhoods were deserted. |
Originally Posted by Ferdinand NYC
(Post 18173585)
According to this link, the kayaking from the Downtown Boathouse is only between Manhattan piers, not across the river:
Free Kayaking ? The Downtown Boathouse I have seen kayaking in the Hudson River at the north end of Battery Park City and in Hoboken, and on the East River at Powell's Cove in Queens. All of these kayakers stay close to shore; none go across the river. But if there is shore-to-shore kayaking somewhere, I'd like to know the details about it. A side note: one thing that has always baffled me is the act of kayaking in waters in which swimming is not allowed. A kayak must occasionally tip over. So, if kayaking is allowed, then surely the water is OK for swimming, right? And what used to be the Downtown Boathouse at 56th Street is now the Manhattan Community Boathouse which also offer free kayaking. |
Originally Posted by dendawg
(Post 18173949)
The DTBH used to do trips across the river and back on weekend mornings if the current was right. Don't know if they still do or not. Swimming in the Hudson won't kill you. Ask the people who participate in the NYC Triathlon, or other swim races.
There are some organised and even competitive swim events in the Hudson; but I am curious about ordinary recreational swimming. I don't have the desire or the skill to participate in organised events; but I can swim and I like to splash around. I just wonder if it is possible to jump into the Hudson and have a dunk or two just as I would in the Atlantic Ocean down at Coney Island or Rockaway. This Sports Illustrated article claims that "contrary to popular belief, recreational swimming in the Hudson is not illegal"; yet I always see "No Swimming" signs posted at the waterfront. Doesn't this mean that the City has rules against it? I think about this mainly when I am on the Hudson River Greenway up in Harlem, where the bike path runs right next to the river lapping up on the rocks. When I am near the water's edge, it typically looks and smells alright; but of course there is the matter of microbes that you cannot see. However, as I mentioned above, the tests run by Riverkeeper usually come back good. Last week I was riding up and down the Hudson coast on the New Jersey side, and I passed a little corner in Hoboken where a couple were sitting with their two boxer dogs. One of the dogs just waded into the river and started paddling around. I thought: if he can do it, why can't I?
Originally Posted by zacster
(Post 18173819)
I would say it is one thing to tip over in a kayak and get dunked, and another to allow swimming.
Originally Posted by zacster
(Post 18173819)
You don't want to tip over, and the kayaking at the piers is meant for you to stay upright. I've seen kayaking in Newtown Creek, can you imagine diving into that muck? I wouldn't kayak in it either as it is so loaded with toxic waste.
There have been articles too of people moving into spaces that are directly on top of the toxic waste sites in industrial Brooklyn. There was a reason nobody lived there and these neighborhoods were deserted. |
Originally Posted by Ferdinand NYC
(Post 18174232)
Interesting! I know that the group called Riverkeeper monitors the river for fecal bacteria, and usually concludes that most of it is safe for swimming, except after rains. The percentage of Hudson River locations that fail the Riverkeeper tests in dry weather is no different than ocean beach locations.
There are some organised and even competitive swim events in the Hudson; but I am curious about ordinary recreational swimming. I don't have the desire or the skill to participate in organised events; but I can swim and I like to splash around. I just wonder if it is possible to jump into the Hudson and have a dunk or two just as I would in the Atlantic Ocean down at Coney Island or Rockaway. This Sports Illustrated article claims that "contrary to popular belief, recreational swimming in the Hudson is not illegal"; yet I always see "No Swimming" signs posted at the waterfront. Doesn't this mean that the City has rules against it? I think about this mainly when I am on the Hudson River Greenway up in Harlem, where the bike path runs right next to the river lapping up on the rocks. When I am near the water's edge, it typically looks and smells alright; but of course there is the matter of microbes that you cannot see. However, as I mentioned above, the tests run by Riverkeeper usually come back good. Last week I was riding up and down the Hudson coast on the New Jersey side, and I passed a little corner in Hoboken where a couple were sitting with their two boxer dogs. One of the dogs just waded into the river and started paddling around. I thought: if he can do it, why can't I? . |
The Citi bikes are everywhere now up to 86th st.. Even some on 5th avenue next to the Central Park (72nd and 79th st.). The sight of so many Citi bikes makes me feel safer riding bike, knowing that drivers are becoming more aware of the cyclists sharing the road with them. :thumb:
(To a much lesser degree, more people on the bikes may also mean less people driving for short trips, though I assume in Manhattan most riding the Citi bikes would have taken public transportation if there were no Citi bikes.) |
Originally Posted by vol
(Post 18232957)
(To a much lesser degree, more people on the bikes may also mean less people driving for short trips, though I assume in Manhattan most riding the Citi bikes would have taken public transportation if there were no Citi bikes.) |
I took a ride on Tuesday, 6 oct, and, deciding to try the new stations on the upper east side, I rode through Central Park. The bike (#10807) kept sticking in second gear, would Not downshift on the hills... so I go to the 90th street exit, a fellow there (on a road bike) offers me some advice "The nearest station is at Park and 84th, but it's full, and the next nearest is at Park ave. and 81st....
I returned the bike exactly on the 45 minute mark, scarcely avoiding an overtime fee... I got back to Penn Station, and tok a train home to Long Island, again coming close to overtime fees at 43 minutes, all the docks were full... |
Originally Posted by hotbike
(Post 18234874)
a fellow there (on a road bike) offers me some advice "The nearest station is at Park and 84th, but it's full, and the next nearest is at Park ave. and 81st....
Not knowing where the nearest station is to return the bike seems to be a common problem. Just yesterday near the Battery Park I saw someone on Citi bike asking another one whether there will be more stations further down so she could continue to ride. Maybe they could provide some kind of screen with live map, say, every 10 or 20 blocks (not at stations but between stations), so riders could know where to return bikes. I guess it's more problem returning the bike than picking up a bike. |
Originally Posted by hotbike
(Post 18234874)
I took a ride on Tuesday, 6 oct, and, deciding to try the new stations on the upper east side, I rode through Central Park. The bike (#10807) kept sticking in second gear, would Not downshift on the hills... so I go to the 90th street exit, a fellow there (on a road bike) offers me some advice "The nearest station is at Park and 84th, but it's full, and the next nearest is at Park ave. and 81st....
I returned the bike exactly on the 45 minute mark, scarcely avoiding an overtime fee... I got back to Penn Station, and tok a train home to Long Island, again coming close to overtime fees at 43 minutes, all the docks were full... Station Full?Select “Request Time Credit” on the start screen of the kiosk. You will have 15 minutes added to your time at no charge to find a nearby station with available docks. |
Originally Posted by vol
(Post 18234959)
Nice roadie :thumb: (Some cyclists are wonderful :D)
Not knowing where the nearest station is to return the bike seems to be a common problem. Just yesterday near the Battery Park I saw someone on Citi bike asking another one whether there will be more stations further down so she could continue to ride. Maybe they could provide some kind of screen with live map, say, every 10 or 20 blocks (not at stations but between stations), so riders could know where to return bikes. I guess it's more problem returning the bike than picking up a bike. |
There was some mention of an idea to put way finding signs (as if Manhattan doesn't already have enough signs) between stations... But those are for people living in the 20th century...
The app would Not work on my new 7 inch Tablet , maybe I'll try it again. But I also can't bike with a 7" Tablet in the cargo pocket of my trouser leg... Maybe I'll just try to memorize the locations of the stations. |
Most of Manhattan is easy to navigate. Lower manhattan is another story altogether. Once below 8th street they no longer follow a numbered grid system, and the streets themselves can twist and turn. I'm not even familiar with Brooklyn at all. The kiosks at the stations can show you nearby stations.
Originally Posted by hotbike
(Post 18236165)
There was some mention of an idea to put way finding signs (as if Manhattan doesn't already have enough signs) between stations... But those are for people living in the 20th century...
The app would Not work on my new 7 inch Tablet , maybe I'll try it again. But I also can't bike with a 7" Tablet in the cargo pocket of my trouser leg... Maybe I'll just try to memorize the locations of the stations. |
Originally Posted by hotbike
(Post 18236165)
There was some mention of an idea to put way finding signs (as if Manhattan doesn't already have enough signs) between stations...
In areas without bus, maybe light poles? So the Citi bike direction signs will not really take any extra space. Edit: Maybe the best place to place a Citi bike station-finding sign is the street sign pole at an intersection. |
Originally Posted by dendawg
(Post 18236410)
Most of Manhattan is easy to navigate. Lower manhattan is another story altogether. Once below 8th street they no longer follow a numbered grid system, and the streets themselves can twist and turn. I'm not even familiar with Brooklyn at all. The kiosks at the stations can show you nearby stations.
https://member.citibikenyc.com/map/ If you have an account you can set your favorite stations. They show available bikes and available docks. Otherwise scroll around the map to find a dock near you. My main issue lately is leaving from lower Manhattan in the evenings and finding a bike. There's 3 docks within a 5 or 10 minute walk. Between the 3 I find a bike without too much trouble. It's still preferable ( to me ) to standing on a crowded subway. |
Citi Bike is a success beyond all predictions in every metric but one. It was hoped to reduce car trips, and it hasn't. It has reduced only mass transit trips. In a way, it's just in time, because the subways are more crowded than before thanks to the city's increased population. But I hope the city does something to reduce motor vehicle traffic. It's awful.
|
Originally Posted by flattie
(Post 18237128)
just an internet connection which I imagine most people with a smartphone have.
|
Originally Posted by vol
(Post 18237471)
I'm not sure about that. I, for one, don't. Citi bike should be made as convenient as possible for as many people as possible, and shouldn't require internet connection or even smartphone, IMO.
|
Originally Posted by zacster
(Post 18242824)
You may be the only one without a smartphone on a citibike.
|
Originally Posted by zacster
(Post 18242824)
You may be the only one without a smartphone on a citibike.
Also I actually haven't ridden Citi bike myself, only rented it for visitors. But even if I don't use it at all, just the signt of many Citi bikes is enjoyable for me :) |
Citi Bike may not require a smartphone, but it'd be harder without one. Not only does it help you find stations, but I always check the start station and the end station, to make sure that there's a bike available, and a place to park. If a station looks like it might fill, I make contingency plans. If a station is full, a smartphone really helps, because nearby stations could be full as well. Happens all the time in the East Village. Balance issues aren't as bad as they used to be, but can still be a problem.
|
Originally Posted by wilfried
(Post 18245554)
Citi Bike may not require a smartphone, but it'd be harder without one.
|
Stipulated. Too many words. What's an iplan? What if I don't have an iPhone?
|
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:37 AM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.